Abstract

Background

Blackleg disease, caused by the fungal pathogen Leptosphaeria maculans, is a serious threat to canola (Brassica napus) production worldwide. Quantitative resistance to this disease is a highly desirable trait but is difficult to precisely phenotype. Visual scores can be subjective and are prone to assessor bias. Methods to assess variation in quantitative resistance more accurately were developed based on quantifying in planta fungal biomass, including the Wheat Germ Agglutinin Chitin Assay (WAC), qPCR and ddPCR assays.

Results

Disease assays were conducted by inoculating a range of canola cultivars with L. maculans isolates in glasshouse experiments and assessing fungal biomass in cotyledons, petioles and stem tissue harvested at different timepoints post-inoculation. PCR and WAC assay results were well correlated, repeatable across experiments and host tissues, and able to differentiate fungal biomass in different host-isolate treatments. In addition, the ddPCR assay was shown to differentiate between L. maculans isolates.

Conclusions

The ddPCR assay is more sensitive in detecting pathogens and more adaptable to high-throughput methods by using robotic systems than the WAC assay. Overall, these methods proved accurate and non-subjective, providing alternatives to visual assessments to quantify the L. maculans-B. napus interaction in all plant tissues throughout the progression of the disease in seedlings and mature plants and have potential for fine-scale blackleg resistance phenotyping in canola.

Details

Title
Comparison of non-subjective relative fungal biomass measurements to quantify the Leptosphaeria maculansBrassica napus interaction
Author
Schnippenkoetter, Wendelin; Hoque, Mohammad; Maher, Rebecca; Van de Wouw, Angela; Hands, Phillip; Rolland, Vivien; Barrett, Luke; Sprague, Susan  VIAFID ORCID Logo 
Pages
1-16
Section
Methodology
Publication year
2021
Publication date
2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
e-ISSN
17464811
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2611348236
Copyright
© 2021. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.