It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
In tRNA, the epigenetic m3C modification at position 32 in the anticodon loop is highly conserved in eukaryotes, which maintains the folding and basepairing functions of the anticodon. However, the responsible enzymes METTL2 and METTL6 were identified only in recent years. The loss of human METTL6 (hMETTL6) affects the translational process and proteostasis in cells, while in mESCs cells, it leads to defective pluripotency potential. Despite its important functions, the catalytic mechanism of the C32 methylation by this enzyme is poorly understood. Here we present the 1.9 Å high-resolution crystal structure of hMETTL6 bound by SAH. The key residues interacting with the ligand were identified and their roles were confirmed by ITC. We generated a docking model for the hMETTL6-SAH-CMP ternary complex. Interestingly, the CMP molecule binds into a cavity in a positive patch with the base ring pointing to the inside, suggesting a flipped-base mechanism for methylation. We further generated a model for the quaternary complex with tRNASer as a component, which reasonably explained the biochemical behaviors of hMETTL6. Taken together, our crystallographic and biochemical studies provide important insight into the molecular recognition mechanism by METTL6 and may aid in the METTL-based rational drug design in the future.
Ran Chen et al. report the crystal structure of human m3C methyltrasfease METTL6. They generate structure models of hMETTL6 in complex with substrates, providing important insight into the molecular recognition mechanism by METTL6 and may aid in the METTL-based rational drug design in the future.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 The Sun Yat-Sen University, MOE Key Laboratory of Gene Function and Regulation, State Key Laboratory for Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China (GRID:grid.12981.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 2360 039X); Chinese Academy of Sciences, Key Laboratory of Tropical Marine Bio-resources and Ecology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Marine Materia Medica, Innovation Academy of South China Sea Ecology and Environmental Engineering, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China (GRID:grid.9227.e) (ISNI:0000000119573309)
2 The Sun Yat-Sen University, MOE Key Laboratory of Gene Function and Regulation, State Key Laboratory for Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China (GRID:grid.12981.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 2360 039X)
3 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology, CAS Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science, Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China (GRID:grid.410726.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 1797 8419)