Introduction
The endothelial glycocalyx (EG) is a thin gel-like layer composed of proteoglycans and glycoproteins found on the luminal surface of healthy blood vessels (Ruane-O’Hora, Ahmeda & Markos, 2020; Uchimido, Schmidt & Shapiro, 2019). First described in the 1960s, many physiological interactions between the glycocalyx and endothelial cells have been discovered which influence physiological and pathological processes. It has been postulated that the EG plays an important role as part of the vascular barrier (Sieve, Münster-Kühnel & Hilfiker-Kleiner, 2018), in mechanotransduction (Tarbell & Pahakis, 2006), in the development of diabetes mellitus (Dogné, Flamion & Caron, 2018) and atherosclerosis (Sieve, Münster-Kühnel & Hilfiker-Kleiner, 2018), in ischemia/reperfusion injury (Dogné & Flamion, 2020), as well as in inflammation and sepsis (Dogné & Flamion, 2020; Uchimido, Schmidt & Shapiro, 2019).
In the last years, several experimental and clinical studies have shown that sepsis damages the EG. This results in endothelial dysfunction and may initiate the development of edema. The resulting impaired lung function eventually leads to the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (Huang et al., 2018; LaRivière & Schmidt, 2018). The same applies to the brain: Shedding of the EG leads to an increased capillary permeability resulting in edema (Jin et al., 2021; Zhu et al., 2018). In these studies, EG degradation was measured indirectly by increased plasma concentrations of EG components, such as heparan sulfate, syndecan-1, or hyaluronic acid (HA).
One of the cornerstones in the management of ARDS during sepsis is protective mechanical ventilation with low tidal volumes (Vt 6 ml kg−1 body weight), which reduces mortality and barotrauma and provides a higher weaning rate than conventional ventilation strategies (Maccagnan Pinheiro Besen, Tomazini & Pontes Azevedo, 2021).
Mechanical ventilation itself can induce an inflammatory response, thus inducing shedding of the EG as it is happening during sepsis. Several studies describe effects of different ventilation strategies on systemic inflammation. It has been demonstrated that a protective ventilation strategy during major surgery leads to an attenuated inflammatory response compared with non-protective ventilation (Michelet et al., 2006; Wrigge et al., 2004). It has been shown, that protective ventilation in ARDS reduces cytokine response compared to ventilation with higher tidal volumes and less PEEP (Ranieri et al., 1999).
Despite these findings, it remains unknown whether different ventilatory strategies influence the shedding of the EG by reducing or aggravating an inflammatory response. Therefore, we proposed two hypotheses:
Methods Animals
The prospective randomized animal experiment was approved by the State and Institutional Animal Care Commission (Landesuntersuchungsamt Rheinland-Pfalz, Koblenz, Germany; reference number: G12-1-059) in accordance with ARRIVE guidelines and planed and conducted in the laboratories of the Department of Anesthesiology of the Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz. Twenty-six German landrace pigs (weight, 24–27 kg; age, 8–12 weeks) were bred from a local farmer, who was recommended by the State and Institutional Animal Care Committee. The group size was based on the trials of previous large animal studies.
To minimize stress, the animals remained in their familiar surroundings under breeder-controlled environmental conditions as long as possible. Food, but not water, was withheld 6 hours before the scheduled experiment to reduce the risk of aspiration. Shortly before the start of the experiment, the animals were delivered from the breeder under controlled and gentle conditions to the state-certified and approved members of the laboratory until the end of the experiments.
Anesthesia and animal preparation
Sedation of the pigs was achieved by intramuscular injection of midazolam (0.2 mg kg−1) and ketamine (8 mg kg−1). Anesthesia was induced by intravenous injection of fentanyl (10 µg kg−1) and propofol (4 mg kg−1) through an ear-vein cannula, followed by administration of atracurium (1 mg kg−1) to induce muscular paralysis and facilitate endotracheal intubation. Anesthesia was maintained using a propofol (8–12 mg kg−1 h−1) and fentanyl (6 µg kg−1 h−1) infusion. The animals were ventilated in a volume-controlled mode (AVEA, CareFusion, San Diego, CA, USA).
First, a central venous line was placed in one femoral vein, followed by the placement of a PiCCO-catheter (Pulsion, Munich, Germany) for extended hemodynamic monitoring via femoral access. A left ventricular catheter and a pulmonary artery catheter were placed in the other femoral vein and artery via introducers. Furthermore, the right carotid artery was catheterized with an antegrade pressure line and the right jugular vein with a retrograde catheter. All the catheters were placed under ultrasound guidance using the Seldinger technique.
The hemodynamic and spirometric parameters were recorded continuously with the Datex S/5 device (Datex-Ohmeda GmbH, Duisburg, Germany) and the PiCCO device.
Experimental protocol
Only animals that achieved ARDS criteria were included in the intervention groups (Tiba et al., 2021).
After instrumentation and a brief stabilization period of 15 min, baseline measurements were performed. The animals were then randomly divided into three groups:
In groups (1) and (2) systemic septic shock-like conditions were simulated by intravenous administration of lipopolysaccharides (LPS; Echerichia coli O111:B4, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) starting with 160 µg kg−1 h−1 for 30 min and continuous administration of 16 µg kg−1 h−1 for the remainder of the experiment. Premature euthanasia of the animals was foreseen if animals did not achieve ARDS criteria, unpredictable stress and pain were observed or if uncontrollable complications such as excessive bleeding or intubation problems occurred during the preparation. Six animals did not achieve ARDS and were euthanized like described below. Major complications never occurred.
All the animals were ventilated with a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 mbar, an inspired oxygen fraction of 0.4, and a variable respiratory rate to maintain normocapnia. When peripheral oxygen saturation fell below 93% for more than 5 min, the ventilator settings were changed according to a defined schedule (Table 1). The no LPS group was observed for 6 h and received the same ventilation as the LTV group, but with no administration of LPS (Fig. 1).
Figure 1: Experimental flow chart. The top line represents the experimental phases. Starting with stabilization after general anesthesia induction and preparation (stabilization), septic shock was induced by a high dose of LPS (160 µg kg−1 h−1) over 30 min. Then, the infusion rate of LPS was reduced to 16 µg kg−1 h−1. This was followed by a 6-h observation period (observation). The third line indicates the LPS dose. The fourth line indicates the duration of the periods. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12649/fig-1
LTV | HTV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Step 1 | FiO2 0.4 | PEEP 5 cmH2O | FiO2 0.4 | PEEP 5 cmH2O |
Step 2 | FiO2 0.4 | PEEP 5-8 cmH2O | FiO2 0.45 | PEEP 5 cmH2O |
Step 3 | FiO2 0.4 | PEEP 8-10cmH2O | FiO2 0.5 | PEEP 5 cmH2O |
Step 4 | FiO2 0.5 | PEEP 10 cmH2O | FiO2 0.55 | PEEP 5 cmH2O |
Step 5 | FiO2 0.6 | PEEP 10 cmH2O | FiO2 0.6 | PEEP 5 cmH2O |
Step 6 | FiO2 0.6 | PEEP10-14cmH2O | FiO2 0.65 | PEEP 5 cmH2O |
Step 7 | FiO2 0.6 | PEEP 15 cmH2O | FiO2 0.7 | PEEP 5 cmH2O |
Step 8 | FiO2 0.7 | PEEP 15 cmH2O | FiO2 0.75 | PEEP 5 cmH2O |
Step 9 | FiO2 0.8 | PEEP 15 cmH2O | FiO2 0.8 | PEEP 5 cmH2O |
Step 10 | FiO2 0.9 | PEEP 15 cmH2O | FiO2 0.85 | PEEP 5 cmH2O |
Step11 | FiO2 1.0 | PEEP 15 cmH2O | FiO2 0.9 | PEEP 5 cmH2O |
Step 12 | FiO2 0.95 | PEEP 5 cmH2O | ||
Step 13 | FiO2 1.0 | PEEP 5 cmH2O |
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12649/table-1
Note:
If SpO2 dropped below 93% for > 5 min.
For fluid replacement, Sterofundin ISO (Braun, Melsungen, Germany) was infused continuously at a rate of 10 ml kg−1 h−1. To avoid hemodynamic deterioration, a standardized fluid bolus (250 ml hydroxyethyl starch over 30 min; Volulyte 6% 130/0.4, Fresenius Kabi, Bad Homburg, Germany) was administered during preparation, followed by 90 ml h−1 hydroxyethyl starch during the experiment. To ensure stable hemodynamic conditions, a continuous infusion of norepinephrine was administered during the experiment to maintain mean arterial pressure above 60 mmHg.
At the end of observation, the animals were euthanized under deep anesthesia by central venous injection of propofol (200 mg) and potassium chloride (40 mmol).
Hyaluronic acid plasma levels and hematological parameters
Blood samples for the HA concentrations as primary outcome parameter were drawn from the central venous line, pulmonary artery, left ventricular catheter, carotid artery catheter, and jugular vein catheter at baseline, at 3 h, and at 6 h. The plasma HA levels were double determined by ELISA (Echelon, Salt Lake City, UT, USA). Heparan sulfate ELISA kits (AMSBio HS ELISA Kit; Milton, UK) were used as an additional EG degradation marker, but they failed to produce valid results in our porcine model. We also analyzed the leukocyte and platelet counts, lactate plasma levels and arterial blood gases.
Post-mortem analysis
Lungs from the HTV and LTV groups were removed en-bloc. The right lung was sliced, weighed, and dried (60 °C for 48 h) to determine the pulmonary wet-to-dry ratio. The frontal cortex was treated in the same manner to determine the cerebral wet-to-dry ratio. The left lung was incised beginning at the main bronchus and three samples were taken from each lobe, one near the hilum, one at the end of the inferior and superior main bronchus, and one midway between the others, representing gravitational dependent, central and nondependent regions. The sections were fixed in formalin, embedded in paraffin, stained with hematoxylin and eosin and analyzed under the supervision of an experienced pathologist. An established histopathologic score was used to determine tissue damage, which consisted of seven parameters (alveolar edema, interstitial edema, hemorrhage, inflammatory infiltration, epithelial destruction, microatelectasis, and overdistension). For each parameter the severity and the extent of the involvement in each slice was determined and scored for four fields of view (values from 0 to 5; 0 = normal appearance, 5 = severe effect). Additional, the quantity of each parameter was analyzed for the complete slice (0 to 5; 0 = 0% extension, 5 = 100% extension). Both scores where multiplied, resulting in a summary score with a maximum of 175 points (Ziebart et al., 2014; Spieth et al., 2011; Spieth et al., 2007).
Statistical analysis
Data are presented as mean and standard deviation (SD). Box plots are presented as median and percentile. The effects of the group and intergroup differences were assessed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and paired multiple comparison correction was performed using the Student–Newman–Keuls method. For the post-mortem parameters, the Kruskal–Wallis test and post-hoc Dunn test were used. Statistical analysis was performed using SigmaPlot 12.5 software (Systat Software, San Jose, CA, USA).
All hemodynamic, spirometric, and laboratory parameters were analyzed from all animals. For simplicity, only the data points every 2 h after ARDS were shown.
Results Ventilation and hemodynamics
All the included animals in the LTV and HTV groups developed gas exchange dysfunction corresponding to at least mild ARDS (PaO2 Fi02−1 < 300), whereas no ARDS was observed in animals in the no LPS group. After 3 and 6 h, the ratio of arterial partial pressure of oxygen to FiO2 was significantly lower in both sepsis groups. The peak ventilator pressures were significantly higher in the LTV and HTV groups than the no LPS group. PEEP was also significantly increased in the LTV group in comparison to the HTV and no LPS groups after 3 and 6 h.
At baseline, all hemodynamic parameters showed no significant differences among the three groups. During the entire experimental period, mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) was significantly lower in the LTV and HTV groups compared to the no LPS group, but it was maintained above 60 mmHg at all-time points by the administration of norepinephrine.
A significant decrease in cardiac output was only observed in the LTV group at the 6-h time point; no significant decrease was observed in the HTV or no LPS groups. Mean pulmonary arterial (PA) pressure was significantly lower in the no LPS group in comparison to the two intervention groups after 6 h.
While no norepinephrine was required to maintain MAP above 60 mmHg in the no LPS group, dosing increased significantly in comparison to the baseline measurements in both the LTV and HTV groups, with animals in the LTV group requiring significantly higher doses than the HTV group (Table 2).
Parameter | Baseline | 3h | 6h | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Mean (SD) | ||||
Ventilation | ||||
no LPS | 16 ± 0.5 | 16 ± 0.3#2 | 16 ± 0.8#2 | |
Peak (cm H2O) | LTV | 16 ± 1.6 | 23 ± 11.6 | 27 ± 4.5 |
HTV | 17 ± 3 | 31 ± 4.5#2 | 30 ± 4.3#2 | |
Pmean (cm H2O) | no LPS | 9 ± 0.2 | 9 ± 0.2#1,2 | 9 ± 0.2#1,2 |
LTV | 9 ± 0.8 | 11 ± 11 #1 | 16 ± 4.4 #1 | |
HTV | 9 ± 1 | 13 ± 1.1#2 | 12 ± 1.1#2 | |
Pplat (cm H2O) | no LPS | 12 ± 1 | 13 ± 1 | 13 ± 1 |
LTV | 12 ± 1 | 22 ± 12#1 | 25 ± 5#1 | |
HTV | 14 ± 2 | 29 ± 5#2 | 27 ± 5#2 | |
no LPS | 466 ± 52 | 437 ± 53#1,2 | 430 ± 65#1,2 | |
PaO2 Fi02−1 | LTV | 459 ± 71 | 200 ± 85#1 | 210 ± 43#1 |
HTV | 419 ± 57 | 278 ± 89 #2 | 188 ± 30#2 | |
no LPS | 7.3 ± 0.2 | 7.2 ± 0.2#2 | 7.3 ± 0.1#2 | |
Vt (ml kg−1) | LTV | 7.3 ± 0.6 | 7.0 ± 0.5#3 | 7.3 ± 0.4#3 |
HTV | 7.3 ± 0.3 | 15.5 ± 0.7#2,3 | 15.2 ± 0.5#2,3 | |
no LPS | 36.0 ± 2.6 | 36.2 ± 2.6#2 | 34.7 ± 1.7#2 | |
RR (min−1) | LTV | 36.6 ± 6.0 | 44.1 ± 4.0#3 | 46.3 ± 7.4#3 |
HTV | 38.9 ± 3.9 | 18.6 ± 2.3#2,3 | 17.7 ± 2.0#2,3 | |
no LPS | 8 ± 1 | 7 ± 1#2 | 7 ± 1#2 | |
PEEP (cm H2O) | LTV | 8 ± 1 | 8 ± 10#3 | 10 ± 3#3 |
HTV | 8 ± 0.3 | 5 ± 1#2,3 | 5 ± 0.4#2,3 | |
no LPS | 0.36 ± 0 | 0.36 ± 0#1 | 0.36 ± 0#1,2 | |
FiO2 | LTV | 0.36 ± 0 | 0.49 ± 0.2#1,2 | 0.46 ± 0.1#1 |
HTV | 0.36 ± 0 | 0.37 ± 0#2 | 0.47 ± 0.2#2 | |
Hemodynamics | ||||
no LPS | 89 ± 11 | 91 ± 14#1,2 | 94 ± 22#1,2 | |
HF (min−1) | LTV | 93 ± 15 | 206 ± 28#1 | 193 ± 23#1 |
HTV | 101 ± 16 | 147 ± 39#2 | 181 ± 57#2 | |
no LPS | 95 ± 21 | 93 ± 8#1,2 | 76 ± 3#1,2 | |
MAP (mmHg) | LTV | 85 ± 13 | 66 ± 2#1 | 60 ± 5#1 |
HTV | 90 ± 16 | 72 ± 13#2 | 64 ± 20#2 | |
no LPS | 3 ± 0.4 | 3.4 ± 0.3 | 3.1 ± 0.4 | |
CO (l min−1) | LTV | 3.7 ± 0.8 | 3.1 ± 1.0 | 2.3 ± 1.5 |
HTV | 3.8 ± 0.7 | 2.9 ± 0.3 | 2.6 ± 1.8 | |
no LPS | 22 ± 5 | 22 ± 3 | 26 ± 5 | |
PA (mmHg) | LTV | 21 ± 4 | 43 ± 12#1 | 39 ± 13#1 |
HTV | 22 ± 3 | 45 ± 13#2 | 47 ± 17#2 | |
no LPS | 0 | 0#1,2 | 0#1,2 | |
NA (μg kg−1 min−1) | LTV | 0 | 0.67 ± 0.65#1 | 25.3 ± 18.2#1 |
HTV | 0 | 0.23 ± 0.3#2 | 4 ± 12.2#2,3 | |
Hematologic | ||||
no LPS | 14.5 ± 5.6 | 17.2 ± 4.7#1.2 | 16.3 ± 4.3#1,2 | |
Leukocytes (nl−1) | LTV | 10 ± 3.7 | 1.3 ± 0.5#1 | 1.9 ± 1#1 |
HTV | 14 ± 4.6 | 1.3 ± 0.2#2 | 1.4 ± 0.6#2 | |
no LPS | 225 ± 130 | 227 ± 102#1,2 | 218 ± 65#1,2 | |
Thrombocytes (nl−1) | LTV | 211 ± 68 | 149 ± 85#1 | 157 ± 116#1 |
HTV | 313 ± 103 | 154 ± 96#2 | 99 ± 148#2 |
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12649/table-2
Note:
Peak, Peak inspiratory pressure; Pmean, mean airway pressure; Pplat, Plateau pressure; PaO2 Fi02−1, oxygenation ratio; Vt, tidal volume; RR, respiratory ratio; PEEP, positive end-expiratory pressure; FiO2, fraction of inspired oxygen; HF, heart frequency, MAP, mean arterial pressure; CO, cardiac output; PA, mean arterial pressure; NA, dose of Norepinephrine; #p < 005 intergroup difference: 1 = no-LPS-group vs. LTV, 2 = no-LPS-group vs. HTV, 3 = LTV vs. HTV.
Hyaluronic acid concentrations
Analysis of the HA concentration showed no significant difference between the three study groups at baseline. After 3 and 6 h, the HA acid concentrations were found to be significantly higher in the LTV and HTV groups compared to their baseline concentrations and the no LPS group (Fig. 2). In the no LPS group, the 6-h values were higher than the baseline concentrations, but they were significantly lower than the concentrations in the LTV and HTV groups at the same time points. No significantdifferences between the LTV and HTV groups were measurable before and after the brain or lung passage (Fig. 2).
Figure 2: Central venous HA concentrations. HA plasma level determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays at baseline, after 3 and 6 h. Kruskal–Wallis test with the post-hoc Dunn test. The line in the boxes is the median; the top and bottom of the box represent the interquartile range; data within the whiskers are in the range of 1.5 times the interquartile range. #p [less than] 0.05 vs. no-LPS-group; n = 20. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12649/fig-2
Hematological parameters
The blood count results showed a significant decrease in leukocytes and platelets in the LTV and HTV groups compared to baseline conditions and the no LPS group over the course of the experiment. A significant increase in serum hematocrit was also observed in both sepsis groups. Moreover, the lactate levels were significantly increased in the sepsis groups in comparison to the no LPS group, with a more pronounced increase in the LTV group.
Post-mortem assessment
The pulmonary and cerebral wet-dry ratios showed no significant difference between the experimental groups. The global scoring values and the regional distribution showed no significant difference between the three groups due to the high variances (Fig. 3).
Figure 3: Cerebral and pulmonary post-mortem analysis. (A) Cerebral wet/dry ratio; (B) pulmonary wet/dry ratio; (C) lung injury score; Kruskal–Wallis test with the post-hoc Dunn test. The line in the boxes is the median; the top and bottom of the box represent the interquartile range; data within the whiskers are in the range of 1.5 times the interquartile range. The pulmonary and cerebral post-mortem analysis showed no significant difference between the experimental groups. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12649/fig-3
Discussion
The present study found significantly increased plasma HA levels in the central venous, pulmonary, and cerebral circulation in a porcine model of sepsis-induced ARDS. Furthermore, the pulmonary HA release was not specifically influenced by the different tidal volumes in the short run. Therefore, the first hypothesis of the study was confirmed, but the second hypothesis was not.
All animals in the LTV and HTV groups developed ARDS according to the current definitions (Ranieri et al., 2012). The fact that no significant differences in the oxygenation ratio were found when comparing the two sepsis groups is surprising only at first glance. It is well known that the benefits of a protective ventilation regime become apparent only after a period of time that is longer than the 6 h, which was the duration of our experiment (Biener et al., 2013). In contrast, higher tidal volumes are able to recruit atelectatic lung tissue and improve gas exchange, but they represent a double-edged sword by inducing ventilator-induced lung injury in the long run. Furthermore, a previous study demonstrated that LPS impairs hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction, which may lead to a greater decrease in the oxygenation rate even with a protective ventilator regime (Davieds et al., 2016; Turzo et al., 2018). HA is an established serum marker for shedding of the EG. A closer look at the EG suggests that HA is the first component of EG shedding because it is closest to the vessel lumen compared with heparan sulfates or even deeper transmembrane proteins (Dogné & Flamion, 2020; Martin et al., 2016).
Consequently, the significant increase in plasma HA levels provides evidence of damage to the EG in both sepsis groups. Previous studies confirm that inflammatory processes and sepsis lead to shedding of EG (Martin et al., 2016).
In the present study, the ventilator regime of LTV versus HTV had no relevant effect on the amount of EG shedding over the 6 h of the experiment. Considering that protective ventilation also requires more time to show positive effects in comparison to a high tidal ventilation regime, it is conceivable that the corresponding effects on EG could also be seen later. Also it must be noted, that the pathophysiology of ARDS is not only explained by shedding of the EG but also the alveolar epithelial barrier. A recent study showed elevated levels of heparan sulfate,a consituent of the alveolar epithelial glycocalyx and EG, in LPS-induced ARDS, which was not collected in our study. (Li et al., 2021). Maybe this parameter would have showed a difference between our experimental groups.
Finally, it is conceivable that the precision of the ELISA used was not sufficient to detect minor changes in the plasma HA levels that could indicate the differential effects of LTV and HTV on EG. The smaller but also significant increase in plasma HA concentration in the no LPS group in comparison to the LTV and HTV groups could be explained by the animal preparation. Furthermore, general anesthesia and mechanical ventilation have been found to lead to an impairment of pulmonary integrity, which could be seen especially in the lung injury score of animals that were mechanically ventilated (Kamuf et al., 2018; Kamuf et al., 2020).
Interestingly, data published by Choi et al. (2006) suggest that mechanical ventilation with higher tidal volumes and without PEEP during major abdominal surgery leads to increased plasma leakage and disruption of the endothelial barrier of the pulmonary vasculature compared with ventilation using lower tidal volumes and PEEP. If this observation is a consequence of EG depletion, one would assume that a difference in EG levels had to be detected at least when comparing the animals in the HTV and LTV groups. It can only be assumed that the expected effect was masked by septic shock. However, Murphy et al. (2017) observed that non-pulmonary sepsis resulted in greater degradation of EG than pulmonary sepsis. This may also suggest a superimposed effect of the septic shock model on subtle differences in EG degradation between the HTV and LTV groups that might otherwise have been detected.
The main limitation of our study is the missing direct measurement of EG. However, the indirect method of serum concentration of HA is widely accepted and has been used in several previous studies (Dogné & Flamion, 2020; Smart et al., 2018). Attempts were made to measure additional parameters, such as heparan sulfate and Syndecan-1, with commercially available ELISA kits. Unfortunately, no valid results could be measured with these kits in our model.
The septic shock model used for the LTV and HTV groups required the use of norepinephrine to ensure stable circulatory conditions. In this regard, MAP was maintained above 60 mmHg throughout the 6-h time period of the experiment. Higher MAP values might have been achievable with more generous fluid therapy. Considering potential damage to the EG from atrial natriuretic peptide release or volume overload, this option was discarded (Jacob et al., 2013).
The significantly higher dosage of norepinephrine in the LTV group in comparison to the HTV group can be explained by the significantly higher PEEP values in the LTV group; a correlation between the use of higher PEEP and lower MAP due to reduced preload caused by high intrathoracic pressures has been scientifically recognized (Luecke & Pelosi, 2005). The same mechanism serves as an explanation for the significantly reduced cardiac output in the LTV group after 6 h of the experiment. The blood count results showed a significant decrease in leukocytes and platelets in both the LTV and HTV groups; this phenomenon is known to be an immunological response to the administration of LPS and also a criterion for the diagnosis of sepsis. An interesting observation was made regarding hematocrit. It was significantly increased in both sepsis groups, which could be interpreted as a sign of hemoconcentration due to fluid loss across the endothelial barrier impaired by sepsis (Rehm et al., 2004).
Finally, the increased serum lactate levels in the LTV and HTV groups can be explained by impaired microcirculation resulting from septic shock. The small but significant decrease in the serum lactate levels in the no LPS group could be the result of slightly elevated levels at baseline after animal preparation. Neither the pulmonary wet-to-dry ratios nor the cerebral wet-to-dry ratios showed significant differences among the three experimental groups. The chosen time period of 6 h was based on experience from previous animal studies in which LPS was used to induce septic shock, although we used higher concentration of LPS to achieve ARDS based on experiences from preliminary prepared animals (Lipcsey et al., 2010). However, there is a possibility that a longer study period would be required to analyze a capillary leak in order to observe pulmonary edema and, more importantly, cerebral edema In retrospect, the choice of hydroxyethyl starch for hemodynamic stabilization proved to be less than optimal because it has beneficial effects on glycocalyx (Zhao et al., 2020). Additionally, hydroxyethyl starch is no longer used in sepsis due to its negative effects on various organ systems (Rhodes et al., 2017). This can be explained by the fact that, in the present study, this knowledge was not available at the time the experiments were conducted.
Although there were no significant differences in the lung injury score among the three groups, the parameters assessed generally showed high variances. However, it is important to note that the present study was not primarily designed or powered for this analysis. Moreover, several aspects need to be considered to further elucidate the results. A septic shock model with high doses of norepinephrine induces microcirculatory disturbances and, at the same time, LPS attenuates the mechanism of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction (Easley et al., 2009). A sustained effect of pulmonary perfusion on the decrease in the oxygenation rate may explain these discrepancies. Additionally, the reported baseline oxygenation ratio values under baseline conditions were significantly lower than data from recent studies from our laboratory with comparable animals (breed, age, weight, breeder). Therefore, a preexisting or contributory environmental influence cannot be excluded.
In conclusion, this study demonstrated that LPS-induced systemic sepsis caused EG degradation as measured by the plasma HA levels. In this porcine model, different ventilation regimes like LTV and HTV had no influence on EG degradation in the pulmonary or cerebral circulation. Further studies focusing on more EC-specific parameters and a longer study period are needed.
Supplemental Information
ARRIVE 2.0 checklist.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12649/supp-1
Download
Hemodynamic and spirometric parameters.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12649/supp-2
Download
Histopathological evaluaton.
(extracted and fixed in formalin for parafin sectioning and haematoxylin/eosin staining; image magnification x 10 &20)
A: alveolar oedema B: interstitial edema C: hemorrhage D: Inflammatory infiltration E: epithelial destruction F + G: overdistension + microatelectasis
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12649/supp-3
Download
Hyaluronic acid plasma levels before and after lung and brain.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12649/supp-4
Download
Additional Information and Declarations
Competing Interests
Erik K. Hartmann is an Academic Editor for PeerJ.
Author Contributions
Rainer Thomas conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.
Tanghua Liu conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.
Arno Schad analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
Robert Ruemmler analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
Jens Kamuf analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
René Rissel analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
Thomas Ott analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
Matthias David conceived and designed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.
Erik K. Hartmann conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.
Alexander Ziebart conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.
Animal Ethics
The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):
This study was conducted after approval by the State and Institutional Animal Care Committee (Landesuntersuchungsamt Rheinland-Pfalz, Mainzer Straße 112, 56068 Koblenz, Germany; Chairperson: Dr Silvia Eisch-Wolf; reference number: G12-1-059)
Data Availability
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:
The raw measurements are available in the Supplemental File.
Funding
The study was funded by the German Research Council (DFG DA 842/2–2). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Biener I, Czaplik M, Bickenbach J, Rossaint R. 2013. Lung protective ventilation in ARDS. Medizinische Klinik—Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin 108(7):578-583
Choi G, Wolthuis EK, Bresser P, Levi M, van der Poll T, Dzoljic M, Vroom MB, Schultz MJ. 2006. Mechanical ventilation with lower tidal volumes and positive end-expiratory pressure prevents alveolar coagulation in patients without lung injury. Anesthesiology 105(4):689-695
Davieds B, Gross J, Berger MM, Baloğlu E, Bärtsch P, Mairbäurl H. 2016. Inhibition of alveolar Na transport and LPS causes hypoxemia and pulmonary arterial vasoconstriction in ventilated rats. Physiological Reports 4(18):e12985
Dogné S, Flamion B. 2020. Endothelial glycocalyx impairment in disease: focus on hyaluronan shedding. American Journal of Pathology 190(4):768-780
Dogné S, Flamion B, Caron N. 2018. Endothelial glycocalyx as a shield against diabetic vascular complications: involvement of hyaluronan and hyaluronidases. Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology 38(7):1427-1439
Easley RB, Mulreany DG, Lancaster CT, Custer JW, Fernandez-Bustamante A, Colantuoni E, Simon BA. 2009. Redistribution of pulmonary blood flow impacts thermodilution-based extravascular lung water measurements in a model of acute lung injury. Anesthesiology 111(5):1065-1074
Huang L, Zhang X, Ma X, Zhang D, Li D, Feng J, Pan X, Lü J, Wang X, Liu X. 2018. Berberine alleviates endothelial glycocalyx degradation and promotes glycocalyx restoration in LPS-induced ARDS. International Immunopharmacology 65(10):96-107
Jacob M, Saller T, Chappell D, Rehm M, Welsch U, Becker BF. 2013. Physiological levels of A-, B- and C-type natriuretic peptide shed the endothelial glycocalyx and enhance vascular permeability. Basic Research in Cardiology 108(3):347
Jin J, Fang F, Gao W, Chen H, Wen J, Wen X, Chen J. 2021. The structure and function of the glycocalyx and its connection with blood-brain barrier. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience 15:739699
Kamuf J, Garcia-Bardon A, Ziebart A, Thomas R, Folkert K, Frauenknecht K, Thal SC, Hartmann EK. 2018. Lung injury does not aggravate mechanical ventilation-induced early cerebral inflammation or apoptosis in an animal model. PLOS ONE 13(8):e0202131
Kamuf J, Garcia Bardon A, Ziebart A, Frauenknecht K, Folkert K, Schwab J, Ruemmler R, Renz M, Cana D, Thal SC, Hartmann EK+1 more. 2020. Experimental lung injury induces cerebral cytokine mRNA production in pigs. PeerJ 8:e10471
LaRivière WB, Schmidt EP. 2018. The pulmonary endothelial glycocalyx in ARDS: a critical role for heparan sulfate. Current Topics in Membranes 82(7):33-52
Lipcsey M, Olovsson M, Larsson E, Einarsson R, Qadhr GA, Sjölin J, Larsson A. 2010. The brain is a source of S100B increase during endotoxemia in the pig. Anesthesia and Analgesia 110(1):174-180
Li J, Qi Z, Li D, Huang X, Qi B, Feng J, Qu J, Wang X. 2021. Alveolar epithelial glycocalyx shedding aggravates the epithelial barrier and disrupts epithelial tight junctions in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 133:111026
Luecke T, Pelosi P. 2005. Clinical review: positive end-expiratory pressure and cardiac output. Critical Care 9(6):607-621
Maccagnan Pinheiro Besen BA, Tomazini BM, Pontes Azevedo LC. 2021. Mechanical ventilation in septic shock. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 34(2):107-112
Martin L, Koczera P, Zechendorf E, Schuerholz T. 2016. The endothelial glycocalyx: new diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in sepsis. BioMed Research International 2016(5):3758278
Michelet P, D’Journo XB, Roch A, Doddoli C, Marin V, Papazian L, Decamps I, Bregeon F, Thomas P, Auffray JP. 2006. Protective ventilation influences systemic inflammation after esophagectomy: a randomized controlled study. Anesthesiology 105:911-919
Murphy LS, Wickersham N, McNeil JB, Shaver CM, May AK, Bastarache JA, Ware LB. 2017. Endothelial glycocalyx degradation is more severe in patients with non-pulmonary sepsis compared to pulmonary sepsis and associates with risk of ARDS and other organ dysfunction. Annals of Intensive Care 7(1):102
Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ferguson ND, Caldwell E, Fan E, Camporota L, Slutsky AS. 2012. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition. JAMA 307(23):2526-2533
Ranieri VM, Suter PM, Tortorella C, De Tullio R, Dayer JM, Brienza A, Bruno F, Slutsky AS. 1999. Effect of mechanical ventilation on inflammatory mediators in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 282:54-61
Rehm M, Zahler S, Lötsch M, Welsch U, Conzen P, Jacob M, Becker BF. 2004. Endothelial glycocalyx as an additional barrier determining extravasation of 6% hydroxyethyl starch or 5% albumin solutions in the coronary vascular bed. Anesthesiology 100(5):1211-1223
Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, Levy MM, Antonelli M, Ferrer R, Kumar A, Sevransky JE, Sprung CL, Nunnally ME, Rochwerg B, Rubenfeld GD, Angus DC, Annane D, Beale RJ, Bellinghan GJ, Bernard GR, Chiche JD, Coopersmith C, De Backer DP, French CJ, Fujishima S, Gerlach H, Hidalgo JL, Hollenberg SM, Jones AE, Karnad DR, Kleinpell RM, Koh Y, Lisboa TC, Machado FR, Marini JJ, Marshall JC, Mazuski JE, McIntyre LA, McLean AS, Mehta S, Moreno RP, Myburgh J, Navalesi P, Nishida O, Osborn TM, Perner A, Plunkett CM, Ranieri M, Schorr CA, Seckel MA, Seymour CW, Shieh L, Shukri KA, Simpson SQ, Singer M, Thompson BT, Townsend SR, Van der Poll T, Vincent JL, Wiersinga WJ, Zimmerman JL, Dellinger RP+49 more. 2017. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Critical Care Medicine 45(3):486-552
Ruane-O’Hora T, Ahmeda A, Markos F. 2020. The vascular glycocalyx is not a mechanosensor in conduit arteries in the anesthetized pig. PeerJ 8(1):e8725
Sieve I, Münster-Kühnel AK, Hilfiker-Kleiner D. 2018. Regulation and function of endothelial glycocalyx layer in vascular diseases. Vascular Pharmacology 100(18):26-33
Smart L, Boyd CJ, Claus MA, Bosio E, Hosgood G, Raisis A. 2018. Large-volume crystalloid fluid is associated with increased hyaluronan shedding and inflammation in a canine hemorrhagic shock model. Inflammation 41(4):1515-1523
Spieth PM, Carvalho AR, Güldner A, Kasper M, Schubert R, Carvalho NC, Beda A, Dassow C, Uhlig S, Koch T, Pelosi P, Gama de Abreu M+2 more. 2011. Pressure support improves oxygenation and lung protection compared to pressure-controlled ventilation and is further improved by random variation of pressure support. Critical Care Medicine 39(4):746-755
Spieth PM, Knels L, Kasper M, Domingues Quelhas A, Wiedemann B, Lupp A, Hübler M, Neto AG, Koch T, Gama de Abreu M. 2007. Effects of vaporized perfluorohexane and partial liquid ventilation on regional distribution of alveolar damage in experimental lung injury. Intensive Care Medicine 33(2):308-314
Tarbell JM, Pahakis MY. 2006. Mechanotransduction and the glycocalyx. Journal of Internal Medicine 259(4):339-350
Tiba MH, McCracken BM, Leander DC, Colmenero CI, Nemzek JA, Sjoding MW, Konopka KE, Flott TL, VanEpps JS, Daniels RC, Ward KR, Stringer KA, Dickson RP+3 more. 2021. A novel swine model of the acute respiratory distress syndrome using clinically relevant injury exposures. Physiological Reports 9(9):e14871
Turzo M, Vaith J, Lasitschka F, Weigand MA, Busch CJ. 2018. Role of ATP-sensitive potassium channels on hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in endotoxemia. Respiratory Research 19(1):29
Uchimido R, Schmidt EP, Shapiro NI. 2019. The glycocalyx: a novel diagnostic and therapeutic target in sepsis. Critical Care 23(1):16
Wrigge H, Uhlig U, Zinserling J, Behrends-Callsen E, Ottersbach G, Fischer M, Uhlig S, Putensen C. 2004. The effects of different ventilatory settings on pulmonary and systemic inflammatory responses during major surgery. Anesthesia & Analgesia 98:775-781
Zhao H, Zhu Y, Zhang J, Wu Y, Xiang X, Zhang Z, Li T, Liu L. 2020. The beneficial effect of HES on vascular permeability and its relationship with endothelial glycocalyx and intercellular junction after hemorrhagic shock. Frontiers in Pharmacology 11:597
Zhu J, Li X, Yin J, Hu Y, Gu Y, Pan S. 2018. Glycocalyx degradation leads to blood-brain barrier dysfunction and brain edema after asphyxia cardiac arrest in rats. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism 38(11):1979-1992
Ziebart A, Hartmann EK, Thomas R, Liu T, Duenges B, Schad A, Bodenstein M, Thal SC, David M. 2014. Low tidal volume pressure support versus controlled ventilation in early experimental sepsis in pigs. Respiratory Research 15(1):101
Rainer Thomas1, Tanghua Liu1, Arno Schad2, Robert Ruemmler1, Jens Kamuf1, René Rissel1, Thomas Ott1, Matthias David1, Erik K. Hartmann1, Alexander Ziebart1
1 Department of Anesthesiology, Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany
2 Institute of Pathology, Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2022 Thomas et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Background
Shedding of the endothelial glycocalyx can be observed regularly during sepsis. Moreover, sepsis may be associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which requires lung protective ventilation with the two cornerstones of application of low tidal volume and positive end-expiratory pressure. This study investigated the effect of a lung protective ventilation on the integrity of the endothelial glycocalyx in comparison to a high tidal volume ventilation mode in a porcine model of sepsis-induced ARDS.
Methods
After approval by the State and Institutional Animal Care Committee, 20 male pigs were anesthetized and received a continuous infusion of lipopolysaccharide to induce septic shock. The animals were randomly assigned to either low tidal volume ventilation, high tidal volume ventilation, or no-LPS-group groups and observed for 6 h. In addition to the gas exchange parameters and hematologic analyses, the serum hyaluronic acid concentrations were determined from central venous blood and from pre- and postpulmonary and pre- and postcerebral circulation. Post-mortem analysis included histopathological evaluation and determination of the pulmonary and cerebral wet-to-dry ratios.
Results
Both sepsis groups developed ARDS within 6 h of the experiment and showed significantly increased serum levels of hyaluronic acid in comparison to the no-LPS-group. No significant differences in the hyaluronic acid concentrations were detected before and after pulmonary and cerebral circulation. There was also no significant difference in the serum hyaluronic acid concentrations between the two sepsis groups. Post-mortem analysis showed no significant difference between the two sepsis groups.
Conclusion
In a porcine model of septic shock and ARDS, the serum hyaluronic acid levels were significantly elevated in both sepsis groups in comparison to the no-LPS-group. Intergroup comparison between lung protective ventilated and high tidal ventilated animals revealed no significant differences in the serum hyaluronic acid levels.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer