It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Loss-of-function mutations in the RB1 tumour suppressor are key drivers in cancer, including osteosarcoma. RB1 loss-of-function compromises genome-maintenance and hence could yield vulnerability to therapeutics targeting such processes. Here we demonstrate selective hypersensitivity to clinically-approved inhibitors of Poly-ADP-Polymerase1,2 inhibitors (PARPi) in RB1-defective cancer cells, including an extended panel of osteosarcoma-derived lines. PARPi treatment results in extensive cell death in RB1-defective backgrounds and prolongs survival of mice carrying human RB1-defective osteosarcoma grafts. PARPi sensitivity is not associated with canonical homologous recombination defect (HRd) signatures that predict PARPi sensitivity in cancers with BRCA1,2 loss, but is accompanied by rapid activation of DNA replication checkpoint signalling, and active DNA replication is a prerequisite for sensitivity. Importantly, sensitivity in backgrounds with natural or engineered RB1 loss surpasses that seen in BRCA-mutated backgrounds where PARPi have established clinical benefit. Our work provides evidence that PARPi sensitivity extends beyond cancers identifiable by HRd and advocates PARP1,2 inhibition as a personalised strategy for RB1-mutated osteosarcoma and other cancers.
RB1 mutations are seen in 40-60% of sporadic osteosarcoma. Here, the authors demonstrate a selective sensitivity to PARP inhibitors in RB1-mutated osteosarcoma-derived cell lines that is not associated with canonical signatures indicative of a homologous recombination defect.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details









1 University College London, UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK (GRID:grid.83440.3b) (ISNI:0000000121901201)
2 The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK (GRID:grid.451388.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1795 1830); Université Libre de Bruxelles, Institute for Interdisciplinary Research, Brussels, Belgium (GRID:grid.4989.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2348 0746)
3 IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Experimental Oncology Laboratory, Bologna, Italy (GRID:grid.419038.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 2154 6641)
4 University College London, UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK (GRID:grid.83440.3b) (ISNI:0000000121901201); Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Department of Histopathology, Stanmore, UK (GRID:grid.416177.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 0417 7890)
5 University College London, UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK (GRID:grid.83440.3b) (ISNI:0000000121901201); University College London Hospitals Foundation Trust, London Sarcoma Service, London, UK (GRID:grid.439749.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 0612 2754)