1. Introduction
A common practice in extremity surgery, especially in orthopedic surgery, involves the application of controlled ischemia, commonly performed through the application of a pneumatic cuff as a tourniquet. This procedure provides a blood-free surgical field, which facilitates both anatomical dissection and identification of structures. However, these cuffs, while making surgery easier, also cause injury to the limb to which they are applied. This injury arises from the combination of three different factors: a) mechanical damage, due to the pressure of the pneumatic cuff on the tissues; b) anoxic damage, due to oxygen deprivation resulting from ischemia; c) inflammatory-oxidative damage, due to reperfusion when the pneumatic cuff is released. The latter two are intimately linked, and both may be grouped under the so-called ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI), a phenomenon resulting from the reoxygenation of tissues previously subjected to anoxia. Blood flow restoration triggers a sequence of biochemical processes, such as the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), activation of cytokines, and alteration of capillary permeability, which exacerbate the cellular dysfunction suffered during the ischemic process, being the muscle the most affected tissue in the extremities [1,2]. In this context, the use of the ischemia cuff has been associated with a worse clinical recovery at least in the short and medium term (increased pain, edema, quadriceps weakness...) [3,4,5,6,7,8], which has even led some authors to question the risk-benefit balance of using the ischemia cuff in knee arthroplasty [9].
In order to minimize the cuff pressure-induced damage, not only improvements have been introduced in terms of cuff shape and width [10], but also in the pressure setting to the minimal arterial occlusion pressure (MAOP) [11]. However, this only has an effect on limiting or eliminating the mechanical damage previously described, while not addressing the ischemic, inflammatory, and oxidative damages, which trigger IRI.
Both clinically and experimentally, different molecules have been proposed for the prophylactic pharmacological treatment of IRI: (a) antioxidant compounds, such as equivalents of superoxide dismutase (SOD), malondialdehyde (MDA), allopurinol, melatonin, N-acetylcysteine (NAC) [12,13,14,15]; (b) statins [16,17]; and (c) anesthetics, such as propofol, sevoflurane, dexmedetomidine or oxycodone [18,19]. Another proposed therapeutic approach is the so-called “ischemic conditioning”, first described in myocardium [20]. This maneuver consists of performing one or several short-term ischemia periods, either in the same or different anatomical location, and before or after the long ischemia period. The basis of this approach lies in the activation of endogenous redox buffer mechanisms, thus avoiding the need of exogenous antioxidants. There is no defined protocol described for the performance of conditioning, at least in the extremities [21,22]. In most of the studies, the effectiveness of the abovementioned treatments is assessed by considering only immediate indicators of oxidative stress, such as MDA; there are very few experiments including biochemical, anatomopathological or clinical markers of muscle damage with a later onset [13,14,16,17,23]. We have recently validated a rat model in which, by exerting a controlled pressure to achieve 3 h of ischemia in the lower limbs, we are able to assess the response to IRI from the biochemical, histological and functional point of view [24].
Folic acid, or its active form, folinic acid (FA), is a well-known antioxidant [25,26,27], inexpensive, and without described toxicity [28]. In spite of this, only a few works are available using it to treat IRI, either at the level of the cardiac muscle [29], or in the mesenteric and hepatic tissues, where the administration of 2.5 mg/kg of FA showed a protective effect [30,31].
This piece of work aims to evaluate the effectiveness of FA as a treatment for lower limb IRI (IRI-LL), in a rat model emulating the characteristics, techniques and duration of ischemia periods used in clinical practice when performing limb surgery under ischemic conditions, by analyzing biochemical, anatomopathological and functional parameters considered to be analogous to those used in clinical practice.
2. Materials and Methods
All procedures were performed in accordance with current European and Spanish legislation and were approved by the Ethics Committee on Animal Experimentation of the University of the Basque Country (ref.: M20/2015/075/ Herrero de la Parte).
For the present work we used male WAG/RijHsd rats, aged 3–4 months and with an average weight of 302 ± 12 g, bred and maintained in the Animal Facility of the University of the Basque Country, UPV/EHU, with food and water “ad libitum”, and a 12 h light-dark cycle and constant temperature of 24 °C. In order to minimize the variability due to the circadian rhythms of the animals, all the procedures performed for the induction of IRI-LL were carried out in the morning.
A total of 42 animals were randomly distributed in two experimental groups (18 animals each), with three different sacrifice times (3 and 24 h, and 14 days), and a control group (six animals). The ischemia was always performed on the right lower limb.
2.1. Induction and Maintenance of Lower Limb Ischemia
Ischemia was induced and maintained by an in-house designed and built mechanical device. Briefly, it consists in an adjustable support that allows placing the anesthetized animal in the supine decubitus position and a nylon cable, connected to a dynamometer and a plunger system, which slides around the limb at its base exerting a tension of 1 kg, the whole assembly being stabilized by two articulated arms [24].
The animals were intraperitoneally anesthetized with diazepam (15 mg/kg), ketamine (80 mg/kg) and medetomidine (0.5 mg/kg) and placed in the device in the supine position. The cable connected to the dynamometer was placed around the right lower extremity and kept elevated with the help of an auxiliary arm. Once the leg was exsanguinated by an elastic bandage (Esmarch bandage), the tension of the dynamometer was set at 1 kg to maintain the limb under ischemia. The correct achievement of ischemia was verified by checking the absence of capillary filling, the paleness of the limb and verified by a laser Doppler probe over the pedial artery territory. After half of the ischemia time (80–100 min), a new dose of diazepam (7.5 mg/kg) was administered to maintain the animal’s sedation until the end of the 3-h ischemia period. The animals of the treated groups, were given FA (2.5 mg/kg, ip) 20 min before the end of the ischemia period. The same volume of saline was administered to animals in the control groups.
Once the 3 h of ischemia were completed, the tension of the tourniquet was completely released, allowing reperfusion of the limb during the period corresponding to each experimental group. Restoration of blood flow was verified by the presence of clinical signs of reperfusion and laser Doppler scanning. Post-ischemia recovery was accomplished under a heat source at 22–24 °C, and buprenorphine (0.05 mg/kg sc) was administered to minimize pain. The animal’s condition was checked every 30 min, until complete recovery.
2.2. Biochemical Determinations
Serum parameters changes were analyzed after 3 h of reperfusion. For this purpose, the animal was anesthetized with 1.5% isoflurane and the entire volume of circulating blood (5–7 mL) was obtained by puncture of the abdominal cava vein with a 20 G needle. The blood obtained was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min in SST ™ II Advance tubes (BD Vacutainer®, East Rutherford, NJ, USA). The serum obtained was aliquoted and stored at −25 °C until analysis.
The determination of all biochemical parameters was performed on a Cobas® 8000 module c702 (Roche Diagnostics GMBH, Mannheim, Germany). Electrolyte levels [sodium (Na+), potassium (K+) and chlorine (Cl−)], renal function indicators (urea and creatinine), ubiquitous enzymes [alkaline phosphatase (ALP), aspartate transaminase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT)] and muscle enzymes creatine kinase (CK) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were quantified.
2.3. Histopathological Study
After allowing 24 h of reperfusion, tissue damage was evaluated. Macroscopically, edema was assessed by measuring the perimeter of the limbs and weight of the gastrocnemius muscle of both lower limbs (left limb as a control and right limb subjected to ischemia). The perimeter was measured at the proximal level of the thigh with a tape measure. This measurement was performed after shaving the animal’s limb, with the animal placed on the ischemia device, and the limb with a slight traction to the zenith through superior auxiliary arm. Afterwards, both control and ischemic gastrocnemius muscle were removed, weighed and fixed in 4% formaldehyde.
For microscopical evaluation of the damage, five randomly chosen slides were counted for each set of gastrocnemius muscles examined from each animal [32]. The histological section were stained following standard hematoxylin-eosin staining protocol and then observed under an optical microscope (at 20× magnification). Polymorphonuclear neutrophil (PMN) infiltration was also assessed, by counting the number of these cells in each field.
2.4. Functional Analysis
Six rats per group were tested on a Rotarod apparatus (Panlab Harvard Apparatus, Barcelona, Spain). The rats were placed on a moving rod with a rotation speed of 15 r.p.m. Following the 15 s acclimation time, the Rotarod was gradually accelerated on a 30-s slope, which increased the speed from 15 r.p.m. to 25 r.p.m.
Once the rod acceleration started, the latency to fall time started to be recorded automatically by the SeDaCom v2.0.03 software (Panlab Harvard Apparatus, Barcelona, Spain); the speed of the rotarod at the time of fall was also recorded. Prior to ischemia induction, animals were subjected to a 2-day training protocol before being tested on the day −1, which acclimated the rats to the rotarod. The animals were subjected to the Rotarod test every day during the first week after ischemia, and also on day 10 and day 14.
2.5. Statistical Analysis
Statistical processing of the results was carried out with Prism® 7 statistical software (GraphPad Software, San Diego CA, USA). First, the normal distribution of the data to be studied was verified using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality test. Once it was verified that the data complied with a normal distribution, the results were expressed as the mean and standard deviation (SD) and parametric tests were performed between the different experimental groups.
Analysis between the limbs subjected to I/R and their healthy contralateral was performed using a Student’s t-test for paired samples. The analysis between the treated and untreated groups was also performed using a Student’s t-test, in this case for unpaired samples. For all analyses, statistically significant differences were accepted when the p-value was < 0.05.
3. Results
3.1. Ischemia Induction
The procedure to induce ischemia was successfully performed and well tolerated in all the rats, without any observable adverse effect. No events of pressure loss were reported related to the device used for induction. The pressure applied (1 kg) remained constant during the 3 h of ischemia. In those animals that were sacrificed after 24 h and 14 days, no adverse effects related to the tourniquet were evident after ischemia. No signs or symptoms of pain or suffering were reported.
3.2. Effect of FA on Biochemical Parameters Analyzed in Serum Samples
The results of the biochemical parameters studied are shown in Table 1 and Figure 1. Both in the animals treated with FA and in the vehicle group, the damage after ischemia and reperfusion did not lead to significant alterations in the levels of Na+, K+ or Cl−, neither after 3 h of reperfusion nor after 14 days.
The histopathologic results are detailed in Table 2 and presented in Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4.
Regarding urea and creatinine levels (Figure 1d,e), a significant increase was observed after 3 h of reperfusion, up to 66.3 ± 5.06 mg/dL and 0.798 ± 0.13 mg/dL, respectively. This increase was significantly lower in those animals receiving FA treatment prior to the start of reperfusion (59.6 ± 6.13 mg/dL and 0.506 ± 0.13 mg/dL, respectively) (p < 0.001). Both analytes’ levels returned to normal levels 14 days after controlled ischemia (p > 0.05).
On the other hand, it was also observed that pretreatment with FA of animals exposed to 3 h of reperfusion resulted in a significant decrease in ALP values (99 ± 4.15; p < 0.001) (Figure 1f), compared to the control group. This decrease in ALP levels was sustained over time until the 14th day, both in the animals that received saline and in those treated with FA (85.2 ± 5.46 and 81.8 ± 12.8, respectively); without evidence of any differences between untreated and treated animals (p > 0.05). Both transaminase levels (AST and ALT, Figure 1G-H) experienced a marked increase after 3 h of reperfusion, the increase being significantly lower in those animals that received prophylactic FA treatment; after 14 days, AST and ALT levels returned to values similar to those detected in healthy animals that had not undergone the IRI process.
Finally, CK and LDH levels (Figure 1i–j), enzymes that are mainly indicative of muscle damage, were significantly increased after three hours of reperfusion in the saline group. However, the animals that received FA showed a significantly lower increase in serum levels of both enzymes (6123 ± 1000 vs. 7792 ± 1187 IU/L, and 848 ± 109 vs. 1413 ± 227 IU/L, respectively). When analyzed on day 14th, CK values were significantly decreased, through still more than doubled the control values (p > 0.05). On day 14th, LDH values in the saline group remained significantly elevated compared to the animals not undergoing ischemia (control group), whereas treatment with FA reduced serum LDH values by half.
After 3 h of ischemia and 24 h of reperfusion, no changes were found in the circumference of the contralateral healthy limb (not subjected to ischemia). However, a significant increase in the perimeter of the limb undergoing ischemia was observed, without finding significant differences between the animals that received saline or FA (Figure 2a). But when determining the percentage of increase in the cross-sectional area of the ischemic limb with respect to the contralateral healthy limb, we found that this value in the animals treated with saline was 30%, while in those treated with FA it was only 17% (p < 0.05) (Figure 2b).
Regarding the weight of the gastrocnemius muscle (Figure 3), there are no differences between the animals of the three groups (control, ischemic without treatment, and ischemic + FA). In the limbs undergoing ischemia the mean weight of the gastrocnemius muscle was significantly increased (2.06 ± 0.150 g vs. 1.84 ± 0.092 g) (p < 0.05). However, when FA was administered before restoring blood perfusion, this increase in the muscle weight was prevented (1.86 ± 0.102 g; p > 0.05).
On the other hand, after microscopic observation of histological sections of the muscle, it was found that, after 3 h of ischemia and 24 h of reperfusion, there was an increase in the PMN cell count compared to control muscles (8.133 ± 4.93 PMN/field, Figure 4). In those animals that were not treated with FA, the PMN count increased by 6-fold, up to 54.44 ± 19.47 PMN/field, while FA treatment made this increase barely reach 5-fold (41.75 ± 15.43 PMN/field), resulting in a statistically significant reduction (p < 0.01). Which translated into a cell density of 4.52 × 104 PMN/mm2, and 3.42 × 104 PMN/mm2, respectively.
Finally, by counting the damaged fibers and calculating their percentage with respect to the total number of fibers per field at 20×, we found that FA also showed a protective effect against muscle cell damage. The percentage of damaged fibers in those animals treated with FA did not reach 50% of the fibers observed in the field, while in those that received saline, the damaged fibers raised over 65% (p < 0.001).
3.3. Effect of FA on Functional Recovery
Finally, when taking into account data recorded in the Rotarod test, we can observe that the pre-treatment with FA significantly increased “latency time to fall” (Figure 5), expressing an improvement in lower limbs functional capacity. This effect could be seen as early as the third day after induction of ischemia, showing 20–40% higher figures in those receiving the treatment (p < 0.05 compared to ischia without treatment).
On the 14th day, only those animals treated with FA recovered a normal “latency time to fall”, similar to those obtained before ischemia (210.5 ± 14.42 vs. 199.6 ± 14.76 s; p > 0.05). In animals that did not receive any treatment, the “latency time to fall” was still significantly shorter (186 ± 6.39 vs. 199.6 ± 14.76 s; p < 0.05).
4. Discussion
Cuff-induced ischemia is a procedure commonly used in many surgical procedures, particularly in orthopedics. This technique implies an inherent local damage to the limb to which it is applied, with an impact on clinical parameters [4,5,6,7,8]. Nowadays some efforts have been made to control this local damage, including improvements in cuff design and recommendations for its use [10,11]; however, no treatment or prophylaxis for IRI-LL are currently provided.
In the present study, we have analyzed a prophylactic treatment with FA in a model of IRI-LL, induced by 3 h of ischemia. This time, although longer than that usually applied in clinical reality [33,34], has been chosen to ensure that, even in those long-term surgeries, FA could be indicated as a preventive treatment for IRI-LL. Furthermore, experimental and clinical evidence at this period of ischemia indicates that the damage remains located in the limb [24,35,36,37].
The device used to induce ischemia differs from that published in rat models. However, we consider that our system, by having a device to measure the pressure exerted by the tourniquet, is closer to those used in clinical practice [21,22]. These invasive systems, which require more aggressive procedures on the animal [21,22], are not suitable as a proper model of IRI-LL. Similarly, non-invasive systems lacking devices to control the exerted pressure (rubber bands, tubular rings), more closely related to the Esmarch band model [17,32,38,39,40,41,42], are also far distant from clinical practice, as they are more similar to a tourniquet than to the current pneumatic cuff inflated at MAOP.
To assess the potential therapeutic effect of FA, we have chosen biochemical parameters that are widely used in clinical practice (AST, ALT, CK, LDH, ALP, creatinine and ions such as K+, Na+ and Cl−), and also commonly used in several models of IRI, both in experimental and clinical studies [38,43,44,45,46,47,48]. Specific oxidative stress markers provide important information at the experimental level. But at the clinical level many of them still need to be validated in larger sample sizes and compared to current clinical standards in order to be considered as valid parameters in clinical diagnosis [49]. This is the reason for ruling out other specific oxidative stress markers such as ischemia-modified albumin (IMA), isoprostanes-iosfurans, or MDA [13,15,18,50,51]. In addition, we also perform pathological analyses to assess the degree of muscle fiber destruction and PMN infiltration. Finally, the rotarod test was used to evaluate mid-term recovery by measuring the functional status of the limb subjected to ischemia.
Reviewing the literature, no studies have been found that analyze the effects of FA as a treatment for IRI-LL. However, published studies by other authors, and by ourselves, have shown that FA can be used to prevent IRI in other tissues such as the ovary, kidney, liver, intestine, etc. [52,53,54,55,56]. In all these studies, FA improved, as in the present study, the anatomopathological damage to the tissue as a consequence of IRI.
Focusing on IRI-LL, other authors have studied compounds as the C5a receptor antagonists, which blocks the effects of C5a, a potent anaphylatoxin with key roles in the inflammatory and immune response [44], or N-metyl-4-isoleucine-cyclosporin (NIM-811), a mitochondria specific drug, which can prevent IRI, by inhibiting mitochondrial permeability transition pores (mPTP) [45].
Woodruff et al. [44] demonstrated that C5a receptor antagonists were able to decrease the levels of those enzymes that were markers of muscle damage. CK and LDH values were 3 and 4 times lower after pre-ischemia or pre-reperfusion administration of C5a receptor antagonist. AST, ALT, and creatinine also showed a similar response when animals were pre-treated (3-, 1.5- and 1.4-times lower levels, respectively). Garbaisz et al. also observed a favorable response when animals were pre-treated with NIM-811. Their results showed a decrease in damage more in line with that described in this paper. In addition, histological assessment of muscle fibers showed a 4-fold increase in fiber viability in treated animals (7.94% ± 5.71% vs. 36.97% ± 11.06%) [45]. Indeed, hyperkalemia was diminished.
Non-pharmacological therapies, such as remote ischemic postconditioning, investigated by Gao et al. were also shown to reduce rhabdomyolysis damage (determined by CK and LDH levels) in a model of myocardial IRI [46]. This reduction was demonstrated both in anatomopathological parameters, such as the reduction of the infarct area or the percentage of apoptosis (22.9 ± 3.3% vs. 40.9 ± 6.2% and 13.4% ± 3.1% vs. 26.2% ± 3.1%, respectively), and in serum CK and LDH levels (21.97 ± 4.08 vs. 35.86 ± 2.91 ng/mL and 6.17 ± 0.58 vs. 8.37 ± 0.89 U/mL).
The therapies analyzed in these studies were able to improve the markers of IRI-LL damage in different ways. Although it is true that data reported by these studies are not quite homogeneous, it is due to the different IRI-LL models used. For example, as different ischemia and reperfusion periods were used, it led to different degrees of initial damage. Furthermore, the induction devices also differed greatly between those studies and this piece of work. In addition, the routes used to administer the compounds used to treat IRI-LL are also very heterogeneous. It is therefore difficult to assess which of them is more effective, as there are many factors that could influence the analysis.
It does appear that, although increases in plasma ALT and AST levels have commonly been used as markers of liver damage [48], both enzymes are also found increased in muscle injury and therefore the elevation may be in part attributed to the affected muscle, rather than to liver or systemic damage [42,57].
At the pathological level, the studies of Cowled and Köksoy have shown that it is also possible to reduce the damage to muscle fibers after IRI-LL. Cowled tested Simvastatin and N-Imino-L-ornithine (L-NIO; a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor,). Though simvastatin alone did not improve the histological assessment of muscle undergoing IRI-LL, L-NIO did significantly reduce it. Moreover, it also induced a significant reduction of neutrophil extravasation and protected against IRI-induced collagen IV degradation, confirming a cytotoxic role of NOS in muscle damage mediated by IRI-LL [16]. However, Köskoy, administering simvastatin (1 mg/kg/day for 6 weeks) to diabetic mice undergoing IRI-LL, demonstrated its therapeutic effect. Pre-treatment with simvastatin led to a 71% reduction in muscle necrosis in diabetic animals, and a 23% improvement in tissue oedema. In addition, skeletal muscle injury, characterized by tissue oedema and the presence of PMNs, was significantly less severe with simvastatin treatment. In this respect, our results were well aligned with those described above [17].
Orban et al. [58] combined N-acetylcysteine (NAC; a well-known antioxidant compound), and preconditioning in patients undergoing knee ligamentoplasty. Although they found no differences in markers of muscle damage, as reported in our work, they noted that the need of narcotic administration for postoperative pain control was significantly reduced with both preconditioning (0.22 ± 0.31 mg/kg vs. 0.47 ± 0.33 mg/kg; p < 0.05) and NAC administration (0.22 ± 0.23 mg/kg vs. 0.47 ± 0.33 mg/kg; p < 0.05). They also monitored the quadriceps muscle strength of the operated leg with the American Spine Injury Association (ASIA) motor score on the second postoperative day. However, the score obtained in the control group (4.1 ± 0.6) was not improved by preconditioning (4.2 ± 0.8) or NAC treatment (4.3 ± 0.9). Mowafi also demonstrated that melatonin administration (10 mg) reduced postoperative tourniquet-associated pain, as well as a longer time to fentanyl rescue and a reduction in intraoperative fentanyl consumption [14].
Finally, some recent studies have shown that the use of tourniquet in knee surgery worsens postoperative mobility and increases patient-perceived pain. In 2019, Alexandersson et al. reported that three months after undergoing knee surgery, those patients who had not received a tourniquet exhibited 10% greater mobility than those operated under tourniquet, measured by the timed up and go test (TUG) [59]. Ejaz also found similar outcomes in a randomized study with 70 patients, with better function and less pain at the initial rehabilitation stage in those patients in which a tourniquet was not used. Patients without tourniquet showed better performance in both the knee range of motion (ROM) and all subscales of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaire (pain, symptoms, activity of daily living, sport and recreation, and quality of life) [6].
In the present study, to assess how FA could improve motor function in an animal model of IRI-LL, we performed the rotarod test. This test is widely used in other rodent models as a motor ability test [60,61,62,63]. According to the aforementioned clinical studies, we were able to show that, after ischemia, the animals suffered a significant loss of muscle function.
On the following day to ischemia, the time the animals were able to stay on the rod dropped from 200 s to barely (21 s for no treated, and 27 s for FA treated). One week after ischemia, the pre-treated animals had almost reached a “latency to fall time” of 111 s, more 50% of the recorded before ischemia (111 ± 13 s vs. 200 ± 15 s). On the other hand, the control group only achieved a “latency to fall time” of 45% (95 ± 5.8 s vs. 200 ± 15 s). At the end of the experiment (14 days), only the FA group reached pre-ischemia values (211 ± 14 s; p > 0.05), while the untreated group just reached 186 ± 6.4 s, a time significantly shorter than the treated animals (p < 0.01), and also shorter than the time before ischemia (p < 0.05).
5. Conclusions
In conclusion, the administration of FA before tourniquet release could be considered as a prophylactic treatment to prevent IRI-LL-induced damage when these devices are used in orthopedic surgery.
Conceptualization, I.C., B.H.d.l.P., I.R.M. and I.G.-A.; methodology, I.C. and D.I.M.-F.; validation, A.A.-V. and I.G.-A.; formal analysis, I.C. and B.H.d.l.P.; investigation, I.C.; resources, B.H.d.l.P. and I.G.-A.; writing—original draft preparation, I.C., B.H.d.l.P., I.R.M., D.I.M.-F. and I.G.-A.; writing—review and editing, B.H.d.l.P., I.R.M., and I.G.-A.; supervision, B.H.d.l.P., A.A-V. and I.G.-A.; project administration, I.G.-A.; funding acquisition, B.H.d.l.P. and I.G.-A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
This research received funding from the University of The Basque Country UPV/EHU (grant reference GIU19/088). The APC was funded by the Research Committee of OSI Bilbao-Basurto (ref. number: COHUB2021/11).
The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of The University of The Basque Country (protocol code M20/2015/075/Herrero de la Parte).
Not applicable.
The data presented in this study are available in the article.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Enlarge this image.Figure 1. Serum electrolytes and enzymes of control animals (control, white bar); animals exposed to 3 h of ischemia & 3 h of reperfusion, and treated with saline (saline 3 h, gray bar), or treated with folinic acid (FA 3 h, dark gray bar); animals exposed to 3 h of ischemia & 14 days of reperfusion, and treated with saline (saline 14 D, gray bar with horizontal striped pattern), or treated with folinic acid (FA 14 D, gray bar with vertical striped pattern. Na+ (A), K+ (B), Cl− (C), urea (D), creatinine (E), alkaline phosphatase (ALP (F)), aspartate transaminase (AST (G)), alanine transaminase (ALT (H)), creatine kinase (CK (I)), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH (J)). Units are expressed in international units per liter (IU/L), milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) or in milliequivalents per liter (mEq/L). The asterisks show the statistically significant differences compared to the control (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001), and the pads show the statistically significant differences between the groups indicated by the upper box (### p < 0.001); ns: p > 0.05.3.3. Effect of FA on histological damage induced by IRI.
Enlarge this image.Figure 2. Perimeter (a) and percentage of increase in the cross-sectional area of the ischemic limb with respect to the contralateral healthy limb (b). The asterisks show the statistically significant differences compared to the control (** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001), and the pads show the statistically significant differences between the groups indicated by the upper box (# p < 0.05); ns: p > 0.05.
Enlarge this image.Figure 3. Fresh weight of the gastrocnemius muscle of both limbs: left limb (healthy, bars without pattern) and right limb (ischemic, bars with vertical striped pattern), from animals not subjected to ischemia (white bars), treated with saline (Saline 24 h, light gray bars), or treated with folinic acid (FA 24 h, dark gray bars). The asterisks show the statistically significant differences compared to the control (* p < 0.05), and the pads show the statistically significant differences between the groups indicated by the upper box (# p < 0.05); ns: p > 0.05.
Enlarge this image.Figure 4. Polymorphonuclear neutrophil (PMN) cell count (left axis, bars without pattern) and percentage of damaged fibers in each field at 20 × (right axis, bars with vertical striped pattern) of control healthy animals (Control, white bars), and animals undergoing 3 h of ischemia and 24 h of reperfusion and treated with saline (Saline 24 h, light gray bars), or treated with folinic acid (FA 24 h, dark gray bars). The asterisks show the statistically significant differences compared to the control (*** p < 0.001), and the pads show the statistically significant differences between the groups indicated by the upper box (## p < 0.01; ### p < 0.001); ns: p > 0.05.
Enlarge this image.Figure 5. Assessment of limb functional status over a 14-day period using the Rotarod test. Data show the mean and standard deviation in the fall time (expressed in seconds) of animals subjected to 3 h of ischemia period, treated with folinic acid (blue line) or with saline (red line). The asterisks show the statistically significant differences compared to the control (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01). The dashed red line box indicates the differences between the 14th day of the study and the baseline values determined on the day before ischemia induction (day −1) (# p < 0.05; ns: p > 0.05).
Results of biochemical analysis and levels of electrolytes in serum. Data are presented as the mean and the standard deviation (SD). Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Aspartate transaminase (AST), Alanine transaminase (ALT), Creatine kinase (CK), and Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). Na+, K+, and Cl− are expressed in milliequivalents per liter (mEq/L), urea and creatinine are expressed in milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL), and ALP, AST, ALT, CK, and LDH are expressed in international units per liter (IU/L).
| Parameter | Control Group | Saline 3 h Group | FA 3 h Group | Saline 14 D Group | FA 14 D Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Na+ | 142 ± 1 | 143 ± 2 | 143 ± 2 | 142 ± 1 | 142 ± 1 |
| K+ | 3.87 ± 0.29 | 3.95 ± 0.29 | 3.97 ± 0.13 | 4.05 ± 0.3 | 4.00 ± 0.21 |
| Cl− | 104 ± 2 | 100 ± 2 | 100 ± 3 | 101 ± 3 | 100 ± 3 |
| Urea | 29.0 ± 3.1 | 66.3 ± 5.1 | 59.6 ± 6.1 | 29 ± 2.8 | 28.5 ± 2.1 |
| Creatinine | 0.36 ± 0.06 | 0.80 ± 0.13 | 0.51 ± 0.13 | 0.41 ± 0.06 | 0.38 ± 0.04 |
| ALP | 123 ± 4 | 115 ± 5 | 99 ± 4 | 85 ± 5 | 82 ± 13 |
| AST | 51.4 ± 2.6 | 393.2 + 63.6 | 250.7 ± 20.7 | 87.0 ± 14.6 | 59.0 ± 10.5 |
| ALT | 41.7 ± 1.6 | 90.6 ± 4.4 | 62.0 ± 6.0 | 31.0 ± 5.2 | 28.8 ± 4.2 |
| CK | 92 ± 15 | 7792 ± 1187 | 6123 ± 1000 | 552 ± 116 | 298 ± 137 |
| LDH | 80 ± 9 | 1413 ± 227 | 848 ± 109 | 1281 ± 339 | 603 ± 255 |
Results of histological analysis of gastrocnemius muscle.
| Parameter | Control Group | Saline 24 h Group | FA 24 h Group | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perimeter |
left limb | 54.5 ± 2.7 | 53.8 ± 3.4 | 54.5 ± 14.9 |
| right limb | 52.8 ± 3.0 | 61.7 ± 3.4 | 62.8 ± 2.2 | |
| Increase of limb section |
0.1 ± 7.1 | 29.9 ± 10.0 | 17.4 ± 9.2 | |
| Weight (g) | left limb | 1.82 ± 0.04 | 1.81 ± 0.14 | 1.78 ± 0.10 |
| right limb | 1.84 ± 0.09 | 2.06 ± 0.15 | 1.86 ± 0.10 | |
| PMN (right limb) | 8.13 ± 4.93 | 54.44 ± 19.47 | 41.80 ± 15.40 | |
| Damaged fibers (%) | 5.44 ± 2.76 | 65.53 ± 14.08 | 48.68 ± 18.86 | |
References
1. Blaisdell, F.W. The pathophysiology of skeletal muscle ischemia and the reperfusion syndrome: A review. Cardiovasc. Surg.; 2002; 10, pp. 620-630. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0967-2109(02)00070-4]
2. Gillani, S.; Cao, J.; Suzuki, T.; Hak, D.J. The effect of ischemia reperfusion injury on skeletal muscle. Injury; 2012; 43, pp. 670-675. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2011.03.008]
3. Saied, A.; Zyaei, A. Tourniquet use during plating of acute extra-articular tibial fractures: Effects on final results of the operation. J. Trauma; 2010; 69, pp. E94-E97. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181dbac93]
4. Konrad, G.; Markmiller, M.; Lenich, A.; Mayr, E.; Rüter, A. Tourniquets may increase postoperative swelling and pain after internal fixation of ankle fractures. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.; 2005; 433, pp. 189-194. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000151849.37260.0a]
5. Kirkley, A.; Rampersaud, R.; Griffin, S.; Amendola, A.; Litchfield, R.; Fowler, P. Tourniquet versus no tourniquet use in routine knee arthroscopy: A prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Arthroscopy; 2000; 16, pp. 121-126. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0749-8063(00)90024-0]
6. Ejaz, A.; Laursen, A.C.; Kappel, A.; Laursen, M.B.; Jakobsen, T.; Rasmussen, S.; Nielsen, P.T. Faster recovery without the use of a tourniquet in total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop.; 2014; 85, pp. 422-426. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2014.931197]
7. Liu, D.; Graham, D.; Gillies, K.; Gillies, R.M. Effects of tourniquet use on quadriceps function and pain in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg. Relat. Res.; 2014; 26, pp. 207-213. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5792/ksrr.2014.26.4.207] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25505702]
8. Dennis, D.A.; Kittelson, A.J.; Yang, C.C.; Miner, T.M.; Kim, R.H.; Stevens-Lapsley, J.E. Does Tourniquet Use in TKA Affect Recovery of Lower Extremity Strength and Function? A Randomized Trial. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.; 2016; 474, pp. 69-77. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11999-015-4393-8] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26100254]
9. Nishiguchi, M.; Takamura, N.; Abe, Y.; Kono, M.; Shindo, H.; Aoyagi, K. Pilot study on the use of tourniquet: A risk factor for pulmonary thromboembolism after total knee arthroplasty?. Thromb. Res.; 2005; 115, pp. 271-276. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2004.08.018]
10. Pedowitz, R.A.; Gershuni, D.H.; Botte, M.J.; Kuiper, S.; Rydevik, B.L.; Hargens, A.R. The Use of Lower Tourniquet Inflation Pressures in Extremity Surgery Facilitated by Curved and Wide Tourniquets and an Integrated Cuff Inflation System. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.; 1993; 287, pp. 237-244. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199302000-00038]
11. Estebe, J.P.; Davies, J.M.; Richebe, P. The pneumatic tourniquet: Mechanical, ischaemia-reperfusion and systemic effects. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol.; 2011; 28, pp. 404-411. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0b013e328346d5a9]
12. Wang, W.Z.; Baynosa, R.C.; Zamboni, W.A. Therapeutic interventions against reperfusion injury in skeletal muscle. J. Surg. Res.; 2011; 171, pp. 175-182. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2011.07.015] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21920546]
13. Novelli, G.P.; Adembri, C.; Gandini, E.; Orlandini, S.Z.; Papucci, L.; Formigli, L.; Manneschi, L.I.; Quattrone, A.; Pratesi, C.; Capaccioli, S. Vitamin E protects human skeletal muscle from damage during surgical ischemia-reperfusion. Am. J. Surg.; 1997; 173, pp. 206-209. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(97)89593-1]
14. Mowafi, H.A.; Ismail, S.A. Melatonin Improves Tourniquet Tolerance and Enhances Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Receiving Intravenous Regional Anesthesia. Anesth. Analg.; 2008; 107, pp. 1422-1426. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e318181f689]
15. Saricaoglu, F.; Dal, D.; Salman, A.E.; Atay, O.A.; Doral, M.N.; Salman, M.A.; Kilinç, K.; Aypar, U. Effect of low-dose N-acetyl-cysteine infusion on tourniquet-induced ischaemia-reperfusion injury in arthroscopic knee surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand.; 2005; 49, pp. 847-851. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00722.x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15954970]
16. Cowled, P.A.; Khanna, A.; Laws, P.E.; Field, J.B.F.; Varelias, A.; Fitridge, R.A. Statins Inhibit Neutrophil Infiltration in Skeletal Muscle Reperfusion Injury. J. Surg. Res.; 2007; 141, pp. 267-276. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2006.11.021]
17. Köksoy, C.; Oziş, E.; Cakmak, A.; Yazgan, U.; Okcu-Heper, A.; Köksoy, A.; Demirpençe, E.; Deniz Dinçer, U. Simvastatin pretreatment reduces the severity of limb ischemia in an experimental diabetes model. J. Vasc. Surg.; 2007; 45, pp. 590-596. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2006.10.048] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17257798]
18. Arnaoutoglou, H.; Vretzakis, G.; Souliotis, D.; Cambili, M.; Galaris, D.; Papadopoulos, G. The effects of propofol or sevoflurane on free radical production after tourniquet induced ischaemia-reperfusion injury during knee arthroplasty. Acta Anaesthesiol. Belg.; 2007; 58, pp. 3-6. [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17486917]
19. Cheng, W.; Wang, M.; Liu, P.; Zhao, S.; Liu, X.; Wang, X. Protective Effects of Dexmedetomidine and Oxycodone in Patients Undergoing Limb Ischemia-Reperfusion. Med. Sci. Monit.; 2019; 25, pp. 9073-9084. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.918261]
20. Murry, C.E.; Jennings, R.B.; Reimer, K.A. Preconditioning with ischemia: A delay of lethal cell injury in ischemic myocardium. Circulation; 1986; 74, pp. 1124-1136. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.74.5.1124]
21. Kocman, E.A.; Ozatik, O.; Sahin, A.; Guney, T.; Kose, A.A.; Dag, I.; Alatas, O.; Cetin, C. Effects of ischemic preconditioning protocols on skeletal muscle ischemia-reperfusion injury. J. Surg. Res.; 2015; 193, pp. 942-952. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2014.09.032]
22. Mansour, Z.; Bouitbir, J.; Charles, A.L.; Talha, S.; Kindo, M.; Pottecher, J.; Zoll, J.; Geny, B. Remote and local ischemic preconditioning equivalently protects rat skeletal muscle mitochondrial function during experimental aortic cross-clamping. J. Vasc. Surg.; 2012; 55, pp. 497-505. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2011.07.084]
23. Westman, B.; Weidenhielm, L.; Rooyackers, O.; Fredriksson, K.; Wernerman, J.; Hammarqvist, F. Knee replacement surgery as a human clinical model of the effects of ischaemia/reperfusion upon skeletal muscle. Clin. Sci.; 2007; 113, pp. 313-318. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1042/CS20070025] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17472577]
24. Cearra, I.; de la Parte, B.H.; Moreno-Franco, D.I.; García-Alonso, I. A reproducible method for biochemical, histological and functional assessment of the effects of ischaemia-reperfusion syndrome in the lower limbs. Sci. Rep.; 2021; 11, 19325. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-98887-9]
25. Atteia, B.M.R.; El-Kak, A.E.-A.A.; Lucchesi, P.A.; Delafontane, P. Antioxidant activity of folic acid: From mechanism of action to clinical application. FASEB J.; 2009; 23, pp. 7-103. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.23.1_supplement.103.7]
26. Joshi, R.; Adhikari, S.; Patro, B.S.; Chattopadhyay, S.; Mukherjee, T. Free radical scavenging behavior of folic acid: Evidence for possible antioxidant activity. Free Radic. Biol. Med.; 2001; 30, pp. 1390-1399. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0891-5849(01)00543-3]
27. Asbaghi, O.; Ghanavati, M.; Ashtary-Larky, D.; Bagheri, R.; Rezaei Kelishadi, M.; Nazarian, B.; Nordvall, M.; Wong, A.; Dutheil, F.; Suzuki, K. et al. Effects of Folic Acid Supplementation on Oxidative Stress Markers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Antioxidants; 2021; 10, 871. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antiox10060871] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34071500]
28. Merrell, B.J.; McMurry, J.P. Folic Acid; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2020.
29. Moat, S.J.; Madhavan, A.; Taylor, S.Y.; Payne, N.; Allen, R.H.; Stabler, S.P.; Goodfellow, J.; McDowell, I.F.W.; Lewis, M.J.; Lang, D. High- but not low-dose folic acid improves endothelial function in coronary artery disease. Eur. J. Clin. Investig.; 2006; 36, pp. 850-859. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2362.2006.01739.x]
30. Bilbao, J.E.; Garcia-Alonso, I.; Portugal, V.; Barceló, P.; Ortiz Lacorzana, J.; Méndez, J. Therapeutic usefulness of antioxidant drugs in experimental intestinal reperfusion syndrome. Rev. Esp. Enferm. Dig.; 1991; 80, pp. 237-241.
31. San Cristóbal, J.; Cearra, I.; Otero, B.; Martínez-Astorquiza, T.; Marín, H.; García-Alonso, I. Capillary blood flown as an index of the therapeutic effect of folinic acid in ischemia-reperfusion syndrome. Rev. Esp. Enferm. Dig.; 2007; 99, pp. 25-32.
32. McCormack, M.C.; Kwon, E.; Eberlin, K.R.; Randolph, M.; Friend, D.S.; Thomas, A.C.; Watkins, M.T.; Austen, W.G. Development of reproducible histologic injury severity scores: Skeletal muscle reperfusion injury. Surgery; 2008; 143, pp. 126-133. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2007.06.005] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18154940]
33. Gangadharan, R.; Roslee, C.; Kelsall, N.; Taylor, H. Retrospective review of complications following long tourniquet time in foot and ankle surgery. J. Clin. Orthop. Trauma; 2021; 16, pp. 189-194. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2020.12.023]
34. Masri, B.A.; Eisen, A.; Duncan, C.P.; McEwen, J.A. Tourniquet-induced nerve compression injuries are caused by high pressure levels and gradients—A review of the evidence to guide safe surgical, pre-hospital and blood flow restriction usage. BMC Biomed. Eng.; 2020; 2, 7. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42490-020-00041-5] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32903342]
35. Gregory, M.A.; Mars, M. Serial morphological changes in primate skeletal myofibres after 3 hours of ischaemia and 24 hours of reperfusion. S. Afr. Med. J.; 1992; 81, pp. 473-478.
36. Day, R.L.; Zale, B.W. The effect of tourniquets on muscle enzymes during foot and ankle surgery. J. Foot Ankle Surg.; 1993; 32, pp. 280-285. [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8339082]
37. Daniel, D.M.; Lumkong, G.; Stone, M.L.; Pedowitz, R.A. Effects of tourniquet use in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy; 1995; 11, pp. 307-311. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-8063(95)90008-X]
38. Murata, I.; Ooi, K.; Sasaki, H.; Kimura, S.; Ohtake, K.; Ueda, H.; Uchida, H.; Yasui, N.; Tsutsui, Y.; Yoshizawa, N. et al. Characterization of Systemic and Histologic Injury After Crush Syndrome and Intervals of Reperfusion in a Small Animal Model. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg.; 2011; 70, pp. 1453-1463. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31820ca00a] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21817983]
39. Duarte, J.A.; Glöser, S.; Remião, F.; Carvalho, F.; Bastos, M.L.; Soares, J.M.; Appell, H.J. Administration of tourniquet. I. Are edema and oxidative stress related to each other and to the duration of ischemia in reperfused skeletal muscle?. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg.; 1997; 116, pp. 97-100. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00434110] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9006775]
40. Crawford, R.S.; Hashmi, F.F.; Jones, J.E.; Albadawi, H.; McCormack, M.; Eberlin, K.; Entabi, F.; Atkins, M.D.; Conrad, M.F.; Austen, W.G. et al. A novel model of acute murine hindlimb ischemia. Am. J. Physiol. Circ. Physiol.; 2007; 292, pp. H830-H837. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00581.2006]
41. Bonheur, J.A.; Albadawi, H.; Patton, G.M.; Watkins, M.T. A noninvasive murine model of hind limb ischemia-reperfusion injury. J. Surg. Res.; 2004; 116, pp. 55-63. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4804(03)00232-4]
42. Sagara, G.; Ogikubo, O.; Takeyama, H.; Tada, T.; Suzuki, N.; Okamoto, H.; Otsuka, T. Comparison of effects of ischemia period in rat limb ischemia/reperfusion injury. Nagoya Med. J.; 2009; 50, pp. 83-91.
43. Goto, H.; Benson, K.T.; Katayama, H.; Tonooka, M.; Tilzer, L.L.; Arakawa, K. Effect of high-dose of methylprednisolone on tourniquet ischaemia. Can. J. Anaesth.; 1988; 35, pp. 484-488. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03026896] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3168132]
44. Woodruff, T.M.; Arumugam, T.V.; Shiels, I.A.; Reid, R.C.; Fairlie, D.P.; Taylor, S.M. Protective effects of a potent C5a receptor antagonist on experimental acute limb ischemia-reperfusion in rats. J. Surg. Res.; 2004; 116, pp. 81-90. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2003.04.001]
45. Garbaisz, D.; Turoczi, Z.; Aranyi, P.; Fulop, A.; Rosero, O.; Hermesz, E.; Ferencz, A.; Lotz, G.; Harsanyi, L.; Szijarto, A. Attenuation of Skeletal Muscle and Renal Injury to the Lower Limb following Ischemia-Reperfusion Using mPTP Inhibitor NIM-811. PLoS ONE; 2014; 9, e101067. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101067] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24968303]
46. Gao, S.; Zhan, L.; Yang, Z.; Shi, R.; Li, H.; Xia, Z.; Yuan, S.; Wu, Q.-P.; Wang, T.; Yao, S. Remote Limb Ischaemic Postconditioning Protects Against Myocardial Ischaemia/Reperfusion Injury in Mice: Activation of JAK/STAT3-Mediated Nrf2-Antioxidant Signalling. Cell. Physiol. Biochem.; 2017; 43, pp. 1140-1151. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000481755]
47. Tong, Z.; Yu, F.; Liu, Z.; Liang, H. Influence of ShuJinHuoXue tablets on ischemia reperfusion injury of animals’ skeletal muscle. Molecules; 2012; 17, pp. 8494-8505. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules17078494] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22801363]
48. Holoman, J.; Glasa, J.; Galbavy, S.; Danis, D.; Molnarova, A.; Kazar, J.; Bednarova, A.; Misianik, J. Serum markers of liver fibrogenesis, and liver histology findings in patients with chronic liver diseases. Bratisl. Lek. Listy; 2002; 103, pp. 70-75.
49. Frijhoff, J.; Winyard, P.G.; Zarkovic, N.; Davies, S.S.; Stocker, R.; Cheng, D.; Knight, A.R.; Taylor, E.L.; Oettrich, J.; Ruskovska, T. et al. Clinical Relevance of Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress. Antioxid. Redox Signal.; 2015; 23, pp. 1144-1170. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ars.2015.6317]
50. Lee, J.Y.; Kim, C.J.; Chung, M.Y. Effect of high-dose vitamin C on oxygen free radical production and myocardial enzyme after tourniquet ischaemia-reperfusion injury during bilateral total knee replacement. J. Int. Med. Res.; 2010; 38, pp. 1519-1529. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/147323001003800436]
51. Yagmurdur, H.; Ozcan, N.; Dokumaci, F.; Kilinc, K.; Yilmaz, F.; Basar, H. Dexmedetomidine Reduces the Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury Markers During Upper Extremity Surgery with Tourniquet. J. Hand Surg. Am.; 2008; 33, pp. 941-947. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.01.014]
52. Çandar, T.; Uzunlar, Ö.; Kiseli, M.; Özcan, S. The effect of folate on ischemia/reperfusion injury in a rat adnexal torsion model. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet.; 2021; 303, pp. 1495-1500. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05934-3]
53. Knight, S.F.; Kundu, K.; Joseph, G.; Dikalov, S.; Weiss, D.; Murthy, N.; Taylor, W.R. Folate receptor-targeted antioxidant therapy ameliorates renal ischemia-reperfusion injury. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.; 2012; 23, pp. 793-800. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2011070711]
54. Naito, H.; Nojima, T.; Fujisaki, N.; Tsukahara, K.; Yamamoto, H.; Yamada, T.; Aokage, T.; Yumoto, T.; Osako, T.; Nakao, A. Therapeutic strategies for ischemia reperfusion injury in emergency medicine. Acute Med. Surg.; 2020; 7, e501. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ams2.501]
55. San Cristóbal Epalza, J.; Palomares, T.; García-Alonso, I.; de la Parte, B.H. Histological Assessment of Rat Retinas with Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. Eur. Surg. Res.; 2021; 62, pp. 144-150. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000515832] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33915540]
56. Portugal, V.; García-Alonso, I.; Barceló, P.; Méndez, J. Effect of Allopurinol, Folinic Acid, SOD and Cyclosporine A on Ischemic Liver Regeneration. Eur. Surg. Res.; 1995; 27, pp. 69-76. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000129375] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7781646]
57. Tay, S.K.; Ong, H.T.; Low, P.S. Transaminitis in Duchenne’s muscular dystrophy. Ann. Acad. Med. Singap.; 2000; 29, pp. 719-722. [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11269976]
58. Orban, J.-C.; Levraut, J.; Gindre, S.; Deroche, D.; Schlatterer, B.; Ichai, C.; Grimaud, D. Effects of acetylcysteine and ischaemic preconditioning on muscular function and postoperative pain after orthopaedic surgery using a pneumatic tourniquet. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol.; 2006; 23, pp. 1025-1030. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S026502150600086X] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16780616]
59. Alexandersson, M.; Wang, E.Y.; Eriksson, S. A small difference in recovery between total knee arthroplasty with and without tourniquet use the first 3 months after surgery: A randomized controlled study. Knee Surg. Sport. Traumatol. Arthrosc.; 2019; 27, pp. 1035-1042. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5196-8]
60. Chen, G.; Kamat, P.K.; Ahmad, A.S.; Doré, S. Distinctive effect of anesthetics on the effect of limb remote ischemic postconditioning following ischemic stroke. PLoS ONE; 2020; 15, e0227624. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227624]
61. Deacon, R.M.J. Measuring motor coordination in mice. J. Vis. Exp.; 2013; 75, e2609. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3791/2609]
62. Díaz, D.; Piquer-Gil, M.; Recio, J.S.; Martínez-Losa, M.M.; Alonso, J.R.; Weruaga, E.; Álvarez-Dolado, M. Bone marrow transplantation improves motor activity in a mouse model of ataxia. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med.; 2018; 12, pp. e1950-e1961. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/term.2626] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29222849]
63. Graber, T.G.; Ferguson-Stegall, L.; Kim, J.-H.; Thompson, L. V C57BL/6 neuromuscular healthspan scoring system. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.; 2013; 68, pp. 1326-1336. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glt032] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23585418]
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Details
; Borja Herrero de la Parte 2
; Inmaculada Ruiz Montesinos 3 ; Alonso-Varona, Ana 4
; Moreno-Franco, Diana Isabel 5 ; García-Alonso, Ignacio 2
1 Osakidetza Basque Health Service, Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Basurto University Hospital, ES48013 Bilbao, Spain; Department of Surgery and Radiology and Physical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Nursing, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, ES48940 Leioa, Spain;
2 Department of Surgery and Radiology and Physical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Nursing, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, ES48940 Leioa, Spain;
3 Department of Surgery and Radiology and Physical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Nursing, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, ES48940 Leioa, Spain;
4 Department of Cell Biology and Histology, Faculty of Medicine and Nursing, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, ES48940 Leioa, Spain;
5 Osakidetza Basque Health Service, Department of Vascular Surgery and Angiology, Basurto University Hospital, ES48013 Bilbao, Spain;