Bisoprolol, a Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) class 1 drug, exhibits a prolonged time to maximum concentration (Tmax) after an oral solution administration, challenging mechanistic bisoprolol pharmacokinetic simulations. As noted by Dr. Macwan,1 there are three bisoprolol physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models attempted to simulate the delayed Tmax in dissimilar manners,1–3 the first one with a modified gastric emptying time of 0.6 h by us,2 the second one with a “worst-case” scenario intestinal permeability for BCS class 1 drugs of 1.1 × 10−4 cm/s3, and the third one by Macwan et al.1 with a fitted fraction unbound in enterocytes (fuent) of 5% to account for lysosomal trapping in enterocytes. Dr. Macwan et al.1 believe strongly that their model with lysosomal trapping is the most probable.
At that point, the first bisoprolol PBPK model2 was developed a decade ago, little information concerning the impact of lysosomal trapping on oral drug absorption was available. To our knowledge, lysosomal trapping in enterocytes was incorporated into PBPK modeling for the first time in 2017.4 Hence, we had to consider any alternative mechanisms probably causing prolonged Tmax when we developed the first bisoprolol PBPK model.2 Given large variability in gastric emptying time (0.25 h and 0.4 h implemented in Gastroplus and Simcyp, respectively) and a phenomenon of drug-induced gastric emptying prolongation,5 we decided to modify the Gastroplus default value of stomach transit time to reproduce the delayed Tmax, without compromising maximum plasma concentration (Cmax). Indeed, we were aware of a couple of shortcomings by modifying the value. First, it might be difficult to translate bisoprolol pharmacokinetics from healthy subjects to a specific population when the intended population shows an impaired or accelerated gastric emptying. Second, drug-induced gastric emptying prolongation for bisoprolol has neither been determined nor excluded.
Regarding lysosomal trapping on distribution, we have to clarify that we had already considered by fitting in silico blood-to-plasma ratio of ~0.85 to 1.1 to simulate elevated volume of distribution at steady state (Vss) owing to lysosomal trapping in tissues.2
Overall, although we are persuaded by Macwan1 that their model is, thus far, the most mechanistic one by accounting for lysosomal trapping in enterocytes, we believe PBPK models should be viewed as knowledge-driven models, which could evolve when new knowledge/information of either systems physiology or drug-specific mechanisms becomes increasingly available. Based upon current knowledge, we agree, for highly permeable, lipophilic, week base compounds showing an unexpectedly long Tmax, who are similar structurally to those demonstrated to undergo lysosomal sequestration, lysosomal trapping in enterocytes should be considered in mechanistic absorption modeling.
The authors declared no competing interests for this work.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.