It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The focus of this paper is to comparatively evaluate the performance of ASTER and Hyperion data for target detection of hydrothermal alteration zones associated with geothermal (GT) springs in an unexplored savannah region. The study employed the partial subpixel unmixing Mixture Tuned Match Filtering algorithm for spectral information extraction using the multispectral and hyperspectral satellite data. In both cases, image endmember spectra specifically for kaolinite, alunite, and illite and calcite zones were selected and extracted by using the Analytical Imaging and Geophysics (AIG)-developed processing methods. The results show that the Hyperion, despite its distortions, can effectively discriminate associated alteration zones better than ASTER. Consequently, Hyperspectral data and analysis are thus recommended for use in similar unexplored regions for GT resource detection and monitoring.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Department of Geography, Faculty of Science, Kaduna State University P. M. B. 2339, Kaduna, Nigeria; Department of Geography, Faculty of Science, Kaduna State University P. M. B. 2339, Kaduna, Nigeria
2 Geoscience and Digital Earth Centre (INSTeG), Research Institute for Sustainable Environment (RISE), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Malaysia; Geoscience and Digital Earth Centre (INSTeG), Research Institute for Sustainable Environment (RISE), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Malaysia
3 Korea Polar Research Institute (KOPRI), Songdomirae-ro, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon 21990, Republic of Korea; Korea Polar Research Institute (KOPRI), Songdomirae-ro, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon 21990, Republic of Korea
4 Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of science, Federal University Dutse, Jigawa State, Nigeria; Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of science, Federal University Dutse, Jigawa State, Nigeria