It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
When looking at visual images, the eyes move to the most salient and behaviourally relevant objects. Saliency and semantic information significantly explain where people look. Less is known about the spatiotemporal properties of eye movements (i.e., how people look). We show that three latent variables explain 60% of eye movement dynamics of more than a hundred observers looking at hundreds of different natural images. The first component explaining 30% of variability loads on fixation duration, and it does not relate to image saliency or semantics; it approximates a power-law distribution of gaze steps, an intrinsic dynamic measure, and identifies observers with two viewing styles: static and dynamic. Notably, these viewing styles were also identified when observers look at a blank screen. These results support the importance of endogenous processes such as intrinsic dynamics to explain eye movement spatiotemporal properties.
Andrea Zangrossi et al. analyze individual variability in eye movements when healthy participants view images of natural scenes. Their results suggest that eye movement patterns can be summarized by three principle components, and depend more on subjects’ intrinsic characteristics than the visual contents of the scene.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 University of Padova, Department of Neuroscience, Padova, Italy (GRID:grid.5608.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 1757 3470); University of Padova, Padova Neuroscience Center (PNC), Padova, Italy (GRID:grid.5608.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 1757 3470); Venetian Institute of Molecular Medicine, VIMM, Padova, Italy (GRID:grid.428736.c)
2 University of Padova, Padova Neuroscience Center (PNC), Padova, Italy (GRID:grid.5608.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 1757 3470); University of Padova, Department of General Psychology, Padova, Italy (GRID:grid.5608.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 1757 3470)
3 University of Padova, Padova Neuroscience Center (PNC), Padova, Italy (GRID:grid.5608.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 1757 3470); Venetian Institute of Molecular Medicine, VIMM, Padova, Italy (GRID:grid.428736.c)
4 University of Padova, Department of General Psychology, Padova, Italy (GRID:grid.5608.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 1757 3470); IRCCS San Camillo Hospital, Venice, Italy (GRID:grid.492797.6)