It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Despite progress in understanding seafloor accretion at ultraslow spreading ridges, the ultimate driving force is still unknown. Here we use 40Ar/39Ar isotopic dating of mid-ocean ridge basalts recovered at variable distances from the axis of the Gakkel Ridge to provide new constraints on the spatial and temporal distribution of volcanic eruptions at various sections of an ultraslow spreading ridge. Our age data show that magmatic-dominated sections of the Gakkel Ridge spread at a steady rate of ~11.1 ± 0.9 mm/yr whereas amagmatic sections have a more widely distributed melt supply yielding ambiguous spreading rate information. These variations in spreading rate and crustal accretion correlate with locations of hotter thermochemical anomalies in the asthenosphere beneath the ridge. We conclude therefore that seafloor generation in ultra-slow spreading centres broadly reflects the distribution of thermochemical anomalies in the upper mantle.
The ultimate driver of ultraslow spreading ridges is unknown. Here the authors use spreading rates derived directly from isotopic ages of seafloor samples to link magmatic and amagmatic segments with thermochemical variations in the upper mantle.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 University Erlangen-Nürnberg, GeoZentrum Nordbayern, Erlangen, Germany (GRID:grid.5330.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2107 3311); Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany (GRID:grid.10894.34) (ISNI:0000 0001 1033 7684); Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Faculty of Science, Amsterdam, Netherlands (GRID:grid.12380.38) (ISNI:0000 0004 1754 9227)
2 Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany (GRID:grid.10894.34) (ISNI:0000 0001 1033 7684); University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany (GRID:grid.7704.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 2297 4381)
3 University of Tulsa, College of Engineering & Natural Sciences, Tulsa, USA (GRID:grid.267360.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2160 264X)
4 Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany (GRID:grid.10894.34) (ISNI:0000 0001 1033 7684)
5 Oregon State University, College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Corvallis, USA (GRID:grid.4391.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2112 1969)