Abstract

Deciding whether others’ emotions are genuine is essential for successful communication and social relationships. While previous fMRI studies suggested that differentiation between authentic and acted emotional expressions involves higher-order brain areas, the time course of authenticity discrimination is still unknown. To address this gap, we tested the impact of authenticity discrimination on event-related potentials (ERPs) related to emotion, motivational salience, and higher-order cognitive processing (N100, P200 and late positive complex, the LPC), using vocalised non-verbal expressions of sadness (crying) and happiness (laughter) in a 32-participant, within-subject study. Using a repeated measures 2-factor (authenticity, emotion) ANOVA, we show that N100’s amplitude was larger in response to authentic than acted vocalisations, particularly in cries, while P200’s was larger in response to acted vocalisations, particularly in laughs. We suggest these results point to two different mechanisms: (1) a larger N100 in response to authentic vocalisations is consistent with its link to emotional content and arousal (putatively larger amplitude for genuine emotional expressions); (2) a larger P200 in response to acted ones is in line with evidence relating it to motivational salience (putatively larger for ambiguous emotional expressions). Complementarily, a significant main effect of emotion was found on P200 and LPC amplitudes, in that the two were larger for laughs than cries, regardless of authenticity. Overall, we provide the first electroencephalographic examination of authenticity discrimination and propose that authenticity processing of others’ vocalisations is initiated early, along that of their emotional content or category, attesting for its evolutionary relevance for trust and bond formation.

Details

Title
The neural basis of authenticity recognition in laughter and crying
Author
Kosilo, Maciej 1 ; Costa, Mónica 2 ; Nuttall, Helen E. 3 ; Ferreira, Hugo 1 ; Scott, Sophie 4 ; Menéres, Sofia 5 ; Pestana, José 6 ; Jerónimo, Rita 7 ; Prata, Diana 8 

 Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Instituto de Biofísica e Engenharia Biomédica, Lisbon, Portugal (GRID:grid.9983.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 4263) 
 William James Center for Research, Lisbon, Portugal (GRID:grid.9983.b) 
 Lancaster University, Department of Psychology, Lancaster, UK (GRID:grid.9835.7) (ISNI:0000 0000 8190 6402) 
 University College London, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, London, UK (GRID:grid.83440.3b) (ISNI:0000000121901201) 
 ISPA - Instituto Universitário, APPsyCI - Applied Psychology Research Center Capabilities & Inclusion, Lisbon, Portugal (GRID:grid.410954.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 2237 5901) 
 ISPA – Instituto Universitário, Departamento de Biociências, Lisbon, Portugal (GRID:grid.410954.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 2237 5901) 
 Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (Iscte-IUL), CIS-Iscte, Lisbon, Portugal (GRID:grid.45349.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2220 8863) 
 Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Instituto de Biofísica e Engenharia Biomédica, Lisbon, Portugal (GRID:grid.9983.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 4263); Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (Iscte-IUL), CIS-Iscte, Lisbon, Portugal (GRID:grid.45349.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2220 8863); Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Department of Neuroimaging, London, UK (GRID:grid.13097.3c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2322 6764) 
Pages
23750
Publication year
2021
Publication date
2021
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group
e-ISSN
20452322
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2608263025
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. corrected publication 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.