Full Text

Turn on search term navigation

© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the elemental composition of fifteen algae-based supplements commonly sold in the Portuguese market, by energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence. Despite the fact that the majority of Kelp samples were a good source of iodine, the levels observed might well contribute to an excess in the human body, which can cause dysfunction of the thyroid gland. Furthermore, the presence of lead in Sea spaghetti, Arame, Hijiki and Wakame caused a considerable risk to public health vis a vis possible ingestion of a high daily dose. Regarding arsenic, great variability was observed in all the samples with concentrations equal to or above 60 μg/g in the case of Arame, KelpJ and Hijiki. Although algae mainly accumulate organic arsenic, some also contain high levels of its inorganic form, as is commonly pointed out for Hijiki. Thus, regular ingestion of these supplements must also take into account the mentioned facts. There is no doubt that these supplements are also good sources of other nutrients, but the lack of accurate regulations and control should alert consumers to avoid indiscriminate use of these types of products.

Details

Title
Elemental Composition of Algae-Based Supplements by Energy Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence
Author
Reboredo, Fernando H 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Junior, Walter 1 ; Pessoa, Maria F 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Lidon, Fernando C 1 ; Ramalho, José C 2   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Leitão, Roberta G 3   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Silva, Maria Manuela 4   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Alvarenga, Nuno 5 ; Guerra, Mauro 3   VIAFID ORCID Logo 

 GeoBioTec, Departamento de Ciências da Terra, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal; [email protected] (W.J.); [email protected] (M.F.P.); [email protected] (F.C.L.); [email protected] (J.C.R.) 
 GeoBioTec, Departamento de Ciências da Terra, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Campus da Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal; [email protected] (W.J.); [email protected] (M.F.P.); [email protected] (F.C.L.); [email protected] (J.C.R.); Plant Stress & Biodiversity Lab, Centro de Estudos Florestais (CEF), Instituto Superior Agronomia (ISA), Universidade de Lisboa (ULisboa), Quinta do Marquês, Av. República, 2784-505 Lisboa, Portugal 
 LIBPHYS-UNL, Physics Department, NOVA School of Science and Technology, NOVA University Lisbon, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal; [email protected] 
 ESEAG-COFAC, Avenida do Campo Grande 376, 1749-024 Lisboa, Portugal; [email protected] 
 Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária, I.P., UTI—Unidade de Tecnologia e Inovação, Avenida da República, Quinta do Marquês, 2780-157 Oeiras, Portugal; [email protected] 
First page
2041
Publication year
2021
Publication date
2021
Publisher
MDPI AG
e-ISSN
22237747
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2584471389
Copyright
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.