It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Face perception is considered a remarkable visual ability in humans that is subject to a prolonged developmental trajectory. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, mask-wearing has become mandatory for adults and children alike. Recent research shows that mask-wearing hinders face recognition abilities in adults, but it is unknown if the same holds true in school-age children in whom face perception is not fully developed. Here we tested children (n = 72, ages 6–14 years old) on the Cambridge Face Memory Test – Kids (CFMT-K), a validated measure of face perception performance. Faces were presented with or without masks and across two orientations (upright/inverted). The inclusion of face masks led to a profound deficit in face perception abilities. This decrement was more pronounced in children compared to adults, but only when task difficulty was adjusted across the two age groups. Additionally, children exhibited reliable correlations between age and the CFMT-K score for upright faces for both the mask and no-mask conditions. Finally, as previously observed in adults, children also showed qualitative differences in the processing of masked versus non-masked faces. Specifically, holistic processing, a hallmark of face perception, was disrupted for masked faces as suggested by a reduced face-inversion effect. Together, these findings provide evidence for substantial quantitative and qualitative alterations in the processing of masked faces in school-age children.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 York University, Department of Psychology and the Centre for Vision Research, Toronto, Canada (GRID:grid.21100.32) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9430)
2 Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Department of Psychology, Beer-Sheva, Israel (GRID:grid.7489.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0511)
3 Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Department of Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Beer-Sheva, Israel (GRID:grid.7489.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0511); Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Department of Psychology, Beer-Sheva, Israel (GRID:grid.7489.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0511)
4 York University, Department of Psychology and the Centre for Vision Research, Toronto, Canada (GRID:grid.21100.32) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9430); Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Health Sciences, Toronto, Canada (GRID:grid.17063.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 2157 2938)