It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
While the understanding of average impacts of climate change on crop yields is improving, few assessments have quantified expected impacts on yield distributions and the risk of yield failures. Here we present the relative distribution as a method to assess how the risk of yield failure due to heat and drought stress (measured in terms of return period between yields falling 15% below previous five year Olympic average yield) responds to changes of the underlying yield distributions under climate change. Relative distributions are used to capture differences in the entire yield distribution between baseline and climate change scenarios, and to further decompose them into changes in the location and shape of the distribution. The methodology is applied here for the case of rainfed wheat and grain maize across Europe using an ensemble of crop models under three climate change scenarios with simulations conducted at 25 km resolution. Under climate change, maize generally displayed shorter return periods of yield failures (with changes under RCP 4.5 between −0.3 and 0 years compared to the baseline scenario) associated with a shift of the yield distribution towards lower values and changes in shape of the distribution that further reduced the frequency of high yields. This response was prominent in the areas characterized in the baseline scenario by high yields and relatively long return periods of failure. Conversely, for wheat, yield failures were projected to become less frequent under future scenarios (with changes in the return period of −0.1 to +0.4 years under RCP 4.5) and were associated with a shift of the distribution towards higher values and a change in shape increasing the frequency of extreme yields at both ends. Our study offers an approach to quantify the changes in yield distributions that drive crop yield failures. Actual risk assessments additionally require models that capture the variety of drivers determining crop yield variability and scenario climate input data that samples the range of probable climate variation.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details







1 Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Müncheberg, Germany
2 The Czech Academy of Sciences, Global Change Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic; Department of Agroecology, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark; iCLIMATE Interdisciplinary Centre for Climate Change, Aarhus University, Roskilde, Denmark
3 NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, NY, United States of America
4 Climate Change Programme, Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE), Helsinki, Finland
5 CREA—Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Agriculture and Environment, Bologna, Italy
6 Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Agrarie, Alimentari, Ambientali e Forestali (DAGRI)—Università degli Studi di Firenze, Firenze, Italy
7 College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia
8 Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Müncheberg, Germany; Institut de recherche pour le développement (IRD), ESPACE-DEV Montpellier, France
9 Crop Production Department, Agricultural Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, Martonvásár, Hungary
10 Institute of Agricultural and Fisheries Research and Training (IFAPA), Centre ‘Alameda del Obispo’, Córdoba, Spain
11 Plant Production Systems Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
12 Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Müncheberg, Germany; The Czech Academy of Sciences, Global Change Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
13 CEIGRAM, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
14 LEPSE, Université Montpellier, INRAE, Institut Agro Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, France
15 Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Müncheberg, Germany; Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
16 CEIGRAM, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Department of Economic Analysis and Finances, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, Spain
17 Rothamsted Research, West Common, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
18 Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Müncheberg, Germany; Institute of Crop Science and Natural Resource Management (INRES), University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany