It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
A comparative analysis of efficiency of explicit methods with error and stability control, semi-implicit (m, k)-methods, and implicit methods implemented in the modelling and simulation environment ISMA is presented. The Akzo Nobel Central Research laboratory’s model of a tumour penetrated by antibodies is used as the test problem. The computer model in the LISMA language after applying the method of lines is given. Performance of the numerical integration algorithms is measured for different spatial variable discretization steps.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Automated Control Systems Department, Novosibirsk State Technical University, 20 Prospekt K. Marksa, Novosibirsk, 630073, Russia