It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has posed a major public health crisis all over the world. The role of chest imaging, especially computed tomography (CT), has evolved during the pandemic paralleling the accumulation of scientific evidence. In the early stage of the pandemic, the performance of chest imaging for COVID-19 has widely been debated especially in the context of comparison to real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Current evidence is against the use of chest imaging for routine screening of COVID-19 contrary to the initial expectations. It still has an integral role to play, however, in its work up and staging, especially when assessing complications or disease progression. Chest CT is gold standard imaging modality for COVID-19 pneumonia; in some situations, chest X-ray or ultrasound may be an effective alternative. The most important role of radiologists in this context is to be able to identify those patients at greatest risk of imminent clinical decompensation by learning to stratify cases of COVID-19 on the basis of radiologic imaging in the most efficient and timely fashion possible. The present availability of multiple and more refined CT grading systems and classification is now making this task easier and thereby contributing to the recent improvements achieved in COVID-19 treatment and outcomes. In this article, evidence of chest imaging regarding diagnosis, management and monitoring of COVID-19 will be chronologically reviewed.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 The University of Tokyo, Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan (GRID:grid.26999.3d) (ISNI:0000 0001 2151 536X); Japan Self-Defense Forces Central Hospital, Department of Radiology, Tokyo, Japan (GRID:grid.415474.7)
2 The University of Tokyo, Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan (GRID:grid.26999.3d) (ISNI:0000 0001 2151 536X)
3 University of Michigan, Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Ann Arbor, USA (GRID:grid.214458.e) (ISNI:0000000086837370)
4 Department of Radiology, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan (GRID:grid.419257.c) (ISNI:0000 0004 1791 9005)
5 Japan Self-Defense Forces Central Hospital, Department of Radiology, Tokyo, Japan (GRID:grid.415474.7)