Abstract

Introduction

A common treatment strategy to alleviate mechanical symptoms in young patients with meniscal tears is meniscal surgery, however, it is unknown whether this is superior to a non-surgical strategy. Therefore, we aimed to compare meniscal surgery to early exercise therapy and patient education.

Materials and Methods

In the DREAM trial 121 patients aged 18–40 were randomized to surgery (partial meniscectomy or meniscal repair) or 12-weeks of supervised exercise therapy and patient education, with the option of later surgery if needed. In this secondary analysis we included patients with self-reported mechanical symptoms (yes/no) at baseline. Patients were followed for 12 months and assessed for the presence of mechanical symptoms at 3, 6 and 12 months.

Results

In total, 63/121 patients reported mechanical symptoms at baseline (surgery, n=33 and exercise, n=30), while 9/26 in the surgery group and 20/29 in the exercise group reported mechanical symptoms at 12-month (missing data on 8 patients). During follow-up 8 patients crossed over from the exercise group to use the opportunity for later surgery.

At 12-month the risk difference was 34.4% (95% CI 9.5–59.2) and the relative risk was 1.99 (95%CI, 1.11–3.57) in favour of the surgery group. Similarly, a larger proportion of patients in the exercise group reported mechanical symptoms at 3 and 6 months.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that meniscal surgery may be superior in alleviating mechanical symptoms compared with exercise therapy and patient education with the option of later surgery in young patients with meniscal tears and self-reported mechanical symptoms.

Details

Title
136 Meniscal surgery or exercise therapy in alleviating patient-reported mechanical symptoms in young adults with a meniscal tear
Author
Damsted, Camma; Jonas Bloch Thorlund; Hölmich, Per; Lind, Martin; Varnum, Claus; Mogens Strange Hansen; Søren Thorgaard Skou
Pages
A9-A10
Section
Abstracts
Publication year
2022
Publication date
2022
Publisher
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
e-ISSN
20557647
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2621455431
Copyright
© 2022 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ . Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.