It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Brain age can be estimated using different Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) modalities including diffusion MRI. Recent studies demonstrated that white matter (WM) tracts that share the same function might experience similar alterations. Therefore, in this work, we sought to investigate such issue focusing on five WM bundles holding that feature that is Association, Brainstem, Commissural, Limbic and Projection fibers, respectively. For each tract group, we estimated brain age for 15,335 healthy participants from United Kingdom Biobank relying on diffusion MRI data derived endophenotypes, Bayesian ridge regression modeling and 10 fold-cross validation. Furthermore, we estimated brain age for an Ensemble model that gathers all the considered WM bundles. Association analysis was subsequently performed between the estimated brain age delta as resulting from the six models, that is for each tract group as well as for the Ensemble model, and 38 daily life style measures, 14 cardiac risk factors and cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging features and genetic variants. The Ensemble model that used all tracts from all fiber groups (FG) performed better than other models to estimate brain age. Limbic tracts based model reached the highest accuracy with a Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 5.08, followed by the Commissural (
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 University of Verona, Department of Computer Science, Verona, Italy (GRID:grid.5611.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1763 1124)
2 Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, William Harvey Research Institute, NIHR Barts Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK (GRID:grid.4868.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2171 1133); Barts Health NHS Trust, West Smithfield, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, UK (GRID:grid.139534.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 0372 5777)
3 University of Barcelona, Departamento de Matemàtiques i Informàtica, Barcelona, Spain (GRID:grid.5841.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0247)
4 University College London, Centre for Medical Image Computing (CMIC), Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, London, UK (GRID:grid.83440.3b) (ISNI:0000000121901201)