1. Introduction
Due to the current focus on the development of more sustainable and ecofriendly processes, biomass has been intensively exploited to prepare high-value-added chemicals and materials. In addition to the continuous search for useful biomass feedstock and ecofriendly processes suitable for its derivatization, products such as bio-derived solvents, additives, and functional materials are also of special interest. In this regard, bio-derived ionic liquids (ILs) [1,2,3] that can serve as solvents for the biomass dissolution desirable in the closed-loop biorefinery concept [4], as solvents for ionothermal biomass upgrading into functional carbon materials, or as carbon precursors themselves [5,6,7] can be useful sustainable chemicals.
The doping of carbon materials with electron-donating or electron-withdrawing heteroatoms (N, B, P, F, or S) provides a convenient way to tune and control their physicochemical properties, i.e., by increasing their electrical conductivity, basicity, oxidation stability, and catalytic activity (both electrochemical and chemical). Doped carbon materials have recently gained a great deal of interest as metal-free electrode materials for electrochemical applications [8] (electrocatalysis, Li-ion batteries, or supercapacitors) and as metal-free catalysts for traditional chemical processes (aerobic oxidation of alcohols [9], acetylene hydrochlorination [10], or the Knoevenagel condensation [11]).
There is particular interest in the carbonization of biomass, which can serve as an inexpensive, abundant, and renewable carbon source. Various feedstocks, including saccharides, cellulose, and lignin are used to yield carbon residues from biological, chemical, or thermochemical processes [12]. One of the strategies to provide biomass-derived carbon materials with specific properties, such as enhanced surface area or heteroatom doping, is the use of ILs, which can act as heteroatom sources, stabilizers, pore-generating agents, or as precursors themselves, in the carbonization process [5,13,14].
Bio-derived ILs have recently been studied as alternatives to conventional ILs derived from fossil fuels, ready to develop sustainable doped carbon materials. They combine the properties of biomass, such as high carbon content, with the properties of ILs, including high thermal stability, low vapor pressure, and nitrogen-rich molecular structures. Under thermal treatment, N atoms can be uniformly introduced into the carbon structure during the in situ self-assembly process [6]. Various feedstocks, including amino acids [7,15,16], carbohydrates [5], glucamine [6], alginic acid [17], cellulose [18], and furfurylamine [19], have been transformed into ILs and further utilized as N-doped carbon precursors. Via precise design of the structure of the precursors at the molecular level, the final properties of the carbonaceous material, such as the N-doping level, carbonization yield, and the surface properties, can be controlled [5,20]. So far, protic ILs have been shown to be the most viable for the carbonization process due to their easy and inexpensive synthesis [21]. However, carbon materials with the highest N-doping were synthesized from ILs containing nitrile groups, which, under thermal treatment, form polytriazine networks [20]. It has been demonstrated that the ionic structure, together with the presence of the N-based cation- and anion-containing cyano groups, contributes to the formation of carbon residues [22]. When nonionic reactants were subjected to thermolysis, they yielded only volatile products with no carbon residues, even though they possessed cross-linkable moieties in their structure [23]. ILs with both cross-linkable cations and anions were investigated as precursors for nitrogen-rich nanoporous carbons [23,24,25,26,27]. Conventional imidazolium-based ILs combined with tetracyanoborate anions yielded carbon with a nitrogen content of up to 17.5% at 1000 °C [26]. With the interplay of the anion, carbon residues with nitrogen doping of up to 26% were synthesized at 800 °C using the dicyanamide anion. Moreover, not only did the cross-linkable anion influence the properties of the final carbon materials, but so did the cation, as shown by replacing the N,N-ethylmethyl-imidazolium cation with 3-methyl-N-butyl-pyridinium (at the same carbonization temperature, material with a 10% lower nitrogen content was synthesized) [23].
In this study, we combined carbohydrates with different cross-linkable anions (Figure 1) to obtain quaternary ammonium compounds [28], and we investigated their potential as nitrogen-doped carbon precursors, being an alternative to traditional imidazolium-based ILs. To test the influence of the precursor structure on the properties of the carbon materials, such as carbon yield and heteroatom doping, we synthesized a series of ionic precursors composed of a glucose moiety-based cation and four cyano-based anions. The resulting carbon materials were utilized as electrocatalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction process. The limits of the adopted approach were elaborated on and discussed.
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Synthesis of the Precursors and Their Thermophysical Properties
A series of carbohydrate-derived ILs and salts with various cyano anions (Figure 1) was synthesized via the bromination of commercially available methyl α-
The new ionic systems showed carbohydrate-like, supercooled thermal behavior; once melted, they did not undergo a reversible crystallization, but showed a glass transition, as shown in repetitive heating and cooling experiments conducted with DSC (Figure S3). The combination of α-
2.2. Carbonization of Carbohydrate-Derived ILs and Salts
The α-
Both the carbonization temperature and the precursor structure affected the elemental composition of the produced samples (Table 2). Materials with a maximum nitrogen doping of up to 11.1% were synthesized at 600 °C (from the precursors containing [DCA] and [TCM] anions), and doping up to 8.7% was noted for a material synthesized at 800 °C (from the precursor containing the [DCA] anion). The combination of the carbohydrate moiety with the [SCN] anion yielded materials with additional sulfur doping, ranging from 4.7% to 2.6%, depending on the carbonization temperature.
Comparing the doping levels achieved for materials derived from sugar-based salts with their pyridinium or imidazolium analogs, the latter yielded carbon residues with higher N-doping (carbon residues with a nitrogen content as high as 23–24% were achieved from [C2mim][DCA] and [C2mim][TCB] precursors at 800 °C) [26,27]. However, it is impossible to compare the doping levels accurately due to the use of the silica template in the annealing process of the sugar-based precursors. The hard template alters the reaction mechanisms, resulting in lower doping values than in the bulk material; for instance, the N-doping of material derived from [Carb][DCA] was 9.6% [5],whereas, when it was carbonized in the presence of a template, the value was only 8.7%. For thiazolium salts, even higher discrepancies were reported, with up to 3% and 5% for nitrogen and sulfur, respectively [24]. Nevertheless, the lower doping levels observed for carbohydrate-derived precursors may be ascribed to the nonaromatic cation facilitating precursor decomposition and a lower N/C ratio in the molecular structure [23,26].
Investigating the carbonization yields, besides the high carbon content in the carbohydrate-derived precursors, only the precursor possessing the [SCN] anion yielded more carbon residues than its imidazolium analog [C2mim][SCN] [27]. Nevertheless, the thiocyanate anion yielded the least carbon out of all the investigated anions due to its trimerization into thiocyanuric acid, which does not form extended polymer networks and undergoes sublimation instead [27]. The final carbon yields resulted mostly from the cross-linkable anions (Table 2). Comparing the carbonization yield of sugar-based cations combined with [DCA], [TCM], and [TCB] anions with traditional imidazolium analogs, the latter yielded more carbon residues, which can be ascribed to their aromatic cation structure. Even though the cations without cross-linkable functional groups mostly decompose during thermal treatments [20], the aromatic moieties in the structures of the precursors contribute to higher carbon yields, by being confined in the three-dimensional carbonaceous frameworks formed during the cyclotrimerization reaction of the anions [20].
Comparing the mass loss directly from the thermogravimetric analysis, [C2mim][SCN] already yielded only 2.5% of ash at 450 °C, and no further decrease in yield was observed up to 850 °C [32], while [Carb][SCN] yielded 12% of carbon residues at 450 °C and 8.7% at 850 °C, which was even higher than for the derivatives with tricyanomethanide and dicyanamide anions at 850 °C. In contrast, [C2mim][DCA] left 33% of carbon residues at 450°C and 13.3% at 850 °C, while the carbohydrate-derived analog gave 20% and 6.3% respectively [32]. The highest difference was observed for the [Carb][TCM] derivative, which, at 450 °C, yielded 33% carbon residues, but, at 850 °C, decomposed completely into volatiles, while its imidazolium analog still gave 26% carbon residues.
2.3. Electrochemical Activity toward Oxygen Reduction Reaction (ORR)
The electrochemical activity of the prepared carbon materials in the ORR was determined by cyclic voltammetry (CV) and linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) in 0.1 M KOH solution (Figure 4). In the O2-saturated medium, the CV curves gave an irreversible cathodic peak at approximately −0.40 V (vs. Ag/AgCl), associated with the irreversible reduction of oxygen, as depicted for the representative [Carb][SCN]-derived carbon (Figure 4a), whereas, in the Ar-saturated solutions, for all the samples, quasi-rectangular voltammograms with no significant redox peak were recorded.
In the next series of experiments, the ORR electrocatalytic activity of the materials was investigated using a rotating ring-disc electrode (RRDE) at various rotating speeds (Figure 4b). The onset potential for the ORR varied between materials and generally increased with an increase in the carbonization temperature (Table 3). This enhanced activity can be ascribed to the increased amount of intrinsic carbon structural defects, which was confirmed by Raman spectroscopy (Figure 3c) [37]. Moreover, the highest onset potential, −0.12 V, was observed for the carbon material derived at 800 °C from the [Carb][SCN] precursor, also indicating the remarkable effect of N and S dual-doping [38]. Investigating more closely the mechanism of oxygen reduction by performing RRDE measurements, all the materials catalyzed the reaction, mainly through a ca. four-electron process (O2 to H2O), as shown by the number of electrons transferred (Figure 4c, Table 3), which was higher than 3.25 (for the material derived from [Carb][SCN], approaching even 3.74) over the range of −0.8 to −0.6 V. In fact, S and N dual-doped carbons gave higher electron transfer numbers than single N-doped carbons carbonized at the same temperature.
A significant influence on the activity of the materials derived from the carbohydrate-based ILs and salts was their high specific surface areas, achieved by using a hard template in the carbonization process. Even though the material without a template was carbonized at a higher temperature (900 °C), it gave both a lower onset potential for the ORR (−0.15 V) [5] than when carbonized in the presence of Ludox nanoparticles (−0.14 V) and a lower number of electrons transferred (3.15 vs. 3.56) under the same measurement conditions. The difference may be ascribed to the significant difference in the textural properties; the material carbonized in the presence of the silica template ([Carb][DCA]_800) gave an SBET of ~700 m2·g−1, while when carbonized without a template gave only 146 m2·g−1.
3. Materials and Methods
1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra (Figure S1) were recorded with a 400 MHz Agilent spectrometer. Chemical shifts (ppm) are reported relative to tetramethylsilane as an internal standard. DMSO-d6 was used as solvent. High-resolution mass spectrometry analyses (Figure S2) were carried out on a Waters Xevo G2 Q-TOF mass spectrometer equipped with an ESI source operating in the positive and negative ion modes. The accurate mass and composition of the molecular ions were calculated using MassLynx software V4.1 SCN802 2011, Waters Inc., Etten-Leur, The Netherlands. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed using a Mettler-Toledo TGA/DSC 3+ thermobalance. Samples were heated from 50 to 1000 °C, at a rate of 10 °C/min, in standard 70 μL Al2O3 crucibles under a dynamic flow of N2 (80 mL/min).
Raman spectra of the samples were recorded with a laser having an excitation wavelength of 514 nm and a 2400 lines/mm grating at room temperature using a Renishaw inVia Raman microscope. IR spectra (Figure S4) of the samples were collected in ATR (attenuated total reflectance) mode using a Perkin Elmer IR spectrometer. Nitrogen adsorption and desorption isotherms were obtained with a Micromeritics ASAP 2420M instrument at −196 °C. The specific surface area was calculated using the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller method. The size of the pores was obtained using the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda method with the Harkins and Jura equation and the Faas correction. Prior to the experiments, the samples were outgassed at 200 °C and 1.33 × 10−3 Pa for 5 h. Elemental analyses (C, N, S, and H content) were carried out using an Elementar VARIO EL III elemental analyzer, with the absolute deviation across the three measurements for each experiment being less than 0.4 for C, 0.07 for H, 0.02 for N, and 0.05 for S. The morphology of the samples was investigated by scanning electron microscopy (Phenom Pro Desktop SEM). Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was performed using a Perkin Elmer DSC 8000, calibrated using indium (Perkin Elmer, Tm = 156 °C, ΔHf = 28.45 J·g−1). The obtained data were examined using Pyris software version 13, Waltham, MA, USA. Experiments were carried out under a nitrogen atmosphere in triplicate with a heating rate of 10 °C·min−1. The presented values were taken from the second cycle. The melting point (Tm, °C) was considered to be the peak maximum, and the glass transition temperature (Tg, °C) was taken from the heating cycle.
3.1. Materials
Methyl α-
3.2. Carbonization of Ionic Precursors
Carbohydrate-derived precursors were carbonized with Ludox® HS-40. The carbonization conditions were as follows: 0–750 °C (10°/min), 750–800 °C (1.7°/min), 800 °C (2 h), Ar 100 mL/min or 0–160 °C (4°/min), 160–600 °C (10°/min), 600 °C (2 h), Ar 100 mL/min. After carbonization, the silica was removed by washing with 4 M ammonium hydrogen difluoride (NH4HF2). For each 1 g of silica present in the obtained carbon materials, 45 mL of the NH4HF2 solution was used. The samples were denoted indicating the precursor used and carbonization temperature, e.g., [Carb][SCN]_800 for the material derived from [Carb][SCN] at 800 °C.
3.3. Synthesis of the Precursors
3.3.1. N-(6-Deoxy-1-O-Methoxy-α-
N-(6-Deoxy-1-O-methoxy-α-
1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) δ 5.45 (d, 1H, –OH; J = 6.0 Hz), 5.03 (d, 1H, –OH; J = 5.1 Hz), 4.92 (d, 1H, –OH; J = 6.4 Hz), 4.60 (d, 1H, H-1; J = 3.7 Hz), 3.89 (t, 1H, H-6b; J = 9.0 Hz), 3.63 (d, 1H, H-6a; J = 13.3 Hz), 3.41–3.53 (m, 2H, H-4, H-5) 3.39 (s, 3H, –OCH3), 3.19–3.24 (m, 1H, H-3), 3.13 (s, 9H, –N+(CH3)3), 2.88–2.95 (m, 1H, H-3). 13C-NMR (101 MHz, DMSO) δ 129.06 (–CN), 100.63 (C-1), 72.33, 71.54, 71.09 (C-2, C-3, C-4), 66.93, 66.79 (C-5, C-6), 56.40 (–OCH3), 53.32 (–N+(CH3)3). ESI-MS: [M+] calculated: 236.1498; found: 236.1504; [M−] calculated: 57.9751; found: 57.9757.
3.3.2. N-(6-Deoxy-1-O-Methoxy-α-
N-(6-Deoxy-1-O-methoxy-α-
1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) δ 5.45 (d, 1H, –OH; J = 6.0 Hz), 5.03 (d, 1H, –OH; J = 5.2 Hz), 4.92 (d, 1H, –OH; J = 6.4 Hz), 4.60 (d, 1H, H-1; J = 3.7 Hz), 3.89 (t, 1H, H-6b; J = 9.0 Hz), 3.63 (d, 1H, H-6a; J = 13.1 Hz), 3.41–3.52 (m, 2H, H-4, H-5), 3.39 (s, 3H, –OCH3), 3.19–3.24 (m, 1H, H-3), 3.12 (s, 9H, –N+(CH3)3), 2.90–2.94 (m, 1H, H-3). 13C-NMR (101 MHz, DMSO) δ 118.98 (–CN), 100.64 (C-1), 72.34, 71.55, 71.10 (C-2, C-3, C-4), 66.94, 66.80 (C-5, C-6), 56.40 (–OCH3), 53.32 (–N+(CH3)3). ESI-MS: [M+] calculated: 236.1498; found: 236.1498; [M−] calculated: 66.0092; found: 66.0104.
3.3.3. N-(6-Deoxy-1-O-Methoxy-α-
N-(6-Deoxy-1-O-methoxy-α-
1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) δ 5.45 (d, 1H, –OH; J = 6.0 Hz), 5.04 (d, 1H, –OH; J = 5.2 Hz), 4.92 (d, 1H, –OH; J = 6.4 Hz), 4.60 (d, 1H, H-1; J = 3.7 Hz), 3.89 (t, 1H, H-6b; J = 9.0 Hz), 3.63 (d, 1H, H-6a; J = 13.2 Hz), 3.41–3.52 (m, 2H, H-4, H-5), 3.39 (s, 3H, –OCH3), 3.19–3.24 (m, 1H, H-3), 3.12 (s, 9H, –N+(CH3)3), 2.91–2.95 (m, 1H, H-2). 13C-NMR (101 MHz, DMSO) δ 120.38 (–CN), 100.66 (C-1), 72.36, 71.55, 71.10 (C-2, C-3, C-4), 66.94, 66.80 (C-5, C-6), 56.41 (–OCH3), 53.33 (–N+(CH3)3), 4.64 (C(CN)3−). ESI-MS: [M+] calculated: 236.1498; found: 236.1498; [M−] calculated: 90.0092; found: 90.0127.
3.3.4. N-(6-Deoxy-1-O-Methoxy-α-
N-(6-Deoxy-1-O-methoxy-α-
1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) δ 5.45 (d, 1H, –OH; J = 6.0 Hz), 5.04 (d, 1H, –OH; J = 5.1 Hz), 4.92 (d, 1H, –OH; J = 6.4 Hz), 4.60 (d, 1H, H-1; J = 3.7 Hz), 3.89 (t, 1H, H-6b; J = 9.0 Hz), 3.63 (d, 1H, H-6a; J = 13.2 Hz), 3.43–3.52 (m, 2H, H-4, H-5), 3.39 (s, 3H, –OCH3), 3.20–3.25 (m, 1H, H-3), 3.12 (s, 9H, –N+(CH3)3), 2.91–2.95 (m, 1H, H-2). 13C-NMR (101 MHz, DMSO) δ 122.68, 121.98, 121.27, 120.57 (–CN), 100.63 (C-1), 72.34, 71.53, 71.09 (C-2, C-3, C-4), 66.92, 66.79 (C-5, C-6), 56.38 (–OCH3), 53.31 (–N+(CH3)3). ESI-MS: [M+] calculated: 236.1498; found: 236.1498; [M−] calculated: 115.0216; found: 115.0238.
3.3.5. Silver Thiocyanate
Potassium thiocyanate (17.54 g, 180 mmol) and silver nitrate (33.67 g, 198 mmol) were each dissolved in 140 mL of water. The silver nitrate solution was added dropwise to the potassium thiocyanate solution, with a brownish precipitate being immediately formed. The reaction was covered from the light and stirred for 24 h. The precipitated product was filtered off, washed with water, and dried (29.42 g, 98%).
3.3.6. Silver Dicyanamide
Sodium dicyanamide (25.00 g, 281 mmol) and silver nitrate (47.70 g, 281 mmol) were each dissolved in 150 mL of water. The silver nitrate solution was added dropwise to the sodium dicyanamide solution, with a violet precipitate being immediately formed. The reaction was covered from light and stirred for 24 h. The precipitated product was filtered off, washed with water, and dried (25.30 g, 95%).
3.3.7. Silver Tricyanomethanide
Potassium tricyanomethanide (4.02 g, 31 mmol) and silver nitrate (5.82 g, 34 mmol) were each dissolved in 40 mL of water. The silver nitrate solution was added dropwise to the potassium tricyanomethanide solution, with a cream precipitate being immediately formed. The reaction was covered from light and stirred for 24 h. The precipitated product was filtered off, washed with water, and dried (6.00 g, 97%).
3.3.8. Silver Tetracyanoborate
Potassium tetracyanoborate (4.92 g, 32 mmol) and silver nitrate (5.97 g, 35 mmol) were each dissolved in 40 mL of water. The silver nitrate solution was added dropwise to the potassium tetracyanoborate solution, with a light-gray precipitate being immediately formed. The reaction was covered from light and stirred for 24 h. The precipitated product was filtered off, washed with water, and dried (6.94 g, 98%).
4. Conclusions
A group of new bio-derived ILs and salts, featuring cationic carbohydrates and cyano-based anions, were synthesized and investigated as doped carbon precursors. Combining α-
Conceptualization, A.B.-S.; investigation, A.B.-S., B.G. and K.M.; methodology, A.B.-S., B.G. and A.B.-G.; supervision, A.B.-S.; writing—original draft, A.B.-S.; writing—review and editing, B.G., A.B.-G., K.M. and A.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
This research was funded by the National Science Center Poland (Grant no. UMO-2018/29/B/ST8/01784). A.B.-S. and K.M. also express gratitude to the National Agency for Academic Exchange of Poland (under the Academic International Partnerships program, grant agreement PPI/APM/2018/1/00004) for financial support.
The data presented in this study are available in article or
The authors thank Anna Kolanowska for her support with the carbonization process.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figure 1. Molecular structures of the investigated carbohydrate-derived ionic liquids and salts with various cyano anions.
Figure 2. Thermogravimetric analysis curves of carbohydrate-based ILs and salts with cyano anions.
Figure 3. (a) Pore-size distribution and (b) N2 gas adsorption/desorption isotherms for carbons derived from the precursor [Carb][SCN] at 500, 600, and 800 °C. (c) Raman spectra. (d,e) SEM images of carbon materials: [Carb][SCN], [Carb][DCA].
Figure 4. (a) CV curves recorded for [Carb][SCN]-derived carbon, deposited on a GC electrode in O2- and Ar-saturated 0.1 M KOH at a scan rate of 50 mV/s; (b) LSV recorded for [Carb][SCN]-derived carbon deposited on a GC electrode in O2-saturated 0.1 M KOH at a scan rate of 50 mV/s; (c) electron-transfer numbers and peroxide yields (H2O2%) calculated from RRDE measurements registered in O2-saturated 0.1 M KOH at a scan rate of 50 mV/s for carbohydrate-derived carbons synthesized at 800 °C.
Thermal properties of ionic products.
IL/Salt | Tg (°C ± 1 °C) | Tm (°C ± 1 °C) | Tonset (°C) | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
[Carb][SCN] | 23 | 173 | 229 | solid |
[Carb][DCA] | 10 | 123 | 232 | solid |
[Carb][TCB] | −5 | 76 | 308 | solid, hygroscopic |
[Carb][TCM] | −10 | - | 255 | liquid, hygroscopic |
Chemical compositions obtained by elemental analysis and yield of the carbon materials.
Carbon Material | T |
C Yield |
C Yield Theor. (wt.%) a | C Yield Theor. (wt.%) b | N |
C |
H |
S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[Carb][SCN] | 500 | 25.9 | 4.1 | 26 | 8.5 | 65.7 | 3.4 | 4.7 |
[Carb][SCN] | 600 | 25.7 | 4.1 | 24 | 7.9 | 69.1 | 2.0 | 3.0 |
[Carb][SCN] | 800 | 19.4 | 4.1 | 19 | 5.9 | 71.6 | 1.7 | 2.6 |
[Carb][DCA] | 600 | 32.8 | 7.9 | 11 | 11.1 | 73.6 | 2.6 | - |
[Carb][DCA] | 800 | 17.9 | 7.9 | 14 | 8.7 | 79.4 | 2.0 | - |
[Carb][TCM] | 600 | 29.9 | 14.7 | 22 | 11.1 | 74.7 | 2.5 | - |
[Carb][TCM] | 800 | 24.8 | 14.7 | 22 | 7.1 | 76.7 | 1.6 | - |
[Carb][TCB] | 600 | 21.4 | 13.7 | 15 | 8.2 | 78.3 | 2.5 | - |
[Carb][TCB] | 800 | 28.1 | 13.7 | 15 | 6.1 | 69.1 | 1.7 | - |
a Theoretical yield calculated on the basis of the overall carbon content in the precursor; b theoretical yield calculated on the basis of the overall carbon content in the anion.
The electrochemical properties of the carbon materials.
Carbon Material | Eonset (V) * | No. of Electrons ** | % H2O2 ** |
---|---|---|---|
[Carb[SCN]_800 | −0.12 | 3.74 | 12.8 |
[Carb[SCN]_600 | −0.20 | 3.62 | 18.9 |
[Carb[SCN]_500 | −0.29 | 3.42 | 28.9 |
[Carb][DCA]_800 | −0.14 | 3.56 | 21.7 |
[Carb][DCA]_600 | −0.29 | 3.25 | 37.2 |
[Carb][TCM]_800 | −0.13 | 3.56 | 21.7 |
[Carb][TCM]_600 | −0.25 | 3.65 | 17.6 |
[Carb][TCB]_800 | −0.14 | 3.60 | 19.5 |
[Carb][TCB]_600 | −0.22 | 3.42 | 28.9 |
* The onset potentials for ORR; ** electron-transfer numbers and peroxide yields (H2O2%) at E = −0.75 V calculated from RRDE measurement (1600 rpm, in O2-saturated 0.1 M KOH at a scan rate of 50 mV/s).
Supplementary Materials
1H and 13C NMR, MS, IR spectra and DSC thermograms are available online at
References
1. Gaida, B.; Brzęczek-Szafran, A. Insights into the Properties and Potential Applications of Renewable Carbohydrate-Based Ionic Liquids: A Review. Molecules; 2020; 25, 3285. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25143285] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32698359]
2. Zullo, V.; Iuliano, A.; Guazzelli, L. Sugar-Based Ionic Liquids: Multifaceted Challenges and Intriguing Potential. Molecules; 2021; 26, 2052. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26072052] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33916695]
3. Jopp, S. Carbohydrate Based Ionic Liquids (CHILs): Synthesis and Applications. Eur. J. Org. Chem.; 2020; 2020, pp. 6418-6428. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejoc.202000714]
4. Hulsbosch, J.; De Vos, D.E.; Binnemans, K.; Ameloot, R. Biobased Ionic Liquids: Solvents for a Green Processing Industry. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng.; 2016; 4, pp. 2917-2931. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b00553]
5. Brzeczek-Szafran, A.; Erfurt, K.; Blacha-Grzechnik, A.; Krzywiecki, M.; Boncel, S.; Chrobok, A. Carbohydrate Ionic Liquids and Salts as All-in-One Precursors for N-Doped Carbon. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng.; 2019; 7, pp. 19880-19888. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b05297]
6. Zhao, M.; Li, T.; Jia, L.; Li, H.; Yuan, W.; Li, C.M. Pristine-Graphene-Supported Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Self-Assembled from Glucaminium-Based Ionic Liquids as Metal-Free Catalyst for Oxygen Evolution. ChemSusChem; 2019; 12, pp. 5041-5050. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201901961]
7. Zhou, H.; Zhou, Y.; Li, L.; Li, Y.; Liu, X.; Zhao, P.; Gao, B. Amino Acid Protic Ionic Liquids: Multifunctional Carbon Precursor for N/S Codoped Hierarchically Porous Carbon Materials toward Supercapacitive Energy Storage. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng.; 2019; 7, pp. 9281-9290. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b00279]
8. Watanabe, M.; Thomas, M.L.; Zhang, S.; Ueno, K.; Yasuda, T.; Dokko, K. Application of Ionic Liquids to Energy Storage and Conversion Materials and Devices. Chem. Rev.; 2017; 117, pp. 7190-7239. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00504]
9. Watanabe, H.; Asano, S.; Fujita, S.; Yoshida, H.; Arai, M. Nitrogen-Doped, Metal-Free Activated Carbon Catalysts for Aerobic Oxidation of Alcohols. ACS Catal.; 2015; 5, pp. 2886-2894. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.5b00375]
10. Lin, R.; Kaiser, S.K.; Hauert, R.; Pérez-Ramírez, J. Descriptors for High-Performance Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Catalysts in Acetylene Hydrochlorination. ACS Catal.; 2018; 8, pp. 1114-1121. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.7b03031]
11. Brzęczek-Szafran, A.; Gwóźdź, M.; Kolanowska, A.; Krzywiecki, M.; Latos, P.; Chrobok, A. N-Doped Carbon as a Solid Base Catalyst for Continuous Flow Knoevenagel Condensation. React. Chem. Eng.; 2021; 6, pp. 1246-1253. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/D1RE00016K]
12. Yang, D.P.; Li, Z.; Liu, M.; Zhang, X.; Chen, Y.; Xue, H.; Ye, E.; Luque, R. Biomass-Derived Carbonaceous Materials: Recent Progress in Synthetic Approaches, Advantages, and Applications. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng.; 2019; 7, pp. 4564-4585. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b06030]
13. Zhang, P.; Gong, Y.; Wei, Z.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Li, H.; Dai, S.; Wang, Y. Updating Biomass into Functional Carbon Material in Ionothermal Manner. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces; 2014; 6, pp. 12515-12522. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/am5023682] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25001196]
14. Lee, J.S.; Mayes, R.T.; Luo, H.; Dai, S. Ionothermal Carbonization of Sugars in a Protic Ionic Liquid under Ambient Conditions. Carbon; 2010; 48, pp. 3364-3368. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2010.05.027]
15. Zhou, H.; Zhou, Y.; Wu, S.; Li, L.; Li, Y.; Guo, M.; Qi, Z.; Feng, C. Synthesis of N/S Co-Doped Porous Carbon Microspheres Based on Amino Acid Protic Salt for Supercapacitor. J. Alloys Compd.; 2020; 829, 154549. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.154549]
16. Zhou, H.; Wu, S.; Wang, H.; Li, Y.; Liu, X.; Zhou, Y. The Preparation of Porous Carbon Materials Derived from Bio-Protic Ionic Liquid with Application in Flexible Solid-State Supercapacitors. J. Hazard. Mater.; 2021; 402, 124023. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124023] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33254832]
17. Cheng, J.; Xu, Q.; Lu, J.; Du, J.; Chen, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Z.; He, F.; Wu, F.; Xie, H. Synthesis of Ultrahigh Surface Area of Nitrogen-Doped Porous Carbon Materials from Alginic-Based Protic Polyanion Ionic Liquids for High-Performance Supercapacitors. Energy Technol.; 2019; 7, 1800734. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ente.201800734]
18. Fragal, E.H.; Fragal, V.H.; Huang, X.; Martins, A.C.; Cellet, T.S.P.; Pereira, G.M.; Mikmeková, E.; Rubira, A.F.; Silva, R.; Asefa, T. From Ionic Liquid-Modified Cellulose Nanowhiskers to Highly Active Metal-Free Nanostructured Carbon Catalysts for the Hydrazine Oxidation Reaction. J. Mater. Chem. A; 2017; 5, pp. 1066-1077. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C6TA09821E]
19. Zhang, Y.; Wang, J.; Shen, G.; Duan, J.; Zhang, S. Template-Free Synthesis of N-Doped Porous Carbon Materials From Furfuryl Amine-Based Protic Salts. Front. Chem.; 2020; 8, 196. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2020.00196]
20. Fulvio, P.F.; Lee, J.S.; Mayes, R.T.; Wang, X.; Mahurin, S.M.; Dai, S. Boron and Nitrogen-Rich Carbons from Ionic Liquid Precursors with Tailorable Surface Properties. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.; 2011; 13, pp. 13486-13491. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c1cp20631a]
21. Zhang, S.; Dokko, K.; Watanabe, M. Direct Synthesis of Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Materials from Protic Ionic Liquids and Protic Salts: Structural and Physicochemical Correlations between Precursor and Carbon. Chem. Mater.; 2014; 26, pp. 2915-2926. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cm5006168]
22. Wooster, T.J.; Johanson, K.M.; Fraser, K.J.; MacFarlane, D.R.; Scott, J.L. Thermal Degradation of Cyano Containing Ionic Liquids. Green Chem.; 2006; 8, pp. 691-696. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b606395k]
23. Paraknowitsch, J.P.; Thomas, A.; Antonietti, M. A Detailed View on the Polycondensation of Ionic Liquid Monomers towards Nitrogen Doped Carbon Materials. J. Mater. Chem.; 2010; 20, pp. 6746-6758. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c0jm00869a]
24. Paraknowitsch, J.P.; Wienert, B.; Zhang, Y.; Thomas, A. Intrinsically Sulfur- and Nitrogen-Co-Doped Carbons from Thiazolium Salts. Chem. A Eur. J.; 2012; 18, pp. 15416-15423. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.201202445]
25. Lee, J.S.; Luo, H.; Baker, G.A.; Dai, S. Cation Cross-Linked Ionic Liquids as Anion-Exchange Materials. Chem. Mater.; 2009; 21, pp. 4756-4758. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cm902522b]
26. Fellinger, T.P.; Su, D.S.; Engenhorst, M.; Gautam, D.; Schlögl, R.; Antonietti, M. Thermolytic Synthesis of Graphitic Boron Carbon Nitride from an Ionic Liquid Precursor: Mechanism, Structure Analysis and Electronic Properties. J. Mater. Chem.; 2012; 22, pp. 23996-24005. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c2jm34486f]
27. Fechler, N.; Fellinger, T.P.; Antonietti, M. One-Pot Synthesis of Nitrogen-Sulfur-Co-Doped Carbons with Tunable Composition Using a Simple Isothiocyanate Ionic Liquid. J. Mater. Chem. A; 2013; 1, pp. 14097-14102. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c3ta13435k]
28. Vereshchagin, A.N.; Frolov, N.A.; Egorova, K.S.; Seitkalieva, M.M.; Ananikov, V.P. Quaternary Ammonium Compounds (QACs) and Ionic Liquids (ILs) as Biocides: From Simple Antiseptics to Tunable Antimicrobials. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2021; 22, 6793. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22136793]
29. Erfurt, K.; Wandzik, I.; Walczak, K.; Matuszek, K.; Chrobok, A. Hydrogen-Bond-Rich Ionic Liquids as Effective Organocatalysts for Diels-Alder Reactions. Green Chem.; 2014; 16, pp. 3508-3514. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C4GC00380B]
30. Komabayashi, M.; Stiller, T.; Jopp, S. Structure-Property Relationships of Ribose Based Ionic Liquids. J. Mol. Liq.; 2021; 325, 115167. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2020.115167]
31. Reiß, M.; Brietzke, A.; Eickner, T.; Stein, F.; Villinger, A.; Vogel, C.; Kragl, U.; Jopp, S. Synthesis of Novel Carbohydrate Based Pyridinium Ionic Liquids and Cytotoxicity of Ionic Liquids for Mammalian Cells. RSC Adv.; 2020; 10, pp. 14299-14304. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/D0RA01370F]
32. Navarro, P.; Larriba, M.; Rojo, E.; García, J.; Rodríguez, F. Thermal Properties of Cyano-Based Ionic Liquids. J. Chem. Eng. Data; 2013; 58, pp. 2187-2193. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/je400140n]
33. Sanchez-Ramirez, N.; Martins, V.L.; Ando, R.A.; Camilo, F.F.; Urahata, S.M.; Ribeiro, M.C.C.; Torresi, R.M. Physicochemical Properties of Three Ionic Liquids Containing a Tetracyanoborate Anion and Their Lithium Salt Mixtures. J. Phys. Chem. B; 2014; 118, pp. 8772-8781. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp505051v] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24992482]
34. Lee, J.S.; Wang, X.; Luo, H.; Baker, G.A.; Dai, S. Facile Ionothermal Synthesis of Microporous and Mesoporous Carbons from Task Specific Ionic Liquids. J. Am. Chem. Soc.; 2009; 131, pp. 4596-4597. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja900686d]
35. Jurkiewicz, K.; Pawlyta, M.; Zygadło, D.; Chrobak, D.; Duber, S.; Wrzalik, R.; Ratuszna, A.; Burian, A. Evolution of Glassy Carbon under Heat Treatment: Correlation Structure–Mechanical Properties. J. Mater. Sci.; 2017; 53, pp. 3509-3523. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1753-7]
36. Deldicque, D.; Rouzaud, J.N.; Velde, B. A Raman—HRTEM Study of the Carbonization of Wood: A New Raman-Based Paleothermometer Dedicated to Archaeometry. Carbon; 2016; 102, pp. 319-329. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.02.042]
37. Lin, L.; Miao, N.; Wallace, G.G.; Chen, J.; Allwood, D.A. Engineering Carbon Materials for Electrochemical Oxygen Reduction Reactions. Adv. Energy Mater.; 2021; 11, 2100695. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202100695]
38. Liang, J.; Jiao, Y.; Jaroniec, M.; Qiao, S.Z. Sulfur and Nitrogen Dual-Doped Mesoporous Graphene Electrocatalyst for Oxygen Reduction with Synergistically Enhanced Performance. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.; 2012; 51, pp. 11496-11500. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.201206720] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23055257]
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Carbohydrate moieties were combined with various cross-linkable anions (thiocyanate [SCN], tetracyanoborate [TCB], tricyanomethanide [TCM], and dicyanamide [DCA]) and investigated as precursors for the synthesis of nitrogen-doped and nitrogen-/sulfur-co-doped carbons. The influence of the molecular structures of the precursors on their thermophysical properties and the properties of the derived carbon materials was elucidated and compared to petroleum-derived analogs. A carbohydrate-based ionic liquid featuring an [SCN] anion yielded more carbon residues upon carbonization than its 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium analog, and the resulting dual-doping of the derived carbon material translated to enhanced catalytic activity in the oxygen reduction reaction.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details




1 Faculty of Chemistry, Silesian University of Technology, Krzywoustego 4, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland;
2 School of Chemistry, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia;