It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
All the patients with suspected stroke are directed to whole-brain CT scan. The purpose of this scan is to look for early features of ischemia and to rule out alternative diagnoses than stroke. In case of ischemic stroke, CT diagnostics (including CT angiography) is used mainly to locate the occlusion and its size, while the Hounsfield Units (HU) values of the thrombus causing the stroke are usually overlooked on CT scan or considered not important. The aim of this study was to demonstrate that the HU value is relevant and can help in better treatment planning. There were 25 patients included in the study, diagnosed with ischemic stroke in the middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory. In all patients, systemic thrombolysis was not successful and the mechanical recanalization was needed. The retrieved thrombi were also analyzed histologically for the determination of red blood cells (RBC) proportion. CT of the proximal MCA (M1) segment was analyzed for average HU value and its variability both in the occluded section and the symmetrical normal site. These CT parameters were then statistically studied for the possible correlations with different clinical, histological and procedure parameters using the Linear Regression and the Pearson correlation coefficient. Relevant positive correlations were found between average HU value of thrombus and outcome modified Rankin Scale (mRS), initial mRS, number of passes with thrombectomy device as well as RBC proportion. Results of the present study suggest that measured HU values in CT images of the cerebral thrombi may help in the assessment of thrombus compaction and therefore better treatment planning.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Jožef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia
2 Jožef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia; Institute of Physiology, Medical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
3 Institute of Physiology, Medical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia; Department of Vascular Neurology and Intensive Therapy, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
4 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Clinical Institute of Radiology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, General Hospital Slovenj Gradec, Ljubljana, Slovenia
5 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Clinical Institute of Radiology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia