It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Deforestation and drainage has made Indonesian peatlands susceptible to burning. Large fires occur regularly, destroying agricultural crops and forest, emitting large amounts of CO2 and air pollutants, resulting in adverse health effects. In order to reduce fire, the Indonesian government has committed to restore 2.49 Mha of degraded peatland, with an estimated cost of US$3.2-7 billion. Here we combine fire emissions and land cover data to estimate the 2015 fires, the largest in recent years, resulted in economic losses totalling US$28 billion, whilst the six largest fire events between 2004 and 2015 caused a total of US$93.9 billion in economic losses. We estimate that if restoration had already been completed, the area burned in 2015 would have been reduced by 6%, reducing CO2 emissions by 18%, and PM2.5 emissions by 24%, preventing 12,000 premature mortalities. Peatland restoration could have resulted in economic savings of US$8.4 billion for 2004–2015, making it a cost-effective strategy for reducing the impacts of peatland fires to the environment, climate and human health.
Deforestation and drainage have made Indonesian peatlands susceptible to burning. Here the authors find that Indonesia’s 2015 fires resulted in economic losses totaling US$28 billion, while the area burned and emissions released could have been significantly reduced had restoration been completed.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Arnold, S R 2 ; Papargyropoulou, E 3 ; Conibear, L 2 ; Wiedinmyer, C 4
; Knote, C 5
; Adrianto, H A 6 1 University of Leeds, School of Earth and Environment, Leeds, UK (GRID:grid.9909.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8403); University of California, Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Riverside, USA (GRID:grid.266097.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2222 1582)
2 University of Leeds, School of Earth and Environment, Leeds, UK (GRID:grid.9909.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8403)
3 School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Sustainability Research Institute, Leeds, UK (GRID:grid.9909.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8403)
4 CIRES, University of Colorado, Boulder, USA (GRID:grid.464551.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 0450 3000)
5 Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany (GRID:grid.5252.0) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 973X)
6 University of Leeds, School of Earth and Environment, Leeds, UK (GRID:grid.9909.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8403); IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia (GRID:grid.440754.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 0698 0773)




