It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Forest cover is the primary determinant of elephant distribution, thus, understanding forest loss and fragmentation is crucial for elephant conservation. We assessed deforestation and patterns of forest fragmentation between 1930 and 2020 in Chure Terai Madhesh Lanscape (CTML) which covers the entire elephant range in Nepal. Forest cover maps and fragmentation matrices were generated using multi-source data (Topographic maps and Landsat satellite images of 1930, 1975, 2000, and 2020) and spatiotemporal change was quantified. At present, 19,069 km2 forest cover in CTML is available as the elephant habitat in Nepal. Overall, 21.5% of elephant habitat was lost between 1930 and 2020, with a larger (12.3%) forest cover loss between 1930 and 1975. Area of the large forests (Core 3) has decreased by 43.08% whereas smaller patches (Core 2, Core 1, edge and patch forests) has increased multifold between 1930 and 2020. The continued habitat loss and fragmentation probably fragmented elephant populations during the last century and made them insular with long-term ramifications for elephant conservation and human-elephant conflict. Given the substantial loss in forest cover and high levels of fragmentation, improving the resilience of elephant populations in Nepal would urgently require habitat and corridor restoration to enable the movement of elephants.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Wildlife Institute of India (WII), Dehradun, India (GRID:grid.452923.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 1767 4167); Ministry of Forests and Environment, Kathmandu, Nepal (GRID:grid.452923.b)
2 Ministry of Industry, Tourism, Forests and Environment, Province 2, Janakpur, Nepal (GRID:grid.452923.b)
3 Ministry of Forests and Environment, Kathmandu, Nepal (GRID:grid.452923.b)
4 Wildlife Institute of India (WII), Dehradun, India (GRID:grid.452923.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 1767 4167)
5 National Trust for Nature Conservation (NTNC), Lalitpur, Nepal (GRID:grid.466953.b)
6 University of Georgia, Savannah Research Ecology Laboratory, Athens, USA (GRID:grid.213876.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 738X)
7 National Remote Sensing Centre, Indian Space Research Organization, Hyderabad, India (GRID:grid.506044.3)