It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Melanoma, one of the most dangerous types of skin cancer, results in a very high mortality rate. Early detection and resection are two key points for a successful cure. Recent researches have used artificial intelligence to classify melanoma and nevus and to compare the assessment of these algorithms to that of dermatologists. However, training neural networks on an imbalanced dataset leads to imbalanced performance, the specificity is very high but the sensitivity is very low. This study proposes a method for improving melanoma prediction on an imbalanced dataset by reconstructed appropriate CNN architecture and optimized algorithms. The contributions involve three key features as custom loss function, custom mini-batch logic, and reformed fully connected layers. In the experiment, the training dataset is kept up to date including 17,302 images of melanoma and nevus which is the largest dataset by far. The model performance is compared to that of 157 dermatologists from 12 university hospitals in Germany based on the same dataset. The experimental results prove that our proposed approach outperforms all 157 dermatologists and achieves higher performance than the state-of-the-art approach with area under the curve of 94.4%, sensitivity of 85.0%, and specificity of 95.0%. Moreover, using the best threshold shows the most balanced measure compare to other researches, and is promisingly application to medical diagnosis, with sensitivity of 90.0% and specificity of 93.8%. To foster further research and allow for replicability, we made the source code and data splits of all our experiments publicly available.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 University of Science and Technology of Hanoi, ICT Laboratory, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam (GRID:grid.267849.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2105 6888); Thuyloi University, Hanoi, Vietnam (GRID:grid.440808.0) (ISNI:0000 0004 0385 0086); FPT Software, Ha Noi, Vietnam (GRID:grid.440808.0)
2 University of Science and Technology of Hanoi, ICT Laboratory, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam (GRID:grid.267849.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2105 6888); Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Institute of Information Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam (GRID:grid.267849.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2105 6888)
3 Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology and Education, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam (GRID:grid.444848.0) (ISNI:0000 0004 4911 9563)
4 University of La Rochelle, L3i Laboratory, La Rochelle, France (GRID:grid.11698.37) (ISNI:0000 0001 2169 7335)