It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Only a subgroup of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) responds to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). To better understand lack of response to ICI, we analyze 681 TNBCs for spatial immune cell contextures in relation to clinical outcomes and pathways of T cell evasion. Excluded, ignored and inflamed phenotypes can be captured by a gene classifier that predicts prognosis of various cancers as well as anti-PD1 response of metastatic TNBC patients in a phase II trial. The excluded phenotype, which is associated with resistance to anti-PD1, demonstrates deposits of collagen-10, enhanced glycolysis, and activation of TGFβ/VEGF pathways; the ignored phenotype, also associated with resistance to anti-PD1, shows either high density of CD163+ myeloid cells or activation of WNT/PPARγ pathways; whereas the inflamed phenotype, which is associated with response to anti-PD1, revealed necrosis, high density of CLEC9A+ dendritic cells, high TCR clonality independent of neo-antigens, and enhanced expression of T cell co-inhibitory receptors.
Only a subset of triple negative breast cancer patients respond to immunotherapy. Here, the authors analysed spatial immune contextures, which can be captured by a gene classifier, in relation to genomic alterations, mechanisms of T cell evasion and response to anti-PD1 treatment.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Timmermans Mieke 1 ; Smid Marcel 1
; Trapman-Jansen, Anita M 1 ; Foekens Renée 1 ; Isaeva, Olga I 2
; Voorwerk Leonie 3 ; Balcioglu, Hayri E 1 ; Wijers, Rebecca 1 ; Nederlof Iris 3
; Salgado, Roberto 4
; Horlings Hugo 5
; Kok Marleen 6
; Reno, Debets 1
1 Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Department of Medical Oncology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.508717.c) (ISNI:0000 0004 0637 3764)
2 The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Division of Tumor Biology & Immunology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.430814.a); The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Molecular Oncology & Immunology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.430814.a)
3 The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Division of Tumor Biology & Immunology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.430814.a)
4 GZA-ZNA Ziekenhuizen, Department of Pathology, Antwerp, Belgium (GRID:grid.428965.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 7536 2436); Peter Mac Callum Cancer Center, Division of Research, Melbourne, Australia (GRID:grid.1055.1) (ISNI:0000000403978434)
5 The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Division of Tumor Biology & Immunology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.430814.a); The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Pathology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.430814.a)
6 The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Division of Tumor Biology & Immunology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.430814.a); The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.430814.a)




