It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Protein stability datasets contain neutral mutations that are highly concentrated in a much narrower ΔΔG range than destabilizing and stabilizing mutations. Notwithstanding their high density, often studies analyzing stability datasets and/or predictors ignore the neutral mutations and use a binary classification scheme labeling only destabilizing and stabilizing mutations. Recognizing that highly concentrated neutral mutations would affect the quality of stability datasets, we have explored three protein stability datasets; S2648, PON-tstab and the symmetric Ssym that differ in size and quality. A characteristic leptokurtic shape in the ΔΔG distributions of all three datasets including the curated and symmetric ones were reported due to concentrated neutral mutations. To further investigate the impact of neutral mutations on ΔΔG predictions, we have comprehensively assessed the performance of eleven predictors on the PON-tstab dataset. Correlation and error analyses showed that all of the predictors performed the best on the neutral mutations while their performance became gradually worse as the ΔΔG of the mutations departed further from the neutral zone regardless of the direction, implying a bias towards dense mutations. To this end, after unraveling the role of concentrated neutral mutations in biases of stability datasets, we described a systematic under-sampling approach to balance the ΔΔG distributions. Before under-sampling, mutations were clustered based on their biochemical and/or structural features and then three mutations were systematically selected from every 2 kcal/mol of each cluster. Upon implementation of this approach by distinct clustering schemes, we generated five subsets varying in size and ΔΔG distributions. All subsets notably showed amelioration of not only the shape of ΔΔG distributions but also other pre-existing imbalances in the frequency distributions. We also reported differences in the performance of the predictors between the parent and under-sampled subsets due to the enrichment of previously under-represented mutations in the subsets. Altogether, this study not only elaborated the pivotal role of concentrated mutations in the dataset biases but also contemplated and realized a rational strategy to tackle this and other forms of biases. Under-sampling code is available (https://github.com/narodkebabci/gRoR).
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Footnotes
* https://github.com/narodkebabci/gRoR
* https://bit.ly/3xNg0tr
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer