It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Aims
In previous randomized controlled trials, the use of tolvaptan (TLV) at a fixed dose of 30 mg/day for 1 year did not provide renal benefits in patients with heart failure (HF). This retrospective, cohort study examined the renoprotective effects of long‐term, flexible‐dose, and lower‐dose TLV use.
Methods and results
Tolvaptan users were defined as patients receiving TLV for at least 180 consecutive days or those who continued it until death, any cardiac events, or renal replacement therapy even if it was taken for <180 days. Of a total of 584 HF patients, 78 TLV users were identified. The median age, baseline B‐type natriuretic peptide, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were 71 years, 243 pg/mL, and 54 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. During follow‐up (median, 461 days), TLV use (median average dose, 7.5 mg/day) was associated with frequent dose reductions of loop diuretics (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1–2.2), particularly in patients with serum sodium ≤135 mEq/L (IRR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.5–5.7) (Pinteraction = 0.04). In a mixed effects model, propensity score (PS)‐matched TLV users had higher eGFRs over time than PS‐matched never‐users (P < 0.01). The entire cohort analyses (N = 584) yielded similar results. The renal benefit of TLV in terms of annualized eGFR slope was more pronounced in patients with lower sodium levels (Pinteraction = 0.03). This effect modification was extinguished when patients who underwent a loop diuretic dose reduction during the follow‐up period were excluded from the analysis.
Conclusions
Long‐term, flexible‐dose, and low‐dose TLV use was associated with better renal function, particularly in hyponatremic HF, possibly due to its loop diuretic dose‐sparing effect in the long term.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Department of Nephrology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
2 Department of Nephrology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan, Department of Nephrology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Aichi, Nagoya, Japan
3 Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
4 Department of Nephrology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan, Department of Internal Medicine, Japan Community Healthcare Organization Osaka Hospital, Osaka, Japan
5 Department of Nephrology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan, Department of Kidney Disease and Hypertension, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan
6 Department of Inter‐Organ Communication Research in Kidney Disease, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan





