It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Land use change from forests to grazing lands is one of the important sources of greenhouse gas emissions in many parts of the tropics. The objective of this study was to analyze the extent of soil organic carbon (SOC) loss from the conversion of native forests to pasturelands in Mexico. We analyzed 66 sets of published research data with simultaneous measurements of soil organic carbon stocks between native forests and pasturelands in Mexico. We used a generalized linear mixed effect model to evaluate the effect of land use change (forest versus pasture), soil depth, and original native forest types. The model showed that there was a significant reduction in SOC stocks due to the conversion of native forests to pasturelands. The median loss of SOC ranged from 31.6% to 52.0% depending upon the soil depth. The highest loss was observed in tropical mangrove forests followed by highland tropical forests and humid tropical forests. Higher loss was detected in upper soil horizon (0–30 cm) compared to deeper horizons. The emissions of CO2 from SOC loss ranged from 46.7 to 165.5 Mg CO2 eq. ha−1 depending upon the type of original native forests. In this paper, we also discuss the effect that agroforestry practices such as silvopastoral arrangements and other management practices like rotational grazing, soil erosion control, and soil nutrient management can have in enhancing SOC stocks in tropical grasslands. The results on the degree of carbon loss can have strong implications in adopting appropriate management decisions that recover or retain carbon stocks in biomass and soils of tropical livestock production systems.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 Facultad de Ciencias Agronómicas, CONACYT-UNACH, Villaflores, Chiapas C.P. 30470, Mexico
2 Cuerpo Académico de Agroforestería Pecuaria, Facultad de Ciencias Agronómicas, Universidad Autónoma de Chiapas, Chiapas C.P. 30470, Mexico;
3 Independent Consultant, Cristóbal Colón, Mexico City C.P. 53117, Mexico
4 Departamento de Agroecología, El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Unidad Villahermosa, Villahermosa, Tabasco C.P. 86280, Mexico
5 Tecnológico Nacional de México, Instituto Tecnológico de la Zona Maya, Othón P. Blanco, Quintana Roo C.P. 77960, Mexico
6 Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas (UNICACH), Sede Villa Corzo, Chiapas C.P. 30520, Mexico
7 Cuerpo Académico de Agroforestería Pecuaria, Facultad de Ciencias Agronómicas, Universidad Autónoma de Chiapas, Chiapas C.P. 30470, Mexico;
8 Centro del Cambio Global y la Sustentabilidad A. C., Villahermosa, Tabasco C.P. 86080, Mexico
9 Campus Sorocaba, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Sorocaba CEP 18052-780, Sao Paolo, Brazil