It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Theropod behaviour and biodynamics are intriguing questions that paleontology has been trying to resolve for a long time. The lack of extant groups with similar bipedalism has made it hard to answer some of the questions on the matter, yet theoretical biomechanical models have shed some light on the question of how fast theropods could run and what kind of movement they showed. The study of dinosaur tracks can help answer some of these questions due to the very nature of tracks as a product of the interaction of these animals with the environment. Two trackways belonging to fast-running theropods from the Lower Cretaceous Enciso Group of Igea (La Rioja) are presented here and compared with other fast-running theropod trackways published to date. The Lower Cretaceous Iberian fossil record and some features present in these footprints and trackways suggest a basal tetanuran, probably a carcharodontosaurid or spinosaurid, as a plausible trackmaker. Speed analysis shows that these trackways, with speed ranges of 6.5–10.3 and 8.8–12.4 ms−1, testify to some of the top speeds ever calculated for theropod tracks, shedding light on the question of dinosaur biodynamics and how these animals moved.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Universidad de La Rioja (UR), Cátedra Extraordinaria de Paleontología, Departamento de Ciencias Humanas, Logroño, Spain (GRID:grid.119021.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 2174 6969)
2 Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Departamento de Geodinámica, Estratigrafía y Paleontología, Madrid, Spain (GRID:grid.4795.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2157 7667)
3 Universidad Nacional de Río Negro-IIPG. Av, General Roca, Argentina (GRID:grid.4795.f); Instituto de Investigación en Paleobiología y Geología (IIPG), General Roca, Argentina (GRID:grid.4795.f)
4 Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (UPV/EHU), Departamento de Geología, Facultad de Ciencia y Tecnología, Leioa, Spain (GRID:grid.11480.3c) (ISNI:0000000121671098)
5 Centro de Interpretación Paleontológica de la Rioja, Igea, Spain (GRID:grid.11480.3c)