Short-term PM2.5 and cardiovascular admissions in NY State: assessing sensitivity to exposure model choice

Abstract

Background

Air pollution health studies have been increasingly using prediction models for exposure assessment even in areas without monitoring stations. To date, most studies have assumed that a single exposure model is correct, but estimated effects may be sensitive to the choice of exposure model.

Methods

We obtained county-level daily cardiovascular (CVD) admissions from the New York (NY) Statewide Planning and Resources Cooperative System (SPARCS) and four sets of fine particulate matter (PM_2.5) spatio-temporal predictions (2002–2012). We employed overdispersed Poisson models to investigate the relationship between daily PM_2.5 and CVD, adjusting for potential confounders, separately for each state-wide PM_2.5 dataset.

Results

For all PM_2.5 datasets, we observed positive associations between PM_2.5 and CVD. Across the modeled exposure estimates, effect estimates ranged from 0.23% (95%CI: -0.06, 0.53%) to 0.88% (95%CI: 0.68, 1.08%) per 10 µg/m³ increase in daily PM_2.5. We observed the highest estimates using monitored concentrations 0.96% (95%CI: 0.62, 1.30%) for the subset of counties where these data were available.

Conclusions

Effect estimates varied by a factor of almost four across methods to model exposures, likely due to varying degrees of exposure measurement error. Nonetheless, we observed a consistently harmful association between PM_2.5 and CVD admissions, regardless of model choice.