It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
To investigate the peripapillary vascular metrics in early normal tension glaucoma (NTG) and early primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) eyes using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A). One or both eyes of each subject were imaged for a 3 × 3 mm peripapillary region by swept-source OCT-A (DRI-OCT Triton, Topcon, Japan) and assessed by an automated MATLAB program. OCT-A metrics including circumpapillary vessel density (cpVD) and fractal dimension (cpFD) were compared. Their association with visual field (VF) parameters and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness were determined. Sixty-eight eyes of 51 PACG, 68 eyes of 48 NTG, and 68 eyes of 49 control subjects were cross-sectionally analyzed. NTG eyes had significantly lower global cpVD (52.369 ± 0.781%) compared with PACG eyes (55.389 ± 0.721%, P = 0.004) that had comparable disease severity and average RNFL thickness. Multivariable analysis revealed that, for PACG and NTG eyes, decreased cpVD ([PACG] β = −4.242; CI: −8.120, −0.363 vs [NTG] β = −5.531; CI: −9.472, −1.590) and cpFD ([PACG] β = −8.894;CI: −11.925, −5.864 vs [NTG] β = −12.064; CI: −17.095, −6.932) were associated with decreased RNFL thickness (all P ≤ 0.032); with a stronger association between decrease cpFD and decreased RNFL thickness in NTG eyes (P = 0.028). Decreased cpVD was associated with decrease mean deviation (MD) in NTG eyes (β = −0.707; CI: −1.090, −0.324; P ≤ 0.001) and not associated with the visual field parameters in PACG eyes. Early NTG had lower global cpVD compared with early PACG, despite similar disease severity and average RNFL thickness.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kowloon, The People’s Republic of China
2 The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kowloon, The People’s Republic of China; Hong Kong Eye Hospital, Kowloon, The People’s Republic of China (GRID:grid.490089.c) (ISNI:0000 0004 1803 8779)
3 The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kowloon, The People’s Republic of China (GRID:grid.490089.c); Hong Kong Eye Hospital, Kowloon, The People’s Republic of China (GRID:grid.490089.c) (ISNI:0000 0004 1803 8779)