Abstract

Introduction

Many patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) experience excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) despite primary airway therapy. This study aimed to understand the burden of EDS in European adults with OSA who received primary airway therapy.

Methods

Non-interventional, qualitative study in patients with EDS in OSA, from the UK, Germany, and Spain. Post-IRB approval, patients with self-reported OSA were recruited via patient panels. Eligible patients had Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score ≥10, self-reported adequate nightly sleep, current/past primary airway therapy, and no other self-reported EDS-associated conditions. Patients completed a quantitative pre-interview questionnaire and a qualitative, semi-structured telephone interview.

Results

Fifteen patients (n=5/country; 60% female; mean age, 48.7 years; mean years since OSA diagnosis, 7.7) were included. Six of 8 current positive airway pressure (PAP) users were compliant (≥4 h, 7 nights/wk); 6 of 7 non-PAP users had prior airway surgery. Mean ESS score was 14.5; 60% of those without an EDS diagnosis reported discussing EDS with their doctor. Patients experienced broadly consistent negative impacts from EDS, including physical functioning (n=15), daily life activities (n=15), work/study habits (n=14), emotional (n=15), social life (n=14), and cognition (n=13). No between-country differences were observed.

Discussion

Findings demonstrate the patient-perceived burden of residual EDS in OSA. Forty percent of patients without an EDS diagnosis did not discuss EDS with their doctor despite daily impacts.

Details

Title
14 Non-interventional, qualitative study assessing patient perspectives of the burden of excessive daytime sleepiness in obstructive sleep apnoea
Author
Carls, Ginger S; Pokrzywinski, Robin; Karn, Hayley; Collacott, Hannah; Mettam, Sam
Pages
A7-A7
Section
Abstracts
Publication year
2021
Publication date
2021
Publisher
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
e-ISSN
20524439
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2592841295
Copyright
© 2021 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ . Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.