Introduction
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the seventh coronavirus known to infect humans. Among them, SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2 can cause severe disease, whereas HKU1, NL63, OC43, and 229E are associated with mild symptoms (Andersen et al., 2020; Gralinski & Menachery, 2020; Xie & Chen, 2020). SARS-CoV-2 is the etiological cause of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which was first identified in humans in China in late December 2019 (Wu & McGoogan, 2020). The outbreak has since spread further and as of March 2021, there have been 100 million confirmed cases of COVID-19 worldwide with over 2 million deaths (https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/covid-19-weekly-epidemiological-update; access date: 2021/03/08). Fewer than 1000 cases of COVID-19 have been reported on the self-governing island of Taiwan (through March 8, 2021), a number that has remained relatively low due to a series of aggressive containment, quarantine, and monitoring measures that have limited local SARS-CoV-2 transmission (Chang, 2020; Chen et al., 2020; Cheng et al., 2020). The majority of confirmed COVID-19 cases were imported from other countries, including America, European countries, and other Asian countries (Lin et al., 2020b).
Mutations arise as a natural occurrence of viral replication. When a newly arising mutation confers a competitive advantage with respect to viral replication, transmission, or escape from immunity, that mutation is maintained in the overall virus population (Andersen et al., 2020; Uddin et al., 2020). Several SARS-CoV-2 genes have been found to evolve, including those encoding the nucleocapsid (N), viral replicase, and spike proteins (S) (Dilucca et al., 2020). The D614G mutation in the spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 was first detected at a significant level in early March 2020 and spread to global dominance over the following few months (Al-Zyoud & Haddad, 2021; Isabel et al., 2020; Islam et al., 2020; Korber et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2020). Up-to-date information on viral genomics is crucial for understanding the global dispersion of SARS-CoV-2 and for providing insight into its pathogenicity (Furuse, 2021; Guan et al., 2020). Knowing the genome sequence helps us understand how SARS-CoV-2 is mutating into variants and how the virus is passing between people.
Taiwan has experienced two waves of imported COVID-19; the first from China between January to late February 2020, and the second from other countries starting in early March 2020 (Gong et al., 2020; Jian et al., 2021b). To determine the genetic variations and evolutionary trajectory of the isolates, we compared their genomes to those of global virus strains available through GISAID (Lo & Jamrozy, 2020). Here, we characterized the SARS-CoV-2 genome sequences from five travelers who returned to Taiwan from the United States of America during March and April, 2020. Genome sequences of SARS-CoV-2 were then compared with those deposited in GISAID in order to characterize the genealogical networks and identify possible routes of transmission. Our findings may be used to show how variants of SARS-CoV-2 entered Taiwan, and to determine their association with the implemented quarantine system for entry measures established by the Central Epidemic Command Center (CECC), Taiwan. Our findings have implications for epidemiological investigations and surveillance of viral genomic data.
Material and Methods Collection of clinical specimens
Nasopharyngeal swabs (COPAN’s COVID-19 Collection & Transport Kits with Universal Transport Medium or Virus Transport Swabs 147C) were obtained from travelers suspected of having COVID-19. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Tri-Service General Hospital (TSGHIRB No.: C202005041), and was registered on March 20, 2020. Written informed consent was obtained from participants for publication of the case reports. The same IRB NO (TSGHIRB No.: C202005041) used in a previous publication (Jian et al., 2021b). We need to clarify the objective is sufficiently different and non-overlapping which the previous publication aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and differentiation of genetic variation among isolates from a cluster of local familial COVID-19 infection. In this study we addressed different questions with more complex analyses and focus on SARS-CoV-2 genome sequences from travelers who returned to Taiwan from the United States of America. The aim of this study was to trace virus circulation and evolution in Taiwan. Since the D614G mutation in the spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 surged in early March 2020, variant cases were selected between March to April 2020. Total nucleic acid containing viral RNA was extracted from 0.3 mL of the throat swab supernatant using LabTurbo Viral nucleic acid extraction kits on a LabTurbo 48 AIO automatic extractor (Taigen Bioscience Corp., Taipei, Taiwan). RNA was eluted with 60 μL of RNase-free water (Perng et al., 2020).
SARS-CoV-2 Real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing
Pharyngeal specimens were collected from travelers with symptoms of suspected COVID-19. The presence of SARS-CoV-2 was confirmed by RT-PCR testing according to the guidelines of the Taiwan Center for Disease Control (CDC), as described previously (Jian et al., 2021a). Briefly, a SARS-CoV-2 real-time RT-PCR assay using primers, probe, and RT-PCR reagents to detect the RdRp and E genes of SARS-CoV-2 was performed on an AIO 48 System (LabTurbo, New Taipei City, Taiwan). A diluted viral RNA sample from a COVID-19-positive patient was used as a positive control, which was aliquoted and stored at −80 °C (a Ct values of 34 ± 2 per run was considered acceptable) (Jian et al., 2021a). All positive samples were confirmed by the Taiwan CDC Central Laboratory. The five cases (Cases 1–5) were obtained between March and April 2020 and included subjects with a travel history from the USA to Taiwan.
Whole-genome sequencing of SARS-CoV-2
The Ovation RNA-Seq System V2 (Nugen Technologies, San Carlos, CA, USA) was used to synthesize cDNA, which was then processed into a library described previously (Gong et al., 2020). WGS was performed as described previously (Jian et al., 2021b). Briefly, whole-genome sequences of the SARS-CoV-2 isolates (TSGH-04, TSGH-08, TSGH-22, TSGH-23, and TSGH-29) were obtained using the Illumina TruSeq Stranded mRNA Library Prep Kit protocol to enrich SARS-CoV-2 cDNA using multiplex RT-PCR amplicons. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed on the NovaSeq 6000 platform (Illumina, San Diego, USA) with paired-end reads.
Phylogenetic relationship analysis
Phylogenetic analysis was performed as described previously (Jian et al., 2021b). Briefly, the SARS-CoV-2 genome sequences from GISAID, and those of the five cases reported herein, were aligned using Clustal Omega (Sievers et al., 2011). Aligned nucleic acid sequences were then used to construct phylogenetic trees based on the neighbor-joining tree algorithms provided by PHYLIP (Felsenstein, 2005). Using the file created by PHYLIP, the tree was drawn and managed using MEGA X (Kumar et al., 2018). Bootstrap analysis was performed with 1,000 replicates and the values were presented adjacent to the branch nodes (Felsenstein, 1985).
Comparative genome sequence analysis and single nucleotide variation (SNV) analysis
The almost full-length genome sequence of SARS-CoV-2 (≥ 29 kb) was retrieved from the GISAID EpiCoV database on February 05, 2021, followed by multiple alignments using MAFFT v7.222. The core regions were compared with those of the Wuhan-Hu-1 genome sequences. The five genome sequences, together with sequences retrieved from GISAID, were aligned using MAFFT. SNV median-joining network analysis was performed using PopART software3 (http://popart.otago.ac.nz.), as previously described (Sekizuka et al., 2020). Briefly, early stage (2020/02/18–2020/06/19) SARS-CoV-2 genome sequence from USA were aligned to TSGH-04, TSGH-08, TSGH-22, TSGH-23, and TSGH-29. After further analysis of aligned sequences through CD-HIT, 129 sequences from the USA were selected to BLAST in GISAD, and 3,867 highly similar sequence were applied in a haplotype network analysis combined with COVID-19 sequences from TSGH-04, TSGH-08, TSGH-22, TSGH-23, TSGH-29.
Results Phylogenetic relationship analysis
Data regarding the genome sequences of the five strains obtained in our study (Table 1) were deposited in the GISAID database. To investigate the genomic relationships of these five strains, and to identify the possible sources of infection, we used SARS-CoV-2 sequences from the USA, which spread between 2020/02/18 and 2020/06/19 , deposited in the GISAID database. These sequences were aligned to those of TSGH-04, TSGH-08, TSGH-22, TSGH-23, and TSGH-29. The alignment results were further clustered by CD-HIT. After cluster analysis, 129 sequences from the USA were selected and aligned. The alignment was used to decipher the time-evolution relationship of the different SARS-CoV-2 genomes. Our data showed that the five strains clustered in different positions of phylogenetic tree (Fig. 1). This indicated that the five imported cases of COVID-19 were likely to have originated from contact with different infection sources in the USA. Further characterization of genetic lineages class shows the five SARS-CoV-2 sequences diversified into lineages B, with multiple sub-lineages B (TSGH-29), B1 (TSGH-04, TSGH-08, and TSGH-23), and B.1.369 (TSGH-22) confirmed by PANGOLIN software (https://pangolin.cog-uk.io/) (Table S1).
Figure 1: Phylogenetic analysis of the genomes of 129 strains of SARS-CoV-2 linking the five imported cases of the current study to previously reported genome sequences. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.11991/fig-1
Report case | Accession ID | Gender/Age | Travel history | Collection date | SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR | Ct value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Case 1 TSGH-04 | EPI_ISL_426632 | Male/30 | USA | 03/17/2020 | Positive | 22 |
Case 2 TSGH-08 | EPI_ISL_427395 | Female/64 | USA | 03/23/2020 | Positive | 14 |
Case 3 TSGH-22 | EPI_ISL_436107 | Male/25 | USA | 03/31/2020 | Positive | 17 |
Case4 TSGH-23 | EPI_ISL_436108 | Female/21 | USA | 04/02/2020 | Positive | 23 |
Case5 TSGH-29 | EPI_ISL_447255 | Female/32 | USA | 03/17/2020 | Positive | 26 |
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.11991/table-1
Notes:
CT value, cycle threshold value.
Amino acid variation mapping of SARS-CoV-2 genomes and network analysis
Analysis of the complete genomes of five SARS-CoV-2 strains from patients with a travel history to the USA revealed several missense mutations. The mutations occurred in the S-protein, non-structural protein, and open reading frames (ORFs) (Table 2), including the D614G variant in the S-protein in Cases 1–4; the wild-type form was identified in Case 5. In addition to the S-protein D614G mutation, other missense mutations were identified in NSP12 (RNA dependent RNA polymerase; RdRp) with a P323L mutation, a T85I mutation in NSP2, and a Q57H mutation in ORF3a protein. The genetic changes highlighted above are detailed in Table 2, based on the glue application (http://cov-glue.cvr.gla.ac.uk/) (Table S2). To determine the timing of transmission routes for the five travelers who returned to Taiwan from the USA, whole-genome sequences of the isolates were compared by median-joining SNV network analysis with those of all available SARS-CoV-2 genomes in the GISAID database (n = 3872; retrieved Aug 9, 2020). Our findings suggested that these current strains were related to, and clustered chronologically with, other globally identified viruses originally detected in the USA from December 2019 to May 2020 (Fig. 2).
Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | Case 5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lineage (GISAID clade)a | GH | GH | GH | GH | O |
Best reference hit | |||||
NSP1 hCoV-19/Wuhan/WIV04/2019 | –b | – | – | – | – |
NSP2 hCoV-19/Wuhan/WIV04/2019 | T85I | T85I | T85I | T85I | – |
NSP3 hCoV-19/Wuhan/WIV04/2019 | – | P1403S | – | – | F1141X, R1449G |
NSP4 hCoV-19/Wuhan/WIV04/2019 | – | – | – | – | – |
NSP5 hCoV-19/Wuhan/WIV04/2019 | – | – | – | – | – |
NSP6 hCoV-19/Wuhan/WIV04/2019 | – | – | – | – | A161S, I266L |
NSP7 hCoV-19/Wuhan/WIV04/2019 | – | S25L | V58F | – | – |
NSP8 hCoV-19/Wuhan/WIV04/2019 | – | – | – | – | – |
NSP9 hCoV-19/Wuhan/WIV04/2019 | – | – | – | – | – |
NSP10 hCoV-19/Wuhan/WIV04/2019 | – | – | – | – | – |
NSP11 hCoV-19/Wuhan/WIV04/2019 | – | – | – | – | – |
NSP12 hCoV-19/Wuhan/WIV04/2019 | P323L | P323L | P323L | P323L | – |
NSP13 hCoV-19/Wuhan/WIV04/2019 | – | – | – | – | M436L |
NSP14 hCoV-19/Wuhan/WIV04/2019 | L177F | A320V | – | – | – |
NSP15 hCoV-19/Wuhan/WIV04/2019 | – | – | – | – | – |
NSP16 hCoV-19/Wuhan/WIV04/2019 | – | – | – | – | – |
Spike hCoV-19/Wuhan/WIV04/2019 | D614G | D614G | D614G | D614G | – |
NS3 hCoV-19/Wuhan/WIV04/2019 | Q57H | Q57H | Q57H | Q57H | – |
E hCoV-19/Wuhan/WIV04/2019 | – | – | – | – | – |
M hCoV-19/Wuhan/WIV04/2019 | – | – | – | – | I8S |
NS6 hCoV-19/Wuhan/WIV04/2019 | – | – | – | – | – |
NS7a hCoV-19/Wuhan/WIV04/2019 | – | – | – | – | – |
NS7b hCoV-19/Wuhan/WIV04/2019 | – | – | – | – | – |
NS8 hCoV-19/Wuhan/WIV04/2019 | – | – | – | – | – |
N hCoV-19/Wuhan/WIV04/2019 | – | – | S183Y | – | – |
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.11991/table-2
Notes:
aClade and lineage nomenclature was developed by Sebastian Maurer-Stroh et al., based on marker mutations used in GISAID.
bno mutations.
Figure 2: Haplotype network established using genome-wide single-nucleotide variations of SARS-CoV-2 isolates. The haplotype of the SARS-CoV-2 genome sequences for five strains (TSGH-04, TSGH-08, TSGH-22, TSGH-23, and TSGH-29) isolated from five different patients was found to localize in two clusters, which were mainly comprised by North America and European isolates. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.11991/fig-2
Discussion
Up to March 2021, there had been approximately 1,000 confirmed cases of COVID-19 in Taiwan. Although the number of COVID-19 cases in Taiwan is low compared with other countries, we evaluated five genome sequences of SARS-CoV-2 to understand viral evolution. To gain a better understanding of the genomic epidemiology of the COVID-19 outbreak in Taiwan, we characterized the full genome sequences of five SARS-CoV-2 strains collected from individuals traveling from the USA to Taiwan who were diagnosed with COVID-19 and confirmed to be SARS-CoV-2-positive by RT-PCR. Then, we performed a haplotype network analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 isolates using genome-wide single-nucleotide variations. The D614G SARS-CoV-2 variant appears to have independently arisen and then dispersed throughout multiple geographic regions, including Europe, Latin America, and Asia (Isabel et al., 2020; Islam et al., 2020; Kannan et al., 2020). This is consistent with the timeline of the five COVID-19 cases we evaluated in the current study. Our analysis identified polymorphisms in the S-protein of the current imported cases, which separated into two clusters that were related to globally detected viruses first detected in the USA. Previous studies have shown that the P323L mutation in NSP12 co-evolved with the D614G mutation in S-protein (Kannan et al., 2020; Vilar & Isom, 2021). Our current findings are consistent with this observation, in that the viral genome sequences of the SARS-CoV-2 strains from Cases 1–4 harbored both the D614G and P323L mutations. Case 5 was found to be wild type for these mutations, and was collected before D614G had become the dominant variant in the world. This demonstrates the need for public health bodies to respond to new viral genetic variants. This is also substantiated by the emergence of the new “UK variant” (lineage B.1.1.7), which began circulating between early September and mid-November, 2020 and has become a variant of widespread concern (Lauring & Hodcroft, 2021; Leung et al., 2021). More stringent border control and quarantine restrictions have been imposed in response to the emergence of new SARS-CoV-2 variants, such as the UK variant. The spread of this new variant has led to a surge in COVID-19 cases and deaths (Davies et al., 2021). Enhanced genomic surveillance combined with increased compliance with public health mitigation strategies, including vaccination, physical distancing, use of masks, hand hygiene, isolation and quarantine, will be essential to limiting the spread of SARS-CoV-2 and protecting public health (Lo & Jamrozy, 2020).
The current study highlights the importance of genomic tracing of the SARS-CoV-2 genome as an epidemiological tool and means of virus surveillance. Travelers have played a significant role in introducing new cases of COVID-19 to countries, perpetuating ongoing human-to-human transmission during the pandemic (Rodriguez-Morales et al., 2020). The high transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2, before and immediately after the onset of COVID-19 symptoms, suggests that generalized protective measures may be required, such as social distancing and the wearing of masks (Cheng et al., 2020). Taiwan was expected to experience the second highest number of COVID-19 cases due to its proximity to the coast of mainland China. This was avoided due to big data analysis and effective quarantine measures in combination with strong public policies implemented by Taiwan’s CECC and CDC. This included the establishment of an entry quarantine system requiring travelers to complete a health declaration form either prior to departure or upon arrival at a Taiwan airport (Lin et al., 2020a; Wang, Ng & Brook, 2020). Early assessment of airport entry screening has helped Taiwan to detect imported cases of COVID-19, preventing the further spread of the pandemic.
Given the widespread transmission of SARS-CoV-2, additional sequence data regarding new strains are required to fully understand how the virus has spread and evolved. Understanding SARS-CoV-2 variants remains an issue of concern for all governments, and is critical for establishing and implementing effective public health measures. Genomic surveillance of COVID-19 can generate meaningful information for tracking SARS-CoV-2 transmission, and is useful for the real-time response of health departments.
Additional Information and Declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare there are no competing interests.
Author Contributions
Ming-Jr Jian conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
Hsing-Yi Chung, Chih-Kai Chang and Shan-Shan Hsieh conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
Jung-Chung Lin, Chien-Wen Chen and Feng-Yee Chang conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
Kuo-Ming Yeh and Tein-Yao Chang conceived and designed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
Kuo-Sheng Hung conceived and designed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.
Ming-Tsan Liu and Ji-Rong Yang conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
Sheng-Hui Tang conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.
Cherng-Lih Perng conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
Hung-Sheng Shang conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
Human Ethics
The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Tri-Service General Hospital (TSGHIRB No.: C202005041), registered on March 20, 2020. Written informed consent was obtained from the participants for publication of the case report.
DNA Deposition
The following information was supplied regarding the deposition of DNA sequences:
All viral assemblies are available at GISAID:
TSGH-04 EPI_ISL_426632, TSGH-08 EPI_ISL_427395, TSGH-22 EPI_ISL_436107, TSGH-23 EPI_ISL_436108, TSGH-29 EPI_ISL_447255.
Sequences are also available in the Supplemental Files.
Data Availability
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:
All viral assemblies are available at GISAID (requires a free account to access): TSGH-04: EPI_ISL_426632; TSGH-08: EPI_ISL_427395; TSGH-22: EPI_ISL_436107; TSGH-23: EPI_ISL_436108; TSGH-29: EPI_ISL_447255
Funding
This study was supported by the Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC (grant number: TSGH-D-110100). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Al-Zyoud W, Haddad H. 2021. Mutational sensitivity of D614G in spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 in Jordan. Biochemistry Biophysics Reports 25:100896
Andersen KG, Rambaut A, Lipkin WI, Holmes EC, Garry RF. 2020. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2. Nature Medicine 26:450-452
Chang W-H. 2020. The influences of the COVID-19 pandemic on medical service behaviors. Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 59:821-827
Chen C-C, Tseng C-Y, Choi W-M, Lee Y-C, Su T-H, Hsieh C-Y, Chang C-M, Weng S-L, Liu P-H, Tai Y-L, Lin C-Y+1 more. 2020. Taiwan government-guided strategies contributed to combating and controlling COVID-19 Pandemic. Frontiers in Public Health 8:547423
Cheng H-Y, Jian S-W, Liu D-P, Ng T-C, Huang W-T, Lin H-H, Team TC-OI. 2020. Contact tracing assessment of COVID-19 transmission dynamics in taiwan and risk at different exposure periods before and after symptom onset. JAMA Internal Medicine 180:1156-1163
Davies NG, Abbott S, Barnard RC, Jarvis CI, Kucharski AJ, Munday JD, Pearson CAB, Russell TW, Tully DC, Washburne AD, Wenseleers T, Gimma A, Waites W, Wong KLM, Van Zandvoort K, Silverman JD, Group CC-W, Consortium C-GU, Diaz-Ordaz K, Keogh R, Eggo RM, Funk S, Jit M, Atkins KE, Edmunds WJ+15 more. 2021. Estimated transmissibility and impact of SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.1.7 in England. Science 372(6538):eabg3055
Dilucca M, Forcelloni S, Georgakilas AG, Giansanti A, Pavlopoulou A. 2020. Codon usage and phenotypic divergences of SARS-CoV-2 genes. Viruses 12:498
Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791
Felsenstein J. 2005. PHYLIP (phylogeny inference package) version 3.6. Distributed by Author. Seattle: Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington. software
Furuse Y. 2021. Genomic sequencing effort for SARS-CoV-2 by country during the pandemic. International Journal of Infectious Diseases 103:305-307
Gong Y-N, Tsao K-C, Hsiao M-J, Huang C-G, Huang P-N, Huang P-W, Lee K-M, Liu Y-C, Yang S-L, Kuo R-L, Chen K-F, Liu Y-C, Huang S-Y, Huang H-I, Liu M-T, Yang J-R, Chiu C-H, Yang C-T, Chen G-W, Shih S-R+10 more. 2020. SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance in Taiwan revealed novel ORF8-deletion mutant and clade possibly associated with infections in Middle East. Emerging Microbes & Infections 9:1457-1466
Gralinski LE, Menachery VD. 2020. Return of the coronavirus: 2019-nCoV. Viruses 12:135
Guan Q, Sadykov M, Mfarrej S, Hala S, Naeem R, Nugmanova R, Al-Omari A, Salih S, Mutair AA, Carr MJ, Hall WW, Arold ST, Pain A+3 more. 2020. A genetic barcode of SARS-CoV-2 for monitoring global distribution of different clades during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Infectious Diseases 100:216-223
Isabel S, Graña Miraglia L, Gutierrez JM, Bundalovic-Torma C, Groves HE, Isabel MR, Eshaghi A, Patel SN, Gubbay JB, Poutanen T, Guttman DS, Poutanen SM+2 more. 2020. Evolutionary and structural analyses of SARS-CoV-2 D614G spike protein mutation now documented worldwide. Scientific Reports 10:14031
Islam MR, Hoque MN, Rahman MS, Alam ASMRU, Akther M, Puspo JA, Akter S, Sultana M, Crandall KA, Hossain MA. 2020. Genome-wide analysis of SARS-CoV-2 virus strains circulating worldwide implicates heterogeneity. Scientific Reports 10:14004
Jian MJ, Chung HY, Chang CK, Hsieh SS, Lin JC, Yeh KM, Chen CW, Chang FY, Chiu SK, Hung KS, Liu MT, Yang JR, Perng CL, Shang HS+4 more. 2021b. Investigation of one familial cluster of COVID-19 in Taiwan: differentiation of genetic variation among isolates and implications for epidemiological investigation and surveillance by genomic assay. Infection and Drug Resistance 14:971-977
Jian MJ, Chung HY, Chang CK, Lin JC, Yeh KM, Chiu SK, Wang YH, Liao SJ, Li SY, Hsieh SS, Perng CL, Chang FY, Shang HS+3 more. 2021a. Novel automated sample-to-result SARS-CoV-2 laboratory-developed RT-PCR assay for high-throughput testing using LabTurbo AIO 48 system. Clinica Chimica Acta 514:54-58
Kannan SR, Spratt AN, Quinn TP, Heng X, Lorson CL, Sönnerborg A, Byrareddy SN, Singh K. 2020. Infectivity of SARS-CoV-2: there is something more than D614G? Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology 15:574-577
Korber B, Fischer WM, Gnanakaran S, Yoon H, Theiler J, Abfalterer W, Hengartner N, Giorgi EE, Bhattacharya T, Foley B, Hastie KM, Parker MD, Partridge DG, Evans CM, Freeman TM, Silva Tid, McDanal C, Perez LG, Tang H, Moon-Walker A, Whelan SP, LaBranche CC, Saphire EO, Montefiori DC, Group SC-G, Angyal A, Brown RL, Carrilero L, Green LR, Groves DC, Johnson KJ, Keeley AJ, Lindsey BB, Parsons PJ, Raza M, Rowland-Jones S, Smith N, Tucker RM, Wang D, Wyles MD+30 more. 2020. Tracking changes in SARS-CoV-2 spike: evidence that d614g increases infectivity of the COVID-19 virus. Cell 182:812-827
Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. 2018. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35:1547-1549
Lauring AS, Hodcroft EB. 2021. Genetic variants of SARS-CoV-2—what do they mean? Journal of the American Medical Association 325:529-531
Leung K, Shum MHH, Leung GM, Lam TTY, Wu JT. 2021. Early transmissibility assessment of the N501Y mutant strains of SARS-CoV-2 in the United Kingdom, October to 2020. Eurosurveillance 26:2002106
Lin C, Braund WE, Auerbach J, Chou J-H, Teng J-H, Tu P, Mullen J. 2020a. Early Release - policy decisions and use of information technology to fight 2019 novel coronavirus disease, Taiwan - Volume 26, Number 7—July 2020 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC. Emerging Infectious Diseases 26:1506-1512
Lin CY, Wang WH, Urbina AN, Tseng SP, Lu PL, Chen YH, Yu ML, Wang SF. 2020b. Importation of SARS-CoV-2 infection leads to major COVID-19 epidemic in Taiwan. International Journal of Infectious Dieasess 97:240-244
Lo SW, Jamrozy D. 2020. Genomics and epidemiological surveillance. Nature Reviews Microbiology 18:478
Perng C-L, Jian Jr M, Chang C-K, Lin J-C, Yeh K-M, Chen C-W, Chiu S-K, Chung H-Y, Wang Y-H, Liao S-J, Li S-Y, Hsieh S-S, Tsai S-H, Chang F-Y, Shang H-S+5 more. 2020. Novel rapid identification of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by real-time RT-PCR using BD Max Open System in Taiwan. PeerJ 8:e9318
Rodriguez-Morales AJ, MacGregor K, Kanagarajah S, Patel D, Schlagenhauf P. 2020. Going global - travel and the 2019 novel coronavirus. Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease 33:101578
Sekizuka T, Kuramoto S, Nariai E, Taira M, Hachisu Y, Tokaji A, Shinohara M, Kishimoto T, Itokawa K, Kobayashi Y, Kadokura K, Kamiya H, Matsui T, Suzuki M, Kuroda M+5 more. 2020. SARS-CoV-2 Genome analysis of Japanese Travelers in Nile River Cruise. Frontiers in Microbiology 11:1316
Sievers F, Wilm A, Dineen D, Gibson TJ, Karplus K, Li W, Lopez R, McWilliam H, Remmert M, Soding J, Thompson JD, Higgins DG+2 more. 2011. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Molecular Systems Biology 7:539
Uddin M, Mustafa F, Rizvi TA, Loney T, Suwaidi HA, Al-Marzouqi AHH, Eldin AK, Alsabeeha N, Adrian TE, Stefanini C, Nowotny N, Alsheikh-Ali A, Senok AC+3 more. 2020. SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19: viral genomics, epidemiology, vaccines, and therapeutic interventions. Viruses 12:526
Vilar S, Isom DG. 2021. One year of SARS-CoV-2: how much has the virus changed? Biology 10:91
Wang CJ, Ng CY, Brook RH. 2020. Response to COVID-19 in Taiwan: big data analytics, new technology, and proactive testing. Journal of the American Medical Association 323:1341-1342
Wu Z, McGoogan JM. 2020. Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in china: summary of a report of 72314 cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Journal of the American Medical Association 323:1239-1242
Xie M, Chen Q. 2020. Insight into 2019 novel coronavirus - an updated interim review and lessons from SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV. International Journal of Infectious Disease 94:119-124
Zhang L, Jackson CB, Mou H, Ojha A, Peng H, Quinlan BD, Rangarajan ES, Pan A, Vanderheiden A, Suthar MS, Li W, Izard T, Rader C, Farzan M, Choe H+5 more. 2020. SARS-CoV-2 spike-protein D614G mutation increases virion spike density and infectivity. Nature Communications 11:6013
Ming-Jr Jian1, Hsing-Yi Chung1, Chih-Kai Chang1, Shan-Shan Hsieh1, Jung-Chung Lin2, Kuo-Ming Yeh2, Chien-Wen Chen3, Feng-Yee Chang2, Kuo-Sheng Hung4, Ming-Tsan Liu5, Ji-Rong Yang5, Tein-Yao Chang6, Sheng-Hui Tang1, Cherng-Lih Perng1, Hung-Sheng Shang1
1 Division of Clinical Pathology, Department of Pathology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Taipei city, Taiwan
2 Division of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Department of Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Taipei city, Taiwan
3 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Taipei city, Taiwan
4 Center for Precision Medicine and Genomics, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Taipei City, Taiwan
5 Centers for Disease Control, Taipei, Taiwan, Taipei city, Taiwan
6 Institute of Preventive Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei city, Taiwan
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2021 Jian et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Background
There is a global pandemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Information on viral genomics is crucial for understanding global dispersion and for providing insight into viral pathogenicity and transmission. Here, we characterized the SARS-CoV-2 genomes isolated from five travelers who returned to Taiwan from the United States of America (USA) between March and April 2020.
Methods
Haplotype network analysis was performed using genome-wide single-nucleotide variations to trace potential infection routes. To determine the genetic variations and evolutionary trajectory of the isolates, the genomes of isolates were compared to those of global virus strains from GISAID. Pharyngeal specimens were confirmed to be SARS-CoV-2-positive by RT-PCR. Direct whole-genome sequencing was performed, and viral assemblies were subsequently uploaded to GISAID. Comparative genome sequence and single-nucleotide variation analyses were performed.
Results
The D614G mutation was identified in imported cases, which separated into two clusters related to viruses originally detected in the USA. Our findings highlight the risk of spreading SARS-CoV-2 variants through air travel and the need for continued genomic tracing for the epidemiological investigation and surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 using viral genomic data.
Conclusions
Continuous genomic surveillance is warranted to trace virus circulation and evolution in different global settings during future outbreaks.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer