It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
With continued population growth, increasing staple crop production is necessary. However, in dryland areas, this is negatively affected by various abiotic stresses, such as drought and salinity. The field screening of 10 improved genetic lines of pear millet originating from African dryland areas was conducted based on a set of agrobiological traits (i.e., germination rate, plant density, plant maturity rate, forage, and grain yields) in order to understand plant growth and its yield potential responses under saline environments. Our findings demonstrated that genotype had a significant impact on the accumulation of green biomass (64.4% based on two-way ANOVA), while salinity caused reduction in grain yield value. HHVBC Tall and IP 19586 were selected as the best-performing and high-yielding genotypes. HHVBC Tall is a dual purpose (i.e., forage and grain) line which produced high grain yields on marginal lands, with soil salinization up to electrical conductivity (EC) 6–8 dS m−1 (approximately 60–80 mM NaCl). Meanwhile, IP 19586, grown under similar conditions, showed a rapid accumulation of green biomass with a significant decrease in grain yield. Both lines were tolerant to drought and sensitive to high salinity (above 200 mM NaCl). The threshold salinity of HHVBC Tall calculated at the seedling stage was lower than that of IP 19586. Seedling viability of these lines was affected by oxidative stress and membrane peroxidation, and they had decreased chlorophyll and carotenoid biosynthesis. This study demonstrated that ionic stress is more detrimental for the accumulation of green and dry biomass, in combination with increasing the proline and malonic dialdehyde (MDA) contents of both best-performing pearl millet lines, as compared with osmotic stress.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 International Platform for Dryland Research and Education (IPDRE), Tottori University, Tottori 680-8550, Japan; International Center for Biosaline Agriculture for Central Asia and Caucasus (ICBA-CAC), 6A, Osyo Street, Tashkent 100000, Uzbekistan
2 K.A. Timiryazev Institute of Plant Physiology, Russian Academy of Science, Botanicheskaya Street 35, Moscow 127276, Russia
3 Water Resources Research Center, Kyoto University, Gokasho, Kyoto 611-0011, Japan
4 International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center for Central Asia and the Caucasus, 51, Zhandosova Street, Almaty 050035, Kazakhstan
5 International Center for Biosaline Agriculture for Central Asia and Caucasus (ICBA-CAC), 6A, Osyo Street, Tashkent 100000, Uzbekistan
6 International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, Patancheru, Telangana 502 324, India
7 Arid Land Research Center, Tottori University, Tottori 680-8550, Japan
8 Nukus Branch of Uzbek Corn Research and Experimental Station, 25, Kegeli Street, Nukus 230100, Uzbekistan