It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Dryland ecosystems are dominant influences on both the trend and interannual variability of the terrestrial carbon sink. Despite their importance, dryland carbon dynamics are not well-characterized by current models. Here, we present DryFlux, an upscaled product built on a dense network of eddy covariance sites in the North American Southwest. To estimate dryland gross primary productivity, we fuse in situ fluxes with remote sensing and meteorological observations using machine learning. DryFlux explicitly accounts for intra-annual variation in water availability, and accurately predicts interannual and seasonal variability in carbon uptake. Applying DryFlux globally indicates existing products may underestimate impacts of large-scale climate patterns on the interannual variability of dryland carbon uptake. We anticipate DryFlux will be an improved benchmark for earth system models in drylands, and prompt a more sensitive accounting of water limitation on the carbon cycle.
Upscaling in situ carbon flux measurements using remotely sensed and meteorological observations in a machine learning algorithm leads to improved estimates of average uptake, and interannual variability in global drylands.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 Indiana University, O’Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Bloomington, USA (GRID:grid.411377.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 0790 959X)
2 Southwest Watershed Research Center, United States Department of Agriculture- Agricultural Research Service, Tucson, USA (GRID:grid.512849.3) (ISNI:0000 0000 9225 8308)
3 University of Arizona, School of Natural Resources and the Environment, Tucson, USA (GRID:grid.134563.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2168 186X)
4 Indiana University, Department of Geography, Bloomington, USA (GRID:grid.411377.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 0790 959X)
5 University of New Mexico, Department of Biology, Albuquerque, USA (GRID:grid.266832.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 2188 8502)
6 University of Arizona, School of Natural Resources and the Environment, Tucson, USA (GRID:grid.134563.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2168 186X); University of Arizona, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Tucson, USA (GRID:grid.134563.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2168 186X)