It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Lignin has significant potential as an abundant and renewable source for commodity chemicals yet remains vastly underutilized. Efforts towards engineering a biochemical route to the valorization of lignin are currently limited by the lack of a suitable heterologous host for the production of lignin-degrading enzymes. Here, we show that expression of fungal genes in Nicotiana benthamiana enables production of members from seven major classes of enzymes associated with lignin degradation (23 of 35 tested) in soluble form for direct use in lignin activity assays. We combinatorially characterized a subset of these enzymes in the context of model lignin dimer oxidation, revealing that fine-tuned coupling of peroxide-generators to peroxidases results in more extensive C-C bond cleavage compared to direct addition of peroxide. Comparison of peroxidase isoform activity revealed that the extent of C-C bond cleavage depends on peroxidase identity, suggesting that peroxidases are individually specialized in the context of lignin oxidation. We anticipate the use of N. benthamiana as a platform to rapidly produce a diverse array of fungal lignin-degrading enzymes will facilitate a better understanding of their concerted role in nature and unlock their potential for lignin valorization, including within the plant host itself.
Khlystov et al. introduce a new plant-based system (N. benthamiana) as a platform to rapidly produce a diverse array of recombinant fungal lignin-degrading enzymes. This study provides an initial framework to better understand the coordinated efforts of various lignin-degrading enzymes during fungal lignin deconstruction in nature.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Stanford University, Department of Chemical Engineering, Stanford, USA (GRID:grid.168010.e) (ISNI:0000000419368956)
2 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Berkeley, USA (GRID:grid.184769.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2231 4551)
3 Stanford University, Department of Chemical Engineering, Stanford, USA (GRID:grid.168010.e) (ISNI:0000000419368956); Stanford University, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford, USA (GRID:grid.168010.e) (ISNI:0000000419368956)