Cross-sectional associations of housework with cognitive, physical and sensorimotor functions in younger and older community-dwelling adults: the Yishun Study

Abstract

Objectives

Regular moderate-to-vigorous intensity recreational physical activity (PA) improves physical and cognitive functions. However, the age-associated relationships between non-recreational PA and functional ability remain less explored. We examined the associations between housework and functional health among younger and older Singaporean community-dwelling adults.

Design

Cross-sectional study.

Setting and participants

Younger (<65 years, n=249) and older (≥65 years, n=240) community-dwelling adults were randomly recruited from a large residential town in Singapore.

Outcome measures

Physical function was assessed using Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), repeated-chair-sit-to-stand and gait speed. Cognitive and sensorimotor functions were assessed using Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) and Physiological Profile Assessment (PPA), respectively.

Methods

Light housework (LH) and heavy housework (HH), recreational, and occupational and transport-related PAs were assessed using PA questionnaires. Participants were dichotomised into low-volume and high-volume LH and HH groups. Results were adjusted for level of recreational and other non-recreational PAs.

Results

Among older but not younger adults, RBANS scores were 8% and 5% higher in high HH and LH groups compared with low HH and LH groups, respectively (p=0.012 and p=0.016). Specifically, HH was associated with 14% higher attention score (p=0.014), and LH was associated with 12% and 8% higher immediate and delayed memory scores, respectively (p<0.001 and p=0.004). In older adults, sit-to-stand time and PPA scores were 8% and 23% lower in the high HH group than the low HH group, respectively (p=0.011 and p=0.040). SPPB and gait speed did not differ with age or HH. LH was not associated with physical or sensorimotor function.

Conclusions

Among older adults, housework is associated with higher cognitive function, specifically in attention and memory. Associations of housework with physical function and sensorimotor performance were intensity dependent. Housework PA is positively associated with functional health among community-dwelling older adults, independent of recreation and other non-recreational PAs. Further longitudinal and intervention studies are needed to establish causality.

Correspondence to Dr Shiou-Liang Wee; [email protected]

Strengths and limitations of this study

• Representative sample of Singapore’s adult population across age groups.

• Comprehensive information about housework, recreational, occupational and transport-related physical activities (PAs) using validated measures.

• Analyses included comparison between younger and older age groups and adjustments for potential confounders.

• This study is cross-sectional; therefore, associations between housework and functional health do not necessarily reflect causality.

• Housework and PAs were self-reported and not objectively measured.

Introduction

Regular physical activity (PA) improves physical and mental health, mitigates the risks and effects of chronic diseases, and reduces falls, immobility, dependency and mortality among older adults.^1–3 Yet, global surveillance data indicate that in 2016, levels of insufficient PA remained high (27.5%) and stable across the previous 10 years.⁴ The prevalence of insufficient PA was also more than double in high-income countries than in low-income countries (36.8% vs 16.2%), and was the highest in Singapore (36.5%) among high-income Asia Pacific countries.⁴ In wealthier countries, transition towards more sedentary occupations and motorised transportation could explain the higher levels of inactivity. The majority of PAs in high-income countries are from recreational PA, which differed from low-income countries where PA is predominantly from non-recreational activities, including transportation, occupational and housework.^{4 5} Given the increasing prevalence of insufficient PA globally,⁵ better strategies and policies are required to increase PA levels, especially among older adults, due to their increased vulnerability to adverse health outcomes.⁶

Earlier studies in high-income countries largely focused on the effects of recreational PA on physical and cognitive capacities, which are key risk factors for falls among older adults.^7–9 Few studies have examined the independent effects of non-recreational activity, such as housework tasks, on age-associated decline in functional ability.^10–12 Furthermore, although the effects of exercise intensity have been widely investigated,¹ none of the studies investigated the associations between housework intensity and age-associated functional health. With the rapidly ageing population and increasing life expectancy worldwide, approaches to promote healthy ageing, which centres on the maintenance of functional ability, are urgently needed.¹³

Housework activities are a large part of everyday activities in older people and account for a significant proportion of self-reported PA.¹⁴ Apart from a meaningful occupation, housework is also a component of instrumental activities of daily living—both key factors of successful ageing. Additionally, single bout of housework and chronic housework are associated with improved cognition, brain volume and executive function, and negatively associated with frailty.^10–12 Regardless of country income levels, higher levels of non-recreational PA were associated with a graded reduction in mortality and cardiovascular diseases, suggesting the potential role of non-recreational PA, such as housework, on improving health outcomes even in high-income countries.⁵ Housework may also confer benefits on physical and mental functions among older adults in a high-income country such as Singapore. Therefore, we studied the associations of light housework (LH) and heavy housework (HH) activities with cognitive, physical and sensorimotor functions, among younger and older adults in Singapore.

Methods

Settings

Community-dwelling adults (≥21 years) were recruited from a large, northeastern residential town of Yishun in Singapore, with residential population of 220 320 (50.6% women), with 12.2% older adults (≥65 years). This is similar to the overall Singapore residential population of 4 044 200 (51.1% women), with 15.2% older adults (≥65 years).¹⁵

Participants

Participants were recruited cross-sectionally from the Yishun Study through random sampling, in quotas of 20–40 participants in each sex and age group (10-year age groups between 21 and 60 years old and 5-year age groups after 60 years), to obtain a representative sample of ~300 men and ~300 women.¹⁶ Briefly, community-dwelling adults aged 21 years and above who were independent in performing activities of daily living, had <5 comorbidities and had no neuromuscular or cognitive disorders were recruited. Those between 21 and 64 years and between 65 and 90 years of age were categorised as younger and older participants, respectively. Participants self-reported their years of education and medical conditions and comorbidities. All assessments were based on standardised protocols and administered by trained researchers at the Geriatric Education & Research Institute Lab on Yishun Health Campus, mostly within one visit.

Patient and public involvement

Neither patients nor the public were involved in the design, planning, conduct or reporting of this study.

Anthropometric assessment

Body weight and height were measured using an electronic scale and stadiometer, respectively (SECA, Hamburg, Germany). Body mass index was calculated as body weight (kg) divided by height (m) squared.

Housework and recreational, transport and occupational PAs

Data on housework were self-reported and collected according to the Longitudinal Ageing Study Amsterdam Physical Activity Questionnaire (LAPAQ),¹⁷ which consists of specific questions regarding frequency and time spent on light and heavy household tasks. LH tasks included washing the dishes, dusting, making the bed, doing the laundry, hanging out the laundry, ironing, tidying up and cooking meals. HH tasks included window cleaning, changing beddings, beating the mat, vacuuming, washing or scrubbing the floor, and chores involving sawing, carpeting, repairing or painting. The median time spent per week on household activities was used to dichotomise participants into high and low groups for LH (315 min/week) and HH (15 min/week) groups. LH was assigned a metabolic equivalent of task (MET) of 2.5 and HH was assigned a MET of 4.0.¹⁸

Recreational (sport, fitness or leisure time activities), transport (active commuting/travel) and occupational (work) PAs were determined using the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ), which consists of questions assessing the frequency and duration of vigorous-intensity or moderate-intensity activities during a typical week.¹⁹ A cut-off of ≥600 MET min/week (≥150 min/week of moderate-intensity PA or ≥75 min/week of vigorous-intensity PA) was used to determine the percentage of participants who met the current PA guidelines.^{5 20}

Cognitive function

Cognitive performance was assessed by the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) score. RBANS is a standardised age-adjusted battery that is sensitive to cognitive impairment.²¹ RBANS assesses global and specific cognitive domains including immediate and delayed memories, visuospatial construction, language and attention.

Physical function

Habitual gait speed was assessed using a 6 m GAITRite Walkway (CIR Systems, Sparta, New Jersey, USA) with 2 m lead in and out phase. Participants performed three trials and the average timing was recorded. The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) consists of three subtests including balance, gait and sit-to-stand.^{22 23} The balance subtest is composed of three parts with progressive difficulty, including unaided feet-together stand, semitandem stand and full-tandem stand. Participants were timed until they moved or 10 s elapsed time. Gait speed was assessed by participants walking 8 ft at their usual pace, with a moving start.²² The average timing was recorded over two trials. To assess sit-to-stand time, participants folded their arms across their chest and performed five chair stands as quickly as possible. Each of the three subtests was scored from 0 to 4, and the total score was the sum of three subtests, ranging from 0 to 12. Higher SPPB scores indicated better physical function.²²

Sensorimotor or physiological falls risk assessments

Physiological falls risk was determined using the Physiological Profile Assessment (PPA) short version, which has been shown to predict fall incidents and consists of five validated sensorimotor measures: visual contrast sensitivity, hand reaction time, knee extension strength, proprioception and postural sway.^{24 25} The five measures were weighted to compute a composite PPA index score using the NeuRA FallScreen Falls Risk Calculator (https://fbirc.neura.edu.au/fallscreen). Higher PPA scores indicate poorer sensorimotor performance and greater falls risk.^{24 25}

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using R V.3.6.2 (R Foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria). A sample size of 400 (100 per group) was needed for the trial to have 80% power to detect a two-sided hypothesis test at an α level of 0.05 (effect size of 0.2) (G*Power, V.3.1, Germany). All participants with completed outcome measures were included for analysis. Numerical variables are presented as mean (SD) in text and figures unless otherwise stated. Participant characteristics were analysed using independent samples t-test to assess potential differences between high and low HH and LH groups. Sensorimotor, cognitive and physical function measures were analysed using two-way analysis of variance for HH and LH independently, with age group (younger vs older), housework groups (low vs high) and their interaction (age×housework) as fixed effects. Normality and homogeneity of variances assumptions were tested using Shapiro-Wilk and Levene tests, respectively. Effect sizes are reported with partial eta squared (η² _p).²⁶ A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Participant characteristics

A total of 249 participants (57% women) with mean age of 44 years (SD 14 years) in the younger group, and 240 participants (57.1% women) with mean age of 75 years (SD 6 years) in the older group, had housework (LAPAQ) data available and were included in the analysis. Ethnic distribution of participants (82.0% Chinese, 8.4% Malay, 6.7% Indians and 2.9% from other ethnicities) was similar to that of Singapore’s population.¹⁵ A total of 36% (n=90) and 48% (n=116) of the participants in the younger and older groups, respectively, met the recommended PA level derived exclusively from recreational PA.²⁰ These values were lower than 61% (n=152) and 66% (n=159) of the younger and older participants, respectively, who attained the recommended PA level exclusively through housework activities.

Participant demographics between high and low HH and LH groups, such as age, education, anthropometric, PA and housework data, are summarised in table 1. Compared with low HH and LH groups, majority of participants in high HH and LH groups were women, regardless of age groups. Within the younger group, those in the high LH group were shorter and had less years of education than those in the low LH group (all p<0.001, table 1). Total, recreational and occupational PAs did not differ between high and low HH and LH groups in younger and older adults (all p>0.05, table 1). Within the younger but not the older group, transport-related PA was 39% lower in the low LH group than in the high LH group (p=0.003, table 1). Regardless of age group, compared with low HH and LH groups, participants in the high HH and LH groups spent more time on both LH and HH activities per week and had higher total housework MET min/week (all p<0.001, table 1).

Table 1

Mean (SD) participant characteristics for high and low HH and LH groups, within younger and older groups

	HH		P value	LH		P value
	Low	High		Low	High
Younger
n	100	149		137	112
Sex, female, n (%)	48 (48)	94 (63)		62 (45)	80 (71)
Age (years)	43 (15)	44 (13)	0.516	42 (14)	46 (13)	0.015
Education (years)	12 (4)	12 (4)	0.493	13 (4)	11 (4)	<0.001
Height (m)	1.64 (0.09)	1.62 (0.08)	0.115	1.65 (0.08)	1.60 (0.08)	<0.001
Weight (kg)	68.0 (15.2)	67.7 (17.3)	0.875	69.0 (17.2)	66.4 (15.5)	0.219
Body mass index	25.2 (4.8)	25.6 (5.6)	0.557	25.1 (5.4)	25.8 (5.2)	0.324
PA (GPAQ)
Recreational (MET min/week)	576 (784)	774 (1302)	0.137	637 (933)	764 (1324)	0.393
Transport (MET min/week)	2065 (3010)	2003 (2228)	0.861	1577 (1955)	2579 (3075)	0.003
Occupational (MET min/week)	1686 (3619)	2408 (5658)	0.220	2052 (4252)	2199 (5699)	0.821
Total (MET min/week)	4327 (5151)	5185 (6903)	0.263	4266 (4971)	5543 (7511)	0.125
Housework activity (LAPAQ)
Heavy (min/week)	0 (2)	192 (292)	<0.001	47 (81)	198 (335)	<0.001
Light (min/week)	198 (363)	584 (593)	<0.001	95 (87)	838 (592)	<0.001
Total (MET min/week)	496 (908)	2228 (2079)	<0.001	425 (458)	2887 (2120)	<0.001
Older
n	132	108		103	137
Sex, female, n (%)	63 (48)	74 (69)		39 (38)	98 (72)
Age (years)	77 (6)	73 (6)	<0.001	77 (7)	74 (6)	0.004
Education (years)	6 (4)	7 (5)	0.168	7 (5)	7 (5)	0.764
Height (m)	1.57 (0.09)	1.57 (0.08)	0.987	1.58 (0.08)	1.56 (0.08)	0.064
Weight (kg)	60.1 (10.3)	58.5 (9.6)	0.192	60.4 (9.8)	58.6 (10.1)	0.161
Body mass index	24.5 (3.7)	23.8 (3.3)	0.102	24.2 (3.5)	24.1 (3.5)	0.778
PA (GPAQ)
Recreational (MET min/week)	828 (1053)	890 (1047)	0.650	867 (1181)	847 (941)	0.884
Transport (MET min/week)	1561 (1565)	1836 (2050)	0.253	1554 (1964)	1783 (1667)	0.340
Occupational (MET min/week)	676 (2269)	401 (1397)	0.251	547 (2113)	557 (1783)	0.968
Total (MET min/week)	3065 (2731)	3127 (2531)	0.856	2968 (2968)	3187 (2366)	0.537
Housework activity (LAPAQ)
Heavy (min/week)	0 (0)	131 (140)	<0.001	31 (72)	80 (134)	<0.001
Light (min/week)	446 (508)	684 (568)	<0.001	89 (93)	902 (485)	<0.001
Total (MET min/week)	1116 (1270)	2236 (1584)	<0.001	347 (377)	2576 (1349)	<0.001

Significant p values are indicated by bold typeface.

GPAQ, Global Physical Activity Questionnaire; HH, heavy housework; LAPAQ, Longitudinal Ageing Study Amsterdam Physical Activity Questionnaire; LH, light housework; MET, metabolic equivalent of task; PA, physical activity.

For subsequent LH analyses, age, sex, height, education, transport PA and HH were included in the model to adjust for confounding variables. To adjust for confounding factors, age, sex and LH were included in the model for subsequent HH analyses. Adjusting for recreational and occupational PAs in the analyses did not affect any of the results presented; hence, data are presented with recreational and occupational PAs excluded from the model.

Associations of HH activities with cognitive function

Within the older group, RBANS global cognition score was 8% higher in the high HH group than in the low HH group (p=0.012) but did not differ between high and low HH groups among the younger individuals (p=0.630) (age×housework; p=0.031, η² _p=0.01; figure 1A). Immediate memory index scores between high and low HH groups were not statistically significant among older (p=0.055) and younger adults (p=0.332), despite significant interaction effects (age×housework; p=0.038, η² _p=0.009; figure 1B). No significant interaction effects between age and HH groups were observed for delayed memory (p=0.108, η² _p=0.005), visuospatial construction (p=0.183, η² _p=0.004) and language index scores (p=0.776, η² _p=0.0002) (figure 1C–E). Attention index score was 14% higher in the high HH than in the low HH group within the older group (p=0.014) but not within the younger group (p=0.304) (age×housework; p=0.012, η² _p=0.01; figure 1F).

Figure 1. Mean (SD) of (A) global cognitive function and specific domains, including (B) immediate memory, (C) delayed memory, (D) visuospatial-construction, (E) language and (F) attention, between high and low heavy housework groups, within younger and older adults. *P<0.05, adjusted for age, sex and time spent on light housework per week. RBANS, Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status.

Associations of LH activities with cognitive function

Compared with the low LH group, the high LH group had 5% higher RBANS global cognition score among the older but not the younger adults (p=0.016 vs p=0.335) (age×housework; p=0.015, η² _p=0.01; figure 2A). Within the older but not the younger individuals, immediate and delayed memory index scores were also 12% (p<0.001 vs p=0.165) and 8% (p=0.004 vs p=0.729) higher in high LH group than the low LH group, respectively (age×housework; p<0.001, η² _p=0.03 and p=0.022, η² _p=0.01; figure 2B,C). No significant interaction effects between age and LH groups were observed for visuospatial construction (p=0.781, η² _p=0.0002), language (p=0.318, η² _p=0.002) and attention (p=0.194, η² _p=0.004) index scores (figure 2D–F).

Figure 2. Mean (SD) of (A) global cognitive function and specific domains, including (B) immediate memory, (C) delayed memory, (D) visuospatial-construction, (E) language and (F) attention, between high and low light housework groups, within younger and older adults. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001, adjusted for age, sex, height, years of education, transport-related physical activity and time spent on heavy housework per week. RBANS, Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status.

Associations of heavy housework activities with physical and sensorimotor functions

The interaction effects between age and HH groups were not significant for total SPPB score (p=0.155, η² _p=0.004; figure 3A) and gait speed (p=0.482, η² _p=0.001; figure 3B). Within the older but not the younger group, sit-to-stand time was 8% lower in the high HH group than the low HH group (p=0.011 vs p=0.722) (age×housework; p=0.036, η² _p=0.009; figure 3C). PPA index score, indicative of sensorimotor function, was 23% lower in the high HH group than in the low HH group, among the older (p=0.040) but not the younger adults (p=0.477) (age×housework; p=0.046, η² _p=0.008; figure 3D).

Figure 3. Mean (SD) of physical function measures including (A) total short physical performance battery score, (B) 6 m habitual gait speed, (C) five-times repeated chair sit-to-stand time and sensorimotor function measure including (D) physiological profile assessment, between high and low heavy housework groups, within younger and older adults. *P<0.05, adjusted for age, sex and time spent on light housework per week. SPPB, Short Physical Performance Battery.

Associations of LH activities with physical and sensorimotor functions

The interaction effects between age and LH groups were not significant for total SPPB score (p=0.709, η² _p=0.0003), gait speed (p=0.136, η² _p=0.005), sit-to-stand (p=0.445, η² _p=0.001) (figure 4A–C). PPA index scores, indicative of sensorimotor function, were not significant between high and low LH groups among older (p=0.067) and younger adults (p=0.178), despite significant interaction effects (age×housework; p=0.021, η² _p=0.01; figure 4D). Mean (SD) values of cognitive, physical and sensorimotor performances between age and housework groups are presented in online supplemental table S1.

Figure 4. Mean (SD) of physical function measures including (A) total short physical performance battery score, (B) 6 m habitual gait speed, (C) five-times repeated chair sit-to-stand time and sensorimotor function measure including (D) physiological profile assessment, between high and low light housework groups, within younger and older adults. All p > 0.05, adjusted for age, sex, height, years of education, transport-related physical activity and time spent on heavy housework per week. SPPB, Short Physical Performance Battery.

Discussion

The present study is the first to report that housework activity is associated with cognitive, physical and sensorimotor functions among older but not younger adults in Singapore. These positive associations of housework with functional performance in older adults were independent of recreational, occupational and transport-related PAs. We also show that more adults attained recommended PA levels through housework than recreation.

Regardless of intensity, higher levels of housework activities were associated with higher global cognition, among our population of older adults. Earlier studies observed that lower levels of housework activities were associated with mild cognitive impairment, cognitive decline and lower grey matter volume among older adults,^{11 27 28} suggesting a positive association between housework activities and cognitive function, plausibly through an increase in brain volume, as observed with exercise interventions in older adults.^{29 30} However, the positive associations between housework and cognition were not apparent in younger adults in our population. Differences in years of education between younger and older adults likely explain the disparity, as younger adults in this study had five more years of education on average than older adults. Since education level is positively associated with baseline cognitive function and slower cognitive decline,³¹ it is plausible that higher education levels and cognitive function in younger adults decrease the potential for better cognitive function associated with housework activities.

Our results demonstrate, for the first time, that the intensity of housework was differentially associated with specific cognitive domains. Heavy housework was associated with higher scores in the attention domain, while LH was associated with higher scores in both delayed and immediate memory domains in older adults. Earlier studies reported that aerobic exercise interventions of varying intensities improved specific cognitive function domains, including executive and motor function, attention and memory, through an increase in hippocampal volume and brain-derived neurotrophic factor expression.^32–34 Given that housework accounted for a significant proportion (~24% to 36% in women and ~19% to 28% in men) of self-reported moderate-to-vigorous-intensity PA among older adults aged above 60,¹⁴ it is plausible that the higher cognitive function associated with housework occurs through a similar mechanism as PA or exercise.¹⁴ More studies are required to understand the underlying mechanisms driving the age-associated differing associations of housework intensity with specific cognitive domains.

Poorer cognitive performance in attention and executive functions were associated with poorer physical function, slower gait, postural instability and future falls among community-dwelling older adults.^35–37 We show that higher levels of heavy housework activities were also independently associated with better physical function (chair-stand time) and sensorimotor (PPA) performance in older but not younger adults. Among older Swedish adults, longer chair-stand time and poorer cognitive performance (processing speed and executive function) independently increased the risk of injurious falls over 3–10 years by 10%–23%.³⁸ Unlike older adults, younger adults have higher functional abilities and are unlikely to experience decline in sensorimotor and physical functions, potentially explaining the lack of associations between housework activities and physical and sensorimotor performances. These results collectively suggest that the higher cognitive, physical and sensorimotor functions related to heavy housework activities might plausibly be associated with lower physiological fall risk among community-dwelling older adults.

We demonstrated that unlike heavy housework, LH was not associated with physical or sensorimotor function. The lack of associations could be due to the already high functional ability of our study participants.²³ In support, compared with lower intensity exercise, greater improvements in functional ability and decreased fear of falling were observed after high-intensity exercise in older adults.^39–41 These results indicate a dose-response effect for exercise intensity on physical and sensorimotor functions and associated falls risk in older adults. Similarly, we propose that the positive associations of housework with physical and sensorimotor functions are dependent on intensity, especially in community-dwelling older adults.

Notably in this present study, 25% and 18% more participants in the younger and older groups, respectively, met the PA guidelines derived exclusively from housework, than that attained solely through recreational PA. This finding reflects the challenges inherent with recreational PA participation, which is, by definition, done during discretionary hours of the day outside of occupational and domestic duties. Incorporating PA into daily lifestyle through domestic duties (ie, housework) has the potential to achieve higher PA, which is positively associated with functional health especially among older community-dwelling adults.

Our study recruited adults aged 21–80+ randomly from a large residential town representative of Singapore’s population, suggesting a good degree of generalisability. We also included a comparison between older and younger adults in the study, to elucidate the age-associated effects of housework activities on cognitive, physical and sensorimotor functions. However, although associations can be drawn from the study results, the cross-sectional design does not prove causality. It is plausible that healthier older adults with higher functional ability engaged in higher levels of housework. Nonetheless, in a 13-year follow-up study, productive housework activities such as cooking and shopping were associated with lower mortality risk in older adults,⁴² suggesting that housework activities are associated with better health outcomes in older adults. Another potential limitation included the lack of patient or public involvement in the design, planning, conduct or reporting of the study. The study findings in community-dwelling individuals cannot be generalised to institutionalised older adults, such as those in nursing homes. In the present study, housework and PA measures were self-reported based on type, intensity, frequency and duration per week. Although the LAPAQ and GPAQ used in this study is valid and reliable,^{17 19} future studies using more objective measures of housework and PA should be undertaken. It is possible that socioeconomic status may mediate the effects of housework on health,⁴³ which should be further examined in the Asian cultural context. While we adjusted for sex in all analyses, compared with low housework groups, participants in high housework groups were mostly women, which is consistent with earlier studies showing greater involvement in household chores among women than men.⁴⁴ Future studies should investigate the sex-specific effects of housework on functional health.

In conclusion, our study suggests that a combination of light and heavy housework is associated with higher cognitive function, specifically in attention and memory domains, among community-dwelling older adults. Furthermore, the positive associations of housework levels with physical and sensorimotor functions in older adults were intensity dependent. Housework may also complement recreational PAs among current older community-dwelling adults in high-income countries towards healthier ageing. Future longitudinal and intervention studies are required to establish causality between housework activities and functional health.

The authors gratefully acknowledge the strong support of Professor Pang Weng Sun in making this Yishun Study possible, and the support of Daniella Ng, Queenie Tan, Dr Lilian Chye, Sylvia Ngu Siew Ching, Aizuriah Mohamed Ali, Mary Ng Pei Ern, Chua Xing Ying and Shermaine Thein in this study.

Data availability statement

Data are available upon reasonable request. The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval

This study involves human participants and was approved by an ethics committee or institutional board (National Healthcare Group DSRB 2017/00212), in accordance with the relevant guidelines from the Declaration of Helsinki and the ethical principles in the Belmont Report. All participants gave written informed consent.

Footnote

Contributors SYL performed the data analysis, interpretation and visualisation and wrote the manuscript. S-LW, TPN, BWJP and LKL contributed to the study concept and design. BWJP, LKL, KAJ, WTS and KKC administered the project and collected the data. BWJP and LKL accessed and verified the underlying data. S-LW and TPN contributed to the critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. S-LW is responsible for the overall content as guarantor. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding This work was supported by Geriatric Education and Research Institute intramural funding (grant number GERI 1609).

Competing interests None declared.

Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.

References

¹ McPhee JS, French DP, Jackson D, et al. Physical activity in older age: perspectives for healthy ageing and frailty. Biogerontology 2016; 17: 567–80. doi:10.1007/s10522-016-9641-0 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26936444

² Geidl W, Schlesinger S, Mino E, et al. Dose-response relationship between physical activity and mortality in adults with noncommunicable diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studies. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2020; 17: 109. doi:10.1186/s12966-020-01007-5 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32843054

³ Sherrington C, Fairhall N, Kwok W, et al. Evidence on physical activity and falls prevention for people aged 65+ years: systematic review to inform the who guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2020; 17: 144. doi:10.1186/s12966-020-01041-3 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33239019

⁴ Guthold R, Stevens GA, Riley LM, et al. Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1·9 million participants. Lancet Glob Health 2018; 6: e1077–86. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30357-7 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30193830

⁵ Lear SA, Hu W, Rangarajan S, et al. The effect of physical activity on mortality and cardiovascular disease in 130 000 people from 17 high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries: the PURE study. Lancet 2017; 390: 2643–54. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31634-3 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28943267

⁶ Cunningham C, O' Sullivan R, Caserotti P, et al. Consequences of physical inactivity in older adults: a systematic review of reviews and meta-analyses. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2020; 30: 816–27. doi:10.1111/sms.13616 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32020713

⁷ Sherrington C, Michaleff ZA, Fairhall N, et al. Exercise to prevent falls in older adults: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med 2017; 51: 1750–8. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2016-096547 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27707740

⁸ Lam FM, Huang M-Z, Liao L-R, et al. Physical exercise improves strength, balance, mobility, and endurance in people with cognitive impairment and dementia: a systematic review. J Physiother 2018; 64: 4–15. doi:10.1016/j.jphys.2017.12.001 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29289581

⁹ García-Hermoso A, Ramirez-Vélez R, Sáez de Asteasu ML, et al. Safety and effectiveness of long-term exercise interventions in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Sports Med 2020; 50: 1095–106. doi:10.1007/s40279-020-01259-y http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32020543

¹⁰ Stephan A-J, Strobl R, Müller M, et al. A high level of household physical activity compensates for lack of leisure time physical activity with regard to deficit accumulation: results from the KORA-Age study. Prev Med 2016; 86: 64–9. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.01.021 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26854764

¹¹ Koblinsky ND, Meusel L-AC, Greenwood CE, et al. Household physical activity is positively associated with gray matter volume in older adults. BMC Geriatr 2021; 21: 104. doi:10.1186/s12877-021-02054-8 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33546613

¹² Tsuchiya K, Mitsui S, Fukuyama R, et al. An acute bout of housework activities has beneficial effects on executive function. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2018; 14: 61–72. doi:10.2147/NDT.S153813 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29339923

¹³ Beard JR, Officer A, de Carvalho IA, et al. The world report on ageing and health: a policy framework for healthy ageing. Lancet 2016; 387: 2145–54. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00516-4 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26520231

¹⁴ Murphy MH, Donnelly P, Breslin G, et al. Does doing housework keep you healthy? the contribution of domestic physical activity to meeting current recommendations for health. BMC Public Health 2013; 13: 966. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-966 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24139277

¹⁵ Department of Statistics Singapore. Population and population structure, 2021. Available: https://www.singstat.gov.sg./find-data/search-by-theme/population/population-and-population-structure/latest-data [Accessed 25 Mar 2021 ].

¹⁶ Pang BWJ, Wee S-L, Lau LK, et al. Prevalence and associated factors of sarcopenia in Singaporean Adults-The Yishun study. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2021; 22: 885.e1-885.e10. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2020.05.029 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32693999

¹⁷ Stel VS, Smit JH, Pluijm SMF, et al. Comparison of the LasA physical activity questionnaire with a 7-day diary and pedometer. J Clin Epidemiol 2004; 57: 252–8. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.07.008 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15066685

¹⁸ Siebeling L, Wiebers S, Beem L, et al. Validity and reproducibility of a physical activity questionnaire for older adults: questionnaire versus accelerometer for assessing physical activity in older adults. Clin Epidemiol 2012; 4: 171–80. doi:10.2147/CLEP.S30848 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22866018

¹⁹ Bull FC, Maslin TS, Armstrong T. Global physical activity questionnaire (GPAQ): nine country reliability and validity study. J Phys Act Health 2009; 6: 790–804. doi:10.1123/jpah.6.6.790 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20101923

²⁰ Haskell WL, Lee I-M, Pate RR, et al. Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of sports medicine and the American heart association. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007; 39: 1423–34. doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e3180616b27 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17762377

²¹ Randolph C, Tierney MC, Mohr E, et al. The repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status (RBANS): preliminary clinical validity. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1998; 20: 310–9. doi:10.1076/jcen.20.3.310.823 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9845158

²² Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Simonsick EM, et al. Lower-extremity function in persons over the age of 70 years as a predictor of subsequent disability. N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 556–61. doi:10.1056/NEJM199503023320902 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7838189

²³ Lee SY, Choo PL, Pang BWJ, et al. SPPB reference values and performance in assessing sarcopenia in community-dwelling Singaporeans - Yishun study. BMC Geriatr 2021; 21: 213. doi:10.1186/s12877-021-02147-4 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33781211

²⁴ Lord SR, Ward JA, Williams P, et al. Physiological factors associated with falls in older community-dwelling women. J Am Geriatr Soc 1994; 42: 1110–7. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb06218.x http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7930338

²⁵ Lord SR, Menz HB, Tiedemann A. A physiological profile approach to falls risk assessment and prevention. Phys Ther 2003; 83: 237–52. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12620088

²⁶ Lakens D. Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Front Psychol 2013; 4: 863. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24324449

²⁷ Jiang C, Xu Y. The association between mild cognitive impairment and doing housework. Aging Ment Health 2014; 18: 212–6. doi:10.1080/13607863.2013.823376 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23919266

²⁸ Peng Z, Jiang H, Wang X, et al. The efficacy of cognitive training for elderly Chinese individuals with mild cognitive impairment. Biomed Res Int 2019; 2019: 4347281. doi:10.1155/2019/4347281 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31886216

²⁹ Colcombe SJ, Erickson KI, Scalf PE, et al. Aerobic exercise training increases brain volume in aging humans. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2006; 61: 1166–70. doi:10.1093/gerona/61.11.1166 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17167157

³⁰ Erickson KI, Leckie RL, Weinstein AM. Physical activity, fitness, and gray matter volume. Neurobiol Aging 2014; 35: S20–8. doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.03.034 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24952993

³¹ Clouston SAP, Smith DM, Mukherjee S, et al. Education and cognitive decline: an integrative analysis of global longitudinal studies of cognitive aging. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2020; 75: e151–60. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbz053 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31059564

³² Angevaren M, Aufdemkampe G, Verhaar HJ. Physical activity and enhanced fitness to improve cognitive function in older people without known cognitive impairment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008: CD005381. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005381.pub3

³³ Gomez-Pinilla F, Hillman C. The influence of exercise on cognitive abilities. Compr Physiol 2013; 3: 403–28. doi:10.1002/cphy.c110063 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23720292

³⁴ Smith PJ, Blumenthal JA, Hoffman BM, et al. Aerobic exercise and neurocognitive performance: a meta-analytic review of randomized controlled trials. Psychosom Med 2010; 72: 239–52. doi:10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181d14633 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20223924

³⁵ Tabbarah M, Crimmins EM, Seeman TE. The relationship between cognitive and physical performance: MacArthur studies of successful aging. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2002; 57: M228–35. doi:10.1093/gerona/57.4.m228 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11909888

³⁶ Montero-Odasso M, Speechley M. Falls in cognitively impaired older adults: implications for risk assessment and prevention. J Am Geriatr Soc 2018; 66: 367–75. doi:10.1111/jgs.15219 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29318592

³⁷ Muir SW, Gopaul K, Montero Odasso MM. The role of cognitive impairment in fall risk among older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Age Ageing 2012; 41: 299–308. doi:10.1093/ageing/afs012 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22374645

³⁸ Welmer A-K, Rizzuto D, Laukka EJ, et al. Cognitive and physical function in relation to the risk of injurious falls in older adults: a population-based study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2017; 72: 669–75. doi:10.1093/gerona/glw141 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27449140

³⁹ Sanders LMJ, Hortobágyi T, Karssemeijer EGA, et al. Effects of low- and high-intensity physical exercise on physical and cognitive function in older persons with dementia: a randomized controlled trial. Alzheimers Res Ther 2020; 12: 28. doi:10.1186/s13195-020-00597-3 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32192537

⁴⁰ Jiménez-García JD, Hita-Contreras F, de la Torre-Cruz M, et al. Risk of falls in healthy older adults: benefits of high-intensity interval training using lower body suspension exercises. J Aging Phys Act 2019; 27: 325–33. doi:10.1123/japa.2018-0190 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30160635

⁴¹ Edholm P, Nilsson A, Kadi F. Physical function in older adults: impacts of past and present physical activity behaviors. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2019; 29: 415–21. doi:10.1111/sms.13350 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30506596

⁴² Glass TA, de Leon CM, Marottoli RA, et al. Population based study of social and productive activities as predictors of survival among elderly Americans. BMJ 1999; 319: 478–83. doi:10.1136/bmj.319.7208.478 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10454399

⁴³ Rodriguez-Stanley J, Alonso-Ferres M, Zilioli S, et al. Housework, health, and well-being in older adults: the role of socioeconomic status. J Fam Psychol 2020; 34: 610–20. doi:10.1037/fam0000630 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32052986

⁴⁴ Bianchi SM, Sayer LC, Milkie MA, et al. Housework: who did, does or will do it, and how much does it matter? Soc Forces 2012; 91: 55–63. doi:10.1093/sf/sos120 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25429165