It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The influence of exposure to hormonal treatments, particularly cyproterone acetate (CPA), has been posited to contribute to the growth of meningiomas. Given the widespread use of CPA, this systematic review and meta-analysis attempted to assess real-world evidence of the association between CPA and the occurrence of intracranial meningiomas. Systematic searches of Ovid MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Controlled Register of Controlled Trials, were performed from database inception to 18th December 2021. Four retrospective observational studies reporting 8,132,348 patients were included in the meta-analysis. There was a total of 165,988 subjects with usage of CPA. The age of patients at meningioma diagnosis was generally above 45 years in all studies. The dosage of CPA taken by the exposed group (n = 165,988) was specified in three of the four included studies. All studies that analyzed high versus low dose CPA found a significant association between high dose CPA usage and increased risk of meningioma. When high and low dose patients were grouped together, there was no statistically significant increase in risk of meningioma associated with use of CPA (RR = 3.78 [95% CI 0.31–46.39], p = 0.190). Usage of CPA is associated with increased risk of meningioma at high doses but not when low doses are also included. Routine screening and meningioma surveillance by brain MRI offered to patients prescribed with CPA is likely a reasonable clinical consideration if given at high doses for long periods of time. Our findings highlight the need for further research on this topic.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 University of Bristol, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK (GRID:grid.5337.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7603)
2 National University of Singapore, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Singapore, Singapore (GRID:grid.4280.e) (ISNI:0000 0001 2180 6431)
3 University of Cambridge and Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cambridge, UK (GRID:grid.5335.0) (ISNI:0000000121885934); National Neuroscience Institute, Department of Neurosurgery, Singapore, Singapore (GRID:grid.276809.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 0636 696X)
4 University of Cambridge and Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cambridge, UK (GRID:grid.5335.0) (ISNI:0000000121885934)
5 National University Health System, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore (GRID:grid.410759.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 0451 6143)