It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Introduction. Switching from polluting (e.g. wood, crop waste, coal) to clean (e.g. gas, electricity) cooking fuels can reduce household air pollution exposures and climate-forcing emissions. While studies have evaluated specific interventions and assessed fuel-switching in repeated cross-sectional surveys, the role of different multilevel factors in household fuel switching, outside of interventions and across diverse community settings, is not well understood. Methods. We examined longitudinal survey data from 24 172 households in 177 rural communities across nine countries within the Prospective Urban and Rural Epidemiology study. We assessed household-level primary cooking fuel switching during a median of 10 years of follow up (∼2005–2015). We used hierarchical logistic regression models to examine the relative importance of household, community, sub-national and national-level factors contributing to primary fuel switching. Results. One-half of study households (12 369) reported changing their primary cooking fuels between baseline and follow up surveys. Of these, 61% (7582) switched from polluting (wood, dung, agricultural waste, charcoal, coal, kerosene) to clean (gas, electricity) fuels, 26% (3109) switched between different polluting fuels, 10% (1164) switched from clean to polluting fuels and 3% (522) switched between different clean fuels. Among the 17 830 households using polluting cooking fuels at baseline, household-level factors (e.g. larger household size, higher wealth, higher education level) were most strongly associated with switching from polluting to clean fuels in India; in all other countries, community-level factors (e.g. larger population density in 2010, larger increase in population density between 2005 and 2015) were the strongest predictors of polluting-to-clean fuel switching. Conclusions. The importance of community and sub-national factors relative to household characteristics in determining polluting-to-clean fuel switching varied dramatically across the nine countries examined. This highlights the potential importance of national and other contextual factors in shaping large-scale clean cooking transitions among rural communities in low- and middle-income countries.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 School of Population and Public Health, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
2 College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United States of America
3 Department of Statistics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
4 Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
5 St. John’s Medical College & Research Institute, Bangalore, India
6 Madras Diabetes Research Foundation, Chennai, India
7 School of Public Health, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
8 School of Public Health, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India; Department of Community Medicine, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
9 Eternal Heart Care Centre and Research Institute, Jaipur, India
10 Health Action By People, Thiruvananthapuram and Medical College, Trivandrum, India
11 Health Action By People, Thiruvananthapuram and Medical College, Trivandrum, India; Achutha Menon Centre for Health Science Studies, Trivandrum, India
12 Medical Research & Biometrics Center, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
13 Shunyi District Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
14 Department of Physiology, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
15 Pamoja Tunaweza Research Centre, Moshi, Tanzania
16 Pamoja Tunaweza Research Centre, Moshi, Tanzania; Department of Medicine, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
17 Department of Community Health Science, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
18 School of Life Sciences, Independent University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
19 Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile
20 Research Department, FOSCAL and Medical School, Universidad de Santander (UDES), Bucaramanga, Colombia
21 Research Department, FOSCAL and Medical School, Universidad Autonoma de Bucaramanga (UNAB), Colombia
22 School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Bellville, South Africa