It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Arm movement kinematics may provide a more sensitive way to assess neurorehabilitation outcomes than existing metrics. However, measuring arm kinematics in people with stroke can be challenging for traditional optical tracking systems due to non-ideal environments, expense, and difficulty performing required calibration. Here, we present two open-source methods, one using inertial measurement units (IMUs) and another using virtual reality (Vive) sensors, for accurate measurements of wrist position with respect to the shoulder during reaching movements in people with stroke. We assessed the accuracy of each method during a 3D reaching task. We also demonstrated each method’s ability to track two metrics derived from kinematics-sweep area and smoothness-in people with chronic stroke. We computed correlation coefficients between the kinematics estimated by each method when appropriate. Compared to a traditional optical tracking system, both methods accurately tracked the wrist during reaching, with mean signed errors of 0.09 ± 1.81 cm and 0.48 ± 1.58 cm for the IMUs and Vive, respectively. Furthermore, both methods’ estimated kinematics were highly correlated with each other (p < 0.01). By using relatively inexpensive wearable sensors, these methods may be useful for developing kinematic metrics to evaluate stroke rehabilitation outcomes in both laboratory and clinical environments.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, USA (GRID:grid.280418.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 0705 8684); Northwestern University, Department of Neurology, Chicago, USA (GRID:grid.16753.36) (ISNI:0000 0001 2299 3507)
2 Northwestern University, Department of Neurology, Chicago, USA (GRID:grid.16753.36) (ISNI:0000 0001 2299 3507); University of Illinois at Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago, USA (GRID:grid.185648.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2175 0319)
3 Northwestern University, Department of Neurology, Chicago, USA (GRID:grid.16753.36) (ISNI:0000 0001 2299 3507); Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, USA (GRID:grid.280535.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 0388 0584)
4 Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, USA (GRID:grid.280535.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 0388 0584); Northwestern University, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Chicago, USA (GRID:grid.16753.36) (ISNI:0000 0001 2299 3507)
5 Northwestern University, Department of Neurology, Chicago, USA (GRID:grid.16753.36) (ISNI:0000 0001 2299 3507); Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, USA (GRID:grid.280535.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 0388 0584); Northwestern University, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Chicago, USA (GRID:grid.16753.36) (ISNI:0000 0001 2299 3507); Northwestern University, Department of Neuroscience, Chicago, USA (GRID:grid.16753.36) (ISNI:0000 0001 2299 3507); Northwestern University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Evanston, USA (GRID:grid.16753.36) (ISNI:0000 0001 2299 3507)