It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Fall armyworm (FAW) is a polyphagous and voracious pest, destroying maize plants in farms in Cameroon. An annual yield loss is estimated to range from15 to 78%, valued at US\( 2,481 to US\) 6,187 million. With most damage experienced in the mono-cropping system. Maize is the most widely grown cereal crop globally due to its several uses, namely human consumption, animal feed and biofuel. In Cameroon, maize is a staple food grown by small- scale producers in all ten regions. The control of FAW is unsuccessful with only the use of pesticide method, the application is knowledge-intensive, and misuse often leads to pesticide resistance, resurgence and increased production cost. The purpose of this review was to explore the different controlling methods adopted to suppress FAW from causing economic damage in maize farms of small-scale producers in Cameroon. Integrated pest management (IPM) approach was used to control FAW, including cultural control, chemical control, botanicals, push-pull farming system, biological control and indigenous knowledge. Results showed that push-pull farming system provides protection and improves maize nutrition, botanicals have similar efficacy like synthetic insecticide, and wood ash is a bio-pesticide. The combined application of pesticides and handpicking FAW was effective though feasible in small surface areas. Based on the general assessment, the push-pull farming system deserves to be promoted due to its numerous benefits: eco-friendly, enhancement of natural enemies, increased soil fertility and economic returns. Natural enemies and bio-pesticides application are essential to control FAW since farmers are resource-poor, causes no health problem and are environmentally friendly.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Department of Mechanical and Biosystem Engineering, Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor, West Java, 16680, Indonesia; International Centre of Environmental Education and Community Development, P.O Box 641 Buea, South West Region, Cameroon
2 Department of Agronomic and Applied Molecular Sciences, University of Buea, P.O Box 63, South West Region, Cameroon
3 Institute of Agricultural Research for Development, Ekona, South West Region, PMB 25 Buea, Cameroon
4 PT Hatfield Indonesia, Plaza Harmoni Unit B5-B7, Bogor, West Java 16131, Indonesia
5 Department of Mechanical and Biosystem Engineering, Bogor Agricultural University, Bogor, West Java, 16680, Indonesia
6 Department of Agriculture Research, Pesticides Control Board, Bvumbwe Agricultural Research Station, P.O. Box 51300, Limbe, Malawi
7 Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Pakuan University, P.O BOX 452 Bogor, Indonesia