The use of e-cigarettes among university students in Malaysia

Abstract

Introduction:

E-cigarette use is an emerging phenomenon with increasing recognition and acceptance globally. This study aims to create a profile of e-cigarette users among university students in Malaysia.

Methods:

The study was conducted using a cross-sectional research involving six universities in Malaysia. A semi-structured questionnaire was distributed to 1302 randomly selected students, who either smoked cigarettes and/or e-cigarettes. The 2011 version of Global Adult Tobacco Surveys (GATS) tool was used to record the respondents’ sociodemographic data.

Results:

The study revealed that 74.9% of the respondents smoked e-cigarettes; 40.3% used both cigarettes and e-cigarettes (dual users), and 34.5% were exclusive e-cigarette users. The exclusive use of e-cigarettes was related to gender (OR=0.18, 95% CI: 0.09 – 0.39). Also, male respondents were the majority users (95%). Of the respondents, 75.2 % were Malays, 98.0% single and most believed they have no health problems (92.1%). Further findings revealed the occurrence of adverse effects, dizziness 14.4%, cough 14.1%, and headaches 12.4%. Overall, 57.8% of the respondents used e-cigarettes as a smoking cessation tool, while others consider e-cigarettes a self-image enhancing tool or as part of social activities.

Conclusions:

Further research on the use of e-cigarettes should be conducted on a large number of respondents in other settings to augment the findings of this study, and also guide policy making on and prevention practice of e-cigarette use, among the general student population in Malaysia.

INTRODUCTION

The electronic-cigarette (e-cigarette) is an electronic device, also known as vape, containing a cartridge filled with liquid nicotine and/or other chemicals, producing inhalable smoke. E-cigarette use has quickly gained popularity worldwide¹, especially among current and former smokers^2-6. E-cigarette manufacturers promote it as a safer, cheaper and an alternative product for smoking cessation. As the popularity and use increase, so is concern about public health. In 2009, Australia, Brazil, China, Uruguay⁷, Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam⁸ completely banned the sale and marketing of e-cigarettes; while New Zealand, United Kingdom, and other European countries allowed marketing of e-cigarettes. South– East Asia is one of the regions in the world with the highest number of countries (6 out of 11 countries in the region) that banned the use of e-cigarettes⁸. However, some aspects of the banned regulations in these countries need improvement⁹.

The International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Project (ITC Project) reports the use of e-cigarettes in 10 countries, through a survey conducted between 2009 and 2013. Malaysia was found to be the country with the highest prevalence of users, at 14%, while other countries like Republic of Korea and Australia had 7% each, United States 6%, United Kingdom 4%, Netherlands 3%, Canada 1%, and China 0.05%¹. The 2015 Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) conducted in the South-East Asian (SEAN) region, gave the following e-cigarette use prevalence for countries in the region: Indonesia 0.3% and Malaysia 0.8%, in 2011¹⁰; Philippines 1.7%¹¹ and Vietnam 0.2%¹². Also, the Global Youth Tobacco Survey (GYTS) of 2016 showed the prevalence of e-cigarette use among students (age 13 – 15 years) to be 2.3% in Cambodia¹³ and 5.7% in Myanmar¹⁴. Noteworthy, the survey revealed a 3.2% prevalence rate for Malaysia^1,14,15, which makes it the largest vaping market in the SEAN region¹⁶.

Wong et al. reported 39.9% of e-cigarette use among young students of higher institutions and 36% use among young professionals in their study conducted in the Selangor and Kuala Lumpur areas of Malaysia¹⁷. In an attempt to check the menace of e-cigarette use, the Higher-Education Minister of Malaysia announced in November 2015 a ban on e-cigarette use and tobacco smoking in universities. The ban is in effect in several Malaysian universities^18,19.

E-cigarette use prevalence is high among the young, and diverse reasons for the use have been reported in several studies. Some studies state that cigarette (tobacco) smoking is an important associated factor of e-cigarette use among young people^20-23, while the older users consider it an alternative to tobacco smoking^24,25. Other reasons for the use are: experimenting due to curiosity^26-29, interesting flavours^30,31, ‘just for fun’^29,32, popularity³³ and ‘just experimenting’³⁴. The risk associated with e-cigarette use is said to be much less than that of tobacco smoking. If the claim is right, the harms related to tobacco smoking would be substantially reduced, with benefits for cardiovascular health³⁵. However, more research needs to be conducted to ascertain the effects of e-cigarette use compared with tobacco smoking.

Several aspects of e-cigarette use in Malaysia were reported in various studies, but none was on the users’ profile. As such, this study aims to explore the factors associated with e-cigarette use, in order to create e-cigarette users’ profile based on sociodemographic distribution, source of information and supply, gender, and adverse effects, amongst other features, in six Malaysian universities.

METHODS

Participants and procedure

The study was conducted through a cross-sectional field survey research approach, from August 2016 to December 2016. Six out of sixteen universities situated in Klang Valley, Malaysia, were randomly selected; three public and three private universities. As prevalence for e-cigarette users among adults in Malaysia was 14%¹, and the total population was estimated at 204000 students, a sample size of n=185 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) and 5% significant level) from each of the selected universities was obtained using the Leslie Kish formula. A total of 1302 participants were chosen through a box-model random sampling technique.

Inclusion criteria of this study were: 1) university student, 2) age 18 years and older, and 3) student currently smoking a conventional cigarette or use of e-cigarette at the time of the study. Exclusion criteria were: 1) student on leave and/or not attending classes for three months, 2) student suspended by university, 3) student did not wish to participate in the study, and 4) student with cognitive disorders due to diseases like dementia, Parkinson’s disease or schizophrenia.

Measurements

The questionnaire, in English and Malay, contained both closed and open-ended questions, divided into three sections: 1) sociodemographic background and current health status; 2) smoking history; and 3) e-cigarette use. The sociodemographic section included age, gender, race/ethnicity, educational levels, nationality, marital status, total household income and health problems. Questionnaires were distributed to the participants by the lead researcher and a trained research assistant. Ethical approval for the study was granted by the Secretariat of Research and Innovation, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre (Code: FF-2016-301) and the administrative board of each participating university. Information sheets and consent forms were distributed to all students, and active consent was received from the participants. The respondents were duly informed that participation in the study was voluntary, and that their identity will remain anonymous. They were also informed that a response to a question was neither ‘right’ nor ‘wrong’.

Questions on smoking history were adapted from the GATS 2011 with slight modification to suit the study. Participants were asked if they had ever smoked a cigarette, smoking habits of their immediate family members, age at smoking initiation, amount of smoking and type of cigarette used, among other questions. Questions on the reasons for e-cigarette use were based on 28 items and a 5-point Likert scale (1=totally disagree, 2=disagree, 3=unsure, 4=agree, 5=totally agree). Responses were coded in two categories: low (total score lower than mean score) and high (total score higher than mean score).

Statistical analysis

The collected data were analyzed using SPSS version 23.0, using frequencies (n), percentages (%), chi-square tests and multivariable binary logistic regression models. Level of significance was set at p< 0.05 and regression results are presented as Adjusted Odds Ratios (AOR) with 95% Confidence Interval (CI).

RESULTS

Participants’ background

The respondents were between the ages of 18 to 40 years: males n=1234 (94.8%) and females n=68 (5.2%); mean age and standard deviation of 21.15 ± 2.55 years; ethnic Malay 75.2%, Malaysian nationals 97.9%, and single 98.0%. Distribution based on education level was PhD/DrPH 0.6% and undergraduate 65.2%. The household mean monthly income was MYR 5760.89 ± 7411.14, and the propotion of participants with a self-perception of being healthy was 92.1% ().

Table 1

Distribution of sociodemographic characteristics of respondents (n=1302 )

Variables	Frequency (n)	Per cent (%)
Age (years)
18 – 20	376	28.9
21 – 25	880	67.6
26 – 30	38	2.9
> 30	8	0.6
Gender
Male	1234	94.8
Female	68	5.2
Ethnicity
Malay	979	75.2
Chinese	98	7.5
Indian	162	12.4
Others (e.g. Kedayan, Bajau, Bangladesh, Indonesia)	63	4.8
Nationality
Malaysian	1275	97.9
Others (e.g. Bangladesh, Indonesia, Mexico)	26	2.1
Marital status
Single/unmarried	1276	98.0
Married	26	2.0
Level of education
Diploma	373	28.6
Degree	849	65.2
Masters	72	5.5
PhD/DrPH	8	0.6
Household income (MYR/Month), n=1116
≤ 2000	273	24.5
2001 – 4000	307	27.5
4001 – 6000	244	21.9
6001 – 8000	99	8.9
8001 – 10000	106	9.5
≥ 10001	87	7.8
Presence of comorbidity disease
None (healthy)	1199	92.1
Asthma	64	4.9
High cholesterol	13	1.0
High blood pressure	7	0.5
Diabetes mellitus	2	0.2
Kidney problem	3	0.2
Heart disease	4	0.3
Others (e.g Allergic, Migraine, Gastric, Cancer)	21	1.6

Smoking and e-cigarette use profile

Within our sample population of students, 34.5% were exclusive e-cigarette users, and 40.3% were dual users, indicating that 74.8% of the respondents were current e-cigarette users (Figure 1). Moreover, 18.7% were current smokers and 6.4% neither smoked nor used e-cigarettes. Among current e-cigarette users, 40.3% used cigarettes and e-cigarettes simultaneously. In all, 57.5% (749) of the respondents were introduced to e-cigarettes by colleagues in the university, 37.5% (488) by friends outside the university, 36.6% through the internet (websites, social networking sites, blogs, and e-mails) and 28.8% through the communication media (television, radio, mail, print, billboards and outdoor advertisement). A propotion of 37.9% of the respondents bought e-cigarette products from retailers, 17.6% from their fellow university students, and 14.8% online.

Fig. 1 Cigarette/e-cigarette users among students (n=1302 )

Findings in this study revealed that most of the e-cigarette users preferred locally produced e-liquid (55.6%) rather than imported e-liquids (44.4%). A total of 312 (32%) respondents preferred e-liquid that contained ≤ 6 mg nicotine, followed by 212 (21.7%) who were oblivious to the nicotine level (). About 178 (18.3%) preferred e-liquid without nicotine, while only 2.4% preferred e-liquid with a high amount of nicotine (≥ 16 mg).

Table 2

Respondents smoking/e-cigarette-use profile

Profiles	Frequency (n)	Per cent (%)
Age of smoking initiation (years), n=1036
< 10	39	3.8
10 – 15	380	36.7
16 – 20	569	54.9
21 – 25	48	4.6
Family member who smokes, n=1284
Yes	679	53.5
No	605	46.5
Average cigarettes per day, n=1036
Did not answer	36	3.5
≤ 5	584	56.4
6 – 10	252	24.3
11 – 15	76	7.3
16 – 20	70	6.8
≥ 21	18	1.8
Preferable cigarette, n=1036
Standard	791	76.4
Light	279	26.9
Menthol	218	21.0
Tobacco (Indonesia)	151	14.6
Cigar/Curut	55	5.3
Others (e.g. Harvest, John, U2, Mevius)	37	3.6
Source of e-cigarette information
Family	100	7.7
Product seller	160	12.3
Advertisement	189	14.5
University student	749	57.5
Internet	476	36.6
Magazines	80	6.1
Outside peer	488	37.5
Media	349	28.8
Unsure	127	9.8
Source of e-cigarettes
Wholesale	109	8.4
Booth seller	135	10.4
Family member	32	2.5
Retailer	493	37.9
Online	193	14.8
Exchange among peers	126	9.7
University student	229	17.6
Outside peers	144	11.1
Unsure	187	14.4
Number of e-cigarette devices, n=506
1	387	76.5
2	81	16.0
3	21	4.2
≥ 4	17	3.6
Preferable e-juice, n=975
Local	542	55.6
Imported	433	44.4
Types of e-juice, n=975
Without nicotine (no flavours)	178	18.3
Without nicotine (with flavours)*	85	8.7
≤ 6 mg nicotine	312	32.0
≤ 9 mg nicotine	84	8.6
≤ 12 mg nicotine	79	8.1
≥ 16 mg nicotine	23	2.4
Unsure	212	21.7
Unanswered	2	0.2

* e.g. mango, mint, redbull, grape, vanilla.

This study showed that over 67% of the respondents did not report any health impact and were not certain if they suffered any adverse effects from the use of e-cigarettes. Among the adverse effects experienced by the users were: dizziness 14.4%, cough 14.1%, headache 12.4%, addiction to e-cigarette use 9.5%, chest pain 6.9%, and shortness of breath 5.7%. Other adverse effects, experienced by less than 5% of the respondents, were: vomiting 4.5%, decreased appetite 4.1%, insomnia 4.0%, weight loss 1.9%, depression 1.6%, and anxiety 1.1%. Dual users had significantly experienced more adverse effects compared to exclusive e-cigarette users ().

Table 3

Adverse events occurrence based on types of cigarette/e-cigarette users

Variable	Types of cigarette/e-cigarette users (n, %)
	Dual user	E-cigarette user (never smoker)	E-cigarette user (ex-smoker)	Smoker (never use e-cigarette)	Ex-smoker (never use e-cigarette)	χ2	p
Adverse events
None	302 (33.0)	175 (19.1)	111 (12.1)	244 (26.7)	83 (9.1)	193.488	< 0.001*
1 Symptom	103 (54.5)	47 (24.9)	39 (20.6)	0 (0.0)	0 (0.0)
2 Symptoms	57 (58.8)	21 (21.6)	19 (19.6)	0 (0.0)	0 (0.0)
≥ 3 Symptoms	63 (62.4)	23 (22.8)	15 (14.9)	0 (0.0)	0 (0.0)
Total	525 (40.3)	266 (20.4)	184 (14.1)	244 (18.7)	83 (6.4)

* Chi-squared test. Values are expressed as frequency and per cent (n, %). p< 0.05 compares dual users, e-cigarette user (never smoker), e-cigarette user (ex-smoker), smoker (never use e-cigarette) and ex-smoker (never use e-cigarette).

Figure 2 depicts the feelings of respondents towards e-cigarette use as an alternative to smoking cessation, where 31.9% felt uncertain about the best alternative means for quitting smoking, 29.5% did not mention any need for an alternative, while 28.2% agreed that e-cigarettes could be used as an alternative means for quitting smoking. Further, smoking cessation methods chosen were: nicotine lozenges 23.7%, a support group 19.6% , health counseling 16.6%, nicotine patch 10.8%, nicotine replacement drug 9.8%, other 7.0%, and traditional medicine 5.8%.

Fig. 2 Students opinion on the most effective alternative for smoking cessation (n=1036 )

With regards to the reason for e-cigarette use provided by dual users (n=975), 64.6% of the respondents use e-cigarette due to their own desire, personal beliefs 64.6%, social influence 54.8%, emotional factors (boredom, loneliness and stress) 62.6%, current trends 62.7%, while 57.8% claimed to use e-cigarettes as a means for quitting smoking.

The study found that majority of the respondents were dual users, the high-risk group (involved in tobacco/nicotine use). The bivariate analysis revealed. that gender as well as three reasons for e-cigarette use (own desire, personal belief, aim to quit smoking) have a significant relationship with e-cigarette use (). Of the 975 male e-cigarette users, 52.9% were dual users, while 42.3% from the same category of male respondents were exclusive e-cigarette users. Among the dual users’ category, the reasons given for e-cigarette use were: own desire 37.8%, personal belief 37.2%, mood disorder 34.8%, aim to quit smoking 34.4%, current trend 33.8%, and social influence 29.6%. Among the exclusive e-cigarette users’ category, main reasons given for e-cigarette use were: current trend 28.8%, mood disorder 27.8%, personal belief 27.3%, own desire 26.8%, social influence 25.1%, and aim to quit smoking 23.5%.

Table 4

Association between dual user and e-cigarette (e-cig) users with sociodemographics, adverse events occurrence, comorbidity disease and reason for e-cigarette use initiation among students (n=975 )

Variable	Dual user n (%)	E-cig user n (%)	χ2	p	OR	95% CI
						Lower	Upper
Institution
Public	277 (28.4)	226 (23.2)	0.63	0.43	1.11	0.86	1.42
Private	248 (25.4)	224 (23.0)
Age (years)
≤ 21	320 (32.8)	296 (30.4)	2.42	0.12	0.81	0.62	1.05
> 21	205 (21.0)	154 (15.8)
Gender
Male	516 (52.9)	412 (42.3)	23.92	< 0.001*	0.19	0.09	0.40
Female	9 (0.9)	38 (3.9)
Ethnicity
Malay	400 (41.0)	350 (35.9)	0.34	0.56	1.09	0.81	1.48
Others	125 (12.8)	100 (10.3)
Marital status
Single	516 (52.9)	441 (45.2)	0.11	0.74	0.85	0.34	2.17
Married	9 (0.9)	9 (0.9)
Level of education
Degree	351 (36.0)	280 (28.7)	2.28	0.13	0.82	0.63	1.06
Others	174 (17.8)	170 (17.4)
Household income (MYR/month)
≤ RM4000	228 (27.8)	206 (25.1)	0.01	0.93	0.99	0.75	1.30
> RM4000	204 (24.9)	182 (22.2)
Adverse events occurrence
≤ 2 symptoms	462 (47.4)	412 (42.3)	3.30	0.07	0.68	0.44	1.03
> 2 symptoms	63 (6.5)	38 (3.9)
Comorbidity disease
None (healthy)	484 (49.6)	407 (41.7)	0.94	0.33	1.25	0.80	1.95
Having comorbidity	41 (4.2)	43 (4.4)
Reason for e-cigarette use
i) Own desire
Low	156 (16.0)	189 (19.4)	16.00	< 0.001*	0.58	0.45	0.76
High	369 (37.8)	261 (26.8)
ii) Social influence
Low	236 (24.2)	205 (21.0)	0.04	0.85	0.98	0.76	1.26
High	289 (29.6)	245 (25.1)
iii) Personal belief
Low	162 (16.6)	184 (18.9)	10.65	< 0.001*	0.64	0.50	0.84
High	363 (37.2)	266 (27.3)
iv) Currents trends
Low	195 (20.0)	169 (17.3)	0.02	0.89	0.98	0.76	1.27
High	330 (33.8)	281 (28.8)
v) Aim to quit smoking
Low	190 (19.5)	221 (22.7)	16.59	< 0.001*	0.59	0.45	0.76
High	335 (34.4)	229 (23.5)
vi) Self emotion
Low	186 (19.1)	179 (18.4)	1.96	0.16	0.83	0.64	1.08
High	339 (34.8)	271 (27.8)

Data exclude non-e-cigarette user with analysis using chi-squared test. E-cigarette user refers to exclusive e-cigarette user. OR: odds ratio, CI: confidence interval.

* p< 0.05 indicates significant difference does exist.

Logistic regression was performed to ascertain the impact of age, gender, ethnicity, level of education, adverse events occurrence, comorbidity disease and the reason for e-cigarette use. Exclusive e-cigarette use was significantly associated with gender (AOR=0.19, 95% CI: 0.09 – 0.40, p< 0.001) and own desire (AOR=0.58, 95% CI: 0.45 – 0.76, p< 0.001), personal belief (AOR=0.64, 95% CI: 0.50 – 0.84, p=0.001) and aim to quit smoking (AOR=0.59, 95% CI: 0.45 – 0.76, p< 0.001). However, the multivariate analysis showed that exclusive e-cigarette use was only associated with gender (p< 0.001) with an adjusted odds ratio of becoming e-cigarette user 0.18 times lower for males compared to females ().

Table 5

Factors associated with e-cigarette users in univariate and multivariate analysis among students (n=975 )

Variable	Univariate analysis			Multivariate analysis
	0=dual user, 1=e-cigarette user (reference)
	p	AOR	95% CIk	p	AOR	95% CI
Age (years)
≤ 21 (reference)	0.12	0.81	0.62 – 1.05	0.17	0.82	0.62 – 1.09
> 21
Gender
Female (reference)	< 0.001*	0.19	0.09 – 0.40	< 0.001*	0.18	0.09 – 0.39
Male
Ethnicity
Others (reference)	0.56	1.09	0.81 – 1.48	0.17	1.24	0.91 – 1.71
Malay
Level of education
Others (reference)	0.13	0.82	0.63 – 1.06	0.44	0.89	0.67 – 1.19
Degree
Adverse events occurrence
≤ 2 symptoms (reference)	0.07	0.68	0.44 – 1.03	0.05	0.65	0.42 – 1.01
> 2 symptoms
Comorbidity disease
None (reference)	0.33	1.25	0.80 – 1.9	0.29	1.29	0.81 – 2.05
Having comorbidity
Reason for e-cigarette use
i) Own desire
Low (reference)	< 0.001*	0.58	0.45 – 0.76	0.27	0.82	0.59 – 1.16
High
ii) Personal belief
Low (reference)	0.001*	0.64	0.50 – 0.84	0.34	0.85	0.61 – 1.19
High
iii) Aim to quit smoking
Low (reference)	< 0.001*	0.59	0.45 – 0.76	0.06	0.72	0.51 – 1.01
High

[i] Data exclude non-e-cigarette user with analysis using logistic regression. E-cigarette user refers to exclusive e-cigarette user. AOR: adjusted odds ratio, CI: confidence interval. *p< 0.05 indicates significant difference does exist.

DISCUSSION

The study assessed factors related to e-cigarette use through which user profiles were created. The study revealed that male respondents were the majority e-cigarette users, most of them young and residing in urban areas. The respondents smoked cigarettes alongside their family members, colleagues and peers who either smoked tobacco, used an e-cigarette, or both. This finding is similar to the e-cigarette user profile reported by Jun et al.²⁰ and Joan-Carles et al.²¹. In Malaysia, smoking among females is culturally unacceptable, which affirms the low number of female e-cigarette users found in the study. Young people have strong desires to try something new; living in an urban settings allows easy access to e-cigarette sources and living in proximity to a smoking environment enhances smoking interest. Involvement with e-cigarette use exposes the users to various health risks, particularly those who use it as an alternative to quitting cigarette smoking. The implication here is the possible lack of knowledge about smoking quitting methods, despite the availability of alternative means for quitting cigarette smoking, such as nicotine lozenges, support group, counselling, nicotine patch, nicotine replacement drug and traditional medicine. The listed methods are safe and subsidized by the government, but were only used by 25% of the respondents.

In this study, about 74.8% of the respondents were e-cigarette users, the finding is augmented by the Saddleson et al.³⁶ assertion that most university/college students use e-cigarettes for pleasure. However, a study conducted in France found that 70% of college students in two major campuses never used e-cigarette³⁷. Also, some studies in the United States and other countries show that e-cigarette users may as well use conventional cigarettes^38,39 and drugs⁴⁰ in the future. It is also worrying that e-cigarette use among ex-smokers may cause a return to cigarette smoking⁴¹.

Over three-quarters of the respondents were involved in smoking, including ex-smokers. Of them, 54.9% started smoking at the age of 16 – 20 years, when they were in high school or just entering university. This situation clearly indicates that strategic prevention planning should target this age group and younger. Rigotti⁴² stated that university students should be targeted for behavior change advocacy, because adolescents were the main marketing target group of the tobacco industry. It was further revealed that 34.5% of the respondents were exclusive e-cigarette users, with preference to e-juice without nicotine (only flavors) and lower level of nicotine (≤ 6 mg of nicotine)⁴¹.

Health effects of smoking are well known due to the existence of evidence-based research outcomes and established linkage to cancer, heart disease, and stroke. Information on smoking hazards are available and easily accessible through various media outlets (e.g. posters, advertisements on buildings and vehicles, video, radio and television ads etc.). Despite this development for a conventional cigarette, information on e-cigarette adverse effects are relatively new and emerging, and in need of more research. In this study, adverse effects like dizziness, cough, headache, addiction and chest pain were reported. Findings by Hua et al.⁴³ posit that there are over 405 different health-related effects experienced by users. Additionally, most common health-related effects occurred in the respiratory, neurological, sensory and digestive systems, while direct health effects occurred solely in the respiratory system⁴³.

E-cigarette marketers often advertise it as a safe and healthier alternative to conventional smoking and that it aids smoking cessation^44-48. The study found that e-cigarettes were used by the respondents for various reasons: own desire, personal beliefs, self-emotion, and as a current smoking trend. Using it as a means for quitting smoking is popular among dual users (59.4%). Chapman et al.⁴⁹ stated that e-cigarette use is not consistent with attempting to quit tobacco smoking among young adults, as adults most often report e-cigarette use as a substitute for tobacco and not as a means for quitting^24,25,49.

The effectiveness of e-cigarette use as a smoking cessation tool is unclear^1,4,20, and subject for further research. Moreover, e-cigarette use is not without risk, but much less dangerous than tobacco, as it has less carcinogenic chemicals (e.g. acetone, acroline, benzene, cadmium, carbon monoxide, toluene, etc.)^46,48. Lynn et al.⁵⁰ suggested that the mistaken perception of lesser risk may be the influencing factor for e-cigarette use as a substitute for tobacco smoking. Further research on the health effects of e-cigarette use should be conducted, to ascertain its severity on human health.

The main limitation of this study is that the data were only collected in one of the States in Malaysia within a certain time duration. Therefore, the samples do not represent a national proportion and hence have limited generalizability. Also, the self-reporting mechanism used in data collection could result in a biased response. Despite these limitations, the findings present a good profile of e-cigarette users and a framework with which to guide decision making and future research on e-cigarette use. Additionally, e-cigarette use was more popular among young people in this study, larger studies in diverse locations and populations might address the challenges of this study.

CONCLUSIONS

The study provides evidence-based information for a behaviour change campaign on e-cigarette use among university students. Both cigarettes, as well as e-cigarette use among students, for whatever reason, need to be discouraged. Achieving meaningful mitigation of the use of tobacco products needs the combined efforts of academics, civil society, government, industry and communities to find effective means for a solution to the tobacco epidemic.

References

1. Gravely S, Fong GT, Cummings KM, et al. Correction: Gravely, S., et al. Awareness, Trial, and Current Use of Electronic Cigarettes in 10 Countries: Findings from the ITC Project. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11, 11691-11704. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2015;12(5):4631-4637. doi:10.3390/ijerph120504631

2. Caponnetto P, Campagna D, Papale GM, Russo C, Polosa R. The emerging phenomenon of electronic cigarettes. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2012;6(1):63-74. doi:10.1586/ers.11.92

3. Dockrell M, Morrison R, Bauld L, McNeill Ann. E-cigarettes: Prevalence and attitudes in Great Britain. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013;15:1737-1744. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntt057

4. King BA, Patel R, Nguyen KH, Dube SR. Trends in awareness and use of electronic cigarettes among U.S. adults, 2010–2013. Nicotine Tob. Res. 2015;17:219-227. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntu191

5. Farsalinos KE, Poulas K, Voudris V, Le Houezec J. Electronic cigarette use in the European Union: Analysis of a representative sample of 27,460 Europeans from 28 countries. Addiction. 2016;111:2032-2040. doi:10.1111/add.13506

6. Weaver SR, Majeed BA, Pechacek TF, Nyman AL, Gregory KR, Eriksen MP. Use of electronic nicotine delivery systems and other tobacco products among USA adults, 2014: Results from a national survey. Int. J. Public Health. 2016;61:177-188. doi:10.1007/s00038-015-0761-0

7. World Health Organization. WHO Study Group on Tobacco Product Regulation. Report on the Scientific Basis of Tobacco Product Regulation. WHO Technical Report Series, no. 955. http://www.who.int/tobacco/glo.... Published January, 2010. Accessed July 25, 2018.

8. Schmid T. Asia’s E-Cig Regulations: Confusion & Uncertainty. Tobacco Asia. http://www. tobaccoasia.com/features/asia-.... Published May , 2016. Accessed July 28, 2018.

9. Alex Frew McMillan. Vaping in Asia Could Save Big Tobacco. https://www.thestreet.com/stor.... Published August, 2017. Accessed July 28, 2018.

10. Palipudi KM, Mbulo L, Morton J, et al. Awareness and Current Use of Electronic Cigarettes in Indonesia, Malaysia, Qatar, and Greece: Findings From 2011–2013 Global Adult Tobacco Surveys. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2016;18:501. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntv081

11. World Health Organization. Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS): Fact Sheet Philiphines 2015. www.who.int/tobacco/surveillan.... Published February, 2017. Accessed July 25, 2018.

12. World Health Organization. Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS): Fact Sheet Vietnam 2015. http://www.who.int/tobacco/sur... _ E_Oct2016.pdf?ua=1. Published August, 2017. Accessed July 25, 2018.

13. World Health Organization. Global Youth Tobacco Survey (GYTS): Fact Sheet Cambodia 2016. https://nccd.cdc.gov/GTSSDataS... x?ID=3378. Published December, 2017. Accessed July 25, 2018.

14. World Health Organization. Global Youth Tobacco Survey (GYTS): Fact Sheet Myanmar 2016. http://www.searo.who.int/tobac.... Published December, 2017. Accessed July 25, 2018.

15. Ab Rahman J, Nik Mohamed MH, Kartiwi M, et al. National E-cigarette Survey (NECS) 2016 in Malaysia - Method and population characteristics. Med J Malaysia. 2017;72(Suppl.1):A143.

16. Cohen A. How Many People Vape Around The World? vaping.com https://vaping.com/blog/data/h.... Published November, 2017. Accessed July 28, 2018.

17. Wong LP, Mohamad Shakir SM, Alias H, Aghamohammadi N, Hoe VC. Reasons for using electronic cigarettes and intentions to quit among electronic cigarette users in Malaysia. J Community Health. 2016;41:1101-1109. doi:10.1007/s10900-016-0196-4

18. Jusoh I. Vape ban in all public universities. Malay Mail. November 22, 2015. http://www.themalaymailonline..... Published November, 2015. Assessed April 2, 2017.

19. Private varsities ban smoking and Vaping. The Star Online. December 2, 2015. http://www.thestar.com.my/news.... Published December, 2015. Assessed April 2, 2017.

20. Goniewicz ML, Zielinska-Danch W. Electronic cigarette use among teenagers and young adults in Poland. Pediatrics. 2012;130(4):e879-e885. doi:10.1542/peds.2011-3448

21. Cho JH, Shin E, Moon SS. Electronic-cigarette smoking experience among adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2011;49:542-546. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.08.001

22. Suris JC, Berchtold A, Akre C. Reasons to use e-cigarettes and associations with other substances among adolescents in Switzerland. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015;153:140-144. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.05.034

23. Babineau K, Taylor K, Clancy L. Electronic Cigarette Use among Irish Youth: A Cross Sectional Study of Prevalence and Associated Factors. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(5):e0126419. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0126419

24. Etter JF, Bullen C. Electronic cigarette: users profile, utilization, satisfaction and perceived efficacy. Addiction. 2011;106(11):2017-2028. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03505.x

25. Etter JF. Electronic cigarettes: A survey of users. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:231. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-231

26. Schmidt L, Reidmohr A, Harwell TS, Helgerson SD. Prevalence and reasons for initiating use of electronic cigarettes among adults in Montana, 2013. Preventing Chronic Disease. 2014;11:E204. doi:10.5888/pcd11.140283

27. Biener L, Hargraves JL. A longitudinal study of electronic cigarette use among a population-based sample of adult smokers: Association with smoking cessation and motivation to quit. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015;17(2):127-133. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntu200

28. Kong G, Morean ME, Cavallo DA, Camenga DR, Krishnan-Sarin S. Reasons for electronic cigarette experimentation and discontinuation among adolescents and young adults. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015;17(7):847-854. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntu257

29. McDonald EA, Ling PM. One of several ‘toys’ for smoking: young adult experiences with electronic cigarettes in New York City. Tob Control. 2015;24(6):588-593. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051743

30. Harrell MB, Weaver SR, Loukas A, et al. Flavoured e-cigarette use: Charachterizing youth, young adult, and adult users. Preventive Medicine Report. 2017;5:33-40. doi:10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.11.001.

31. Ambrose BK, Day HR, Rostron B. Flavored tobacco product use among US youth aged 12–17 years, 2013-2014. JAMA. 2015;314:1871-1873. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.13802

32. Choi K, Fabian L, Mottey N, Corbett A, Forster J. Young adults’ favorable perceptions of snus, dissolvable tobacco products, and electronic cigarettes: Findings from a focus group study. American Journal of Public Health. 2012;102(11):2088-2093. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2011.300525

33. Dutra LM, Glantz SA. Electronic cigarettes and conventional cigarettes use among US Adolescents: A cross-sectional study. JAMA Pediatricts. 2014;168(7):610-617. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.5488

34. Pepper JK, Ribisl KM, Emery SL, Brewer NT. Reasons for starting and stopping electronic cigarette use. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11:10345-10361. doi:10.3390/ijerph111010345

35. American Heart Association. Electronic cigarettes: A policy statement from the American Heart Association. Dallas. http://circ.ahajournals.org/co... html. Published October, 2014. Assessed April 8, 2017.

36. Saddleson ML, Kozlowski LT, Giovino GA, et al. Risky behaviors, e-cigarette use and susceptibility of use among college students. Drug & Alcohol Dependence. 2015;149:25-30. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.01.001

37. Tavolacci MP, Vasiliu A, Romo L, Kotbagi G, Kern L, Ladner J. Patterns of electronic cigarette use in current and ever users among college students in France: A cross–sectional study. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e011344. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011344.

38. Leventhal AM, Strong DR, Kirkpatrick MG, et al. Association of electronic cigarette use with initiation of combustible tobacco product smoking in early adolescence. JAMA. 2015;314(7):700-707. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.8950

39. Wills TA, Knight R, Williams RJ, Pagano I, Sargent JD. Risk factors for exclusive e-cigarette use and dual e-cigarette use and tobacco use in adolescents. Pediatrics. 2015;135(1):e43-51. doi:10.1542/peds.2014-0760

40. Newman K. NIH Survey: Students vaping, using Marijuana more in 2017. Teens’ use of vaporizers and marijuana could lead to future drug habits researchers warn. U.S. News & World Report. https://www.usnews.com/news/na.... Published, 2017. Assessed April 8, 2017.

41. Sinniah D, Khoo EJ. E-cigarettes: Facts and legal status. IeJSME. 2015;9(3):10-19.

42. Rigotti NA. E-Cigarette use and subsequent tobacco use by adolescents: New evidence about a potential risk of e-cigarettes. JAMA. 2015;314(7):673-674. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.8382

43. Hua M, Alfi M, Talbot P. Health related effects reported by electronic cigarette users in online forums. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2013;15:e59. doi:10.2196/jmir.2324

44. Palazzolo DL. Electronic Cigarettes and Vaping: A New Challenge in Clinical Medicine and Public Health. A Literature Review. Frontiers in Public Health. 2013;1:56. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2013.00056

45. Manuel. Choosing the lesser of the two evils. OLEIA. https://www.oleia.net/choosing.... Published August, 2017. Assessed October 14, 2017.

46. McNeill A, Hajek P. Underpinning evidence for the estimate that e-cigarette use is around 95% safer than smoking. Authors’ note. London, United Kingdom: Public Health England publications gateway; 2015.

47. GOV.UK. E-cigarettes around 95% less harmful than tobacco estimates landmark review. https://www.gov.uk/government/.... Published August, 2015. Assessed April 7, 2017.

48. Farsalinos KE, Polosa R. Safety evaluation and risk assessment of electronic cigarettes as tobacco cigarette substitutes: A systematic review. Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety. 2014;5(2):67-86. doi:10.1177/2042098614524430

49. Carroll Chapman SL, Wu LT. E-Cigarette prevalence and correlates of use among adolescents versus adults: A review and comparison. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 2014;54:43-54. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.03.005

50. Kozlowski LT, Homish DL, Homish GG. Daily users compared to less frequent users find vape as or more satisfying and less dangerous than cigarettes, and are likelier to use non-cig-alike vaping products. Preventive Medicine Reports. 2017;6:111-114. doi:10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.02.026