It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
In this paper we conduct a scoping review of current household energy use patterns and trends in rural Latin America (LA), with the objective of identifying strategies that help promote just and fair transitions in the region. We reviewed a total of 143 publications covering 13 countries within the period from 1996 to 2021. The review shows: (a) fuelwood (FW) continues to be a very important, resilient—and in many countries—the dominant cooking fuel for rural LA households, both exclusively and increasingly stacked (combined) with liquefied petroleum gas (LPG); (b) FW is mostly used in open fires and rustic stoves, with a total toll of 59 000 premature deaths. Interventions have centered on the dissemination of improved woodburning chimney cookstoves and increasing access to LPG through top-down government programs. These programs have focused mostly on single-fuel and stove combinations, and on the number of devices installed with little or no follow-up with local users. As a result, success has been limited and open fires have not been fully displaced in most programs. We conclude that renewed efforts are needed to ensure a sustainable and just household energy transition in the LA region. These efforts should promote integrated portfolios of options including improved practices (drying wood, use of pressure cooker), and the stacking of devices (stoves, water heaters, space heating) and fuels (biomass, other). Specifically, improved chimney woodburning stoves need to be integrated with and be an important component of these programs. Programs should adopt a user-centered perspective, beginning with the understanding of users’ needs and priorities and tailoring solutions to their socio-environmental context. Innovation should be fostered through participatory methods, developing tests adapted to local circumstances and enforcing national standards. Implementation programs should focus on the adoption and sustained use of clean(er) devices and the displacement of traditional fires. Public policies should be more integrated and intersectoral seeking synergies between health, environmental, social development, and economic objectives.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Dirección de Salud Ambiental, Centro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, Morelos 62100, Mexico
2 Grupo de Innovación Ecotecnológica y Bioenergía (GIEB), Instituto de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas y Sustentabilidad (IIES), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Morelia, Michoacán 58190, Mexico
3 Grupo Interdisciplinario de Tecnología Rural Apropiada (GIRA), Pátzcuaro, Michoacán 61613, Mexico