It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
In humans, risk attitude is highly context-dependent, varying with wealth levels or for different potential outcomes, such as gains or losses. These behavioral effects have been modelled using prospect theory, with the key assumption that humans represent the value of each available option asymmetrically as a gain or loss relative to a reference point. It remains unknown how these computations are implemented at the neuronal level. Here we show that macaques, like humans, change their risk attitude across wealth levels and gain/loss contexts using a token gambling task. Neurons in the anterior insular cortex (AIC) encode the ‘reference point’ (i.e., the current wealth level of the monkey) and reflect ‘loss aversion’ (i.e., option value signals are more sensitive to change in the loss than in the gain context) as postulated by prospect theory. In addition, changes in the activity of a subgroup of AIC neurons correlate with the inter-trial fluctuations in choice and risk attitude. Taken together, we show that the primate AIC in risky decision-making may be involved in monitoring contextual information used to guide the animal’s willingness to accept risk.
Prospect theory predicts irrational effects in human decision-making, but relies on ad-hoc assumptions. Here, authors provide a neural basis for this by showing that anterior insular cortex encodes key economic variables proposed by prospect theory.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 Johns Hopkins University, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Baltimore, USA (GRID:grid.21107.35) (ISNI:0000 0001 2171 9311); Zanvyl Krieger Mind/Brain Institute, Baltimore, USA (GRID:grid.21107.35)
2 Zanvyl Krieger Mind/Brain Institute, Baltimore, USA (GRID:grid.21107.35); Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Neuroscience, Baltimore, USA (GRID:grid.21107.35) (ISNI:0000 0001 2171 9311)
3 Johns Hopkins University, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Baltimore, USA (GRID:grid.21107.35) (ISNI:0000 0001 2171 9311); Zanvyl Krieger Mind/Brain Institute, Baltimore, USA (GRID:grid.21107.35); Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Neuroscience, Baltimore, USA (GRID:grid.21107.35) (ISNI:0000 0001 2171 9311)