It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The nature of the Fermi surface observed in the recently discovered family of unconventional insulators starting with SmB6 is a subject of intense inquiry. Here we shed light on this question by accessing quantum oscillations in the high magnetic field-induced metallic regime above ≈47 T in YbB12, which we compare with the unconventional insulating regime. In the field-induced metallic regime, we find prominent quantum oscillations in the electrical resistivity characterised by multiple frequencies and heavy effective masses. The close similarity in Lifshitz-Kosevich low-temperature growth of quantum oscillation amplitude in insulating YbB12 to field-induced metallic YbB12, points to an origin of quantum oscillations in insulating YbB12 from in-gap neutral low energy excitations. Higher frequency Fermi surface sheets of heavy quasiparticle effective mass emerge in the field-induced metallic regime of YbB12 in addition to multiple heavy Fermi surface sheets observed in both insulating and metallic regimes. f-electron hybridisation is thus observed to persist from the unconventional insulating to the field-induced metallic regime of YbB12, in contrast to the unhybridised conduction electron Fermi surface observed in unconventional insulating SmB6. Our findings thus require an alternative model for YbB12, of neutral in-gap low energy excitations, wherein the f-electron hybridisation is retained.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details







1 University of Cambridge, Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge, UK (GRID:grid.5335.0) (ISNI:0000000121885934)
2 Helmholtz Zentrum Dresden Rossendorf, Dresden High Magnetic Field Laboratory (HLD-EMFL) and Würzburg-Dresden Cluster of Excellence ct.qmat, Dresden, Germany (GRID:grid.40602.30) (ISNI:0000 0001 2158 0612)
3 Helmholtz Zentrum Dresden Rossendorf, Dresden High Magnetic Field Laboratory (HLD-EMFL) and Würzburg-Dresden Cluster of Excellence ct.qmat, Dresden, Germany (GRID:grid.40602.30) (ISNI:0000 0001 2158 0612); Technische Universität Dresden, Institut für Festkörper- und Materialphysik, Dresden, Germany (GRID:grid.4488.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2111 7257)
4 National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Tallahassee, USA (GRID:grid.481548.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 2292 2549)
5 The National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kiev, Ukraine (GRID:grid.418751.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 0385 8977)
6 Center for Computational Materials Science, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, USA (GRID:grid.89170.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 0591 0193)
7 University of Warwick, Department of Physics, Coventry, UK (GRID:grid.7372.1) (ISNI:0000 0000 8809 1613)