It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Tropical fruit flies are considered among the most economically important invasive species detected in temperate areas of the United States and the European Union. Detections often trigger quarantine and eradication programs that are conducted without a holistic understanding of the threat posed. Weather-driven physiologically-based demographic models are used to estimate the geographic range, relative abundance, and threat posed by four tropical tephritid fruit flies (Mediterranean fruit fly, melon fly, oriental fruit fly, and Mexican fruit fly) in North and Central America, and the European-Mediterranean region under extant and climate change weather (RCP8.5 and A1B scenarios). Most temperate areas under tropical fruit fly propagule pressure have not been suitable for establishment, but suitability is predicted to increase in some areas with climate change. To meet this ongoing challenge, investments are needed to collect sound biological data to develop mechanistic models to predict the geographic range and relative abundance of these and other invasive species, and to put eradication policies on a scientific basis.
Gutierrez et al. model the potential geographic range in temperate regions of four species of invasive tropical fruit flies under extant weather and climate change using physiologically-based demographic models. Their models show increased habitat suitability for many areas under climate change.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Center for the Analysis of Sustainable Agricultural Systems (www.casasglobal.org), Kensington, USA; University of California, Division of Ecosystem Science, College of Natural Resources, Berkeley, USA (GRID:grid.47840.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 7878)
2 Center for the Analysis of Sustainable Agricultural Systems (www.casasglobal.org), Kensington, USA (GRID:grid.47840.3f); Agenzia nazionale per le nuove tecnologie, l’energia e lo sviluppo economico sostenibile (ENEA), Centro Ricerche Casaccia, Roma, Italy (GRID:grid.5196.b) (ISNI:0000 0000 9864 2490)
3 mundialis GmbH & Co. KG, Bonn, Germany (GRID:grid.5196.b)
4 The New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Ltd., Christchurch, New Zealand (GRID:grid.5196.b); The University of Auckland, School of Biological Sciences, Auckland, New Zealand (GRID:grid.9654.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 0372 3343)
5 Center for the Analysis of Sustainable Agricultural Systems (www.casasglobal.org), Kensington, USA (GRID:grid.9654.e); Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, Facultad de Ciencias Básicas y Aplicadas, Bogotá, Colombia (GRID:grid.412208.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 2223 8106)