It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Introduction: The international research project IEA EBC Annex 72 investigates the life cycle related environmental impacts caused by buildings. The project aims inter alia to harmonise LCA approaches on buildings. Methods: To identify major commonalities and discrepancies among national LCA approaches, reference buildings were defined to present and compare the national approaches. A residential high-rise building located in Tianjin, China, was selected as one of the reference buildings. The main construction elements are reinforced concrete shear walls, beams and floor slabs. The building has an energy reference area of 4566 m2 and an operational heating energy demand of 250 MJ/m2a. An expert team provided information on the quantities of building materials and elements required for the construction, established a BIM model and quantified the operational energy demand. Results: The greenhouse gas emissions and environmental impacts of the building were quantified using 17 country-specific national assessment methods and LCA databases. Comparisons of the results are shown on the level of building elements as well as the complete life cycle of the building. Conclusions: The results of these assessments show that the main differences lie in the LCA background data used, the scope of the assessment and the reference study period applied. Despite the variability in the greenhouse gas emissions determined with the 17 national methods, the individual results are relevant in the respective national context of the method, data, tool and benchmark used. It is important that environmental benchmarks correspond to the particular LCA approach and database of a country in which the benchmark is applied. Furthermore, the results imply to include building technologies as their contribution to the overall environmental impacts is not negligible. Grant support: The authors thank the IEA for its organizational support and the funding organizations in the participating countries for their financial support.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 treeze Ltd., Uster, Switzerland
2 Tianjin University, School of Architecture, Tianjin, China
3 Aalborg University, Danish Building Research Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark
4 Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, Gyeonggi-do Republic of Korea
5 Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany
6 Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria
7 BRANZ, Porirua, New Zealand
8 University of Minho, Civil Engineering, Guimarães, Portugal
9 University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
10 Texas A&M University, Construction Science College, Station, USA
11 KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
12 Universidad de Sevilla, Construcciones Arquitectónicas I., Seville, Spain
13 University of Campinas GBLab, Campinas, Brazil
14 Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitoria, Brazil
15 SINTEF Building and Infrastructure, Oslo, Norway
16 Ascona, Gröbenzell, Germany
17 Czech Technical University in Prague, University Centre for Energy Efficient Buildings, Prague, Czech Republic
18 Groupe Ageco, Montreal, Canada
19 École de technologie supérieure, Génie de la construction, Montreal, Canada
20 MINES ParisTech, Centre Efficacité énergétique des Systèmes, Paris, France
21 Edinburgh Napier University, Resource Efficient Built Environment Lab, Edinburgh Scotland
22 NTNU – Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
23 Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary