1. Introduction
Stroke is highly prevalent in high-income countries (1015–1184 cases per 100,000 people in 2013) [1] Imbalance and post-stroke depression are common among stroke patients and may severely impair their activities of daily living [2,3]. The majority of stroke patients (around 83%) had a balance disability [4]. In a meta-analysis, the percentage of post-stroke depression was about 31% [5], and depression is associated with falls and negatively correlated with functional status [6]. The risk of falls for stroke patients is 1.77 times compared to healthy adults so post-stroke rehabilitation is essential [7].
Exercise increases serotonin which works against depression [8]. Carek et al. reported both aerobic and anaerobic exercises are effective [9]. Increased exercise frequency and group therapy seem be beneficial [10]. The practice of exercises promotes improvements in the levels of depression in people who suffered an ischemic stroke [11]. Franklin et al. reported yoga practices might be also protective [12]. Yoga is widely integrated into physical therapies [13]. However, few reports have focused on the impact of yoga in stroke patients [14,15,16]. Yoga can lower blood pressure, serum cholesterol and increase in internal reasons for exercise [17,18]. Furthermore, yoga consists of dynamic/static postures to stretch muscles and joints, and improve balance and coordination [19]. Bastille and Gill-Body [14] reported an 8-week intervention (1.5-h yoga sessions two times per week) for patients with chronic post-stroke hemiparesis improved balance. Chronic stroke is defined as the condition 90 days after stroke [20]. About 95% of patients achieved their best neurological recovery within 11 weeks, while minor stroke related to faster recovery [21].
Previous studies enrolled patients who began yoga “after” completing the post stroke rehabilitation program. However, no study focused combining yoga into a standard rehabilitation. We compared depression and balance among chronic stroke patients who underwent combining yoga and standard rehabilitation and those with standard rehabilitation alone.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Ethic Statement
Institutional Review Board (IRB)/Ethics Committee approval was obtained before the trial began, and the study was conducted in full compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, 201210006IRB. All written consents were obtained from study participants. Clinical Trial Registration Information: Yoga Exercise for Improving Balance in Patients with Subacute and Chronic Stroke, NCT01806922. URL:
2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
The inclusion criteria: (1) Patients with stroke more then 90 days, (2) can stand independently for 1 min, (3) aged from 30 to 80 years. Exclusion criteria: (1) Those under other therapy (such as acupuncture), (2) diagnosis of other psychiatric disease or use of a psychotropic agent, (3) difficult to follow instructions, and (4) other contraindications like cardiopulmonary disease.
2.3. Protocol
Between onset and enrollment, all patients received the same regular rehabilitation at our hospital. The participants were first stratified into several age groups (5 years apart), then divided each age group by half into the following two groups (first by their will and then by assignment). The intervention group was trained with 60 min of yoga exercise, two times per week, combined with standard stroke rehabilitation for 8 weeks. The control group only underwent standard rehabilitation (Figure 1).
Yoga Exercise Combined Standardized Rehabilitation Program (Intervention Group): In the intervention group, yoga was taught by a registered yoga therapist. A standard protocol was developed with 10 min of warm-up, 40 min of main activity, and 10 min cool-down exercises. All sessions focused on breathing, deep relaxation, mediation, posture, and trunk/limb stretching based on a study showed yoga improved balance in chronic stroke patients [15] (see Supplementary Materials Table S1–S3).
Standardized Rehabilitation Program (Control Group):All participants participated in the program based on the Taiwan Guideline for Stroke Rehabilitation [22] focused on dynamic balance exercises and weight-shift training given by the same therapists.
2.4. Assessment of Outcome
The outcome (depression and balance) were measured with the Taiwanese Depression Questionnaire (TDQ) [23] and Berg Balance Scale (BBS) [24] by the same therapist. (For TDQ: the lower the score, the better the mood. As for BBS: the higher the score, the better the balance.)
The TDQ is an 18-item questionnaire, and each item applies a 4-point scale for the response. It is a culturally specific self-rating instrument for screening of depression. Subjects are guided to rate each item on a scale from 0 to 3 based on “how often you felt during the past week”. TDQ scores range from 0 to 54. Previous studies indicate good psychometric properties in the TDQ [25,26]. The cutoff scores for the screening of depression was 15 [27].
Balance was assessed with the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), which is the gold standard for functional balance testing [28]. It is a 14-item scale and can measure static and dynamic balance after stroke with good reliability and validity [28]. The total score is 56 points. The risk of falls in older adults was high when the score was less than 36 [29], and the risk increased by 6% to 8% with every one-point reduction within the range of 46 to 54 points [30].
2.5. Statistical Analysis
We performed statistical analyses using SPSS for Windows (Version 19.0, IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA). Continuous data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. The independent t-test was used to compare the differences between the two groups (indicated with dotted arrows in the figure). We analyzed the measured values before and after the treatment by paired t-tests (indicated with bold arrows in the figure). A p-value of less than 0.05 is considered to be statistical significant (indicated with an asterisk in the figure). The sample size was determined based on an effective size to detect differences in different groups. If we permitted a 5% chance of a type I error (α = 0.05), with a power of 80%, assuming the difference among the two groups was at least equal to the standard derivation, then approximately 32 patients would be required, while 35 patients completed the study. Subgroup analysis was performed on sex, brain lesion site and age.
3. Results
3.1. Primary Analysis of the Effect for Adding Yoga
Forty people enrolled initially with 20 to the intervention (yoga) group and 20 to the control group (Figure 1). In the yoga group, 16 completed the study. (One failed due to feeling exhausted, and three due to loss of follow-up thus being excluded). In the control group, 19 completed the study, and one loss of follow-up due to recurrent stroke. The completion rate of did not differ significantly. Age, sex, and brain lesion site (Table 1) were also similar. The TDQ score did not differ at baseline, whereas BBS scores were significantly better in the yoga group (Table 1). Overall, the TDQ of all patients decreased (improved) (15.23 ± 9.91 to 11.71 ± 8.66; p = 0.001) and the BBS increased (improved) from 44.71 ± 7.64 to 46.60 ± 7.46 (p < 0.001) after intervention.
The TDQ scores improved significantly only in the yoga group (14.06 ± 8.85 to 8.25 ± 5.19, p = 0.002). In contrast, patients in the control group had little improvement (p = 0.181) (Figure 2A) (bold black arrow). The baseline TDQ did not differ (p = 0.531). But the post-study TDQ was significantly lower (8.25 ± 5.19 vs. 14.63 ± 9.99, p = 0.028) in the yoga group (Figure 2A) (Dotted arrow).
Both groups showed improvement in balance. The BBS score increased from 48.56 ± 4.42 to 51.13 ± 4.25 (p < 0.001) in the yoga group, while from 41.47 ± 8.01 to 42.79 ± 7.85 (p = 0.001) (Figure 2B) for the control group. (Bold black arrows) Although the pre- and post-study BBS scores in the yoga group were higher (dotted arrows), the improvement in the yoga group is also significantly larger than that of the control group (2.56 ± 1.96 vs. 1.31 ± 1.45, p = 0.029) (Table 1) (Figure 2B) (screwed dotted arrow).
3.2. Subgroup Analysis
The experiment group and control group were combined and divided by gender (female vs. male), brain lesion side (left vs. right) and age (age <60 vs. 60 or more) sequentially to see how these factors affected the result of rehabilitation (Table 2).
3.2.1. Gender
The mean age and the duration since stroke did not statistically differ by sex (Table 1). The TDQ scores improved after the study in both men and women. The TDQ scores dropped (improved) from 16.73 ± 9.18 to 12.93 ± 8.10 (p = 0.020) for women and from 14.10 ± 10.51 to 8.10 ± 9.16 (p = 0.027) for men (Figure 3A) (bold black arrow). For balance, the BBS score among all women improved from 44.60 ± 8.16 to 45.73 ± 8.53 (p = 0.009) and from 44.80 ± 7.08 to 47.25 ± 7.05 among men (p < 0.001) (Figure 3B). Thus, rehabilitation was effective despite sex. However, significantly greater improvement in BBS was observed in men (p = 0.029) (Figure 3B) (screwed dotted arrow). Balance among men seems to benefit more than that of women.
3.2.2. Brain Lesion Side
Further analysis of the stroke site in the brain is shown in Table 2 and illustrated in Figure 3B. For depression, patients with left-sided brain lesions showed significant improvement (TDQ scores decreased from 13.47 ± 9.28 to 8.94 ± 5.68, p = 0.006) (Figure 3C) (bold black arrow). In contrast, patients with right-sided brain lesions showed no significant improvement in TDQ (p = 0.076) (Figure 3C).
For balance, unlike depression, patients showed significant improvement despite the lesion site. Overall, BBS scores of patients with left-brain and right-brain lesions increased from 46.41 ± 6.21 to 48.82 ± 6.24 (p < 0.001) and from 44.12 ± 7.34 to 45.35 ± 7.80 (p = 0.003), respectively (Figure 3D) (bold black arrow). In summary, TDQ scores for depression improved only in patients with left brain lesions, but balance improved in all subgroups despite the lesion site.
3.2.3. Age
Table 2 also shows the age effect. We divided the patients by the age of 60 because the mean age is about 60 years (55.79 ± 7.81). Overall, depression improved in both the young and older groups. The TDQ score dropped from 15.74 ± 8.93 to 12.32 ± 7.97 (p = 0.032) in the young and from 14.63 ± 11.23 to 11.00 ± 9.64 (p = 0.015) in the older group (Figure 3E) (bold black arrow).
As for balance, both young and older patients benefitted from rehabilitation. Generally, the BBS score improved from 48.58 ± 4.77 to 50.3 ± 4.65 (p = 0.001) in young patients and from 40.13 ± 7.55 to 42.13 ± 8.18 (p < 0.001) among older patients (Bold black arrows). Additionally, the BBS scores of older patients were much lower than those of the younger ones. (Figure 3F) (dotted arrows).
3.3. Factors Correlated with Balance
Further analysis showed age is a big contributor to poor balance (linear regression for age vs. baseline BBS score, p = 0.005, R2 = 0.464; age vs. post-intervention BBS score, p = 0.006, R2 = 0.456) (Figure 4).
Although the baseline TDQ and BBS scores are not correlated (p = 0.25), the post-intervention TDQ score is significantly correlated to the BBS score (p = 0.016) (Figure 5).
4. Discussion
All patients had significant improvement in depression and balance after rehabilitation (Table 1). Overall, a decrease in TDQ score (p = 0.001) and an increase in BBS score (p < 0.001) were noted. We found the TDQ scores of patients in the yoga group were much lower than those in the control group after the intervention while the baseline TDQ scores were similar (Figure 2A). Only patients in the yoga group showed significant improvement in depression after the intervention which indicates yoga provided anti-depression effect.
Because this was not a randomized trial, the baseline BBS score is much higher in the yoga group (with a better physical condition) compared to the control group even before intervention. BBS scores remained much higher after the intervention (Figure 2B). The reason may be that healthier people have higher intention to be volunteers for epidemiological research or a challenging task and have better survival rates than the general population, thereby producing bias referred to as the “healthy volunteer effect” [31]. Although both groups showed improvements in BBS scores (Figure 2B), the change of improvement in BBS was also significantly larger in the yoga group (p = 0.029). This finding indicates yoga still provided extra benefits compared to standard rehabilitation.
We compared the differences in the effects of rehabilitation on both sexes (Table 2 and Figure 3). Overall, we found that depression was significantly improved equally (Figure 3A). Unlike depression, balance showed a significantly greater improvement in men generally than in women (p = 0.029) (Figure 3B). One possible explanation is that men have poorer flexibility than women due to a lack of hormones such as estrogen or relaxin. Relaxin is known for relaxing the tendons and joints in pregnancy and delivery in women [32]. Yoga has been proven to improve flexibility [33], and flexibility is related to balance [34]. It may be that women have better flexibility in the first place, so the improvement of flexibility and balance after yoga may not be as good as man. In other words, the mind factor (anti-depression) of yoga is similar for both sexes but the body factor (balance) is quite different with better improvements in men.
The effect of brain lesion site is shown in Table 2 and Figure 3B. Only patients with left-sided brain lesions showed a significant improvement in depression (Figure 3C). This is probably due to left-sided brain lesion being associated with aphasia because the linguistic center is located the left brain while aphasia is highly associated with depression [35]. Yoga may lead to an improvement in aphasia [36]. Unlike depression, balance was uniformly improved in all subgroups of patients, despite of brain lesion side. These results are compatible with the brain structure whereby motor cortex is symmetrical, but the language center is located in the left brain [35].
Age is also an influencing factor. For patients younger than 60, depression (p = 0.032) and balance (p = 0.001) significantly improved. (Figure 3E). For older patients aged 60 or more, depression showed significant improvement (p = 0.015), and balance improved as well (p < 0.001) (Figure 3F). Therefore, rehabilitation is important for both young and older patients.
Further analysis of factors associated with balance, we found the BBS score is much lower in the older group, as age is significantly inverse related to the balance (Figure 4). This could be because young patients have better neuroplasticity and muscle power [37]. Aging is a big contributor to poor balance (linear regression for age vs. baseline BBS score, p = 0.005, R2 = 0.464; age vs. post-intervention BBS score, p = 0.006, R2 = 0.456) (Figure 4A,B). Nonetheless, age is not associated with depression (Age vs. baseline TDQ score, p = 0.551; age vs. post-intervention BBS score, p = 0.439). Therefore, old age may not guarantee depression.
On the other hand, although the baseline depression score (TDQ) and balance (BBS) scores are not correlated (p = 0.25), the post-intervention TDQ score is significantly correlated to the BBS score (p = 0.016). This may indicates that better post-intervention physical condition may contribute to a better quality of life and mood after completing the rehabilitation (Figure 5A,B). However, there are more factors other than age (such as gender, brain lesion side) affecting the outcome of rehabilitation.
In summary, for the subgroup analysis of overall rehabilitation effect, we found both sexes benefited in depression and men benefited more in balance than women. Patients with left-brain lesions improved more in depression than those with right lesions after rehabilitation, while balance equally improved regardless of the lesion site. For patients under or above the age of 60, depression and balance both significantly improved after rehabilitation. Older age was significantly related to poor balance but not depression. Post-intervention higher balance (BBS) score was significantly correlated to lower TDQ score and thus a better mood.
Our first limitation was that this was a pilot study with small recruitment number, but we still obtained many significant results. Second, the inclusion criteria limit each subject must be able to stand independently for 1 min, which indicated participants were all relatively mildly functionally impaired. Whether the results can be applied to more disabled people is unknown. Third, in order to respect participants’ will and their capability, our study was not randomized. (However, if done in a randomized manner, the completion rate could be much lower in the intervention group.) Also, the long-term effect after 8 weeks was not confirmed. A larger randomized controlled study with longer follow up period is necessary in the future. Finally, we should add one more group with standard rehabilitation of 300 min (5 h) each week to see which group performs better. However, patients always get bored and become impatient during repetitive exercise in the real clinical setting. That is why we add recreational sport (such as yoga) as an adjuvant exercise because yoga is relaxing and interesting.
Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, group exercise may increase the infection risk. Whether remote video-assisted yoga training provides the same benefit as the current group exercise requires further research.
5. Conclusions
Generally, improvements were noted for balance in patients with standard rehabilitation but improvement in depression was only observed among patients when yoga was combined. Yoga provided more benefit for men than women in balance, for patients with left side brain lesion in depression, and for patients aged under or above 60 in both balance and depression. Older age was significantly related to poor balance but not depression. Post-intervention higher balance (BBS) score was significantly correlated to lower TDQ score and thus a better mood. Our study showed that combining yoga in the current standard rehabilitation is safe and has the potential to improve mood and balance, which provides useful information for stroke patients in tailor-made rehabilitation combing yoga.
Y.-T.L. made substantial contributions to the conception and design; acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data; drafting of the manuscript. C.-H.L., H.-H.T., S.-Y.L. and C.-C.L. revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. C.C.H. and J.-C.Y. provided clinical care for the patient and critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. W.-S.L. and H.-L.C. served as primary consultants in the management of the patient and made substantial contributions to the conception and design; analysis and interpretation of data; drafting of the manuscript; and revising the manuscript critically for important intellectual content; and gave final approval of the version to be published. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
This trial was supported by the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch (Protocol No.: HCH-102-22), the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST 103-2410-H-134-022-MY), Taiwan and Taipei City Hospital (TPCH-108-27), and Department of Health of Taipei City Government (10901-62-023).
Institutional Review Board (IRB)/Ethics Committee approval was obtained before the trial began, and the study was conducted in full compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, 201210006IRB. Clinical Trial Registration Information: Yoga Exercise for Improving Balance in Patients with Subacute & Chronic Stroke, NCT01806922. URL:
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Written informed consent has been obtained from the patient(s) to publish this paper.
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figure 2. (A): Bold black arrows show TDQ score significant dropped (improved) in the yoga group after the intervention compared with their own baseline (p = 0.002). Dotted arrow showed the post intervention TDQ score is significantly lower in the yoga group compared to the control standard rehabilitation group. (p = 0.028). (B): Bold black arrows show BBS score significant increased (improved) in yoga (p < 0.001) and control group (p = 0.001) after the intervention compared with their own baseline BBS score. The dotted arrow shows the pre- and post-study values of the BBS in the yoga group are higher than that of the control group (both p < 0.001) Screwed dotted arrow shows the post intervention increase of BBS score is significantly larger in the yoga group compared to the control standard rehabilitation group (p = 0.029). (*: p < 0.05).
Figure 3. (A): Bold black arrow shows TDQ score significant dropped (improved) in the male and female groups after the intervention compared with their baseline TDQ score. (B): The improvement of TDQ is mainly contributed by the yoga groups in both genders. (C): Bold black arrow shows TDQ score significant dropped (improved) in the left brain lesion group after the intervention compared with their baseline. (p = 0.006) (D): The improvement of TDQ is mainly contributed by patients with left brain lesion in the yoga groups. (p = 0.011) (E): Bold black arrow shows TDQ score significant dropped (improved) in the young group (p = 0.032) and old group (p = 0.015) after the intervention compared with their baseline. (F): The improvement of TDQ is mainly contributed by young patients in the yoga groups (p = 0.010). (*: p < 0.05).
Figure 4. (A) Age is associated with lower baseline balance score (BBS) (p = 0.005, R2 = 0.464), (B) Age is associated with lower post intervention balance score (BBS) (p = 0.006, R2 = 0.456) (*: p < 0.05)).
Figure 5. (A) Baseline balance score is not associated with baseline depression score (TDQ) (p = 0.250, R2 = 0.040), (B) post intervention balance is associated with post intervention depression score (TDQ) (p = 0.016, R2 = 0.163). (*: p < 0.05).
Comparison of baseline clinical and 8-week post-assessment of depression (Taiwanese Depression Questionnaire, TDQ) and balance (Berg Balance Scale, BBS), between control and experimental groups.
All (n = 35) | With Yoga (n = 16) | Without Yoga (n = 19) | p | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Study completion rate, −/+ | 35/40 | 16/20 | 19/20 | 0.151 |
Categorical variables, Chi-square test | ||||
Sex, female:male | 15:20 | 6:10 | 9:10 | 0.734 |
Stroke side, left:right † | 17:17 | 11:5 | 6:12 | 0.084 |
Age < 60:age ≥ 60, years | 19:16 | 11:5 | 8:11 | 0.176 |
Continuous variables, t-test | ||||
Age | 59.0± 10.10 | 56.8 ± 9.11 | 60.9 ± 10.743 | 0.241 |
T onset (days) | 691.9± 20.17 | 560.6 ± 538.57 | 802.4 ± 1153.00 | 0.447 |
Taiwanese Depression Questionnaire (TDQ) score | ||||
Baseline TDQ | 15.23± 9.91 | 14.06 ± 8.85 | 16.21 ± 10.86 | 0.531 |
Post intervention TDQ | 11.71 ± 8.66 | 8.25 ± 5.19 | 14.63 ± 9.99 | 0.028 * |
The change of TDQ | −3.51 ± 5.84 | −5.81 ± 6.13 | −1.57 ± 4.94 | 0.806 |
Paired t (p) | 0.001 * | 0.002 * | 0.181 | |
Berg Balance Scale (BBS) score | ||||
Baseline BBS | 44.71 ± 7.64 | 48.56 ± 4.42 | 41.47 ± 8.01 | <0.001 * |
Post intervention BBS | 46.60 ± 7.46 | 51.13 ± 4.25 | 42.79 ± 7.85 | <0.001 * |
The change of BBS | 1.87 ± 1.79 | 2.56 ± 1.96 | 1.31 ± 1.45 | 0.029 * |
Paired t-test (p) | <0.001 * | <0.001 * | 0.001 * |
Data are given as means ± SD unless otherwise indicated. † One patient was eliminated in this analysis due to this patient suffered from bilateral stroke. * p < 0.05, T onset: days after stroke. D0: for baseline TDQ; D1 for post-assessment TDQ; delta D: the change from D0 to D1. B0: for baseline BBS; B1 for post-assessment BBS; delta B: the change from D0 to D1.
Subgroup analysis for sex, lesion side, and age before and after the rehabilitation in comparison Taiwanese Depression Questionnaire (TDQ) scores and Berg Balance Scale (BBS) scores.
Subgroup |
Women |
Men |
p | Left |
Right |
p | Age < 60 |
Age ≥ 60 |
p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age |
60.88 |
57.64 |
0.386 | 55.79 |
62.06 |
0.733 | 51.48 |
68.00 |
<0.001 |
T onset |
426.67 |
376.12 |
0.103 | 1002.76 |
404.65 |
0.60 | 734.00 |
641.81 |
0.773 |
Taiwanese Depression Questionnaire (TDQ) score | |||||||||
D0 | 16.73 |
14.10 |
0.445 | 13.47 |
16.47 |
0.387 | 15.74 |
14.63 |
0.746 |
D1 | 12.93± 8.10 | 8.10 |
0.479 | 8.94 |
13.76 |
0.102 | 12.32 |
11.00 |
0.661 |
Delta D | −3.80 |
−3.30 |
0.806 | −4.52 |
−2.70 |
0.376 | −3.42 |
−3.62 |
0.920 |
Paired t (p) | 0.020 * | 0.027 * | 0.006 * | 0.076 | 0.032 * | 0.015 * | |||
Berg Balance Scale (BBS) score (BBS) score | |||||||||
B0 | 44.60 |
44.80 |
0.939 | 46.41 |
44.12 |
0.333 | 48.58 |
40.13 |
0.001 * |
B1 | 45.73 |
47.25 |
0.569 | 48.82 |
45.35 |
0.162 | 50.37 |
42.13 |
0.002 * |
Delta B | 1.13 |
2.45 |
0.029 * | 2.41 |
1.23 |
0.053 | 1.78 |
2.00 |
0.735 |
Paired t (p) | 0.009 * | <0.001 * | <0.001 * | 0.003 * | 0.001 * | <0.001 * |
* p < 0.05, T onset: days after stroke. D0: for baseline TDQ; D1 for post-assessment TDQ; delta D: the change from D0 to D1. B0: for baseline BBS; B1 for post-assessment BBS; delta B: the change from D0 to D1.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at:
References
1. Benjamin, E.J.; Blaha, M.J.; Chiuve, S.E.; Cushman, M.; Das, S.R.; Deo, R.; de Ferranti, S.D.; Floyd, J.; Fornage, M.; Gillespie, C. et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2017. Circulation; 2017; 135, pp. e146-e603. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000485]
2. Pahlman, U.; Gutierrez-Perez, C.; Savborg, M.; Knopp, E.; Tarkowski, E. Cognitive function and improvement of balance after stroke in elderly people: The Gothenburg cognitive stroke study in the elderly. Disabil. Rehabil.; 2011; 33, pp. 1952-1962. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2011.553703] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21306194]
3. Robinson, R.G.; Jorge, R.E. Post-Stroke Depression: A Review. Am. J. Psychiatry; 2016; 173, pp. 221-231. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.15030363] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26684921]
4. Tyson, S.F.; Hanley, M.; Chillala, J.; Selley, A.; Tallis, R.C. Balance disability after stroke. Phys. Ther.; 2006; 86, pp. 30-38. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ptj/86.1.30]
5. Hackett, M.L.; Pickles, K. Part I: Frequency of depression after stroke: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Int. J. Stroke; 2014; 9, pp. 1017-1025. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijs.12357] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25117911]
6. Hsieh, L.P.; Kao, H.J. Depressive symptoms following ischemic stroke: A study of 207 patients. Acta Neurol. Taiwan.; 2005; 14, pp. 187-190.
7. Simpson, L.A.; Miller, W.C.; Eng, J.J. Effect of stroke on fall rate, location and predictors: A prospective comparison of older adults with and without stroke. PLoS ONE; 2011; 6, e19431. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019431] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21559367]
8. Young, S.N. How to increase serotonin in the human brain without drugs. J. Psychiatry Neurosci.; 2007; 32, pp. 394-399.
9. Carek, P.J.; Laibstain, S.E.; Carek, S.M. Exercise for the treatment of depression and anxiety. Int. J. Psychiatry Med.; 2011; 41, pp. 15-28. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2190/PM.41.1.c]
10. Troeung, L.; Egan, S.J.; Gasson, N. A waitlist-controlled trial of group cognitive behavioural therapy for depression and anxiety in Parkinson’s disease. BMC Psychiatry; 2014; 14, 19. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-14-19]
11. Aidar, F.J.; Jacó de Oliveira, R.; Gama de Matos, D.; Chilibeck, P.D.; de Souza, R.F.; Carneiro, A.L.; Machado Reis, V. A randomized trial of the effects of an aquatic exercise program on depression, anxiety levels, and functional capacity of people who suffered an ischemic stroke. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fitness; 2018; 58, pp. 1171-1177. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.17.07284-X] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28488825]
12. Franklin, R.A.; Butler, M.P.; Bentley, J.A. The physical postures of yoga practices may protect against depressive symptoms, even as life stressors increase: A moderation analysis. Psychol. Health Med.; 2018; pp. 1-10. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2017.1420206] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29308657]
13. Ebnezar, J.; Nagarathna, R.; Yogitha, B.; Nagendra, H.R. Effects of an integrated approach of hatha yoga therapy on functional disability, pain, and flexibility in osteoarthritis of the knee joint: A randomized controlled study. J. Altern. Complementary Med.; 2012; 18, pp. 463-472. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1089/acm.2010.0320] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22537508]
14. Bastille, J.V.; Gill-Body, K.M. A yoga-based exercise program for people with chronic poststroke hemiparesis. Phys. Ther.; 2004; 84, pp. 33-48. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ptj/84.1.33]
15. Schmid, A.A.; Van Puymbroeck, M.; Altenburger, P.A.; Schalk, N.L.; Dierks, T.A.; Miller, K.K.; Damush, T.M.; Bravata, D.M.; Williams, L.S. Poststroke balance improves with yoga: A pilot study. Stroke; 2012; 43, pp. 2402-2407. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.658211] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22836351]
16. Immink, M.A.; Hillier, S.; Petkov, J. Randomized controlled trial of yoga for chronic poststroke hemiparesis: Motor function, mental health, and quality of life outcomes. Top. Stroke Rehabil.; 2014; 21, pp. 256-271. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1310/tsr2103-256]
17. Hartley, L.; Dyakova, M.; Holmes, J.; Clarke, A.; Lee, M.S.; Ernst, E.; Rees, K. Yoga for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.; 2014; Cd010072. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010072.pub2]
18. Anne, E.; Cox, S.U.-F.; Amy, N.; D’Hondt-Taylor, M. The role of state mindfulness during yoga in predicting self-objectification and reasons for exercise. Psychol. Sport Exerc.; 2016; 22, pp. 321-327. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.10.001]
19. Tsai, H.-G.; Chang, T.-C.; Chen, H.-Y.; Chen, Y.-C.; Liu, C.-Y. The Application of YOGA Activity in Psychiatric Occupational Therapy. J. Taiwan Occup. Therapy Res. Pract.; 2008; 4, pp. 69-77. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.6534/jtotrp.2008.4(1).69]
20. Maraka, S.; Jiang, Q.; Jafari-Khouzani, K.; Li, L.; Malik, S.; Hamidian, H.; Zhang, T.; Lu, M.; Soltanian-Zadeh, H.; Chopp, M. et al. Degree of corticospinal tract damage correlates with motor function after stroke. Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol.; 2014; 1, pp. 891-899. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acn3.132] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25540803]
21. Jorgensen, H.S.; Nakayama, H.; Raaschou, H.O.; Vive-Larsen, J.; Stoier, M.; Olsen, T.S. Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part II: Time course of recovery. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.; 1995; 76, pp. 406-412. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(95)80568-0]
22. Der-Sheng, H.; Chia-Wei, L.; Lu, L.; Ming-Yen, H.; Chueh-Hung, W.; Huey-Wen, L.; Ke-Vin, C.; Shin-Liang, P.; Tyng-Guey, W.; Chein-Wei, C. Taiwan Guideline for Stroke Rehabilitation. Taiwan J. Phys. Med. Rehabil.; 2016; 44, pp. 1-9. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.6315/2016.44(1)01]
23. Lee, Y.; Yang, M.J.; Lai, T.J.; Chiu, N.M.; Chau, T.T. Development of the Taiwanese Depression Questionnaire. Change Gung Med. J.; 2000; 23, pp. 688-694.
24. Berg, K.; Wood-Dauphinee, S.; Williams, J.I. The Balance Scale: Reliability assessment with elderly residents and patients with an acute stroke. Scand. J. Rehabil. Med.; 1995; 27, pp. 27-36. [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7792547]
25. Huang, Y.C.; Hsu, S.T.; Hung, C.F.; Wang, L.J.; Chong, M.Y. Mental health of caregivers of individuals with disabilities: Relation to Suicidal Ideation. Compr. Psychiatry; 2018; 81, pp. 22-27. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2017.11.003]
26. Su, S.F.; Chang, M.Y.; He, C.P. Social Support, Unstable Angina, and Stroke as Predictors of Depression in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease. J. Cardiovasc. Nurs.; 2018; 33, pp. 179-186. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JCN.0000000000000419]
27. Lee, Y.; Wu, Y.-S.; Chien, C.-Y.; Fang, F.-M.; Hung, C.-F. Use of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Taiwanese Depression Questionnaire for screening depression in head and neck cancer patients in Taiwan. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat.; 2016; 12, pp. 2649-2657. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S112069]
28. Langley, F.A.; Mackintosh, S.F.H. Functional balance assessment of older community dwelling adults: A systematic review of the literature. Int. J. All. Health Sci. Pract.; 2007; 5, pp. 1-11. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.46743/1540-580X/2007.1174]
29. Berg, K.O.; Wood-Dauphinee, S.L.; Williams, J.I.; Maki, B. Measuring balance in the elderly: Validation of an instrument. Can. J. Public Health; 1992; 83, (Suppl. S2), pp. S7-S11.
30. Maeda, N.; Kato, J.; Shimada, T. Predicting the probability for fall incidence in stroke patients using the Berg Balance Scale. J. Int. Med. Res.; 2009; 37, pp. 697-704. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/147323000903700313]
31. Froom, P.; Melamed, S.; Kristal-Boneh, E.; Benbassat, J.; Ribak, J. Healthy volunteer effect in industrial workers. J. Clin. Epidemiol.; 1999; 52, pp. 731-735. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00070-0]
32. Hansen, M.; Kjaer, M. Sex Hormones and Tendon. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.; 2016; 920, pp. 139-149. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33943-6_13]
33. Bucht, H.; Donath, L. Sauna Yoga Superiorly Improves Flexibility, Strength, and Balance: A Two-Armed Randomized Controlled Trial in Healthy Older Adults. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health; 2019; 16, 3721. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193721] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31581690]
34. Overmoyer, G.V.; Reiser, R.F., 2nd. Relationships between lower-extremity flexibility, asymmetries, and the Y balance test. J. Strength Cond. Res.; 2015; 29, pp. 1240-1247. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000000693]
35. Ashaie, S.A.; Hurwitz, R.; Cherney, L.R. Depression and Subthreshold Depression in Stroke-Related Aphasia. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil.; 2019; 100, pp. 1294-1299. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2019.01.024]
36. Lynton, H.; Kligler, B.; Shiflett, S. Yoga in stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review and results of a pilot study. Top. Stroke Rehabil.; 2007; 14, pp. 1-8. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1310/tsr1404-1] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17698453]
37. Tolahunase, M.R.; Sagar, R.; Faiq, M.; Dada, R. Yoga- and meditation-based lifestyle intervention increases neuroplasticity and reduces severity of major depressive disorder: A randomized controlled trial. Restor. Neurol. Neurosci.; 2018; 36, pp. 423-442. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3233/RNN-170810] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29614706]
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Background: We combined yoga with standard stroke rehabilitation and compared it to the rehabilitation alone for depression and balance in patients. Methods: Forty patients aged from 30 to 80 who had suffered a stroke 90 or more days previously were divided evenly with age stratification and patients’ will (hence not randomized). In the intervention group 16 completed 8-week stroke rehabilitation combined with 1 h of yoga twice weekly. Another 19 patients completed the standard rehabilitation as the control group. Results: The yoga group showed significant improvement in depression (Taiwanese Depression Questionnaire, p = 0.002) and balance (Berg Balance Scale, p < 0.001). However, the control group showed improvement only in balance (p = 0.001) but not in depression (p = 0.181). Further analysis showed both sexes benefitted in depression, but men had a greater improvement in balance than women. Depression in left-brain lesion patients improved more significantly than in those with right-brain lesion, whereas balance improved equally despite lesion site. For patients under or above the age of 60, depression and balance both significantly improved after rehabilitation. Older age is significantly related to poor balance but not depression. Conclusions: Combining yoga with rehabilitation has the potential to improve depression and balance. Factors related to sex, brain lesion site and age may influence the differences.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei 100, Taiwan;
2 Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan;
3 Department of Kinesiology, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan;
4 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan;
5 Institute of Food Safety and Health Risk Assessment, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112, Taiwan;
6 Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan;
7 Department of Child Psychiatry, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan;
8 Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan;