It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Characterizing the fragility, resistance, and resilience of marshes is critical for understanding their role in reducing storm damages and for helping to manage the recovery of these natural defenses. This study uses high-resolution aerial imagery to quantify the impacts of Hurricane Michael, a category 5 hurricane, on coastal salt marshes in the Florida Panhandle, USA. Marsh damage was classified into several categories, including deposition of sediment or wrack, fallen trees, vegetation loss, and conversion to open water. The marshes were highly resistant to storm damages even under extreme conditions; only 2% of the 173,259 km2 of marshes in the study area were damaged—a failure rate much lower than that of artificial defenses. Marshes may be more resistant than resilient to storm impacts; damaged marshes were slow to recover, and only 16% of damaged marshes had recovered 6 months after landfall. Marsh management mattered for resistance and resilience; marshes on publicly-managed lands were less likely to be damaged and more likely to recover quickly from storm impacts than marshes on private land, emphasizing the need to incentivize marsh management on private lands. These results directly inform policy and practice for hazard mitigation, disaster recovery, adaptation, and conservation, particularly given the potential for more intense hurricane landfalls as the climate changes.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Northeastern University, Marine and Environmental Sciences, Boston, USA (GRID:grid.261112.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 2173 3359); The Nature Conservancy, Boston, USA (GRID:grid.422375.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0591 6771); Center for Coastal Studies, Provincetown, USA (GRID:grid.448633.e)
2 Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, USA Naval Academy, Annapolis, USA (GRID:grid.265465.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2296 3025)
3 The Nature Conservancy, Gulf of Mexico Program, Big Pine Key, USA (GRID:grid.422375.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0591 6771)
4 University of California Santa Cruz, Institute of Marine Sciences, Santa Cruz, USA (GRID:grid.205975.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 0740 6917)
5 The Nature Conservancy, Boston, USA (GRID:grid.422375.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0591 6771)
6 Northeastern University, Marine and Environmental Sciences, Boston, USA (GRID:grid.261112.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 2173 3359)