It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Replication stress causes replication fork stalling, resulting in an accumulation of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA). Replication protein A (RPA) and CTC1-STN1-TEN1 (CST) complex bind ssDNA and are found at stalled forks, where they regulate RAD51 recruitment and foci formation in vivo. Here, we investigate crosstalk between RPA, CST, and RAD51. We show that CST and RPA localize in close proximity in cells. Although CST stably binds to ssDNA with a high affinity at low ionic strength, the interaction becomes more dynamic and enables facilitated dissociation at high ionic strength. CST can coexist with RPA on the same ssDNA and target RAD51 to RPA-coated ssDNA. Notably, whereas RPA-coated ssDNA inhibits RAD51 activity, RAD51 can assemble a functional filament and exhibit strand-exchange activity on CST-coated ssDNA at high ionic strength. Our findings provide mechanistic insights into how CST targets and tethers RAD51 to RPA-coated ssDNA in response to replication stress.
During replication stress, the RPA protein complex coats single-stranded DNA to preclude RAD51 loading. Here, the authors show how RPA and CST crosstalk to regulate RAD51 activity.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details






1 National Taiwan University, Institute of Biochemical Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan (GRID:grid.19188.39) (ISNI:0000 0004 0546 0241)
2 National Taiwan University, Department of Chemistry, Taipei, Taiwan (GRID:grid.19188.39) (ISNI:0000 0004 0546 0241)
3 Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Department of Cancer Biology, Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center, Maywood, USA (GRID:grid.164971.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 1089 6558)
4 Washington State University, Office of Research, Spokane, USA (GRID:grid.30064.31) (ISNI:0000 0001 2157 6568)
5 National Taiwan University, Institute of Biochemical Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan (GRID:grid.19188.39) (ISNI:0000 0004 0546 0241); Academia Sinica, Institute of Biological Chemistry, Taipei, Taiwan (GRID:grid.28665.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2287 1366)