1. Introduction
Global beauty has become a huge industry that affects the daily lives of almost everyone. As the global beauty business permeates our lives and international markets, demand for trendy goods with innovative and diverse characteristics became prevalent [1]. However, the beauty industry has been on a rapid growth trajectory for years. There are some submarkets that are exceptions, such as the mass beauty markets, but overall the business of beauty continues to defy gravity [2]. Additionally, there is unique consumer behavior in the industry. Consumers, mostly women, are constantly exploring new products, styles, and brands. This is part of a significant generational shift of younger consumers, rejecting large brands that their parents preferred and seeking out locally-made, artisanal, and natural products in all consumer categories [3]. The need to be Instagrammable at all times is also very important to them [4]. The global beauty industry (comprising skincare, color cosmetics, hair care, fragrance, and personal care) has also experienced major disruptions due to the recent COVID-19 pandemic [5].
The beauty industry, which supplies products and services used for appearance management, is rapidly changing as it is further subdivided by customer demand and technological innovations. The key drivers for the changing trends of this industry are digitalization, customization, sustainability, and premiumization. The spread of digital and personalized trends calls for different strategies for marketing and distribution than in the past. The growth of online channels and professional beauty shops has further accelerated the change [6].
Recently, the Korean beauty service industry (K-beauty) is enjoying worldwide attention along with the global Korean Wave [7]. Additionally, significant politically driven efforts have launched Brand K as a national-level Korean brand [8]. Global interest in K-beauty is expected to grow further as “Black Pink” topped the Billboard “Artist 100” chart, which shows the influence of pop stars in 2020, followed by “BTS.” The K-pop fever is not cooling down but actually accelerating. The Korean beauty service industry is emerging as a future growth industry that can create high value-added. It has expanded its scope from hair-care service to skincare, nail care, make-up, and much more. K-beauty is in the beginning stage of promoting its presence worldwide, and it started to create huge synergies by converging cosmetics, tourism, and medical industries [7]. Previous studies explored development strategies for the beauty service industry [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16], and researched market segmentation and brand equity for the industry [17,18].
The driving force behind the success of K-beauty has been its innovation capabilities. To survive and thrive in the highly competitive global beauty market, the beauty industry needs to develop successful innovation strategies. The literature indicates that although there have been comprehensive theoretical studies about the beauty industry, very limited research has been carried out on practical and rational approaches to strategic planning in this area based on SWOT analysis. More specifically, there is a paucity of empirical research on strategies for growth and development in the beauty service industry.
What are the practical sustainable strategies of beauty service companies? To answer this question, the purpose of this study is set to provide the context for developing growth strategies in the beauty service industry that is not only academically rational but also practical at an operational level. In this study, we focus on the Korean beauty service industry development strategy by developing eight SWOT matrices based on the strategy literature and interviews of experts in the industry. The eight SWOT matrices will be integrated to develop comprehensive growth strategies for the Korean beauty service industry. To assess the importance of different strategy factors, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is applied to professional experts’ opinions on those factors. The outcome of the analysis process will be a set of strategic alternatives for the growth of the Korean beauty service industry. The results of the study will shed important insights on the researchers and practitioners of the beauty service industry. Especially, the results would help individual beauty service companies understand common strategic directions required in the industry and establish adapted strategies that suit their specific situations.
This paper is organized as follows. Section 2 presents a comprehensive review of the literature to provide theoretical support to the study. In Section 3 we discuss the methods used to apply SWOT and collect the research data from professional experts in the beauty service industry. Section 4 summarizes the analysis results and proposes strategic alternatives. Finally, Section 5 describes the study’s academic implications and limitations.
2. Beauty Industry and Previous Studies
2.1. Global Beauty Industry and K-Beauty
The global beauty industry generates millions of jobs and 500 billion USD of annual retail sales in the four major product categories (fragrances, color cosmetics, skincare products, and personal care), which were increased by about twice from 2005 to 2019 [5]. The annual U.S. sales of cosmetics, skincare, and hair care products are about 62 billion USD [19]. Especially, those of prestige skincare reached 5.9 billion USD as skincare Google searches increased by 16% in 2019 [20]. The average annual per capita consumptions of beauty products are different over countries. For example, they are 249, 149, 37, and 9 USD in the U.S., Brazil, China, and India, respectively, and the consumption in the emerging economies is expected to be increased significantly [6].
In the 2010s, the beauty industry underwent a rapid change, and there was a diverse character of the business globally [1]. Even before COVID-19 had spread, the meaning of beauty was changing to be more global and connected to a sense of well-being [5]. The global beauty industry was one of those hit by the COVID-19 crisis. While the beauty industry had to do its best to survive, it has responded proactively to the crises. Some brands switched their manufacturing lines to produce cleaning agents and sanitizers and offered free beauty products or services for first response workers [5]. Working from home is driving paradigm shifts in the demand for beauty products and services in that women are putting on less make-up as they telecommuted. Skincare, however, is still important to women as the interest moves to facial skincare for video conferencing, where they believe they can stand out if they have clean facial skin [21]. The beauty industry is fashion-driven and very sensitive to changing customer tastes and trends, so it is indispensable to make constant efforts to respond to various changes even after the pandemic.
The Asia-Pacific market accounts for the largest portion, with 31 percent of the global market [5]. Figure 1 displays the market status of the global beauty industry in 2015, in which the Asia-Pacific market was 10% larger than each market of Western Europe and North America. The Asia-Pacific market is home to Korea and Japan, which can be said to be the beauty industry powers, and is also an area where potential consumer groups such as China, India, and Southeast Asia are concentrated. The Asia-Pacific market is expected to reach about 167 billion USD by 2020 [6].
Because Korea’s beauty industry is rapidly reading these changes and responding to them with agility, it was chosen as the subject for this study. Korea’s beauty service industry was first institutionalized in 1961 with the enactment of the Act on Hairdressers, which followed the first Hairstylist License Examination held in 1949. Since then, the industry has continuously developed in alignment with commercial site requirements. Specifically, the practical qualifications required for performing duties at commercial sites were institutionalized according to the National Competency Standards (NCS).
Due to the consistent progress of aspects of service, the beauty service industry has become a greater part of modern life for people who pursue both beauty and individuality. It has also developed into an attractive industry with consistent purchases [23]. Figure 1 displays the sales of the beauty service industry in 2017 with 6.6025 trillion won where 5.2366 trillion won, 79.31% of the industry total, is hairstyling. This indicates a growth of 57.75% when compared to sales in 2007, which was 4.1853 trillion won. In addition, Table 1 shows constant growth with continuous increases in the number of enterprises and workers related to the beauty service industry.
2.2. Previous Studies on the Beauty Service
Ramli [24] mentioned that a hairdresser is not able to satisfy consumers if there is a lack of functional quality such as communication, consumer relationship management, or complaint handling despite possession of high technical qualities. Thus, it was stated that strategic planning was very important in terms of client services. Additionally, Sharma and Black [25] asserted that the business strategy of beauty salons begins with consumers as interaction is crucial for beauty services. The high turnover rate in beauty service has been a big blow because the service is highly labor-intensive. Gold [26] argued that human resources in the beauty service industry were directly connected to service quality as they provided services at touch points with consumers. Kim [27] pointed out that employees in skincare salons lower turnover intention and feel more satisfied with their jobs, especially when the salons look for ways to reduce the manager’s negative leadership and implement fair regulation and promotion. Kim and Lee [28] found a significant relationship between employee job satisfaction with the employee’s customer orientation and the impact of the relationship on the long-term business performance of beauty shops in South Korea. In addition, Park et al. [29] suggested that active and systematic managerial support for junior workers is needed to achieve sustainability in the beauty service industry. Therefore, establishing effective organization management systems and planning distinctive strategies would secure competitive advantages.
Witz et al. [30] claimed that there is an increase in the number of women entering public affairs and the number of men interested in beauty. As social values change, the beauty service industry has rapidly enhanced, fragmented, and specialized. On the other hand, Kumar et al. [31] argued that the domestic beauty industry had limited global competitiveness due to low international awareness, a lack of brand globalization, a small industry structure, and an absence of an overseas support system. Additionally, there is a lack of support from policy-makers for fostering competitive improvement in the beauty industry due to an unrealistic and irrational legal system. Pettinger [32] suggested that the beauty industry should make efforts to provide high-quality service and academia should research improvements in quality with conferences, exhibitions, and competitions. In addition, the research stated that the government needed to adjust standards of hygiene-related laws to clarify the scope of qualifications and better align with the unique characteristics of each field.
Rosenthal [33] concluded that the government should remove legal obstacles with policy. It also recommended the government should support the beauty industry’s corporate environment and assume a core role in drawing development measures for economic growth. Scanlon [34] mentioned business threatening factors such as increases in the minimum wage and the urgent task of leading efficiency management of the beauty industry. It also remarked that satisfying the consumers’ desire to change with key service factors would be the path that increases consumer loyalty. Lindsay [35] mentioned the enhancement of industrial systems and the promotion of globalization as support system improvements for increased beauty industry competitiveness. In short, it was stated that the system in which the industry operates should be reformed to resolve factors that hinder the revision and improvement of beauty-related laws.
Kumar [3] claimed that applying a platform in the beauty industry had the possibility of positively changing the overall business ecosystem. It also stated that the study of an efficient platform’s effect was necessary since there was a lack of existing research on platform application in the beauty industry. An [36] affirmed that Korea, as a country with advanced information technology, showed youthful, fast, new, warm, and beautiful images, so these could be integrated into beauty service to form the image of K-beauty. In addition, the results of previous SWOT analysis studies for the establishment of a Korean beauty service industry development strategy were summarized presented. A representative study by Won et al. [16] asserted the importance of a mid- to long-term plan to advance the beauty industry with a national research institute.
3. Research Design and Methodology
3.1. Concept for Applying AHP in SWOT Analysis
AHP is a decision-making method that mirrors the insight and experiences of respondents through comparisons of factors that form hierarchical decision-making structures. It uses an eigenvalue method from a pairwise matrix to estimate a priority vector per hierarchy. A major advantage of AHP is the flexibility by making qualitative and quantitative attributes commensurable. Objective information, subjective perceptions, and expert insight can be consolidated in the analysis. To make decisions, the AHP analysis proceeds through a 4-step process: (1) development of a hierarchical model with factors, (2) pairwise comparison among factors, (3) calculation of relative weighted values of factors, and (4) factor evaluation by integrating the values. In the first step, a matrix is established with pairwise compared sub-hierarchy factors related to the ultimate goal and with the use of nine scales. If the number of components in the hierarchy is , the number of pairs occurring in the pairwise comparison is . If importance is defined as by pairwise comparison of factors composed in one hierarchy, and in the pairwise comparison matrix are calculated as . For greater detail on AHP analysis, see Saaty [37,38].
Essentially, the results of an AHP analyze the overall priorities of decision alternatives. AHP utilization within a SWOT analysis helps evaluate SWOT factors and their commensurate intensities. An additional value from SWOT analysis can be achieved by performing pairwise comparisons between SWOT factors to analyze them with the eigenvalue technique as applied in AHP. This offers a thorough basis to examine present situations and new strategic alternatives in a more comprehensive manner. After implementing the comparisons, new quantitative information about the decision-making environment can be retrieved.
3.2. Pairwise Comparison and Consistency Ratio
The survey consists of a total of 5 matrices with 30 pairwise comparison questions to include complexity, especially Stage 3 with four 4 × 4 matrices. Each factor has 4 components with 6 vector values of comparison pairs which consist of five 4 × 4 matrices. The following Equation (1) shows the example matrix of and in a pairwise comparison matrix from the second and third stages.
The weights for importance analysis were calculated by dividing the L (Local)-weight, which represents the component of the independent node in the SWOT analysis, by the G (Global)-weight, which represents the component’s importance by reflecting the weight of the upper layer in entire layering model.
(1)
The AHP’s definition of consistency is the logic of the respondents, which is measured by reliability. For example, if the evaluating factor has 3 factor versions of , and the respondent evaluates them as and then the response to this assessment shows logical inconsistency. So, the response of is kept only with consistent logic. Saaty [37,38] proposes that the consistency ratio should be 0.1 or less to be logically reliable.
3.3. SWOT Matrix Composition
SWOT analysis, the basic frame of this research, has a perspective of the external environment based on the five forces model by Porter [39,40]. From a perspective of the internal environment, it is based on the resource-based theory by Prahalad and Hamel [41] and Barney [42], and the theory of competitive advantage by Porter [43]. The external environment is divided by an analytical perspective into a general macro environment and an industrial structural microenvironment. The internal environment is approached from the perspective of management resources. Figure 2 displays the environmental analysis model applied to this study.
The SWOT matrix of this research is based on the SWOT Matrix of Policy Report by Won et al. [16]. In addition, the SWOT matrix is formed through individual in-depth interviews with seven experts. Table 2 shows a list of expert interview candidates. The summary of previous studies of Won et al. [16] and eight SWOT analysis results followed by individual in-depth interviews is presented in Table A1, Table A2, Table A3, Table A4, Table A5, Table A6, Table A7 and Table A8 (Appendix A). The SWOT analysis procedure consisted of (1) identifying opportunities and threats in the external environment, (2) identifying strengths and weaknesses in the internal environment, and (3) creating a SWOT matrix by classifying the factors of opportunities, threats, strengths, and weaknesses in the external and internal environments. The SWOT matrix for analysis of the Korean beauty service industry was created by extracting SWOT factors for each SWOT group from previous studies and expert in-depth interviews, and factors are summarized in Table A1, Table A2, Table A3, Table A4, Table A5, Table A6, Table A7 and Table A8 (Appendix A). As aggregated, integrated, and classified from Table A1, Table A2, Table A3, Table A4, Table A5, Table A6, Table A7 and Table A8 (Appendix A), the SWOT factors are summarized in Table A9 (Appendix B). In that table, the SWOT factors that had appeared three or more times were classified and determined the final factors in this study. The final factors are applied to three rounds of expert discussions, adjustment processes, and a derived SWOT matrix that is shown in Table 3.
3.4. AHP Hierarchy Model
For AHP analysis, a three-stage hierarchy SWOT-AHP model was composed and is detailed in Figure 3. The first stage is the ultimate goal of establishing development strategies for the Korean beauty service industry. The second stage is composed of the four factors of the SWOT matrix: strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. The third stage is composed of 16 components, which are four components per SWOT factor.
3.5. Data Collection
The survey was distributed with a total of 40 copies targeted to experts in the beauty service field. Most respondents were top experts with more than 20 years of experience (see Table 4). The AHP survey has characteristics that made it difficult for even experts to maintain logical consistency. Therefore, to overcome these difficulties, all 40 surveys were accepted with face-to-face field visits.
4. AHP Analysis and Development Strategy
4.1. Results of Verified Consistency Ratio
The questionnaire-based survey, which consisted of 30 pairwise comparison questions, was conducted for the SWOT-AHP analysis. To maintain the consistency of survey results, we distributed 40 questionnaires to experts from 2 September to 29 November of 2019. Most of the survey respondents had more than 20 years of experience in the beauty service industry.
If we a apply consistency ratio under 0.1, 40 responses from the collected questionnaires were treated as logically consistent. Therefore, 31 copies were used to analyze the result. Table A10 (Appendix C) shows the consistency ratio status results of the questionnaires. The consistency test results are summarized in Table 5.
4.2. Results of Importance and Priority
After the relative importance of the SWOT factors was evaluated, experts in the Korean beauty service industry evaluated the importance of strength and weakness factors in the internal environment as 0.343 and 0.265, respectively. The importance of opportunity and threat factors in the external environment are attributed as 0.219 and 0.173, respectively. Both are shown in Table 6. In short, we can acknowledge that Korean beauty service industry experts evaluated the importance of SWOT factors in the following order: First, to strengthen and use internal strengths; Second, to complement or reduce internal environmental weaknesses; Third, to take advantage of external environmental opportunities; Fourth, to mitigate or eliminate threats.
In the priority analyses result for the relative importance (G-weights) of SWOT components, the (management and training system that educates professionals) component of the strength factor had the highest importance at 0.138, and the (poor working conditions, emotional labor, and the high turnover rate for employees) component of the weakness factor had the second-highest importance at 0.132. The (a lack of an effective legal system for the growth of the beauty industry) component of the threat factor had the third-highest importance at 0.078, while the (the lack of profitability as a service business model) component of the weakness factor and the (improving industrial value and status as a professional service industry) component of the opportunity factor simultaneously had the fourth-highest importance at 0.077. Finally, the (excellent technical skills in the beauty service industry) component of the strength factor had the sixth-highest importance. To summarize, there were two components in the weakness factor, two components in the strength factor, one component in the opportunity factor, and one component in the threat factor among the top six components with a significance level greater than 0.07. In the results of the analyses of the L-weights for the SWOT components, , , and were the most important components in each SWOT factor at 40%, 50%, 35%, and 45%, respectively. Table 6 and Figure 4 summarize the L-weights (component priority within a factor), G-weights (overall factor priority), and ranking of each SWOT component.
Figure 5 shows the graph of the importance (L-weight) of each converted component based on the weight of a SWOT factor. The strengths and opportunities with positive (+) factors are located in the upper area and the weakness and threats with negative (-) factors are located in the lower area of the graph.
The length of the straight line within the quadrant refers to the importance of a SWOT attribute, indicating the portion that the attribute possesses of the total. The end point of a straight line locates the position of the factor with the highest L-weight. The remainder of the factors indicated on the graph were converted to L’-weights according to Equation (2) [44]. Table 7 displays the L’-weights.
(2)
: Location on graph of components (converted L-weight)
: The importance of SWOT factors
: L-weight of the most important component within the SWOT factor
: Component L-weight in nth rank within SWOT factor
4.3. Development Strategies of Korea’s Beauty Service Industry by SWOT-AHP Results
The results of the L-weights and G-weights for each component, as listed in Table 6, suggest that it is necessary to complement weaknesses such as and , strengthen strengths such as and , utilize opportunistic factors such as and reduce threat factors such as . Based on the results of the SWOT-AHP analysis, we could construct sustainable strategies for the development of the beauty service industry in Korea by using the SO strategy to utilize strengths and opportunities, the ST strategy to use strengths and overcome threats, the WO strategy to complement weaknesses and utilize opportunities, and the WT strategy to complement weaknesses and overcome threats, as shown in Table 8.
4.3.1. SO (Strength–Opportunity) Strategy
Among the strengths and opportunities, and show higher G-weights, respectively. Therefore, the competitive advantage of superior service quality should be drawn from the strength in training and business systems that foster excellent professionals and outstanding technical skills in the beauty service industry. To accomplish this, the external environment should facilitate improving industrial value and enhance the status of the professional beauty service industry. In addition, it is necessary to ensure a consistent inflow of excellent human resources into the beauty service industry. High value-added service products based on technology should also be developed to increase consumer satisfaction.
4.3.2. ST (Strength–Threat) Strategy
Among the strengths and threats, and show higher G-weights, respectively. Consumer satisfaction and industrial competitiveness should therefore be increased by facilitating strength in training and business systems that foster excellent professionals and outstanding technical skills in the beauty service industry. In addition, the lack of an effective legal system for beauty industry growth, evaluated as an important threat by the experts, should be resolved at an early stage. To resolve this matter, an analysis of both actuality and problems from an institutional beauty service industry perspective should proceed and the outcomes of prescribed legislation should be extensively collected. In addition, a consulting group for the beauty service industry should be formed to systematically propose policies for improvement.
4.3.3. WO (Weakness–Opportunity) Strategy
Among the weaknesses and opportunities, and show higher G-weights, respectively. The experts analyzed the weakness factors as a poor working environment for employees and a high turnover rate due to emotional labor. In addition, they mentioned that the vulnerable profit model should be reformed to a service business model. The weakness factors evaluated as important should be complemented by priority. These factors are considered the most basic and important with a direct connection to the sustainable growth of the beauty service industry. Therefore, the opportunity factor for the period during which the beauty service industry’s industrial value and status are enhanced toward the specialized service industry should be well facilitated. In addition, the weakness of the beauty service industry should be resolved and the groundwork for growth should be developed.
4.3.4. WT (Weakness–Threat) Strategy
Among weaknesses and threats, and show higher G-weights, respectively. WT strategy is the most important strategic measure composed of components with relatively high G-weights. It is, therefore, necessary to improve the working environment of beauty service industry employees to offset the intensity of emotional labor. If these are resolved first, the weakness of high turnover rates will also gradually improve. In addition, experts are critically evaluating the necessity of complementation in areas with poor profit structures for business models in the beauty service industry. Although the structural difficulty is expected with attempts at short-term resolution, it will be rational if improvement measures are sought relative to a resolution of the threat factor: the lack of an effective legal system. To accomplish this, an analysis of both actuality and problems from an institutional beauty service industry perspective should proceed and the outcomes of prescribed legislation should be extensively collected. At the same time, a consulting group for the beauty service industry should be formed to discuss revisions and enactments of current and new law, and produce consistent political proposals for systematic improvement.
5. Conclusions
In summary, 6 of 16 SWOT factors were evaluated as relatively important. Facilitation of strengths such as (management and training system that educates professionals) and (excellent technical skills in the beauty service industry), complementation of weaknesses including (poor working conditions, emotional labor and the high turnover rate for employees) and (lack of profit as a service business model), utilization of opportunities such as (improving industrial value and status as a professional service industry), and resolution of threats such as (a lack of an effective legal system for the growth of the beauty industry) are considered to be crucial. In particular, the importance of weakness factor (poor working conditions, emotional labor and the high turnover rate for employees) and (lack of profit as a service business model) and the threat factor (a lack of an effective legal system for the growth of the beauty industry) were relatively very high. This clearly illustrates the reality of Korea’s beauty service industry with an absence of basic conditions for industrial development, such as poor business profit structures and a lack of government policies.
This study conducted a quantitative examination of SWOT and decision-maker preferences when planning and implementing development strategies for Korea’s beauty service industry. Specifically, this research examined the previous SWOT-analysis-based research that broadly examined Korea’s beauty service industry. A SWOT matrix for a Korean beauty service industry development strategy was then established by integrating, classifying, and adjusting SWOT analysis results derived from previous studies and expert in-depth interviews. AHP analysis was used to quantify the priorities and importance of the SWOT analysis components. On this basis, this research provided concrete, effective, and sustainable strategy directions reflective of rational selection and prioritization within a limited resource context. This research could be meaningful for suggesting a basis for the establishment of a viable development strategy for the beauty service industry in Korea.
The results of this study are in line with those of Pettinger [32] that suggests high quality of core service is a crucial factor of successful companies in the beauty service because facilitating excellent technical skills in the beauty service industry () and management and training system that educates professionals () impacts core service quality. However, non-core activities such as customer relationship management and complaint handling didn’t belong to critical SWOT factors for strategic alternatives after SWOT-AHP analysis. Thus, a beauty service company that offers core service with marginal quality may not be very successful despite good relationships with its customers. This result is not aligned with Ramli [24] that stresses the importance of communication and consumer relationship management in hair salon service. Implicit or non-core service activities keeping customers satisfied seem considered a default setting as time goes on. It may become a service qualifier rather than a service winner over time.
Based on the results of the study, it was possible to construct strategies for the development of the Korean beauty service industry from a practical perspective. The overall strategy is comprised of SO strategies to use strengths and opportunities, ST strategies to overcome threats and complement weaknesses, WO strategies to take advantage of opportunities, and WT strategies to overcome weaknesses and avoid threats. Further AHP analysis showed that the WT strategies were the most important, and suggested that priority should accordingly be given to the WT strategies for the development of Korea’s beauty service industry. Based on the SWOT-AHP analysis, this study suggests that beauty service companies should pay attention to the lack of profitability, poor working conditions, emotional labor, employee stress, and the resultant high turnover rates, all of which are major weak points the beauty service industry should overcome. Focusing on subsiding these weaknesses will help secure beauty service sustainability. Results of the SWOT-AHP analysis also suggest governments should shift to supporting the beauty industry by developing an effective legal system to allow the beauty industry to thrive, and this is aligned with Rosenthal [33].
The present study was limited in scope to the Korean beauty industry. Further SWOT-AHP analysis studies on beauty industries in different countries will extend the meaning of the results of this study. Additionally, this study limits the number of components per attribute to four in the AHP analysis. No recommended number of components is found, but if there are five components or more in each factor, the total number of components becomes 20 or more, and then respondents would be overwhelmed and can become careless with their answers. It will be meaningful if future studies can analyze the importance and priorities of AHP and investigate the causal relationships among the key factors impacting the development of the beauty service industry with a structured model.
All authors contributed equally to this paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
This research was supported by the MSIT (Ministry of Science and ICT), Korea, under the ITRC (Information Technology Research Center) support program (IITP-2021-2017-0-01628) supervised by the IITP (Institute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion).
Ethical review and approval were waived for this study, because the research does not involve vulnerable populations.
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Restrictions apply to the availability of these data. Data were obtained from in-depth interviews of experts in the beauty service field and are available from the corresponding author with the permission of the interviewees.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figure 1. Market size and growth in the beauty service industry. Source: authors’ edition based on Statistics Korea [22].
The number of firms and employees in the Korean beauty service industry.
Classification | Number of Firms | Number of Employees | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2007 | 2017 | Growth Rate | 2007 | 2017 | Growth Rate | |
Total | 108,095 | 148,701 | 37.57% | 164,990 | 225,635 | 36.76% |
Hair Beauty | 97,692 | 115,206 | 17.93% | 144,181 | 175,992 | 22.06% |
Skin Care | 8414 | 20,150 | 139.48% | 16,097 | 29,736 | 84.73% |
Nail Service, etc. | 1989 | 13,345 | 570.94% | 4712 | 19,907 | 322.47% |
Source: authors’ edition based on Statistics Korea [
Experts’ in-depth interviews.
Industry | Date | Number of Interviewers | Names of Firms |
---|---|---|---|
Beauty Treatment | Jun. 2019 | 2 | Park Jun Beauty Lab, Jean Louis David |
Jul. 2019 | 2 | Park Seung Chol Hair Studio, S. Beauterra | |
Aug. 2019 | 1 | Beauty Service Consulting | |
Sep. 2019 | 2 | Professors of Beauty and Cosmetology |
Final SWOT matrix.
S (Strengths) | W (Weaknesses) |
---|---|
• Excellent technical skills in beauty service industry |
• Closure of knowledge, technology, know-how, and information sharing |
C (Opportunities) | T (Threats) |
• Consumer values and change of perception of beauty |
• Competition intensified due to increase in foreign and domestic companies |
Selection of respondents for expert surveys.
Division | Number of Respondents (40) | Organizations of Respondents |
---|---|---|
Company | 31 | Park Jun Beauty Lab, Jean Louis David, S. Beauterra, Nature Hair, Park Seung Chol Hair Studio, Scissors Story, Maritte Hair, My Hair Salon, Hair Salon Group, Salon de Jogak Hair Studio, The Skin by Ssong, FROM a, Tony & Guy, HASYS, Satin Hair, Jungsaemmool Inspiration, Gaggum Hair Dream, ABECHE |
Consulting | 2 | ABC Consulting, Words Consulting |
University | 7 | Konkuk University, Jangan University, Kookje University, Suwon Women’s University, Seokyeong University, Kyung-In Women’s University, Shin Ansan University |
Consistency test results for expert surveys.
Division | Returned | C.R. (Consistency Ratio) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Under 0.1 | 0.1–0.2 | 0.2–0.3 | Over 0.3 | ||||
Total | First | Second | |||||
Total | 40 | 31 | 23 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 1 |
Company | 31 | 24 | 17 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 |
Consulting | 2 | 1 | 1 | - | 1 | ||
University | 7 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 1 |
Weights of SWOT factors.
Factor | Weight | Component of Factor | L-Weight | G-Weight | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S | 0.343 |
|
|
L = 0.216 | G = 0.074 |
|
|
L = 0.402 | G = 0.138 | ||
|
|
L = 0.189 | G = 0.065 | ||
|
|
L = 0.194 | G = 0.066 | ||
W | 0.265 |
|
|
L = 0.080 | G = 0.021 |
|
|
L = 0.132 | G = 0.035 | ||
|
|
L = 0.291 | G = 0.077 | ||
|
|
L = 0.498 | G = 0.132 | ||
O | 0.219 |
|
|
L = 0.193 | G = 0.042 |
|
|
L = 0.175 | G = 0.038 | ||
|
|
L = 0.279 | G = 0.061 | ||
|
|
L = 0.353 | G = 0.077 | ||
T | 0.173 |
|
|
L = 0.235 | G = 0.040 |
|
|
L = 0.452 | G = 0.078 | ||
|
|
L = 0.109 | G = 0.019 | ||
|
|
L = 0.204 | G = 0.035 |
Results of weighted conversion of components (L’-weight).
Factor | L’-Weight | Factor | L’-Weight | Factor | L’-Weight | Factor | L’-Weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
L’ = 0.184 |
|
L’ = 0.043 |
|
L’ = 0.120 |
|
L’ = 0.090 |
|
L’ = 0.343 |
|
L’ = 0.070 |
|
L’ = 0.109 |
|
L’ = 0.173 |
|
L’ = 0.161 |
|
L’ = 0.155 |
|
L’ = 0.173 |
|
L’ = 0.042 |
|
L’ = 0.166 |
|
L’ = 0.265 |
|
L’ = 0.219 |
|
L’ = 0.078 |
The bolded L’-Weights are the highest in their categories.
Strategic alternatives by SWOT-AHP analysis results.
External
|
S | W | |
Internal
|
|
||
|
|||
O |
|
|
|
SO strategy | WO strategy | ||
T | ST strategy | WT strategy | |
|
|
Top six factors in importance and their G-weights are bolded.
Appendix A
SWOT analysis results from Policy Report 2009-53 (KIHASA: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs).
S (Strength) | W (Weakness) |
---|---|
Synergy Effect from Large Companies’ Entry into cosmetics sector |
Small beauty industry |
O (Opportunity) | T (Threat) |
Increasing diverse needs of consumers |
Foreign companies’ entry into domestic market |
SWOT analysis results from expert interview 1 (Park Jun Beauty Lab).
S (Strength) | W (Weakness) |
---|---|
Trend of replacement as a highly educated young manager | Differences in customer satisfaction between service providers |
O (Opportunity) | T (Threat) |
Improving importance of policy as a growth industry linked to tourism |
Negative impact of the Korea-Japan trade dispute on the supply of materials |
SWOT analysis results from expert interview 2 (Jean Louis David).
S (Strength) | W (Weakness) |
---|---|
The growth of Korean Wave culture |
Need to improve small scale and management ability |
O (Opportunity) | T (Threat) |
Increase in online purchases by social commerce |
Increased competition in global beauty market |
SWOT analysis results from expert interview 3 (Park Seung Chol Hair Studio).
S (Strength) | W (Weakness) |
---|---|
Ease of customer acquisition |
Increased fixed costs |
O (Opportunity) | T (Threat) |
Diverse consumer needs |
Changes and threats in external environment |
SWOT analysis results from expert interview 4 (S. Beauterra).
S (Strength) | W (Weakness) |
---|---|
Human resource training through beauty college |
Growing number of young customers dampens atmosphere of hair salons |
O (Opportunity) | T (Threat) |
Increased interest in beauty increases availability |
Decrease in visiting cycle due to economic recession |
SWOT analysis results from expert interview 5 (Beauty Service Consulting).
S (Strength) | W (Weakness) |
---|---|
Growth of Korean Wave culture |
Small beauty industry |
O (Opportunity) | T (Threat) |
Diverse consumer needs |
Foreign companies’ entry into domestic market |
SWOT analysis results from expert interview 6 (Professor of Beauty & Cosmetology).
S (Strength) | W (Weakness) |
---|---|
Improving industrial value and status as professional service industry |
Destruction of prices due to overheated competition |
O (Opportunity) | T (Threat) |
Market segmentation enables diverse and professional beauty salons to be operated |
Turnover rate of workers |
SWOT analysis results from expert interview 7 (Professor of Beauty & Cosmetology).
S (Strength) | W (Weakness) |
---|---|
Human resources development based on education system |
Growing number of young customers dampens atmosphere of hair salons |
O (Opportunity) | T (Threat) |
Increased interest in beauty |
Decrease in visiting cycle due to economic recession |
Appendix B
Summarized SWOT factors.
Previous Study and Interview: Strength | Final Study Factor |
---|---|
|
1. Excellent technical skills in the beauty service industry |
|
2. Management and training systems to educates professionals |
|
3. Extending various beauty links and high value-added services |
|
4. Trend of replacement as a highly educated young manager |
|
5. Others |
Previous Study and Interview: Weakness | Final Study Factor |
|
1. Closure of knowledge, technology, know-how and information sharing |
|
2. Lack of K-beauty brand competitiveness and smallness of companies |
|
3. Lack of profitability as a service business model |
|
4. Poor working conditions, emotional labor and high turnover rate for employees |
|
5. Others |
Previous Study and Interview: Opportunity | Final Study Factor |
|
1. Consumer values and change of perception for beauty |
|
2. K-beauty’s interest increased due to the growth of the Korean Wave culture |
|
3. Improving importance of policy as a growth industry linked to tourism |
|
4. Improving industrial value and status as a professional service industry |
|
※ Others |
Previous Study and Interview: Threat | Final Study Factor |
|
1. Competition intensified due to increase in foreign and domestic companies |
|
2. Lack of effective legal system for the growth of beauty industry |
|
3. Negative impact of the Korea-Japan trade dispute on supply of materials |
|
4. Remnants of social stereotypes that belittle beauty sector |
|
※ Others |
Appendix C
Consistency test results by experts.
No. | Respondents | Overall (Seconds) | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M1 | M2 | M3 | M4 | M5 | |||
1 | Jean Louis David 1 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.15 | 0.09 |
2 | Jean Louis David 2 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.14 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 |
3 | Jean Louis David 3 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.10 | 0.01 | 0.05 |
4 | Jean Louis David 4 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.08 | 0.17 | 0.01 |
5 | Jean Louis David 5 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.12 | 0.09 |
6 | Jean Louis David 6 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.05 |
7 | Park Jun Beauty Lab 1 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.09 | 0.01 | 0.16 |
8 | Park Jun Beauty Lab 2 | 0.24 | 0.26 | 0.15 | 0.29 | 0.33 | 0.15 |
9 | Park Jun Beauty Lab 3 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.14 | 0.03 | 0.11 | 0.16 |
10 | Park Jun Beauty Lab 4 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
11 | Park Jun Beauty Lab 5 | 0.07 | 0.11 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.03 |
12 | PNJ 1 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.02 |
13 | PNJ 2 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.16 |
14 | Park Seung Chol Hair St. | 0.20 | 0.15 | 0.14 | 0.19 | 0.11 | 0.28 |
15 | Nature Hair | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.05 |
16 | Maritte Hair | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.10 |
17 | My Hair | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.05 |
18 | Hair Salon Group | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
19 | The Skin by Ssong | 0.22 | 0.26 | 0.18 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.23 |
20 | FROM ‘a’ | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.33 | 0.08 |
21 | Tony & Guy | 0.16 | 0.18 | 0.20 | 0.08 | 0.14 | 0.14 |
22 | JUNGSAEMMOOL | 0.10 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.19 | 0.02 | 0.04 |
23 | S.Beauterra | 0.17 | 0.16 | 0.12 | 0.19 | 0.30 | 0.18 |
24 | Salon de Jogak Hair St. | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.02 | 0.12 | 0.06 | 0.22 |
25 | Soon Soo Family | 0.18 | 0.18 | 0.90 | 0.16 | 0.15 | 0.18 |
26 | JLDK | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.14 | 0.19 |
27 | Satin Hair | 0.32 | 0.29 | 0.31 | 0.30 | 0.42 | 0.35 |
28 | Gaggum Hair Dream | 0.09 | 0.04 | 0.17 | 0.11 | 0.07 | 0.06 |
29 | ABECHE | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.07 |
30 | Scissors Story | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.44 |
31 | HASYS | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.07 |
32 | ABC Consulting | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.12 | 0.20 | 0.22 | 0.06 |
33 | Words Consulting | 0.18 | 0.25 | 0.08 | 0.13 | 0.20 | 0.06 |
34 | Seokyeong University | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.01 |
35 | Shin Ansan University | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.17 | 0.00 | 0.08 |
36 | Kyung-In Women’s University | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.09 | 0.08 |
37 | Konkuk University | 0.09 | 0.03 | 0.17 | 0.07 | 0.12 | 0.24 |
38 | Suwon Women’s University | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.10 | 0.03 | 0.04 |
39 | Jangan University | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
40 | Kookje University | 0.18 | 0.24 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.31 | 0.03 |
References
1. Jones, G. Beauty Imagined: A History of the Global Beauty Industry; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2011; ISBN 978-0-19-963962-5
2. Yoon, S.-H.; Kang, M.S.; Song, S.-Y. The Growth and Change of Korean Cosmetics Market in Distribution Structure. J. Distrib. Sci.; 2020; 18, pp. 5-13. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.15722/jds.18.1.202001.5]
3. Kumar, S. Exploratory Analysis of Global Cosmetic Industry: Major Players, Technology and Market Trends. Technovation; 2005; 25, pp. 1263-1272. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.07.003]
4. Kestenbaum, R. The Biggest Trends in the Beauty Industry. Available online: https://www.forbes.com/sites/richardkestenbaum/2018/09/09/beauty-industry-biggest-trends-skin-care-loreal-shiseido-lauder/ (accessed on 7 July 2021).
5. Gerstell, E.; Marchessou, S.; Schmidt, J.; Spagnuolo, E. How COVID-19 Is Changing the World of Beauty. Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/consumer-packaged-goods/our-insights/how-covid-19-is-changing-the-world-of-beauty (accessed on 10 June 2021).
6. Ko, E.J. Competition in the Global Beauty Industry Is Changing. Available online: http://www.lgeri.com/report/view.do?idx=19549 (accessed on 3 July 2021).
7. Korea Herald, President Moon Participates in Launch Show of Brand K. Available online: http://news.heraldcorp.com (accessed on 15 May 2021).
8. Yonhap News. S. Korea Kicks off ‘Brand K’ Marketing Project in Bangkok. Available online: https://en.yna.co.kr/view/AEN20190902008100315 (accessed on 12 July 2021).
9. Cho, Y.; Youn, C. A Study on Factor Analysis of Platform Business Model in Beauty Industry Using AHP. J. Humanit. Soc. Sci.; 2017; 8, pp. 185-205.
10. Han, S.-J.; Kim, S.-N. A Study on the Impact of Marketing Mix on the CRM Performance in the Hair Salons. Asian J. Beauty Cosmetol.; 2009; 7, pp. 35-49.
11. Jo, H.J. Research about the Effect of Hair Salon Attributes on Customer s Satisfaction, Store Loyalty and the Revisit Intention. J. Korean Soc. Beauty Arts; 2017; 18, pp. 257-272. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18693/jksba.2017.18.1.257]
12. Jo, J.-W.; Min, G.-S. The Study of the Decisive Factors for Management Results of Franchise Beauty Salons. J. Korea Inst. Electron. Commun. Sci.; 2013; 8, pp. 241-248. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.13067/JKIECS.2013.8.2.241]
13. Kim, J.-R. Conflict Resolution and Political Tasks on the Usage of Beauty Care Devices by Beauty Artists. J. Arbitr. Stud.; 2017; 27, pp. 83-105. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.16998/JAS.2017.27.2.83]
14. Kim, K.Y. A Study on the Way That Can Have the Beauty Industry’s Competitiveness through the Korean Wave. Treatise Plast. Media; 2015; 18, pp. 11-18.
15. Park, S.J. Impact of Service Quality in the Nail Esthetic Industry on Customer Satisfaction, Trust, and Revisit Intention. Asian J. Beauty Cosmetol.; 2017; 15, pp. 259-267. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.20402/ajbc.2016.0106]
16. Won, J.W.; Jung, G.H.; Hwang, D.K. A Study on the Establishment of Mid- to Long-Term Planning for the Advancement of Beauty Industry; Policy Report, No. 2009-53 Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs: Seoul, Korea, 2009.
17. An, H.-S.; Park, J. Market Segmentation Strategy of Beauty Shop Based on Life Style Variable. J. Korean Soc. Fash. Beauty; 2005; 3, pp. 20-28.
18. Ji, J.H.; Yun, H. A Study on Management Performance of Beauty Salon According to Customer and Competition Characteristics. J. Korean Soc. Des. Cult.; 2011; 17, pp. 570-582.
19. Schomer, S. The Strategies These 3 Beauty Startups Use to Stand Out. Available online: https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/285542 (accessed on 16 July 2021).
20. Global Cosmetic Industry. The Beauty 2020–2030 Forecast. Available online: https://www.gcimagazine.com/business/marketing/The-Beauty-2020-2030-Forecast-569283581.html (accessed on 7 August 2021).
21. Shacknai, G. Seven Industry Experts Predict the Biggest Beauty Trends of 2021. Available online: https://www.forbes.com/sites/gabbyshacknai/2021/01/04/seven-industry-experts-predict-the-biggest-beauty-trends-of-2021/ (accessed on 25 July 2021).
22. Statistics Korea. Available online: http://kostat.go.kr/portal/korea (accessed on 5 March 2021).
23. Park, E.J.; Park, O.L. Study on Human Service and Customer’s Revisit According to Their Big Five Personality Trait in the Beauty Shop Setting. J. Korean Soc. Cosmetol.; 2011; 17, pp. 94-104.
24. Ramli, N.S. Immigrant Entrepreneurs on the World’s Successful Global Brands in the Cosmetic Industry. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci.; 2015; 195, pp. 113-122. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.417]
25. Sharma, U.; Black, P. Look Good, Feel Better: Beauty Therapy as Emotional Labour. Sociology; 2001; 35, pp. 913-931. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0038038501035004007]
26. Gold, M.H. Lasers and Light Sources for the Removal of Unwanted Hair. Clin. Dermatol.; 2007; 25, pp. 443-453. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2007.05.017] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17870522]
27. Kim, M.-J. Effects of Awareness of Negative Leadership on Job Satisfaction and Intention to Change Jobs for Estheticians of Skin Care Salons. Asian J. Beauty Cosmetol.; 2021; 19, pp. 89-100. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.20402/ajbc.2021.0127]
28. Kim, T.-Y.; Lee, S.-N. The Mediating Effect of Job Satisfaction on the Relationship between Internal Marketing and the Customer Orientation of Employees in the Beauty Service Industry. Asian J. Beauty Cosmetol.; 2018; 16, pp. 555-567. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.20402/ajbc.2018.0252]
29. Park, J.-E.; Yoo, A.; Park, E.-J. Human Resource Management According to the Characteristics of Beauty Service Workers. Asian J. Beauty Cosmetol.; 2019; 17, pp. 331-343. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.20402/ajbc.2019.0299]
30. Witz, A.; Warhurst, C.; Nickson, D. The Labour of Aesthetics and the Aesthetics of Organization. Organization; 2003; 10, pp. 33-54. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1350508403010001375]
31. Kumar, S.; Massie, C.; Dumonceaux, M.D. Comparative Innovative Business Strategies of Major Players in Cosmetic Industry. Ind. Manag. Data Syst.; 2006; 106, pp. 285-306. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02635570610653461]
32. Pettinger, L. Brand Culture and Branded Workers: Service Work and Aesthetic Labour in Fashion Retail. Consum. Mark. Cult.; 2004; 7, pp. 165-184. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1025386042000246214]
33. Rosenthal, P. Management Control as an Employee Resource: The Case of Front-Line Service Workers. J. Manag. Stud.; 2004; 41, pp. 601-622. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00446.x]
34. Scanlon, J. Dying to Be Beautiful: The Fight for Safe Cosmetics. J. Am. Hist.; 2006; 92, pp. 1478-1479. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4485986]
35. Lindsay, J. Gender and Class in the Lives of Young Hairdressers: From Serious to Spectacular. J. Youth Stud.; 2004; 7, pp. 259-277. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1367626042000268917]
36. An, H.K. The Study on the Phenomenon and Development Methods of Beauty Korean Wave, K-Beauty. Korean Beauty Manag. J.; 2013; 1, pp. 223-233.
37. Saaty, T.L. Fundamentals of Decision Making and Prority Theory with the Analytic Hierarchy Process; 1st ed. Analytic Hierarchy Process Series; RWS Publications: Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2000; ISBN 978-0-9620317-6-2
38. Saaty, T.L. Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World; 3rd ed. RWS Publications: Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2012; ISBN 978-0-9620317-8-6
39. Porter, M.E. How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy. Harv. Bus. Rev.; 1979; 57, pp. 137-145.
40. Porter, M.E. Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors; Free Press: New York, NY, USA, 1980; ISBN 978-0-02-925360-1
41. Prahalad, C.K.; Hamel, G. The Core Competence of the Corporation. Harv. Bus. Rev.; 1990; 68, pp. 79-91.
42. Barney, J.B. Organizational Culture: Can It Be a Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage?. Acad. Manag. Rev.; 1986; 11, 656. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amr.1986.4306261]
43. Porter, M.E. Technology and Competitive Advantage. J. Bus. Strategy; 1985; 5, pp. 60-78. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/eb039075]
44. Kim, Y.J.; Chung, J.C. The Development Strategy of Korean Air Logistics Industry Using SWOT-AHP Method. Korea Trade Rev.; 2012; 37, pp. 229-252.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to provide concrete growth strategies and practical development methods in the beauty service industry. This study consists of a SWOT (Strength, Weakness, Opportunity, Threat) analysis from the literature review and in-depth interviews with experts of the beauty service industry in South Korea. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is applied to the finalized SWOT matrix to incorporate experts’ ideas. The combined high priority factors present four types of strategic alternatives: Strength–Opportunity (SO), Strength–Threat (ST), Weakness–Opportunity (WO), and Weakness–Threat (WT). This study applies an environmental analysis framework from the management strategy field to construct a sophisticated SWOT matrix. Furthermore, this study quantifies the importance of SWOT components through AHP to determine priorities to lay the groundwork for timely and sustainable strategy development in the beauty service industry. Based on the SWOT-AHP analysis, this study suggests that beauty service companies should pay attention to the lack of profitability and employee stress with high turnover rates caused by poor working conditions and emotional labor. In addition, the Korean government should gradually shift away from the lack of an effective legal system to grow the beauty industry.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 Graduate School of Business, Sogang University, Seoul 04107, Korea;
2 Greehey School of Business, St. Mary’s University, San Antonio, TX 78228, USA