Phospho-Tau and Chromatin Landscapes in Early and Late Alzheimer’s Disease

Abstract

Cellular identity is determined through complex patterns of gene expression. Chromatin, the dynamic structure containing genetic information, is regulated through epigenetic modulators, mainly by the histone code. One of the main challenges for the cell is maintaining functionality and identity, despite the accumulation of DNA damage throughout the aging process. Replicative cells can remain in a senescent state or develop a malign cancer phenotype. In contrast, post-mitotic cells such as pyramidal neurons maintain extraordinary functionality despite advanced age, but they lose their identity. This review focuses on tau, a protein that protects DNA, organizes chromatin, and plays a crucial role in genomic stability. In contrast, tau cytosolic aggregates are considered hallmarks of Alzheimer´s disease (AD) and other neurodegenerative disorders called tauopathies. Here, we explain AD as a phenomenon of chromatin dysregulation directly involving the epigenetic histone code and a progressive destabilization of the tau–chromatin interaction, leading to the consequent dysregulation of gene expression. Although this destabilization could be lethal for post-mitotic neurons, tau protein mediates profound cellular transformations that allow for their temporal survival.

1. Introduction

Chromatin is a complex molecular framework of different nucleic acids and proteins that stabilize and ensure the functionality of the nuclear genome. This megastructure is contained inside a cell organelle, the nucleus, which consists of a protein scaffold called nuclear lamin (NL) that supports the nuclear matrix (NM). The long deoxyribonucleotide polymers are reversibly attached to the NM and the inner side of the NL in a tridimensional organization known as the interphasic nucleus.

The expression of specific genetic programs generates the identity of each cellular phenotype. Considering the 30,000 human genes, the task of selectively transcribing a fraction of these requires precisely conformed chromatin. Epigenetic modifications of chromatin components (such as histone methylations) and chromatin modifiers such as the tau protein modulate the organization of chromatin blocks and the access of specific sequences to transcription factories. This dynamic and plastic chromatin structure underlies the existence of over 200 different human cell types.

In this review, we analyze the epigenetic marks that define the aging process of human pyramidal neurons from the hippocampal CA1 region and the chromatin changes during their transition from senile to Alzheimer neurons. In addition, we delimit two chromatin landscapes associated with cytoplasmic or nuclear tau pathology observed in Alzheimer’s disease (AD).

2. Nucleosomes, Chromatin Types, and Nuclear Architecture

The chromatin fiber is the biologically functional DNA structure. The nucleosome consists of a negatively charged double DNA chain wrapped around a positively charged histone octamer built by pairs of H2A, H2B, H3, and H4 proteins. Nucleosomes are connected via 10–60 base pairs of linker DNA, forming a 10 nm chromatin fiber [1,2]. During interphase, the multiple nucleosome fibers fold into a local higher-order solenoidal 30 nm fiber. This structure, which constitutes the eukaryotic genome, is favored by the interaction of linker histone H1, cations such as Mg²⁺, polyamines, and other positively charged molecules. These molecules counterbalance the negatively charged fiber, allowing the compaction of nucleosomes in chromatin domains [3,4]. Furthermore, recent analyses employing Xray dispersion and cryo-electron microscopy identified supramolecular structures called “oligomers”. These 10 nm structures are formed by dynamic and disordered nucleosome fibers with intrinsic ability to self-assemble into large globules of chromatin stabilized by nucleosome-nucleosome interactions [2,5].

In vitro experiments employing synthetic nucleosomes and acetylated histones have shown globular condensates similar to liquid droplets in the presence of H1 and Mg. This exemplifies the nucleosomes’ remarkable auto-organization [6,7]. All modern technologies used to study chromatin, including cryo-electron microscopy, electron microscopy tomography, chromosome conformation capture (3C), and Hi-C [8,9,10,11], demonstrate that the interphasic chromatin is an irregular and dynamic structure with a fluid-like nature [12].

The sequence of DNA nitrogenated bases contains genetic information. Human genome sequencing makes it possible to classify DNA sequences transcribed and translated into proteins, non-coding DNA, and repetitive DNA sequences [13]. Repetitive DNA sequences account for more than 70% of the human genome [14]. Since different sequences derive from different chromatin structures, two functional states have been distinguished: euchromatin and heterochromatin [15]. Euchromatin or decondensed chromatin (10 nm fibers with nucleosome-free regions) is rich in GC bases and contains coding sequences of genes with high transcription levels and large chromatin movements [16,17]. Euchromatin sequences have characteristically hyperacetylated histone tails, which reduce electrostatic interactions with DNA and allow binding with transcription factors [18]. These histone modifications may also enable the formation of chromatin droplets [2]. The characterization of mono-, di-, and trimethylated residues in histone tails is emerging as a necessary code for the modulation of gene expression [19].

Condensed chromatin or heterochromatin is formed by 30 nm fibers or greater degree of packing with tight contacts between nucleosomes; it is rich in AT bases and poor in GC bases [20]. Heterochromatin mainly contains non-coding DNA sequences, especially repetitive sequences such as α, β, γ, I, II, and II satellite sequences; micro-, mini-, and macro-satellites; and diverse transposon types [13]. Constitutive heterochromatin has clear structural functions and scarce genetic density, while facultative heterochromatin adopts different conformations depending on its regulatory functions. Constitutive heterochromatin is mostly localized in telomeric and sub-telomeric regions, centromeric and pericentromeric regions, and in the satellites of the chromatin fibers [21]. It is characterized by a high condensation; hypoacetylated sequences enriched in repressive marks such as H3K9me3 and H4K20me3; and interaction with several proteins, such as HP1α/β, cohesins, and other chromatin proteins [19,22]. Although constitutive heterochromatin is considered functionally inactive, humans and other organisms show the transcription of centromeric and pericentromeric satellites through RNA polymerase II [23,24]. Transcripts of non-coding RNA have been reported under conditions of cellular stress, senescence, and during epithelial transition, both in embryonic development and malign transformation [25,26,27]. In contrast, facultative heterochromatin is more heterogeneous because it can adopt different conformations between 10 and 30 nm according to different conditions, such as transcriptional requirements (embryonic development genes), space (interchange between center and nuclear periphery, according to cellular activity), or genomic imprinting (monoallelic gene expression) [28]. Human facultative heterochromatin is hypoacetylated; its main epigenetic mark is H3K27me2/3, although it may present similar repressive marks to those of constitutive heterochromatin, such as H3K9me2/3 and H4K20me2/3 [19,29].

The scarce mobility of constitutive heterochromatin sequences leads to distinct localizations in the interphasic nuclei [30,31]. Lamin-associated domains (LADs) are genomic regions associated with the nuclear periphery that interact with the nuclear lamina (NL) [32]. As a consequence, euchromatic sequences rich in gene expression are preferentially localized in the center of the nucleus [33]. Collectively, heterochromatin plays a crucial role in the architecture of the interphasic nucleus and global chromatin stability. Last-generation techniques made it possible to observe the interphasic nuclei of eukaryotic cells, where large-scale structures with a diameter of approximately 200 nm build topologically associated chromatin domains (TADs) [34]. The proper structure and function of TADs require the docking of the CTCF protein and the action of cohesins. These domains restrict the regulatory landscapes where functional interactions between genes and regulatory elements occur [35]. In general, two epigenetic compartments are differentiated in the human and murine genome: compartment A and compartment B. Compartment A contains transcriptionally active chromatin that carries coding sequences; compartment B contains inactive chromatin and silenced repetitive intergenic sequences [34,36].

Finally, at the whole diploid nuclear level, the 46 chromosomic fibers are organized into territories (CTs) with each one having a specific localization [37]. The placement of these CTs is determinant for each cellular phenotype and is closely related to its genomic function and the global regulation of gene expression [38,39]. A recent live image analysis of completely differentiated Drosophila larvae showed a contrasting vision of chromatin topology. When living cells are studied without fixation, both chromatin types, active and repressed, are located at the nuclear periphery, close to the NL, and separated from the inner nucleoplasm. This creates a nuclear region devoid of central chromatin [40].

3. Nuclear Tau Modifies the Chromatin Landscape

Tau is a soluble and highly flexible protein with multiple nuclear and cytoplasmic functions. Due to its intrinsically disordered protein (IDP) nature, tau barely displays a tertiary structure [41,42,43]. Tau is present in six isoforms because of alternative splicing (Figure 1A) [44]. The longest isoform, 2N4R, has a heterogeneous charge distribution [45,46]. The first 150 amino acids at the N-terminus, known as the protection domain (PD), have a negative charge. In contrast, the proline-rich domain (PRD, 151–243 aa) has numerous positive charges (Figure 1B). The C-terminus contains a basic microtubule-binding domain (MTBD), which is predominantly positively charged, followed by a negatively charged terminal region. The electrostatic interactions between domains and tau’s IDP nature allow the formation of condensed liquid tau droplets, both in vitro and in vivo [47,48,49,50,51]. Tau interacts with nuclear components such as nucleoli and nuclear speckles, as well as with cytoplasmic bodies such as stress granules and P granules [52,53,54,55,56,57].

Tau binds directly to nucleic acids. This has been demonstrated in vitro, in neuronal and non-neuronal cultures, and in the mouse brain. In addition, tau interacts with transference RNA (tRNAs) [58], small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs), small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs), and messenger RNAs (mRNAs). Through these bindings, tau reversibly condenses into one micrometer droplets, resulting in nuclear and cytoplasmic aggregates [57,58,59,60]. Tau also interacts with single and double DNA chains, building protein–DNA complexes [60,61,62]. The union site is the minor groove of the double strand, through the second half of the PRD and the R2 of the MTRD, giving rise to a “beads on a string” structure, like the histones in nucleosomes [63,64,65]. Depending on the tau/DNA ratio, other stable protein–DNA complexes may arise [66].

Chromatin-associated tau has been found in human and mouse brains [67]. Tau interacts with the whole nuclear DNA, as determined using chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by microarray hybridization (ChIP-on-chip) in primary embryonic neuron cultures. In euchromatin regions, tau binds with gene-coding and intergenic sequences, while in heterochromatin regions it interacts with repetitive sequences of long non-coding RNA rich in GC repeats [68]. GAGA sequences are uniformly distributed throughout the genome, but they are especially enriched in LADs. These sequences can reposition chromatin regions close to the nuclear envelope to silence genes [69]. In addition, a structural and functional relationship between tau and AT-rich alpha satellite repetitive sequences is involved in the organization of the centromeric heterochromatin ring from the nucleolus-associated domains (NADs) [53,70,71,72]. This partly explains the early observation of tau in the nucleolus. The nucleolus emerges around repetitive coding sequences from the active loci of ribosomal DNA (rDNA) or fibrillary centers (FCs) surrounded by repetitive centromeric DNA sequences included in the NADs [32,73]. These perinucleolar regions are enriched in repetitive elements, inactive X chromosome regions (Xi), and genes such as 5S rRNA, immunoglobulins, olfactory receptors, and zinc-finger proteins [74]. Furthermore, these regions are the site for pre-RNA processing and the assembly of pre-ribosome subunits [75,76].

In this respect, tau has been found both in regions of DAPI-positive heterochromatin [77,78,79] and DAPI-negative euchromatin from the nucleoplasm and nucleolus [52,78,80,81]. Gil and collaborators (2017) demonstrated the interaction of phosphorylated tau (p-tau) with global chromatin in pyramidal and granular neurons, as well as in epithelial cells of the colorectal mucosa and breast acinar cells [77]. The staining of p-tau was found in small dense foci within the chromatin distributed in the nucleus. In some cases, there was also staining in the NADs of pyramidal neurons and the LADs of epithelial cells, accompanied by a weak and diffuse nucleoplasm signal. Given that nucleosomes auto-organize in globular condensates like liquid droplets [6,7], interphasic chromatin has a fluid and irregular nature [12], and interphasic chromatin is compartmentalized [34], small p-tau foci might correspond with cell-type-specific tau-heterochromatin concentrates with significant elastic rigidity [38,39]. By contrast, faint nucleoplasm staining would be associated with the interaction between p-tau and euchromatin (compartment A) [82].

Chromatin is a dynamic structure; its topological changes determine cellular identity through specific patterns of gene expression, mainly through the intergenic and repetitive sequences organized in heterochromatin blocks (LADs and NADs) and nucleoplasmic heterochromatin. Tau is directly and indirectly related to the global heterochromatin, including the LADs and NADs [53,70,77,79]. Histone modifications are instrumental for chromatin dynamics, and recent data indicate that Tau could act as a chromatin modifier and be a new player in nuclear architecture due to its action on chromatin. Therefore, tau could also be a dynamic regulator of gene expression [83].

4. Epigenetic Histone Code, Nuclear Tau, and Chromatin Aging

The accumulation of DNA damage, mostly due to increased oxidative stress, represents a critical aging factor [84,85,86]. Post-mitotic neurons are especially vulnerable to oxidative stress because of their high oxygen requirements. They are also the longest living cells in the human body, and they cannot be replaced in the event of irreversible damage [87,88]. Different brain regions (cortex, hippocampus, cerebellum) and different neuron types (pyramidal or granular) within the same region display a wide range of age-related accumulation of DNA damage [89,90,91]. The diverse sensitivity to oxidative stress implies that the brain ages in a cell-type-specific manner [92]. Other well-documented consequences of DNA damage are the modification of the chromatin architecture, its connectivity, TADs organization, and epigenetic dysregulation [93]. The main epigenetic alterations associated with aged chromatin are limited accessibility due to histone loss, global decrease of constitutive heterochromatin, post-translational modifications of histones and DNA, disturbed miRNAs expression, and the replacement of LADs [94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103]. Altogether, these changes lead to the expression of silenced genes and repetitive DNA sequences, resulting in aberrant gene expression patterns [104,105,106,107,108]. Concerning the global heterochromatin loss, the histone methylation pattern in aging is characterized by an increase of transcriptionally active marks (H3K4me2-3, H4K16ac), a decrease of transcriptionally repressive marks (H3K9me2-3; H3K27me3) [94,109,110], and a dysregulation of H4K12 and H3K56 acetylation [111]. The downregulation of H3K36me, which also occurs during aging, is associated with aberrant gene expression and limits life span [112,113]. In addition, the trimethylation of H4K20 also increases with age in some tissues [114]. These patterns of epigenomic aging have only been characterized in replicative senescent cells, but data are scarce concerning post-mitotic neurons. Hernandez-Ortega and collaborators [115] reported high levels of H3K9me2 and H4K12ac in the pyramidal CA1 neurons of 18 senile subjects without neurological dysfunction. This result is interesting because low levels of H4K12ac are associated with memory impairment in the aged mouse brain [116] (Table 1).

It is widely accepted that tau protects DNA [117,118,119], preserves genome integrity [120,121,122,123], and is highly sensitive to cellular stressors [63,118,119], especially in neurons [79,115]. The absence of tau induces DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), the phosphorylation of histone H2AX, and the disorganization of pericentromeric regions in mouse brains [70,119]. Conversely, its presence promotes a slow repair of hippocampal DSBs [119]. This protection could be associated with the progressive age-related increase in tau in pyramidal and granular hippocampal neurons (Table 1) [67,77].

Recent findings suggest a pathway whereby tau strengthens genome protection during aging. The function of tau is determined by its post-translational modifications, notably the phosphorylation of 80 serine or threonine residues distributed along the longest isoform [124,125]. Site-specific tau phosphorylation regulates its cytoplasmic and nuclear functions. Accordingly, two of the most relevant modulators of tau function are the sites recognized by the antibodies AT100 and AT8, located in Thr212 and Ser214, and in Ser202 and Thr205, respectively (Figure 1C) [126,127]. Pyramidal post-mitotic neurons from senile subjects have a very high immunopositivity to AT100, indicating abundant p-tau uniformly distributed within the nucleus, concomitant with high levels of H4K16ac [78,111]. This epigenetic modification inhibits the assembly of the 30 nm chromatin fiber, characteristic of heterochromatin regions [128], and it coexists with a significant aging-associated loss of histones [94,129]. It is tempting to hypothesize that a high tau concentration (around 100 µM) would be required to bind DNA, substituting the lost histones [65]. This binding would form nuclear gel-like p-tau droplets [50,51] where tau interacts with the positive charges [130] to keep the global heterochromatin condensed. Hence, centromeres, telomeres, and transposable elements would be stabilized [108].

The AT8 antibody recognition site of p-tau is an emblematic signature for AD diagnosis with a specific cytoplasmic location [131]. Nevertheless, pyramidal senile neurons clearly present AT8 immunopositivity in the nucleus interacting with the global chromatin, specifically with the transcriptionally inactive NADs [79]. This phosphorylation (sSer202/Thr205, AT8) may result in a change from the previous p-tau conformation (site Thr212/Ser214, AT100) that significantly improves its capacity for droplet organization and chromatin condensation [132,133]. It is remarkable that while AT100 gradually increases its nuclear presence throughout life, AT8 is mostly absent from chromatin and only appears in aged brains. Given its localization, we can conclude that it is associated with the transcriptional silencing of inactive rDNA genes and satellite repeats alpha and beta [78,134], as well as nucleoplasmic regions of facultative heterochromatin [79,135].

AT100 and AT8 are also present in chromatin from senile granular neurons. As in pyramidal neurons, AT100 progressively accumulates with age, displaying a global positivity in the nucleoplasm with a more intense signal in the LADs [77]. The perinuclear localization of AT100 would imply a silencing of repetitive DNA sequences associated with genomic stabilization [134]. In addition, the higher presence of AT100 could be related to the replicative character of granular cells. These cells require a greater DNA repairing capacity because of the continuous turnover derived from their functions in learning and memory [136,137]. AT8 is also present in granular senile neurons, while in younger cells it is almost absent (manuscript in preparation). As previously mentioned, AT8 recognizes the phosphorylated epitope Ser202/Thr205 while the Tau1 antibody marks the same residues but in the non-phosphorylated form [125,138]. The presence of tau in the nucleus, and especially in the nucleolus, has been widely reported [52,118,125,139]. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that tau interacts with repetitive centromeric sequences rich in H3K9me3 and HP1α, using immunoelectron microscopy and ChIP assays from murine embryonic neuronal cultures [70]. In addition, the phosphorylation of this epitope in granular and pyramidal neurons from senile brains shows a conformational change in Thr212/Ser214 [81], which is crucial for the chromatin aging and the gene expression of brain-aging-associated genes [140].

5. Different Chromatin Landscapes Associated to Early and Late Ad Stages

AD diagnosis is performed post-mortem 5 to 10 years after the onset of the disease. Diagnosis is based on the cytoplasmic pathology of toxic neurofibrillary tangles and the presence of extracellular β-amyloid aggregates in the intermediate and late AD stages [141]. Nevertheless, the early landscape of the disease is a nuclear pathology involving chromatin alterations [142,143,144]. Other neurodegenerative disorders also display pathologic characteristics associated with dynamic chromatin modifications [145,146,147].

Recent investigations highlight that the nature of AD is not exclusively linked to aging [148] but to an epigenetic dysregulation of chromatin directly involving the histone code [142] and p-tau exiting the neuronal nucleus [79,115]. The progressive decrease of the epigenetic marks H3K9me3 and H412Kac in CA1 [115,142] is accompanied by a significant increment of H3K9me3 in centromeres and non-coding intergenic and intragenic regions [149,150]. Moreover, H4K20me3 in NADs and LADs [79] are also increased, implying high chromatin condensation. The trimethylation marks in H3K9 and H4K20 indicating chromatin repression are accompanied by the assembly of 30 nm chromatin fibers allowed by the decreased acetylated form H4K16ac [128,151]. Interestingly, the H416ac level, which is directly implied in heterochromatin organization, progressively increases with age, in parallel with AT100. In contrast, both decrease throughout AD progression [77,142]. In synchrony with this closed chromatin landscape during early AD stages (stages I–II according to Braak and Braak) [152], the following epigenetic modifications have been reported: an increased expression of histone deacetylases (HDACs) [153,154], especially of HDAC2, in the hippocampus [155]; and the cytoplasmic misplacement of DNA methyltransferase 1, DNA polymerase II (Pol II), and H3K4me3 [156,157]. In addition, minimal differences in DNA methylation have been observed in cortical neurons at early AD stages, independently of age-associated changes [158]. AT100 transfer from the nucleus to the cytoplasm reflects a progressive uncoupling of tau from chromatin, leading to the consequent destabilization of repetitive DNA sequences that conform NADs, LADs, and mobile genome elements. Although these changes would trigger neuronal death, the AD pyramidal neuron undergoes a profound chromatin transformation that allows its temporal survival. These epigenetic transformations determine the early AD phenotype of pyramidal neurons (Table 1) and involve aging-associated genetic dysregulation and global transcriptional changes that transform an aged neuron into a degenerated one [159].

The starting point of AD is marked by the nuclear phosphorylation of the AT8 site and the exit of AT100 from the nucleus to the cytoplasm [79,115]. In contrast, the late stages of the disease are marked by the massive presence of neurons in CA1 bearing neurofibrillary tangles in the somatodendritic compartments, positive to AT8 and AT100 [160,161]. The course of this process includes not only the aberrant neuronal cytoplasm but also a second transformation of the degenerated chromatin landscape. Important works have reported globally decondensed chromatin in several models, including (i) AD models in mouse and Drosophila bearing classic tau cytoplasmic pathology [143,144], (ii) forebrain neurons derived from human pluripotent stem cells, and (iii) the prefrontal cortex of autopsied brains, where abundant neurofibrillary tangles were taken as clinical evidence of AD [142]. The disappearance of repressive marks such as H3K9me3 and H4K20me3 occurs in concert with increased histone acetylation, such as H2BK5ac, H3K14ac, H3K18ac, H3K23ac, H4K5ac, and H4K12ac [162]. Together with the cytoplasmic tau pathology, H3K9ac is placed both in compartment A and compartment B, confirming the decondensed state of global chromatin and the modification of nuclear architecture in late AD stages (stages V–VI, according to Braak and Braak) [79,143,152] (Table 1). Around 57,800 promotor sequences associated with H3K4me3 and 151,477 active potentiating sequences related to H3K27ac have been identified [163]. Additionally, H3K27ac is highly present in the human entorhinal cortex affected by tau pathology [164]. Analysis of the integral transcriptome of the human hippocampus in late AD stages revealed 2064 genes, 47 lncRNAs, and 4 miRNAs with dysregulated expression. Up-transcribed genes were associated with tau phosphorylation, neurogenesis, synaptic vesicle traffic, long-term potentiation (LTP), and neurite growth [165].

The depletion of global heterochromatin and the closed chromatin structure of repetitive DNA sequences implies the activation of transposons [166,167] and CpG nucleotides dispersed in repetitive DNA [168,169], as well as the destabilization of centromeric and pericentromeric DNA sequences from NADs and LADs [70,79]. Given that these processes manage the organization of chromatin spaces, their structure loss implies the destabilization of topologically associated chromatin domains and CTs [170] and the loss of the post-differentiated character of the neuronal nucleus [171].

Importantly, two processes occur simultaneously throughout the process of AD pathology: the genesis of the AD neuronal phenotype, and the progressive loss of pyramidal cells that reenter the aberrant cell cycle [172,173,174]. This means that two pyramidal neuronal populations with different degrees of degeneration coexist in the hippocampus of AD patients. The first population is post-mitotic neurons that exit the quiescent state by starting an aberrant cell cycle that eventually drives them to cell death. The second refers to neurons with AD phenotype, whose profound chromatin, nuclear, somatodendritic, and axonal transformation materialize the characteristic AD neurodegeneration [79,175]. Recent works in induced neurons from patient-derived fibroblasts have linked oxidative stress and DNA damage to aberrant cell cycle re-entry, apoptosis activation, and, importantly, the loss of a differentiation state and a “return to immaturity” [176,177]. The RNA-seq analysis of 82 temporal cortex neurons from a late AD sample identified the up-regulation of 600 genes related to epithelial–mesenchymal transition and cancer along with the downregulation of genes associated with mature neuronal identity [171].

6. Conclusions and Future Directions

The accumulation of oxidative stress, DNA damage, and other nuclear and cytoplasmic alterations drive aged cells to their biological limits. Once their duplicative potential is depleted, replicative cells can remain in a limbic senescent state. Although this process allows them to stop their eternal youth drive in most cases, it increases the risk for developing the malign cancer phenotype. In contrast, post-mitotic cells maintain extraordinary functionality despite advanced age, but they lose their identity and finally die. The hippocampus is the brain’s compass, and the progressive neuronal loss is alleviated through the genesis of a surviving cell, the AD neuron. This aberrant phenotype grants the AD brain a few more years of life until its final defeat. In this sense, nuclear tau plays a crucial role as an aging chromatin biomarker in AD and cancer [77,171].

Over the course of three decades, pharmacological treatments for AD patients have targeted β-amyloid and tau protein [178]. The objective has been to reduce and/or avoid the development and spreading of their toxic aggregates in the neuropile and neuronal cytoplasm. The disappointing results of therapies against β-amyloid shifted the focus toward neurofibrillary tangles of hyperphosphorylated tau protein [179]. Many small molecules have recently been designed to inhibit or block tau phosphorylation in order to reduce its cytoplasmic toxicity, which characterizes late AD [180,181,182]. Our results indicate that early disease stages are defined by a nuclear dysregulation associated with NL changes, increased nuclear amounts of p-tau, and tau transfer into the cytoplasm. Future research of p-tau inhibitors in AD animal models will enable the possibility of slowing down nuclear p-tau accumulation and delaying cytoplasmic pathology.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.G. and M.E.J.-C.; investigation, L.G.; writing—original draft preparation, L.G., C.G. and S.A.N.; writing—review and editing, L.G. and M.E.J.-C.; visualization, S.A.N.; supervision, M.E.J.-C.; funding acquisition, L.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors acknowledge the support from Fundación Alfonso X el Sabio-Banco Santander, Spain and the Biobanco, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Alcorcón, 28922, Madrid, Spain, and R. Mendez-Hernandez for proofreading the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figure and Table

Figure 1. Tau protein structure and nuclear interactions. Structure of the six tau isoforms expressed in the adult human brain (A). Details of the longest isoform. It contains three major domains: an acidic N-terminal part (red), a proline-rich region (blue), and the basic microtubule-binding domain (green). The electrostatic interactions between domains allow the formation of condensed liquid tau droplets. The dotted line indicates the region where tau interacts with DNA and RNA (B). Upper line: Tau1 antibody recognizes the Ser202/Thr205 site. Lower line: The antibodies AT8 and AT100 bind with the phosphorylated sites Ser202/Thr205and Thr212/Ser214, respectively. Notice the change in the charge of the protein upon phosphorylation (C). Abbreviations: pI, regional isoelectric points; a.a., amino acids. Created with BioRender.com.

Table 1

Summary of chromatin and tau modifications in human CA1 pyramidal neurons through aging and AD evolution. Two epigenetic landscapes are defined for AD, considering an early and a late stage.

Epigenetic Stages in Neurons
Aging: condensed global chromatin and nuclear tau
ON transcriptionally repressive marks (heterochromatin): H3K9me3
OFF transcriptionally active marks (euchromatin): H4K16ac
Dysregulated: H4K12ac
Nuclear tau: AT100 increase and expression of AT8
Early Alzheimer’s Diease: Condensed heterochromatin (LADs, NADs) and Lamin A
ON transcriptionally repressive marks (constitutive heterochromatin): H3K9me3, H4K20me3
ON hippocampal HDAC2 expression
OFF transcriptionally active marks (euchromatin): H4K16ac
Ectopic cytoplasmic localization: H3K4me3, DNA methyltransferase 1, RNA Pol II
Nuclear tau: fading
Late Alzheimer’s Diease: Decondensed global chromatin and cytoplasmic tau
ON global acetylation
OFF methylation (heterochromatin): H3K9me2, H4K20me3
ON H3K9ac (euchromatin and heterochromatin)
Cytosolic tau: Tangles

References

1. Olins, D.E.; Olins, A.L. Chromatin history: Our view from the bridge. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.; 2003; 4, pp. 809-814. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm1225]

2. Maeshima, K.; Imai, R.; Tamura, S.; Nozaki, T. Chromatin as dynamic 10-nm fibers. Chromosoma; 2014; 123, pp. 225-237. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00412-014-0460-2]

3. Grigoryev, S.A.; Woodcock, C.L. Chromatin organization—The 30 nm fiber. Exp. Cell Res.; 2012; 318, pp. 1448-1455. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2012.02.014]

4. Woodcock, C.L.; Skoultchi, A.I.; Fan, Y. Role of linker histone in chromatin structure and function: H1 stoichiometry and nucleosome repeat length. Chromosom. Res.; 2006; 14, pp. 17-25. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10577-005-1024-3]

5. Maeshima, K.; Rogge, R.; Tamura, S.; Joti, Y.; Hikima, T.; Szerlong, H.; Krause, C.; Herman, J.; Seidel, E.; DeLuca, J. et al. Nucleosomal arrays self-assemble into supramolecular globular structures lacking 30-nm fibers. EMBO J.; 2016; 35, pp. 1115-1132. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embj.201592660]

6. Gibson, B.A.; Doolittle, L.K.; Schneider, M.W.; Jensen, L.E.; Gamarra, N.; Henry, L.; Gerlich, D.W.; Redding, S.; Rosen, M.K. Organization of Chromatin by Intrinsic and Regulated Phase Separation. Cell; 2019; 179, pp. 470-484.e21. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.08.037] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31543265]

7. Sanulli, S.; Trnka, M.; Dharmarajan, V.; Tibble, R.W.; Pascal, B.D.; Burlingame, A.L.; Griffin, P.R.; Gross, J.D.; Narlikar, G.J. HP1 reshapes nucleosome core to promote phase separation of heterochromatin. Nat. Cell Biol.; 2019; 575, pp. 390-394. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1669-2] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31618757]

8. Dekker, J. Mapping in Vivo Chromatin Interactions in Yeast Suggests an Extended Chromatin Fiber with Regional Variation in Compaction. J. Biol. Chem.; 2008; 283, pp. 34532-34540. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M806479200] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18930918]

9. Chen, C.; Lim, H.H.; Shi, J.; Tamura, S.; Maeshima, K.; Surana, U.; Gan, L. Budding yeast chromatin is dispersed in a crowded nucleoplasm in vivo. Mol. Biol. Cell; 2016; 27, pp. 3357-3368. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E16-07-0506] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27605704]

10. Ou, H.D.; Phan, S.; Deerinck, T.J.; Thor, A.; Ellisman, M.H.; O’Shea, C.C. ChromEMT: Visualizing 3D chromatin structure and compaction in interphase and mitotic cells. Science; 2017; 357, eaag0025. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aag0025]

11. Ohno, M.; Ando, T.; Priest, D.G.; Kumar, V.; Yoshida, Y.; Taniguchi, Y. Sub-nucleosomal Genome Structure Reveals Distinct Nucleosome Folding Motifs. Cell; 2019; 176, pp. 520-534.e25. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.12.014] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30661750]

12. Maeshima, K.; Tamura, S.; Hansen, J.C.; Itoh, Y. Fluid-like chromatin: Toward understanding the real chromatin organization present in the cell. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.; 2020; 64, pp. 77-89. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2020.02.016] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32283330]

13. Lander, E.S.; Linton, L.M.; Birren, B.; Nusbaum, C.; Zody, M.C.; Baldwin, J.; Devon, K.; Dewar, K.; Doyle, M.; Fitzhugh, W. et al. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature; 2001; 409, pp. 860-921. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35057062]

14. De Koning, A.P.J.; Gu, W.; Castoe, T.A.; Batzer, M.A.; Pollock, D.D. Repetitive Elements May Comprise Over Two-Thirds of the Human Genome. PLoS Genet.; 2011; 7, e1002384. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002384] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22144907]

15. Heitz, E. Das Heterochromatin der Moose. Jahrb Wiss Botanik; 1928; 69, pp. 762-818.

16. Mouchiroud, D.; D’Onofrio, G.; Aïssani, B.; Macaya, G.; Gautier, C.; Bernardi, G. The distribution of genes in the human genome. Gene; 1991; 100, pp. 181-187. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-1119(91)90364-H]

17. Levi, V.; Ruan, Q.; Plutz, M.; Belmont, A.S.; Gratton, E. Chromatin Dynamics in Interphase Cells Revealed by Tracking in a Two-Photon Excitation Microscope. Biophys. J.; 2005; 89, pp. 4275-4285. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.105.066670] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16150965]

18. Shahbazian, M.D.; Grunstein, M. Functions of Site-Specific Histone Acetylation and Deacetylation. Annu. Rev. Biochem.; 2007; 76, pp. 75-100. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.76.052705.162114]

19. Barski, A.; Cuddapah, S.; Cui, K.; Roh, T.Y.; Schones, D.E.; Wang, Z.; Wei, G.; Chepelev, I.; Zhao, K. High-resolution profiling of histone methylations in the human genome. Cell; 2007; 129, pp. 823-837. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.009] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17512414]

20. Bernardi, G. The “Genomic Code”: DNA Pervasively Moulds Chromatin Structures Leaving no Room for “Junk”. Life; 2021; 11, 342. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life11040342]

21. Janssen, A.; Colmenares, S.U.; Karpen, G.H. Heterochromatin: Guardian of the Genome. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol.; 2018; 34, pp. 265-288. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100617-062653] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30044650]

22. Saksouk, N.; Simboeck, E.; Déjardin, J. Constitutive heterochromatin formation and transcription in mammals. Epigenetics Chromatin; 2015; 8, 3. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-8935-8-3]

23. Eymery, A.; Callanan, M.; Vourc’h, C. The secret message of heterochromatin: New insights into the mechanisms and func-tion of centromeric and pericentric repeat sequence transcription. Int. J. Dev. Biol.; 2009; 53, pp. 259-268. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1387/ijdb.082673ae] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19412885]

24. Hall, L.E.; Mitchell, S.E.; O’Neill, R.J. Pericentric and centromeric transcription: A perfect balance required. Chromosom. Res.; 2012; 20, pp. 535-546. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10577-012-9297-9]

25. Valgardsdottir, R.; Chiodi, I.; Giordano, M.; Rossi, A.; Bazzini, S.; Ghigna, C.; Riva, S.; Biamonti, G. Transcription of Satellite III non-coding RNAs is a general stress response in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res.; 2007; 36, pp. 423-434. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm1056] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18039709]

26. Rudert, F.; Bronner, S.; Garnier, J.M.; Dollé, P. Transcripts from opposite strands of gamma satellite DNA are differentially expressed during mouse development. Mamm. Genome; 1995; 6, pp. 76-83. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00303248]

27. Enukashvily, N.; Donev, R.; Waisertreiger, I.-R.; Podgornaya, O. Human chromosome 1 satellite 3 DNA is decondensed, demethylated and transcribed in senescent cells and in A431 epithelial carcinoma cells. Cytogenet. Genome Res.; 2007; 118, pp. 42-54. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000106440] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17901699]

28. Trojer, P.; Reinberg, D. Facultative Heterochromatin: Is There a Distinctive Molecular Signature?. Mol. Cell; 2007; 28, pp. 1-13. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2007.09.011]

29. Bizhanova, A.; Kaufman, P.D. Close to the edge: Heterochromatin at the nucleolar and nuclear peripheries. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Bioenerg.; 2020; 1864, 194666. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2020.194666]

30. Chubb, J.R.; Boyle, S.; Perry, P.; Bickmore, W.A. Chromatin motion is constrained by association with nuclear compart-ments in human cells. Curr. Biol.; 2002; 12, pp. 439-445. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00695-4]

31. Falk, M.; Feodorova, Y.; Naumova, N.; Imakaev, M.; Lajoie, B.R.; Leonhardt, H.; Joffe, B.; Dekker, J.; Fudenberg, G.; Solovei, I. et al. Heterochromatin drives compartmentalization of inverted and conventional nuclei. Nature; 2019; 570, pp. 395-399. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1275-3]

32. Van Koningsbruggen, S.; Gierlinski, M.; Schofield, P.; Martin, D.; Barton, G.J.; Ariyurek, Y.; den Dunnen, J.T.; Lamond, A.I. High-resolution whole-genome sequencing reveals that specific chromatin domains from most human chromosomes associate with nucleoli. Mol. Biol. Cell; 2010; 21, pp. 3735-3748. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e10-06-0508]

33. Saccone, S.; Federico, C.; Bernardi, G. Localization of the gene-richest and the gene-poorest isochores in the interphase nu-clei of mammals and birds. Gene; 2002; 300, pp. 169-178. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1119(02)01038-7]

34. Dixon, J.R.; Selvaraj, S.; Yue, F.; Kim, A.; Li, Y.; Shen, Y.; Hu, M.; Liu, J.S.; Ren, B. Topological domains in mammalian ge-nomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature; 2012; 485, pp. 376-380. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature11082] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22495300]

35. Zuin, J.; Dixon, J.R.; van der Reijden, M.I.; Ye, Z.; Kolovos, P.; Brouwer, R.W.; van de Corput, M.P.; van de Werken, H.J.; Knoch, T.A.; van IJcken, W.F. et al. Cohesin and CTCF differentially affect chromatin architecture and gene expression in human cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2014; 111, pp. 996-1001. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1317788111]

36. Zhang, Y.; McCord, R.P.; Ho, Y.J.; Lajoie, B.R.; Hildebrand, D.G.; Simon, A.C.; Becker, M.S.; Alt, F.W.; Dekker, J. Spatial or-ganization of the mouse genome and its role in recurrent chromosomal translocations. Cell; 2012; 148, pp. 908-921. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.002] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22341456]

37. Cremer, T.; Cremer, M. Chromosome territories. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.; 2010; 2, a003889. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a003889] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20300217]

38. Marella, N.V.; Bhattacharya, S.; Mukherjee, L.; Xu, J.; Berezney, R. Cell type specific chromosome territory organization in the interphase nucleus of normal and cancer cells. J. Cell. Physiol.; 2009; 221, pp. 130-138. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcp.21836]

39. Fritz, A.J.; Sehgal, N.; Pliss, A.; Xu, J.; Berezney, R. Chromosome territories and the global regulation of the genome. Genes Chromosom. Cancer; 2019; 58, pp. 407-426. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/gcc.22732]

40. Amiad-Pavlov, D.; Lorber, D.; Bajpai, G.; Reuveny, A.; Roncato, F.; Alon, R.; Safran, S.; Volk, T. Live imaging of chromatin distribution reveals novel principles of nuclear architecture and chromatin compartmentalization. Sci. Adv.; 2021; 7, eabf6251. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abf6251]

41. Cleveland, D.; Hwo, S.-Y.; Kirschner, M.W. Physical and chemical properties of purified tau factor and the role of tau in microtubule assembly. J. Mol. Biol.; 1977; 116, pp. 227-247. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-2836(77)90214-5]

42. Lee, G.; Cowan, N.; Kirschner, M. The primary structure and heterogeneity of tau protein from mouse brain. Science; 1988; 239, pp. 285-288. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.3122323] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3122323]

43. Wright, P.E.; Dyson, H.J. Intrinsically disordered proteins in cellular signalling and regulation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.; 2014; 16, pp. 18-29. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm3920]

44. Goedert, M.; Klug, A.; Crowther, R.A. Tau protein, the paired helical filament and Alzheimer’s disease. J. Alzheimers. Dis.; 2006; 9, pp. 195-207. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-2006-9S323]

45. Gustke, N.; Trinczek, B.; Biernat, J.; Mandelkow, E.M.; Mandelkow, E. Domains of tau protein and interactions with micro-tubules. Biochemistry; 1994; 33, pp. 9511-9522. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bi00198a017]

46. Wang, Y.; Mandelkow, E. Tau in physiology and pathology. Nat. Rev. Neurosci.; 2015; 17, pp. 22-35. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2015.1] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26631930]

47. Dong, X.; Bera, S.; Qiao, Q.; Tang, Y.; Lao, Z.; Luo, Y.; Gazit, E.; Wei, G. Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation of Tau Protein Is En-coded at the Monomeric Level. J. Phys. Chem. Lett.; 2021; 12, pp. 2576-2586. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c00208] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33686854]

48. Boyko, S.; Qi, X.; Chen, T.-H.; Surewicz, K.; Surewicz, W.K. Liquid–liquid phase separation of tau protein: The crucial role of electrostatic interactions. J. Biol. Chem.; 2019; 294, pp. 11054-11059. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.AC119.009198]

49. Kosik, K.S.; Han, S. Tau Condensates. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.; 2019; 1184, pp. 327-339.

50. Ambadipudi, S.; Biernat, J.; Riedel, D.; Mandelkow, E.; Zweckstetter, M. Liquid-liquid phase separation of the microtu-bule-binding repeats of the Alzheimer-related protein Tau. Nat. Commun.; 2017; 8, 275. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00480-0] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28819146]

51. Wegmann, S.; Eftekharzadeh, B.; Tepper, K.; Zoltowska, K.M.; Bennett, R.E.; Dujardin, S.; Laskowski, P.R.; MacKenzie, D.; Kamath, T.; Commins, C. et al. Tau protein liquid–liquid phase separation can initiate tau aggregation. EMBO J.; 2018; 37, e98049. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embj.201798049] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29472250]

52. Thurston, V.C.; Zinkowski, R.P.; Binder, L.I. Tau as a nucleolar protein in human nonneural cells in vitro and in vivo. Chromosoma; 1996; 105, pp. 20-30. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02510035]

53. Sjöberg, M.K.; Shestakova, E.; Mansuroglu, Z.; Maccioni, R.B.; Bonnefoy, E. Tau protein binds to pericentromeric DNA: A putative role for nuclear tau in nucleolar organization. J. Cell Sci.; 2006; 119, pp. 2025-2034. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.02907]

54. Maina, M.B.; Bailey, L.J.; Wagih, S.; Biasetti, L.; Pollack, S.J.; Quinn, J.P.; Thorpe, J.R.; Doherty, A.J.; Serpell, L.C. The in-volvement of Tau in nucleolar transcription and the stress response. Acta Neuropathol Commun.; 2018; 6, 70. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40478-018-0565-6]

55. Lester, E.; Ooi, F.K.; Bakkar, N.; Ayers, J.; Woerman, A.L.; Wheeler, J.; Bowser, R.; Carlson, G.A.; Prusiner, S.B.; Parker, R. Tau aggregates are RNA-protein assemblies that mislocalize multiple nuclear speckle components. Neuron; 2021; 19, pp. 1675-1691. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2021.03.026] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33848474]

56. Brunello, C.A.; Yan, X.; Huttunen, H.J. Internalized Tau sensitizes cells to stress by promoting formation and stability of stress granules. Sci. Rep.; 2016; 6, 30498. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep30498]

57. Ukmar-Godec, T.; Hutten, S.; Grieshop, M.P.; Rezaei-Ghaleh, N.; Omori, M.S.C.; Biernat, J.; Mandelkow, E.; Söding, J.; Dormann, D.; Zweckstetter, M. Lysine/RNA-interactions drive and regulate biomolecular condensation. Nat. Commun.; 2019; 10, 2909. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10792-y]

58. Zhang, X.; Lin, Y.; Eschmann, N.A.; Zhou, H.; Rauch, J.N.; Hernandez, I.; Guzman, E.; Kosik, K.S.; Han, S. RNA stores tau reversibly in complex coacervates. PLoS Biol.; 2017; 15, e2002183. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2002183]

59. Kampers, T.; Friedhoff, P.; Biernat, J.; Mandelkow, E.M.; Mandelkow, E. RNA stimulates aggregation of microtubule-associated protein tau into Alzheimer-like paired helical filaments. FEBS Lett.; 1996; 399, pp. 344-349. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0014-5793(96)01386-5]

60. Corces, V.; Salas, J.; Salas, M.L.; Avila, J.; And, M.L.S. Binding of Microtubule Proteins to DNA: Specificity of the Interaction. JBIC J. Biol. Inorg. Chem.; 1978; 86, pp. 473-479. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1978.tb12330.x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/207527]

61. Hua, Q.; He, R.-Q.; Haque, N.; Qu, M.-H.; Alonso, A.D.C.; Grundke-Iqbal, I.; Iqbal, K. Microtubule associated protein tau binds to double-stranded but not single-stranded DNA. Cell. Mol. Life Sci.; 2003; 60, pp. 413-421. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s000180300034] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12678504]

62. Krylova, S.M.; Musheev, M.; Nutiu, R.; Li, Y.; Lee, G.; Krylov, S.N. Tau protein binds single-stranded DNA sequence specifi-cally--the proof obtained in vitro with non-equilibrium capillary electrophoresis of equilibrium mixtures. FEBS Lett.; 2005; 579, pp. 1371-1375. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2005.01.032] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15733843]

63. Wei, Y.; Qu, M.-H.; Wang, X.-S.; Chen, L.; Wang, D.-L.; Liu, Y.; Hua, Q.; He, R.-Q. Binding to the Minor Groove of the Double-Strand, Tau Protein Prevents DNA from Damage by Peroxidation. PLoS ONE; 2008; 3, e2600. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002600] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18596978]

64. Qi, H.; Cantrelle, F.X.; Benhelli-Mokrani, H.; Smet-Nocca, C.; Buée, L.; Lippens, G.; Bonnefoy, E.; Galas, M.C.; Landrieu, I. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy characterization of interaction of Tau with DNA and its regulation by phosphor-ylation. Biochemistry; 2015; 54, pp. 1525-1533. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bi5014613]

65. Camero, S.; Benítez, M.J.; Barrantes, A.; Ayuso, J.M.; Cuadros, R.; Ávila, J.; Jiménez, J.S. Tau Protein Provides DNA with Thermodynamic and Structural Features which are Similar to those Found in Histone-DNA Complex. J. Alzheimer’s Dis.; 2014; 39, pp. 649-660. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-131415]

66. Qu, M.H.; Li, H.; Tian, R.; Nie, C.L.; Liu, Y.; Han, B.S.; He, R.Q. Neuronal Tau induces DNA conformational changes ob-served by atomic force microscopy. Neuroreport; 2004; 15, pp. 2723-2727.

67. Portillo, M.; Eremenko, E.; Kaluski, S.; Garcia-Venzor, A.; Onn, L.; Stein, D.; Slobodnik, Z.; Zaretsky, A.; Ueberham, U.; Einav, M. et al. SIRT6-CBP-dependent nuclear Tau accumulation and its role in protein synthesis. Cell Rep.; 2021; 35, 109035. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109035]

68. Benhelli-Mokrani, H.; Mansuroglu, Z.; Chauderlier, A.; Albaud, B.; Gentien, D.; Sommer, S.; Schirmer, C.; Laqueuvre, L.; Josse, T.; Buee, L. et al. Genome-wide identification of genic and intergenic neuronal DNA regions bound by Tau protein under physiological and stress conditions. Nucleic Acids Res.; 2018; 46, pp. 11405-11422. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky929]

69. Zullo, J.M.; Demarco, I.A.; Pique-Regi, R.; Gaffney, D.; Epstein, C.B.; Spooner, C.J.; Luperchio, T.; Bernstein, B.E.; Pritchard, J.K.; Reddy, K.L. et al. DNA Sequence-Dependent Compartmentalization and Silencing of Chromatin at the Nuclear Lamina. Cell; 2012; 149, pp. 1474-1487. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.035]

70. Mansuroglu, Z.; Benhelli-Mokrani, H.; Marcato, V.; Sultan, A.; Violet, M.; Chauderlier, A.; Delattre, L.; Loyens, A.; Talahari, S.; Bégard, S. et al. Loss of Tau protein affects the structure, transcription and repair of neuronal pericentromeric heterochromatin. Sci. Rep.; 2016; 6, 33047. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep33047]

71. Manuelidis, L. Different central nervous system cell types display distinct and nonrandom arrangements of satellite DNA sequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 1984; 81, pp. 3123-3127. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.81.10.3123] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6587343]

72. Akhmanova, A.; Verkerk, T.; Langeveld, A.; Grosveld, F.; Galjart, N. Characterisation of transcriptionally active and inactive chromatin domains in neurons. J. Cell Sci.; 2000; 113, Pt 24, pp. 4463-4474. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.113.24.4463] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11082040]

73. Németh, A.; Längst, G. Genome organization in and around the nucleolus. Trends Genet.; 2011; 27, pp. 149-156. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2011.01.002] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21295884]

74. Matheson, T.D.; Kaufman, P.D. Grabbing the genome by the NADs. Chromosoma; 2015; 125, pp. 361-371. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00412-015-0527-8] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26174338]

75. Pederson, T. The nucleolus. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.; 2011; 3, a000638. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a000638] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21106648]

76. Falahati, H.; Pelham-Webb, B.; Blythe, S.; Wieschaus, E. Nucleation by rRNA Dictates the Precision of Nucleolus Assembly. Curr. Biol.; 2016; 26, pp. 277-285. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.11.065]

77. Gil, L.; Federico, C.; Pinedo, F.; Bruno, F.; Rebolledo, A.B.; Montoya, J.J.; Olazabal, I.M.; Ferrer, I.; Saccone, S. Aging de-pendent effect of nuclear tau. Brain Res.; 2017; 1677, pp. 129-137. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2017.09.030]

78. Federico, C.; Gil, L.; Bruno, F.; D’Amico, A.G.; D’Agata, V.; Saccone, S. Phosphorylated nucleolar Tau protein is related to the neuronal in vitro differentiation. Gene; 2018; 664, pp. 1-11. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2018.04.051]

79. Gil, L.; Niño, S.A.; Chi-Ahumada, E.; Rodríguez-Leyva, I.; Guerrero, C.; Rebolledo, A.B.; Arias, J.A.; Jiménez-Capdeville, M.E. Perinuclear Lamin A and Nucleoplasmic Lamin B2 Characterize Two Types of Hippocampal Neurons through Alzheimer’s Disease Progression. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2020; 21, 1841. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21051841]

80. Lu, J.; Li, T.; He, R.; Bartlett, P.F.; Götz, J. Visualizing the microtubule-associated protein tau in the nucleus. Sci. China Life Sci.; 2014; 57, pp. 422-431. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11427-014-4635-0]

81. Loomis, P.A.; Howard, T.H.; Castleberry, R.P.; Binder, L.I. Identification of nuclear tau isoforms in human neuroblastoma cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 1990; 87, pp. 8422-8426. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.21.8422]

82. Cremer, T.; Kreth, G.; Koester, H.; Fink, R.H.; Heintzmann, R.; Cremer, M.; Solovei, I.; Zink, D.; Cremer, C. Chromosome territories, interchromatin domain compartment, and nuclear matrix: An integrated view of the functional nuclear architecture. Crit. Rev.™ Eukaryot. Gene Expr.; 2000; 10, pp. 179-212. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1615/CritRevEukarGeneExpr.v10.i2.60]

83. Duan, Z.; Blau, C.A. The genome in space and time: Does form always follow function? How does the spatial and temporal organization of a eukaryotic genome reflect and influence its functions?. Bioessays; 2012; 34, pp. 800-810. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bies.201200034] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22777837]

84. Hamilton, M.L.; Van Remmen, H.; Drake, J.A.; Yang, H.; Guo, Z.M.; Kewitt, K.; Walter, C.A.; Richardson, A. Does oxidative damage to DNA increase with age?. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2001; 98, pp. 10469-10474. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.171202698] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11517304]

85. Karanjawala, Z.E.; Lieber, M.R. DNA damage and aging. Mech. Ageing Dev.; 2004; 125, pp. 405-416. [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15272504]

86. Rutten, B.P.; Schmitz, C.; Gerlach, O.H.; Oyen, H.M.; de Mesquita, E.B.; Steinbusch, H.W.; Korr, H. The aging brain: Accumu-lation of DNA damage or neuron loss?. Neurobiol. Aging; 2007; 28, pp. 91-98. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.10.019] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16338029]

87. Christen, Y. Oxidative stress and Alzheimer disease. Am. J. Clin. Nutr.; 2000; 71, pp. 621S-629S. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/71.2.621s] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10681270]

88. Frade, J.M.; Ovejero-Benito, M.C. Neuronal cell cycle: The neuron itself and its circumstances. Cell Cycle; 2015; 14, pp. 712-720. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15384101.2015.1004937] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25590687]

89. Mandavilli, B.S.; Rao, K.S. Neurons in the cerebral cortex are most susceptible to DNA-damage in aging rat brain. IUBMB Life; 1996; 40, pp. 507-514. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15216549600201073]

90. Morrison, J.H.; Hof, P.R. Life and death of neurons in the aging brain. Science; 1997; 278, pp. 412-419. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.278.5337.412]

91. Schmitz, C.; Axmacher, B.; Zunker, U.; Korr, H. Age-related changes of DNA repair and mitochondrial DNA synthesis in the mouse brain. Acta Neuropathol.; 1999; 97, pp. 71-81. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004010050957]

92. Gensler, H.L.; Bernstein, H. DNA Damage as the Primary Cause of Aging. Q. Rev. Biol.; 1981; 56, pp. 279-303. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/412317]

93. Morris, B.J.; Willcox, B.J.; Donlon, T.A. Genetic and epigenetic regulation of human aging and longevity. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Mol. Basis Dis.; 2018; 1865, pp. 1718-1744. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2018.08.039] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31109447]

94. O’Sullivan, R.J.; Kubicek, S.; Schreiber, S.L.; Karlseder, J. Reduced histone biosynthesis and chromatin changes arising from a damage signal at telomeres. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.; 2010; 17, pp. 1218-1225. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.1897] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20890289]

95. Zhang, W.; Qu, J.; Liu, G.-H.; Belmonte, J.C.I. The ageing epigenome and its rejuvenation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.; 2020; 21, pp. 137-150. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41580-019-0204-5]

96. Hu, Z.; Chen, K.; Xia, Z.; Chavez, M.; Pal, S.; Seol, J.H.; Chen, C.C.; Li, W.; Tyler, J.K. Nucleosome loss leads to global tran-scriptional up-regulation and genomic instability during yeast aging. Genes Dev.; 2014; 28, pp. 396-408. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.233221.113] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24532716]

97. Liu, L.; Cheung, T.H.; Charville, G.W.; Hurgo, B.M.C.; Leavitt, T.; Shih, J.; Brunet, A.; Rando, T.A. Chromatin Modifications as Determinants of Muscle Stem Cell Quiescence and Chronological Aging. Cell Rep.; 2013; 4, pp. 189-204. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2013.05.043]

98. Villeponteau, B. The heterochromatin loss model of aging. Exp. Gerontol.; 1997; 32, pp. 383-394. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0531-5565(96)00155-6]

99. Tvardovskiy, A.; Schwämmle, V.; Kempf, S.J.; Rogowska-Wrzesinska, A.; Jensen, O.N. Accumulation of histone variant H3.3 with age is associated with profound changes in the histone methylation landscape. Nucleic Acids Res.; 2017; 45, pp. 9272-9289. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx696]

100. Stefanelli, G.; Azam, A.B.; Walters, B.J.; Brimble, M.A.; Gettens, C.P.; Bouchard-Cannon, P.; Cheng, H.-Y.M.; Davidoff, A.M.; Narkaj, K.; Day, J.J. et al. Learning and Age-Related Changes in Genome-wide H2A.Z Binding in the Mouse Hippocampus. Cell Rep.; 2018; 22, pp. 1124-1131. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2018.01.020]

101. Day, K.; Waite, L.L.; Thalacker-Mercer, A.; West, A.; Bamman, M.M.; Brooks, J.D.; Myers, R.M.; Absher, D. Differential DNA methylation with age displays both common and dynamic features across human tissues that are influenced by CpG land-scape. Genome Biol.; 2013; 14, R102. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2013-14-9-r102] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24034465]

102. Huan, T.; Chen, G.; Liu, C.; Bhattacharya, A.; Rong, J.; Chen, B.H.; Seshadri, S.; Tanriverdi, K.; Freedman, J.E.; Larson, M.G. et al. Age-associated microRNA expression in human peripheral blood is associated with all-cause mor-tality and age-related traits. Aging Cell; 2018; 17, e12687. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acel.12687] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29044988]

103. Martins, F.; Sousa, J.; Pereira, C.D.I.; Silva, O.A.B.D.C.E.; Rebelo, S. Nuclear envelope dysfunction and its contribution to the aging process. Aging Cell; 2020; 19, e13143. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acel.13143]

104. Burgess, R.C.; Misteli, T.; Oberdoerffer, P. DNA damage, chromatin, and transcription: The trinity of aging. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.; 2012; 24, pp. 724-730. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2012.07.005]

105. Tsurumi, A.; Li, W.X. Global heterochromatin loss: A unifying theory of aging?. Epigenetics; 2012; 7, pp. 680-688. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4161/epi.20540] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22647267]

106. Lee, J.-H.; Kim, E.W.; Croteau, D.L.; Bohr, V.A. Heterochromatin: An epigenetic point of view in aging. Exp. Mol. Med.; 2020; 52, pp. 1466-1474. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s12276-020-00497-4]

107. De Cecco, M.; Criscione, S.W.; Peterson, A.L.; Neretti, N.; Sedivy, J.M.; Kreiling, J.A. Transposable elements become active and mobile in the genomes of aging mammalian somatic tissues. Aging; 2013; 5, pp. 867-883. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18632/aging.100621]

108. Andrenacci, D.; Cavaliere, V.; Lattanzi, G. The role of transposable elements activity in aging and their possible involvement in laminopathic diseases. Ageing Res. Rev.; 2020; 57, 100995. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2019.100995]

109. Scaffidi, P.; Misteli, T. Lamin A-dependent misregulation of adult stem cells associated with accelerated ageing. Nature; 2008; 10, pp. 452-459. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1708]

110. Greer, E.; Maures, T.J.; Hauswirth, A.G.; Green, E.; Leeman, D.S.; Maro, G.S.; Han, S.; Banko, M.R.; Gozani, O.; Brunet, A. Members of the H3K4 trimethylation complex regulate lifespan in a germline-dependent manner in C. elegans. Nature; 2010; 466, pp. 383-387. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09195]

111. Dang, W.; Steffen, K.K.; Perry, R.; Dorsey, J.A.; Johnson, F.B.; Shilatifard, A.; Kaeberlein, M.; Kennedy, B.K.; Berger, S.L. His-tone H4 lysine 16 acetylation regulates cellular lifespan. Nature; 2009; 459, pp. 802-807. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08085]

112. Pu, M.; Ni, Z.; Wang, M.; Wang, X.; Wood, J.G.; Helfand, S.L.; Yu, H.; Lee, S.S. Trimethylation of Lys36 on H3 restricts gene expression change during aging and impacts life span. Genes Dev.; 2015; 29, pp. 718-731. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.254144.114]

113. Sen, P.; Dang, W.; Donahue, G.; Dai, J.; Dorsey, J.; Cao, X.; Liu, W.; Cao, K.; Perry, R.; Lee, J.Y. et al. H3K36 methylation pro-motes longevity by enhancing transcriptional fidelity. Genes Dev.; 2015; 29, pp. 1362-1376. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.263707.115]

114. Sarg, B.; Koutzamani, E.; Helliger, W.; Rundquist, I.; Lindner, H.H. Postsynthetic Trimethylation of Histone H4 at Lysine 20 in Mammalian Tissues Is Associated with Aging. J. Biol. Chem.; 2002; 277, pp. 39195-39201. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M205166200]

115. Hernández-Ortega, K.; Garcia-Esparcia, P.; Gil, L.; Lucas, J.J.; Ferrer, I. Altered Machinery of Protein Synthesis in Alz-heimer’s: From the Nucleolus to the Ribosome. Brain Pathol.; 2016; 26, pp. 593-605. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bpa.12335] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26512942]

116. Peleg, S.; Sananbenesi, F.; Zovoilis, A.; Burkhardt, S.; Bahari-Javan, S.; Agis-Balboa, R.C.; Cota, P.; Wittnam, J.L.; Gogol-Doering, A.; Opitz, L. et al. Altered his-tone acetylation is associated with age-dependent memory impairment in mice. Science; 2010; 328, pp. 753-756. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1186088] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20448184]

117. Hua, Q.; He, R. Human neuronal tau promoting the melting temperature of DNA. Chin. Sci. Bull.; 2000; 45, pp. 999-1002. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02884979]

118. Sultan, A.; Nesslany, F.; Violet, M.; Bégard, S.; Loyens, A.; Talahari, S.; Mansuroglu, Z.; Marzin, D.; Sergeant, N.; Humez, S. et al. Nuclear Tau, a Key Player in Neuronal DNA Protection. J. Biol. Chem.; 2011; 286, pp. 4566-4575. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.199976] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21131359]

119. Violet, M.; Delattre, L.; Tardivel, M.; Sultan, A.; Chauderlier, A.; Caillierez, R.; Talahari, S.; Nesslany, F.; Lefebvre, B.; Bonnefoy, E. et al. A major role for Tau in neuronal DNA and RNA protection in vivo under physiological and hyperthermic conditions. Front. Cell. Neurosci.; 2014; 8, 84. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2014.00084] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24672431]

120. Rossi, G.; Dalprà, L.; Crosti, F.; Lissoni, S.; Sciacca, F.L.; Catania, M.; Mangieri, M.; Giaccone, G.; Croci, D.; Tagliavini, F. A new function of microtubule-associated protein tau: Involvement in chromosome stability. Cell Cycle; 2008; 7, pp. 1788-1794. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.7.12.6012]

121. Rossi, G.; Conconi, D.; Panzeri, E.; Redaelli, S.; Piccoli, E.; Paoletta, L.; Dalprà, L.; Tagliavini, F. Mutations in MAPT Gene Cause Chromosome Instability and Introduce Copy Number Variations Widely in the Genome. J. Alzheimer’s Dis.; 2013; 33, pp. 969-982. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-2012-121633] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23047372]

122. Rossi, G.; Conconi, D.; Panzeri, E.; Paoletta, L.; Piccoli, E.; Ferretti, M.G.; Mangieri, M.; Ruggerone, M.; Dalprà, L.; Tagliavini, F. Muta-tions in MAPT give rise to aneuploidy in animal models of tauopathy. Neurogenetics; 2014; 15, pp. 31-40. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10048-013-0380-y]

123. Malmanche, N.; Dourlen, P.; Gistelinck, M.; Demiautte, F.; Link, N.; Dupont, C.; Broeck, L.V.; Werkmeister, E.; Amouyel, P.; Bongiovanni, A. et al. Developmental Expression of 4-Repeat-Tau Induces Neuronal Aneuploidy in Drosophila Tauopathy Models. Sci. Rep.; 2017; 7, 40764. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep40764] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28112163]

124. Johnson, G.V.W.; Stoothoff, W.H. Tau phosphorylation in neuronal cell function and dysfunction. J. Cell Sci.; 2004; 117, pp. 5721-5729. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.01558]

125. Goedert, M.; Spillantini, M.; Jakes, R.; Rutherford, D.; Crowther, R. Multiple isoforms of human microtubule-associated protein tau: Sequences and localization in neurofibrillary tangles of Alzheimer’s disease. Neuron; 1989; 3, pp. 519-526. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0896-6273(89)90210-9]

126. Zheng-Fischhöfer, Q.; Biernat, J.; Mandelkow, E.M.; Illenberger, S.; Godemann, R.; Mandelkow, E. Sequential phosphoryla-tion of Tau by glycogen synthase kinase-3beta and protein kinase A at Thr212 and Ser214 generates the Alzheimer-specific epitope of antibody AT100 and requires a paired-helical-filament-like conformation. Eur. J. Biochem.; 1998; 252, pp. 542-552. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1432-1327.1998.2520542.x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9546672]

127. Goedert, M.; Jakes, R.; Vanmechelen, E. Monoclonal antibody AT8 recognises tau protein phosphorylated at both serine 202 and threonine 205. Neurosci. Lett.; 1995; 189, pp. 167-170. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3940(95)11484-E]

128. Shogren-Knaak, M.; Ishii, H.; Sun, J.M.; Pazin, M.J.; Davie, J.R.; Peterson, C.L. Histone H4-K16 acetylation controls chroma-tin structure and protein interactions. Science; 2006; 311, pp. 844-847. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1124000] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16469925]

129. Feser, J.; Truong, D.; Das, C.; Carson, J.J.; Kieft, J.; Harkness, T.; Tyler, J.K. Elevated Histone Expression Promotes Life Span Extension. Mol. Cell; 2010; 39, pp. 724-735. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.08.015]

130. Ivanov, S.M.; Atanasova, M.; Dimitrov, I.; Doytchinova, I.A. Cellular polyamines condense hyperphosphorylated Tau, triggering Alzheimer’s disease. Sci. Rep.; 2020; 10, 10098. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67119-x]

131. Okamoto, K.; Amari, M.; Fukuda, T.; Suzuki, K.; Takatama, M. Comparison of AT8 immunoreactivity in the locus ceruleus and hippocampus of 154 brains from routine autopsies. Neuropathology; 2017; 37, pp. 306-310. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/neup.12367] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28168741]

132. Kanaan, N.M.; Hamel, C.; Grabinski, T.; Combs, B. Liquid-liquid phase separation induces pathogenic tau conformations in vitro. Nat. Commun.; 2020; 11, 2809. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16580-3] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32499559]

133. Jeganathan, S.; Hascher, A.; Chinnathambi, S.; Biernat, J.; Mandelkow, E.M.; Mandelkow, E. Proline-directed pseu-do-phosphorylation at AT8 and PHF1 epitopes induces a compaction of the paperclip folding of Tau and generates a patho-logical (MC-1) conformation. J. Biol. Chem.; 2008; 283, pp. 32066-32076. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M805300200] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18725412]

134. D’Aquila, P.; Montesanto, A.; Mandalà, M.; Garasto, S.; Mari, V.; Corsonello, A.; Bellizzi, D.; Passarino, G. Methylation of the ribosomal RNA gene promoter is associated with aging and age-related decline. Aging Cell; 2017; 16, pp. 966-975. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acel.12603] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28625020]

135. Gil, L.; Niño, S.A.; Capdeville, G.; Jiménez-Capdeville, M.E. Aging and Alzheimer’s disease connection: Nuclear Tau and lamin A. Neurosci. Lett.; 2021; 749, 135741. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2021.135741]

136. Suberbielle, E.; Sanchez, P.E.; Kravitz, A.V.; Wang, X.; Ho, K.; Eilertson, K.; Devidze, N.; Kreitzer, A.C.; Mucke, L. Physio-logic brain activity causes DNA double-strand breaks in neurons, with exacerbation by amyloid-β. Nat. Neurosci.; 2013; 16, pp. 613-621. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn.3356]

137. Iyama, T.; Wilson, D.M. DNA repair mechanisms in dividing and non-dividing cells. DNA Repair; 2013; 12, pp. 620-636. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2013.04.015]

138. Szendrei, G.I.; Lee, V.M.-Y.; Otvos, L. Recognition of the minimal epitope of monoclonal antibody Tau-1 depends upon the presence of a phosphate group but not its location. J. Neurosci. Res.; 1993; 34, pp. 243-249. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jnr.490340212]

139. Greenwood, J.A.; Johnson, G.V. Localization and in Situ Phosphorylation State of Nuclear Tau. Exp. Cell Res.; 1995; 220, pp. 332-337. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1006/excr.1995.1323]

140. Blalock, E.M.; Chen, K.C.; Sharrow, K.; Herman, J.P.; Porter, N.M.; Foster, T.C.; Landfield, P.W. Gene microarrays in hippo-campal aging: Statistical profiling identifies novel processes correlated with cognitive impairment. J. Neurosci.; 2003; 23, pp. 3807-3819. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-09-03807.2003]

141. Lashley, T.; Schott, J.; Weston, P.; Murray, C.E.; Wellington, H.; Keshavan, A.; Foti, S.C.; Foiani, M.; Toombs, J.; Rohrer, J. et al. Molecular biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease: Progress and prospects. Dis. Model. Mech.; 2018; 11, dmm031781. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dmm.031781]

142. Nativio, R.; Donahue, G.; Berson, A.; Lan, Y.; Amlie-Wolf, A.; Tuzer, F.; Toledo, J.B.; Gosai, S.J.; Gregory, B.D.; Torres, C. et al. Dysregulation of the epigenetic landscape of normal aging in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Neurosci.; 2018; 21, pp. 497-505. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41593-018-0101-9]

143. Klein, H.-U.; McCabe, C.; Gjoneska, E.; Sullivan, S.E.; Kaskow, B.J.; Tang, A.; Smith, R.V.; Xu, J.; Pfenning, A.R.; Bernstein, B.E. et al. Epigenome-wide study uncovers large-scale changes in histone acetylation driven by tau pathology in aging and Alzheimer’s human brains. Nat. Neurosci.; 2018; 22, pp. 37-46. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41593-018-0291-1]

144. Frost, B.; Hemberg, M.; Lewis, J.; Feany, M.B. Tau promotes neurodegeneration through global chromatin relaxation. Nat. Neurosci.; 2014; 17, pp. 357-366. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn.3639] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24464041]

145. Jakovcevski, M.; Akbarian, S. Epigenetic mechanisms in neurological disease. Nat. Med.; 2012; 18, pp. 1194-1204. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nm.2828] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22869198]

146. Lee, J.; Hwang, Y.J.; Shin, J.-Y.; Lee, W.-C.; Wie, J.; Kim, K.Y.; Lee, M.Y.; Hwang, D.; Ratan, R.R.; Pae, A.N. et al. Epigenetic regulation of cholinergic receptor M1 (CHRM1) by histone H3K9me3 impairs Ca(2+) signaling in Huntington’s disease. Acta Neuropathol.; 2013; 125, pp. 727-739. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00401-013-1103-z] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23455440]

147. Maze, I.; Feng, J.; Wilkinson, M.B.; Sun, H.; Shen, L.; Nestler, E.J. Cocaine dynamically regulates heterochromatin and repet-itive element unsilencing in nucleus accumbens. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2011; 108, pp. 3035-3040. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1015483108] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21300862]

148. Ferrer, I. Defining Alzheimer as a common age-related neurodegenerative process not inevitably leading to dementia. Prog. Neurobiol.; 2012; 97, pp. 38-51. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2012.03.005] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22459297]

149. Ryu, H.; Barrup, M.; Kowall, N.; McKee, A. P3-260: Epigenetic modification in a monozygotic twin with Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Dement.; 2008; 4, T598. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2008.05.1828]

150. Lee, M.Y.; Lee, J.; Hyeon, S.J.; Cho, H.; Hwang, Y.J.; Shin, J.-Y.; McKee, A.C.; Kowall, N.W.; Kim, J.-I.; Stein, T.D. et al. Epigenome signatures landscaped by histone H3K9me3 are associated with the synaptic dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease. Aging Cell; 2020; 19, e13153. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acel.13153]

151. Schotta, G.; Lachner, M.; Sarma, K.; Ebert, A.; Sengupta, R.; Reuter, G.; Reinberg, D.; Jenuwein, T. A silencing pathway to induce H3-K9 and H4-K20 trimethylation at constitutive heterochromatin. Genes Dev.; 2004; 18, pp. 1251-1262. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.300704]

152. Braak, H.; Braak, E. Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes. Acta Neuropathol.; 1991; 82, pp. 239-259. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00308809] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1759558]

153. Fischer, A.; Sananbenesi, F.; Mungenast, A.; Tsai, L.-H. Targeting the correct HDAC(s) to treat cognitive disorders. Trends Pharmacol. Sci.; 2010; 31, pp. 605-617. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2010.09.003]

154. Stilling, R.M.; Fischer, A. The role of histone acetylation in age-associated memory impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem.; 2011; 96, pp. 19-26. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2011.04.002]

155. Gräff, J.; Rei, D.; Guan, J.-S.; Wang, W.-Y.; Seo, J.; Hennig, K.M.; Nieland, T.J.F.; Fass, D.M.; Kao, P.F.; Kahn, M. et al. An epigenetic blockade of cognitive functions in the neurodegenerating brain. Nature; 2012; 483, pp. 222-226. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature10849]

156. Mastroeni, D.; Chouliaras, L.; Grover, A.; Liang, W.S.; Hauns, K.; Rogers, J.; Coleman, P.D. Reduced RAN Expression and Disrupted Transport between Cytoplasm and Nucleus; A Key Event in Alzheimer’s Disease Pathophysiology. PLoS ONE; 2013; 8, e53349. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053349]

157. Howe, F.S.; Fischl, H.; Murray, S.C.; Mellor, J. Is H3K4me3 instructive for transcription activation?. BioEssays; 2016; 39, e201600095-12. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bies.201600095] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28004446]

158. Bakulski, K.M.; Dolinoy, D.C.; Sartor, M.A.; Paulson, H.L.; Konen, J.R.; Lieberman, A.P.; Albin, R.L.; Hu, H.; Rozek, L.S. Ge-nome-wide DNA methylation differences between late-onset Alzheimer’s disease and cognitively normal controls in human frontal cortex. J. Alzheimers Dis.; 2012; 29, pp. 571-588. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-2012-111223]

159. Blalock, E.M.; Geddes, J.W.; Chen, K.C.; Porter, N.M.; Markesbery, W.R.; Landfield, P.W. Incipient Alzheimer’s disease: Mi-croarray correlation analyses reveal major transcriptional and tumor suppressor responses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2004; 101, pp. 2173-2178. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0308512100] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14769913]

160. Yilmazer-Hanke, D.M. Pathogenesis of Alzheimer-related neuritic plaques: AT8 immunoreactive dystrophic neurites pre-cede argyrophilic neurites in plaques of the entorhinal region, hippocampal formation, and amygdala. Clin. Neuropathol.; 1998; 17, pp. 194-198. [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9707333]

161. Regalado-Reyes, M.; Furcila, D.; Hernández, F.; Ávila, J.; DeFelipe, J.; León-Espinosa, G. Phospho-Tau Changes in the Human CA1 During Alzheimer’s Disease Progression. J. Alzheimers. Dis.; 2019; 69, pp. 277-288. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3233/JAD-181263] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30958368]

162. Narayan, P.J.; Lill, C.; Faull, R.; Curtis, M.A.; Dragunow, M. Increased acetyl and total histone levels in post-mortem Alzheimer’s disease brain. Neurobiol. Dis.; 2015; 74, pp. 281-294. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2014.11.023] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25484284]

163. Gjoneska, E.; Pfenning, A.R.; Mathys, H.; Quon, G.; Kundaje, A.; Tsai, L.-H.; Kellis, M. Conserved epigenomic signals in mice and humans reveal immune basis of Alzheimer’s disease. Nature; 2015; 518, pp. 365-369. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature14252] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25693568]

164. Marzi, S.J.; Leung, S.K.; Ribarska, T.; Hannon, E.; Smith, A.R.; Pishva, E.; Poschmann, J.; Moore, K.; Troakes, C.; Al-Sarraj, S. et al. A histone acetylome-wide association study of Alzheimer’s disease identifies disease-associated H3K27ac differences in the entorhinal cortex. Nat. Neurosci.; 2018; 21, pp. 1618-1627. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41593-018-0253-7]

165. Annese, A.; Manzari, C.; Lionetti, C.; Picardi, E.; Horner, D.S.; Chiara, M.; Caratozzolo, M.F.; Tullo, A.; Fosso, B.; Pesole, G. et al. Whole transcriptome profiling of Late-Onset Alzheimer’s Disease patients provides insights into the molecular changes involved in the disease. Sci. Rep.; 2018; 8, 4282. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22701-2] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29523845]

166. Guo, C.; Jeong, H.H.; Hsieh, Y.C.; Klein, H.U.; Bennett, D.A.; De Jager, P.L.; Liu, Z.; Shulman, J.M. Tau Activates Transposa-ble Elements in Alzheimer’s Disease. Cell Rep.; 2018; 23, pp. 2874-2880. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2018.05.004] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29874575]

167. Polesskaya, O.; Kananykhina, E.; Roy-Engel, A.M.; Nazarenko, O.; Kulemzina, I.; Baranova, A.; Vassetsky, Y.; Myakishev-Rempel, M. The role of Alu-derived RNAs in Alzheimer’s and other neurodegenerative conditions. Med. Hypotheses; 2018; 115, pp. 29-34. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2018.03.008]

168. Rollins, R.A.; Haghighi, F.; Edwards, J.R.; Das, R.; Zhang, M.Q.; Ju, J.; Bestor, T.H. Large-scale structure of genomic methyla-tion patterns. Genome Res.; 2006; 16, pp. 157-163. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.4362006] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16365381]

169. Mitsumori, R.; Sakaguchi, K.; Shigemizu, D.; Mori, T.; Akiyama, S.; Ozaki, K.; Niida, S.; Shimoda, N. Lower DNA methylation levels in CpG island shores of CR1, CLU, and PICALM in the blood of Japanese Alzheimer’s disease patients. PLoS ONE; 2020; 15, e0239196. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239196]

170. Tang, S.-J. Chromatin Organization by Repetitive Elements (CORE): A Genomic Principle for the Higher-Order Structure of Chromosomes. Genes; 2011; 2, pp. 502-515. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes2030502] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24710208]

171. Beckmann, A.; Ramirez, P.; Gamez, M.; Ray, W.J.; Frost, B. Pathogenic tau disrupts the cellular program that maintains neu-ronal identity. BioRxiv; 2021; [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.05.434166]

172. Busser, J.; Geldmacher, D.S.; Herrup, K. Ectopic Cell Cycle Proteins Predict the Sites of Neuronal Cell Death in Alzheimer’s Disease Brain. J. Neurosci.; 1998; 18, pp. 2801-2807. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-08-02801.1998]

173. Yang, Y.; Mufson, E.J.; Herrup, K. Neuronal Cell Death Is Preceded by Cell Cycle Events at All Stages of Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Neurosci.; 2003; 23, pp. 2557-2563. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-07-02557.2003]

174. Liu, D.X.; Greene, L.A. Neuronal apoptosis at the G1/S cell cycle checkpoint. Cell Tissue Res.; 2001; 305, pp. 217-228. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004410100396] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11545259]

175. Combs, B.; Mueller, R.L.; Morfini, G.; Brady, S.T.; Kanaan, N.M. Tau and Axonal Transport Misregulation in Tauopathies. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.; 2019; 1184, pp. 81-95. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9358-8_7] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32096030]

176. Mertens, J.; Herdy, J.R.; Traxler, L.; Schafer, S.T.; Schlachetzki, J.C.; Böhnke, L.; Reid, D.A.; Lee, H.; Zangwill, D.; Fernandes, D.P. et al. Age-dependent instability of mature neuronal fate in induced neurons from Alzheimer’s patients. Cell Stem Cell; 2021; 28, pp. 1533-1548.e6. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2021.04.004]

177. Arendt, T.; Holzer, M.; Stöbe, A.; Gärtner, U.; Lüth, H.J.; Brückner, M.K.; Ueberham, U. Activated mitogenic signaling in-duces a process of dedifferentiation in Alzheimer’s disease that eventually results in cell death. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.; 2000; 920, pp. 249-255. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06931.x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11193159]

178. Chong, F.P.; Ng, K.Y.; Koh, R.Y.; Chye, S.M. Tau Proteins and Tauopathies in Alzheimer’s Disease. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol.; 2018; 38, pp. 965-980. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10571-017-0574-1]

179. Ma, R.H.; Zhang, Y.; Hong, X.Y.; Zhang, J.F.; Wang, J.Z.; Liu, G.P. Role of microtubule-associated protein tau phosphorylation in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Huazhong Univ. Sci. Technol. Med. Sci.; 2017; 37, pp. 307-312. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11596-017-1732-x]

180. Pradeepkiran, J.A.; Reddy, P.H. Structure Based Design and Molecular Docking Studies for Phosphorylated Tau Inhibitors in Alzheimer’s Disease. Cells; 2019; 8, 260. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells8030260]

181. Pradeepkiran, J.A.; Munikumar, M.; Reddy, A.P.; Reddy, P.H. Protective effects of a small molecule inhibitor ligand against hyperphosphorylated tau-induced mitochondrial and synaptic toxicities in Alzheimer disease. Hum. Mol. Genet.; 2021; ddab244. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddab244] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34432046]

182. Pradeepkiran, J.A.; Reddy, P.H. Phosphorylated tau targeted small-molecule PROTACs for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease and tauopathies. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Mol. Basis Dis.; 2021; 1867, 166162. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2021.166162] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33940164]